Plan to overhaul pre-K proves complicated

While a plan to revamp Louisiana’s pre-kindergarten classes breezed through the Legislature, hammering out the details is shaping up as a huge, controversial undertaking.

The revamp passed the state Senate 39-0 on April 17 and the Louisiana House 94-0 the day before.

The plan sparked little controversy, especially amid pitched political battles in the Legislature over vouchers and new rules for public school teachers.

However, the law only represents an outline for overhauling what critics call a sprawling, expensive and inefficient system of trying to prepare students for kindergarten and beyond.

Most of the nitty gritty of the new system will be crafted by the state Department of Education and the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, or BESE.

State Superintendent of Education John White is tentatively set to spell out a “framework” for the changes in a meeting with BESE on Oct. 17.

BESE is supposed to sign off on a plan in December, including a definition of kindergarten readiness, performance targets for children and eventually letter grades for pre-K programs.

The tentative plans are due back in the Legislature by March 1.

Key issues include:

  • What sort of accountability system will be used to oversee those who care for children between the ages of zero and 4 years old?
  • How will the state balance the calls for top-flight quality with concerns that child care providers will be forced to embrace costly standards?
  • Can state school leaders come up with a plan that wins general acceptance from a wide range of education advocacy groups?

There is already sniping over how much public input should go into work by officials of the state Department of Education, the Department of Health and Hospitals and the Department of Children and Family Services.

The Child Care Association of Louisiana, Education’s Next Horizon and the Louisiana Partnership for Children and Families are seeking a bigger voice in crafting the overhaul.

Education’s Next Horizon, which calls itself a nonprofit education advocacy group, is preparing to release the results of an online survey of about 500 people on what the new pre-K classes should look like.

Another group, Stand for Children, is about to launch a similar survey.

Louisiana has half a dozen publicly-funded pre-K programs with varying costs, standards and quality.

The aim of the new law is to upgrade the programs, especially since officials say that barely half the students who start kindergarten are prepared to tackle numbers, letters and the like.

Melanie Bronfin, director of the Louisiana Partnership’s Policy Institute, said her group favors using Louisiana’s Quality Counts as the cornerstone for holding child care providers accountable.

The state is one of just 15 with such a system, officials said, and it provides monitoring, steps to improve the quality of early childhood programs and helpful guides for parents.

But only 53 percent of the state’s top child care providers are part of the voluntary system.

“It is expensive,” Bronfin noted.

The state has about 12,700 child care businesses employing about 22,000 workers and serves about 149,000 children, according to Bronfin’s group.

Bronfin’s group calls itself an independent source of data on young children for policymakers.

John Warner Smith, chief executive officer for Education Next’s Horizon, said one issue is how to balance the need for quality standards with what child care providers can afford.

“That is going to be a big challenge on child care facilities and public programs,” Smith said.

“We have really got to give adequate consideration of cost impact on providers, time and resources to train and professional development,” he said.

The new pre-K network is supposed to be in place for the 2015-16 school year.

But both Smith’s and Bronfin’s groups are asking state officials to phase-in the changes through pilot projects because of the magnitude of the overhaul.

“It is a major undertaking, a major redesign,” Smith said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (10)


1) Comment by Catsc - 10/10/2012

It may take a fresh look at this aspect of our education system to finally make a difference. As our state continually ranks poorly in education, perhaps we need someone from outside to help out. As for the difficulties in implementing new guidelines in the face of financial constraints, a business person might prove useful. How about not being so quick to condemn before anything has actually been set into motion.

2) Comment by Crafty1 - 07/10/2012

Timesright, I was hoping that someone would make the connection. It's not what you know but who you know that counts.

3) Comment by timesright - 07/10/2012

I appreciate, Crafty1, correcting the TFA association for Jenna Conway. However, what you have shared about her background says plenty. She has no experience and yet she is to lead this revamp. White came to us from NY, why should it be a surprise to see another of his NY associates enter the scene?

4) Comment by Crafty1 - 06/10/2012

morellok2 and timesright, the new PreK Director at the Department of Education is not TFA. Jenna Conway has no teaching experience and no experience with early childhood for that matter. All her experience was with low income housing and I think her previous job was in New York. I hope that she has what it takes to lead this overhaul effort.

5) Comment by bourbon-soda - 06/10/2012

How about grandmothers from intact families in their own and at least one subsequent generation? This is not that inherently complicated.

6) Comment by ultimateliberal - 06/10/2012

There aren't enough early-childhood experts making these decisions. The overhaul needs to come from the bottom up. Have real pre-K teachers design the curriculum that is AGE APPROPRIATE-- a curriculum that invites children to play, discover, imagine, and socialize. When children don't first learn to play and imagine, they are forever lost on such necessary skills as focus, negotiation, problem-solving, and respect for self and others. Children need to develop gross and fine motor skills, parallel and cooperative play skills, and inquisitiveness about how blocks stack and why lines are needed on pictures in coloring books; they need to explore and play make-believe in a pressure-free environment that permits them to grow the way nature intended for humans to develop.

7) Comment by timesright - 06/10/2012

Indeed the revamp of the Pre-K program will be a monumental task. However, one should look at the source of groups mentioned who want to be at the table in designing the changes. Education's Next Horizon has recently added three new board members We can see ties with the Council for a Better Louisiana, a board member of The Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce and one has been a recipient of APEL's Education of the Year Award. One even sits on the Governor's Children's Cabinet Advisory Board. This was an appointment. Other board members can be found here.....http://ednexthorizon.com/whoweare-board.asp Stand for Children does Not stand for children. It started in Oregon. Its CEO in D.C. is Jonah Edelman. It is an astroturf organization funded by big bucks with goals to push charters, vouchers and bust the unions. Here is a link to discover more....http://stand.org/washington/about Rayne Martin is the head of the Louisiana chapter. We need to ask ourselves should the biggest weight be given to the suggestions of these groups or should the decisions for redesign be more weighted to the suggestions that include those professionals practicing in the field of early education? The leader of the revamp group certainly does not fit the qualifications that I would consider an expert in the field with her background being with TFA.

8) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 06/10/2012

So we are revamping PreK at the same time that lower income families have the abilty to get vouchers to go to private school starting in Kindergarden, regardless of the letter grade of their schools. Yes, that is a huge loophole in the voucher law and K is the largest segment of voucher recipients. And once that child starts on vouchers in K, he gets them for the next 12 grades, regardless of income or the grades of his local public schools.

9) Comment by morellok2 - 06/10/2012

Why would anyone be concerned about this revamp? Afterall, it is being planned by a young woman with a couple of years of experience teaching middle school math with TFA and we all know that anyone connected with TFA is an expert on any manner of educational endeavors.

10) Comment by bourbon-soda - 06/10/2012

Like public education in general, this will be a self-perpetuating monument to the idea that one's children are someone else's responsibility.