EBR school system proposes big revamp of strategic plan

Advocate staff photo by HEATHER MCCLELLANDEast Baton Rouge Parish School Board member Jill Dyason, right, reads an email from a concerned resident Wednesday during the Committee for Educational Excellence's first formal presentation of its draft strategic plan. Seated, from left are, board members President Barbara Freiberg, Evelyn Ware-Jackson and Jerry Arbour. The plan, which will soon undergo revisions, outlines possible strategies for improving the system. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by HEATHER MCCLELLANDEast Baton Rouge Parish School Board member Jill Dyason, right, reads an email from a concerned resident Wednesday during the Committee for Educational Excellence's first formal presentation of its draft strategic plan. Seated, from left are, board members President Barbara Freiberg, Evelyn Ware-Jackson and Jerry Arbour. The plan, which will soon undergo revisions, outlines possible strategies for improving the system.

Unchanged for the past 11 months, a proposed new strategic plan for the East Baton Rouge Parish school system is set to get a big makeover over the next month.

“My goal is to make sure we have this adopted by the end of the year,” Superintendent Bernard Taylor said Wednesday.

Taylor said a 33-member Committee for Educational Excellence, made up of local business and community leaders, did a “stellar job” on the plan and that its many recommendations all help the effort to improve student achievement.

Taylor, however, gave the committee a lot of homework, including suggesting that the plan include more focus on technology, how its recommendations can be paid for, consider how its recommendations can be measured, and that it re-examine its call for renewed neighborhood attendance zones.

The committee developed this strategic plan throughout much of 2011 and released a draft version in December. It sat on the shelf while the School Board searched for new superintendent, a search that led to the hiring of Taylor, who started in June.

“We’ve got a lot of work to do,” said Dennis Blunt, co-chairman of the committee and an attorney. “A lot of work to do.”

The far-reaching document suggests giving principals greater say in the teachers they hire and more control of their school budgets. The document also suggests automatic firing of teachers whose students show the least growth in test scores, firing of principals who fail to meet three-year performance goals, higher pay to teachers willing to work in struggling schools, as well as greater openness to innovation and school choice.

About 30 people, including several School Board members, were in the audience Wednesday in a meeting room at the school system’s Professional Development Center on North Sherwood Forest Drive to discuss the draft plan. A few audience members dominated the discussion, offering a diverse number of suggested changes.

School Board member Jill Dyason had problems with a passage in the draft plan suggesting that students be able to choose to attend “any school in the district” as long as they met that school’s entrance requirements. She read from an email of a person who had attended the meetings on that topic and felt it didn’t reflect what was discussed then.

Mattie Coxe, a parent, suggested the school system should move away from schools with entrance requirements because they relegate some students to a worse education.

“At one time we called them white schools and colored schools,” Coxe said. “Now we are referring to them using a new nomenclature and we call them magnet schools and traditional schools. But it’s the same system.”

Taylor was uncomfortable with the document’s call for more neighborhood schools. He said he is in the middle of developing some proposals that wouldn’t mesh with those parts of the plan.

“We’re trying to move away from a notion of an attendance zone to an attendance region,” he said.

Beverly Trahan, a grandparent of a student in the school system, said the school system should protect its pre-kindergarten classes from testing mania.

“We’re moving the prep for testing further down to early ages so that teachers don’t have time to focus on the things we should be focusing on,” Trahan said.

Stephen Stewart, a former teacher in the school system, was unimpressed with the plan.

“This is very generic,” Stewart said. “These are methods that have been employed since the public education system has existed in America.”

School Board President Barbara Freiberg said the draft plan is broad on purpose, that educators will flesh it out later with specific initiatives.

“The education meat to these tactics is where the EBR staff comes in,” she said.

Despite his critiques, Taylor said the strategic plan will help him do his job better.

“This plan has a lot of promise, and it is going to be a blueprint for how we move forward,” he said.

The draft plan and supporting documents are posted on the school system’s website at http://news.ebrschools.org/explore.cfm/ebrstrategicplan/.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (22)


1) Comment by Traveler - 09/11/2012

The caption below this article identifies the man behind Ms. Ware-Jackson as Jerry Arbour. That's not Mr. Arbour----it's Randy Lamana. C'mon, Advocate-----you can do better!

