High schools raise scores

Show caption
/

Seventy percent of Louisiana’s public high schools showed double-digit growth in their school performance scores this year compared with just 2 percent of elementary and middle schools.

Similarly, 40 percent of “combination schools” — usually high schools that feature middle or elementary grades — saw their school performance scores grow by 10 points or more.

It’s the reverse of the past decade when the lower grades, particularly elementary schools, were typically the engines of Louisiana’s academic growth.

The state as a whole increased its performance score 5.7 points, from 94.8 to 100.5, which is the second-highest improvement rate in the 13 years Louisiana has rated its public schools.

The vast majority of high schools, 86 percent of them, outdid the state’s growth rate. Many of these schools jumped up one or two letter grades, earning financial rewards in the process.

These strong results were released Oct. 22.

In an interview earlier this month, state Superintendent of Education John White attributed the striking high school numbers to across the board increases in both graduation rates and improved results from four separate end-of-course exams that high school students take.

He described these as new challenges implemented in high schools in the past few years.

For instance, graduation rates improved from 67.2 to 70.9 percent overall — a handful of schools increased their graduation rates by 20 percent or more. White said while more students are staying in school, schools also are getting better at data keeping.

Meanwhile, passage rates for end-of-course tests in algebra, English, geometry and biology all showed at least a little growth. Biology showed the most gains, with student passage rates improving by 9 percentage points.

“The schools met two different challenges at the same time,” White said.

The challenges are growing more challenging. Consequently, it’s possible that schools that improved a letter grade this year may drop back to where they were, or even decline.

Falling behind has financial consequences for public schools. F-graded schools are in danger of state takeover, and students at C-, D- and F-graded schools qualify for vouchers to attend private schools, taking with them money that would have otherwise gone to their public schools.

High schools, in particular, are being measured differently.

A quarter of a high school’s grade will, from now on, come from how students do on the ACT college placement exam.

Points that schools received for high school students who score “fair” on end-of-course exams, which equates to a little below grade level, are being discontinued. Also points that schools collected if students achieved special “diploma endorsements” are going away.

And all schools are in the process of shifting to the Common Core standards, adopted by 45 states so far, including Louisiana, as well as new standardized tests that rely on those new standards.

The highest possible school performance score will change as well. In the 2012-13 school year, it will change from 200 to 150.

The revised accountability system is being set up with the assumption that schools will do as well on the new measures as they did on the old. White acknowledged, however, that some schools may show declines as they adjust to new tests and new ways of measuring how they are doing. He said that’s a consequence of raising the bar.

“When you reach a point where you are good at what you were doing before, it’s a very natural thing to say, ‘Now let’s increase the challenge,’” White said.

White pointed out that growth in performance scores was not confined to high schools. Indeed, 76 percent of the almost 1,300 schools that earned scores in 2011-12 improved compared with the year before.

High schools’ performance score growth, however, far outpaced the growth in elementary and middle schools.

For instance, while 74 percent of elementary and middle schools improved at least some compared with 2010-11, more than 97 percent of high schools improved their scores during that same time period.

Indeed, only four out of 130 high schools declined, while 252 out of 956 elementary and middle schools declined.

Among high schools, Homer High School declined the most, 5.7 points. By contrast, North Webster Junior High School declined by 18.7 points. Both schools are in Webster Parish, northeast of Shreveport.

The disparity is clear at the top of the scale as well.

Walker Freshman High School in Walker grew 40 points, the most in the state. The fastest-growing performance score in elementary or middle school, John L. Johns Elementary School in Minden, grew half that much, by 20.8 points.

High schools used to be measured similarly to elementary and middle schools, but not so much anymore.

For years, 90 percent of a school’s score was based on standardized tests, the rest based on factors such as attendance and dropout rates.

In 2007, the formula for measuring high schools changed, but elementary and middle schools stuck with the old formula.

With the change, standardized tests accounted for just 70 percent of a high school’s performance score. The remaining 30 percent came from a new “graduation index.”

The index gives a growing number of points to students who stay in school, graduate and take extra courses connected with college or career preparation that earn them “diploma endorsements.”

