Report: State fails in college grad rate

Louisiana’s public colleges do a poor job in being transparent, keeping students in school through graduation and ensuring access for low-income students, a national report says.

But it goes on to say the state does a good job incentivizing colleges to perform better and making it easy for students to transfer between schools.

State Commissioner of Higher Education Jim Purcell largely agreed with the report Thursday, calling it “fairly accurate,” but noting that some of the data, which tracked student progress for nearly a decade, doesn’t reflect newer initiatives the state has since put in place.

“There is a need for improvement,” Purcell said. “I think the policy and political folks agree on that.”

Barry Erwin, president of the higher education watchdog Council for a Better Louisiana, said Louisiana is generally on the right track in emphasizing student retention and completion.

“That is the overarching goal. We have a population that is not educated as well as it should be,” Erwin said.

The report by the Institute for a Competitive Workforce, an affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, assigns letter grades to states and their public two- and four-year universities in different categories.

Louisiana got one A and one F with mostly average or below-average grades in between. The F grade was assigned to the state’s four-year schools in the “Student Access and Success” category, which measures the ability to retain and graduate students within a “reasonable” amount of time and also grades the level of access low-income students have to public colleges and universities.

The report says Louisiana’s four-year schools rank in the bottom 10 states in the nation in student retention and completion. Two-year schools were given a C grade.

Purcell said the low score for four-year schools can be traced back to the youth of Louisiana’s community college system, which is less than a decade old.

When much of the data was collected, the state’s regional four-year colleges had lower admissions standards and offered more remedial classes than their out-of-state peers, Purcell said. They were essentially functioning as community colleges, he added.

Also, the cohort researchers studied for the Student Access and Success measure predated higher admission standards that kicked in in 2006, Purcell said.

Ideally, those students should’ve been enrolled within the Louisiana Community and Technical College System, which “really grew up” between 2007 and 2008, Purcell said.

“I think with the new admissions requirements and the expansion of the community college system, those ratings will go higher,” Purcell said.

Since 2000, the state has been pushing to enroll 60 percent of its students in community colleges with the remainder enrolling in four-year institutions, Purcell said. The state is at about 50-50 now, he said.

Regarding the failure to ensure access for low-income students, Purcell said he was unclear exactly how researchers collected their information, but said he would like to expand need-based state scholarships to help students offset the cost of attending college.

Federal need-based Pell Grants paid 70 percent of student expenses in the 1970s, but cover just 40 percent today, Purcell said.

Reversing that trend won’t be easy, he said.

The state got an A grade in the “Policy Environment” category for a law that ties 15 percent of state funding to colleges on student performance and institutional efficiency.

The A grade also took into account the ease with which students are able to transfer course credits from one institution to another.

The poor showing in student retention and completion, contrasted with the high score for higher education policy, is a function of the “data lagging behind the initiatives,” said Meg Casper, Louisiana Board of Regents associate commissioner of public affairs.

“It means we’re going in the right direction,” Purcell added.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (10)


1) Comment by DUH - 23/07/2012

Zealer, you are absolutely correct!

2) Comment by DMJ - 23/07/2012

Zealer, what you wrote doesn't make any sense. The reason federal loans and grants used to cover a larger % of tutition is because their value HASN'T risen proportionately with the cost of tuition. Think about it...

3) Comment by zealer99 - 22/07/2012

We have two many young people who do not the academic skills, academic drive, no the academic need to enroll as college students. We do not need to allow students to encumber themselves with massive student loans to earn degree in fields that will not afford them with the potential to earn enough to repay the loans if they are able to obtain employment. Part of the answer is to limit enrollment in fields, with weak employment potential, to very well prepared students who are in the 70th percentile or so and to be more restrictive in the loan amounts and the number of students enrolled in those programs. Public colleges and universities have jacked up the costs of tuition and other student fees in response to the availability of Federal Student Loans which results in the students accruing insane student loan debts. The colleges are setting themselves and the students up for a catastrophe when defaults become epidemic and enrollment drops.

4) Comment by redstickhornet - 22/07/2012

Suzanne, the strategies you described are indeed the ones employed by private universities. I attended a private university here in Louisiana; they ensure that students graduate by admitting fewer and better students. LA seems to need fewer public universities and better ones. To accomplish this, more community college options are needed. Higher standards are needed, and more options for students to choose such as online classes.

5) Comment by vicwill - 22/07/2012

But Suzanne, all of that stuff mentioned requires $$$$ that our schools no longer have. You actually have schools cutting their course offerings due to continued budget cuts.

6) Comment by spqr - 22/07/2012

Suzanne, how else can one lag? Can one lag ahead? Can one lag even? One is either lagging or behind...But I guess our universities do need to "rise up" or reports will continue to be "bad poor".

7) Comment by SuzanneMS - 22/07/2012

There are many things that colleges and universities can do to increase student retention. Not all of them require funding, but many do. The first thing is to only admit students who have the academic skills necessary to have a reasonable chance of graduating, based on high school gpa, scores on college admissions tests, and letters of recommendation. Students who don't meet those standards should be encouraged to attend community colleges, where they will have a chance to improve their academic skills. Louisiana lags behind the rest of the nation in developing community colleges. Then, schools have to provide the necessary financial support for those students they have admitted in terms of scholarships and work-study positions. They also need to provide adequate academic advising, as well as offering enough courses on a regular basis so that the student is able to complete the degree. Both of those require enough a low student-to-faculty ratio. They need to provide career counseling that begins no later than the junior year and a good placement service as well as assistance with applying for graduate school. Students are more likely to complete if they have a reasonable expectation of finding either a job or being admitted to grad school. They also need to provide support for disabled students and international students. Actually, "lagging behind" is not redundant. "Lagging behind" makes it clear that, not only are we slow, but everyone else is ahead of us.

8) Comment by spqr - 22/07/2012

How does a university do a better job with student retention? If a students fails a class, drops classes, or takes too few classes and takes five years or more to graduate how is it the fault of the school? If certain classes are not available allowing even good students to graduate on time that is due to massive Jindal budget cuts (LSU's budget cut nearly 40 percent since Jindal took office)...Meg Casper, the phrase "lagging behind" is redundant.

9) Comment by SuzanneMS - 22/07/2012

With the recent and projected increases in tuition, Pell grants will cover an even lower percentage of the cost of attending college, meaning that even fewer low income students in Louisiana will have access. Those who do manage will take even longer to graduate, as they have to go part-time.

10) Comment by Elderly Man - 22/07/2012

A solid community college system is vital. Our system is largely new. We all need a strong foundation in English and mathematics as well as a core level of maturity. Thank you for this article.