2) Comment by VeritasWatch - 08/11/2012

To be fair to Ms Dyason, she wasn't referring to Ms Coxe when speaking about someone that was unhappy with the plan. The email was from someone in her district, but based on what went with the attempted breakaway earlier this year, it's not hard to determine who is behind it.

3) Comment by breducationadvocate - 08/11/2012

Jill Dyason needs to check her resources! Just because someone attends meetings does not mean that they are a parent of a student in East Baton Rouge Parish System. If she checked her resource at all, she would find that Mattie Coxe in fact has a daughter who currently attends private schools, and has done so for the past few years. Also, if she met the lady even once, she would see that she is at least one card short of a full deck. She writes and calls all public figures and offices all the time about everything. I agree with Teachyourkids - sour grapes, with crazy added to it!

4) Comment by Teachyourkids - 08/11/2012

Wow. Ironic on so many levels. To the best of my knowledge, last year Mattie Coxe was the parent of at least one child in a local private school. Not sure how active she is in the public school system, but I have to wonder if this distain for entrance requirements to magnet schools is sour grapes. Guess it goes to show that anyone can have an opinion on anything. For the record, I have kids in an EBRPSS magnet program after many years in a private school that was providing a less than top notch education. The magnet school is second to none, but each child EARNS his/her way in. If they do not perform, they are helped if it's possible or they are asked to leave. The racial makeup of the school is probably 65/35 (minority white), so I strongly disagree with the arguement that magnet schools are "white schools" as Mrs. Coxe suggested. But then, why let facts and experience stand in the way of a good whine?? Mrs. Dyason, as a parent of children in the EBRPSS that are benefitting from a program to which they worked to achieve admission, please understand that even young children who prize education will commit to working harder if they understand entrance to a "better" school is EARNED, and not just another "gimme" where they can take up space. I tell my kids that every day.

5) Comment by unity - 08/11/2012

He also thinks that less than 10,000 seats statewide is plenty when we have 380,000 public school students in LA. Being_Stupid is a real sharp cookie...

6) Comment by VeritasWatch - 08/11/2012

Thanks for the flippant response to what were two serious questions - unless you're seriously stating that ALL private schools offer magnet level programs AND ALL standards (?) are being enforced on the voucher schools, in which case your knowledge on the subject is incredibly deficient.

7) Comment by Being_Stupid - 08/11/2012

ALL OF THEM.

8) Comment by VeritasWatch - 08/11/2012

@Being_Stupid - 1) Which private schools offer magnet level programs? 2) What standards are being enforced on the voucher schools in the current voucher program in Louisiana?

9) Comment by Being_Stupid - 08/11/2012

@unity, we have plenty of private schools that can offer magnet level programs and that is exactly what we are doing via vouchers, enabling these parents that can not enroll their children in those magnet schools, the affordability via vouchers to enroll their children into private schools that offer this type of learning.

10) Comment by Being_Stupid - 08/11/2012

@unity, Voucher Supporters like myself have no problem with government standardized testing. The Role of Government should be to provide vouchers and standardized testing, not micromanage the schools themselves. To say voucher supporters don't support testing is completely false. We support testing, and insist on it.

11) Comment by unity - 08/11/2012

My solution? We have to re-engage the middle class by offering more magnet programs. Copy what works. As long as there are waiting lists for magnet programs, make more of them. And I'm not talking about the kind of magnets that you have to pass an academic test to get into. I'm talking about the programs like BRCVPA, or FLAIM, where an average student can be accepted and nurtured into loving school and feeling he/she is part of something special. Parents who seek these programs out are more engaged in their kid's educational experience which fosters success. It is easy for someone like whocares to say break this thing up, but he'd really being making things worse by throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Copy what works and we will see growth.