The standardized tests also changed beginning in 2009. Graduate exit exams, which Louisiana students had been taking since the 1980s, were replaced by tests given at the end of individual courses.

Louisiana students have steadily improved on these end-of-course exams since then, and the year ending in 2012 was particularly strong.

Donaldsonville High School benefited from all of these circumstances.

This high school, which has languished in the academic cellar for years, jumped from 76.4 to 108.8 on its latest school performance score, an increase of 32.4 points. That was enough to allow the school to jump from a D to a B. The school’s score is now 8.3 points above the state average.

Donaldsonville High’s graduation rate helped, improving by 14 percent. And its end-of-course test results improved in three of four subjects, growing by double digits in geometry and English.

The school’s numbers were also helped when its seventh- and eighth-graders were moved to Lowery Middle School in fall 2011.

The school, however, still has a long way to go. While 60 percent of its students are at grade level or above in algebra, slightly better than the state, only 28 percent were doing as well in biology, a rate barely half the state rate of 52 percent.

The greater prominence of the ACT also may hurt the high school. In 2011, it had just a 16.3 composite ACT score. That’s 0.2 point below last year’s score. It’s a score well below the state average of 20.3 and the national average of 21.1.

The three schools that feed into Donaldsonville High also remain D and F schools.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (19)


1) Comment by TruthSeeker24 - 28/11/2012

There are two things John White should do. 1) Apologize to the general public for inaccurate depiction of our high schools. 2) John needs to re- calibrate the scores to reflect the actual academic growth. What's the point of an accountability system if we cannot get the truth?

2) Comment by deutsch29 - 26/11/2012

I have read two drafts of Bulletin 111. One is the published draft on the DOE website; the other is a draft from June 2012 that had been "revised" and likely mistakenly left on the web. In short: the manner for calculating the "cohort graduation adjustment factor" has been altered such that the 2012 high and combination school scores are more favorably calculated even though they were supposed to be calculated consistently for 2011-2013. The increases in high and combination school scores are an artifact of this change. John White inflated the high school and combination school scores.

3) Comment by deutsch29 - 26/11/2012

Read www.louisianaeducator.blogspot.com 11-27-12 entry regarding scoring bias that John White and BESE know about. (That's right: it's tomorrow's entry.)

4) Comment by TruthSeeker24 - 26/11/2012

Also, I encourage those to continue focusing on building and sustaining great elementary schools. Elementary schools will give students the general knowledge to access rigorous high school curriculum and transfer his/her skills to other broad areas. We cannot afford to get side tracked by false accounts of how well our high schools are doing. We need to continue to apply healthy pressure to school leaders to continue to improve if we wish to see real results

5) Comment by ovation - 26/11/2012

@crabby: These gains have 'occurred' before any of the new mandates that the legislature set into place in the last session. What was done was they changed what what and how education is measures. One of the things that went to the wayside as they no longer count absences. This is one factore high schools showed gains like they did. I agree with the article. You are going to see different results next year when they use a different set of measurements. Of course, everyone will compare that set of results with last years set and make incorrect statements on growth or decline. It is sort of like using the final score of a football game to see who is the winner and then the following year you use the total amount of yards gained to determine the winner and then the next year you use the number of sacks and interceptions. Apples and oranges.

6) Comment by TruthSeeker24 - 26/11/2012

If the information in this article does not throw up RED FLAGS for those reading, then I shall remain speechless because there would be no point in explaining how this data does not indicate any real growth for our high schools. Charles Lussier wrote the following: "It’s the reverse of the past decade when the lower grades, particularly elementary schools, were typically the engines of Louisiana’s academic growth." To Mr. Lussier, elementary schools will continue to be the engines of Louisiana's academic growth. When you study human development issues and apply it to student performance and development, you will see that it is very difficult to develop students in high school when they were under performers in elementary school. When students do not receive the proper foundation in elementary school but then go on to do well according to data from state tests, it is as if you have built a house on an uneven foundation. Soon you will see that these deficiencies are still present regardless of state tests results. Do not take this information the wrong way! Though there are instances where children who have fallen through the cracks in elementary school get an opportunity to improve their academic outcomes; however, this is very difficult to do and to see it happen so easily, so quickly in over 70% of our high schools is completely UNREAL. A clear example of this would be Donanldsonville High School. There is no way elementary schools with D's and F's will feed students into a high school and then the high school becomes a B school. You have got to be kidding! The data clearly does not support the way humans develop. When a child enters school 2 to 3 years behind his peers, it takes 2 to 3 years before real growth occurs. Our kids deserve better than John White and to hop on board with these statistical lies is just insulting. Only in Louisiana we accept what the leaders tell us without holding them accountable for the truth. John needs to tell the truth.