12) Comment by concernedandangry - 08/11/2012

Hello!!!! It's a sad day, and it is here, when teachers and principals are going to be fired for the lack of performance of the students over which they have no control. Yes, I said it. Have you been in the schools lately? These are the very students who bounce from school to school 2 and 3 times during a school year because they are dodging expulsions, suspensions, failing grades, and\or "they are picking on me". Spend one day on a high school campus in EBR, and not BRMHS. You would be appauled at what goes on. The students are all to aware of "their rights" so they do what they want, when they want, and how they want, and tell you they know their rights. They know that if they scream long and loud enough at the central office, someone there will entertain them, call the school, and make them give these people what they want. Trust me, it's not an education. It's a grade. Teachers are indirectly being told to make sure they all pass. Never mind they entered high school with a 3rd or 4th grade reading level. Let's not talk about math skills. The system has done this and teachers and principals are paying the price. If someone can tell teachers how to educate a student who comes to school maybe half a day, 3 days a week, for the sole purpose of making a living by stealing cell phones to hock, and lord only knows what else, maybe then we could make some progress. High schools are being asked to work miracles, work longer hours for less pay, and no appreciation. Someone better start holding parents accountable. Last time I checked parents gave birth to these people, not the schools, but the schools are being asked to rear them. Please! Oh, and by the way, I wonder how many schools will be called and ask for teachers in the trenches for input on this grand strategic plan. Par for the course would be zero. They hand pick people who will just say yes to whatever it is they want. The people with daily direct contact with the students are the ones left out most of the time. We actually have some good solutions. Problem is, the truth hurts and it's bigger than the school system. It's a society issue that no one wants to deal with because we might have to call a spade a spade. Oh my!!!!

13) Comment by unity - 08/11/2012

@being_stupid: It is laughable that you are even using Vouchers and accountability in the same sentence. Once a student gets a voucher into a private school there is NO ACCOUNTABILITY. The student isn't subject to any performance tests after that. You are just assuming that all private schools are better than all public schools and I can guarantee you that they are not. There are many private schools that were fixing to go out of business until they filled their seats with voucher students. Perhaps if these students were subject to the same tests, (i-leap, EOC tests) then we could make a comparison, but alas, they are not. Not to mention the percentage of voucher seats compared to the number of public school students is minuscule.

14) Comment by WhoCares - 08/11/2012

I got one, break this thing up and rebuild it. It's broke.

15) Comment by Being_Stupid - 08/11/2012

People like to complain about all the problems, but seldom offer the solution.

16) Comment by Being_Stupid - 08/11/2012

@tradewinns and @frustrated: We understand the problems. WHAT IS THE SOLUTION? The SOLUTION is a School Voucher System that holds all parties accountable, including school administration, teachers, parents, and students. IF YOU DO NOT PERFORM, then the school goes out of business, the bad teacher is fired, the bad student is expelled or flunks out, the parent is forced to choose a better school for their particular child. The SOLUTION is school vouchers. School Vouchers holds all parties accountable for their actions.

17) Comment by WhoCares - 08/11/2012

BRHS is 33 percent free and reduced. It's the wealthiest school in the parish. Why do you think we have either really good schools and really bad ones? Don't be naive unity.

18) Comment by Being_Stupid - 08/11/2012

We already came up with a strategic plan. The strategic plan is called SCHOOL VOUCHERS.

19) Comment by unity - 08/11/2012

In reference to this statement “At one time we called them white schools and colored schools,” Coxe said. “Now we are referring to them using a new nomenclature and we call them magnet schools and traditional schools. But it’s the same system.” Really? In reality none of the magnet schools have a majority white population. None! Not even the schools that use academic testing as an entrance tool. To characterize the magnet system as the same as a segregated system is just untrue. These schools succeed with a truly diverse student population. The student bodies in the magnet program look more like our city's population, racially and socio- economically diverse.

20) Comment by WhoCares - 08/11/2012

Mattie Cox speaks the truth. You have two systems.

21) Comment by tradewinns - 08/11/2012

you are so correct frustrated. as long as parents don't guide their kids in the proper direction, all the technology, replacing teachers, spending money etc. will do little to no good. it will cost the taxpayer much more money and give lots of excuses for failure of improvement but will achieve nothing.

22) Comment by Frustrated - 08/11/2012

And, of course, nothing is mentioned about holding parents accountable for student performance. Duh.