7) Comment by bourbon-soda - 26/11/2012

@ RODEO - Lake Woebegone educational statistics are not new or unique to this administration.

8) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 26/11/2012

This article reminds one of a quote often time employed concerning such reports: "the greatest liars in the world are statistics and statisticians, and that is a fact". The analysis and evaluation of the school systems apparently is a hodgepodge of differing standards, differing results which make any evaluation useless. Furthermore, I cannot understand how a superintendent, who has been on the job less than six months, can make such broad and destructive comments. Typical rule of thumb is before one reinvents the wheel, it is incumbent for one to comprehend how and what makes it roll. My own personal analysis is this is simply another effort on the part of Jindal and his "lap dogs" to destroy the educational efforts and advances made by the educational system.

9) Comment by bourbon-soda - 26/11/2012

@ crabby - What is the evidence that "we" seem to mastering how to teach to the test? @ tradewinns - The operative word in your post, is "if." The credit goes to whoever contrived these chutes-and-ladders statistics.

10) Comment by tradewinns - 26/11/2012

if these improvements are real, then to what goes the credit? there has to be a reason for such dramatic improvement.

11) Comment by crabby - 26/11/2012

Wouldn't you know it . . . just when we seem to be mastering how to teach to the test, now we're going to have to figure out how to teach to the assessment. The interesting analysis will be to see how many failing teachers are at these succeeding schools.

12) Comment by bourbon-soda - 26/11/2012

Even if this is the result of a "come to Jesus" moment stimulated by the threat to cash flow to the Dogpatch school boards, where does all this statistical garbage come from? True measures of educational outcome do not vary by multiple percentage points per year.

13) Comment by jeffsadow - 26/11/2012

Do you think that, knowing by the beginning of the year that the voucher program was on the way, these schools focused intensely on improving their performances, resulting in this? Nah, couldn't be. After all, we all know that Jindal, White, etc. implemented vouchers only to help out their cronies in the private sector, as a way to act upon their hatred of teachers, and to destroy public education in the state, not as a means to empower families and to provide stimulus to public schools to improve right? Let's keep our eyes on the prize, shall we, and continue repeating "Jindal/White=bad," and reveling in our government-monopoly, one-size-fits-all, all-it-needs-is-more-money-to-improve education system.

14) Comment by bourbon-soda - 26/11/2012

This failure of critical thinking is actually the headline on the paper. Hide in plain sight. In the only reference to a nationally standardized test, the Donaldsonville ACT composite is close to one standard deviation below the state and national average. This score actually fell while the graduation rate went up. What does that tell us?

15) Comment by nimby? - 26/11/2012

creative math ...

16) Comment by bourbon-soda - 26/11/2012

Warmed over ninterpretable statistical hash with baloney topping.

17) Comment by tball - 26/11/2012

Amazing statistic, the feeder schools for Donaldsonville remain a D and F, but Donaldsonville High went from a D to B. Are these students getting smart pills??

18) Comment by spqr - 26/11/2012

And we're off!!!...John White takes the lead for the credit. Coming up on the outside is Piyush Jindal. Now here comes the Baton Rouge Area Chamber. But White is closing in. Piyush is now making his move! But here comes White!! The teachers are in last place! And White stretches his lead!!!! Moving to the finish line!!!!! And the winner is- The inexperienced John-boy White! Great job, John-boy.

19) Comment by morellok2 - 26/11/2012

Well, this does seem to indicate improvement in public education. Sure hope the state does the same type analysis of all these nonpublic schools that are getting my tax dollars. Oops, I forgot, we are supposed to just accept that anything nonpublic is better for our kids based on how parents "feel" about their nonpublic school" that the public is actually helping to finance.