Slate of new courses set for schools

Louisiana is about to become what officials call the first state to launch a huge expansion of how courses are offered to public school students, with private firms, colleges and even former teachers expected to enter a revamped education system.

State education leaders are touting the expansion as primarily another option for students in C, D and F schools, with the new course providers helping students to catch up with their peers and graduate on time, or to take classes not offered in their schools.

In addition, the new courses will help students who want to graduate early, earn college credit while in high school or take career and technical classes with specific jobs in mind.

“It is about more choice for all students,” said Dave Lefkowith, one of the officials working on the “course choice program” being set up by the state Department of Education.

The agency plans to send requests for proposals from course providers on July 16.

Those plans then face reviews from officials of the department, an independent panel of experts and the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, which sets policies for about 700,000 public school students in the state.

BESE is scheduled to approve the new course providers on Dec. 5.

An online course catalog will be published on Jan. 1, and registration will begin on March 7 for the 2013-14 school year.

Ken Bradford, assistant superintendent, said it is too soon to predict how many new course options will be offered.

All the proposed classes are due to the state by Oct. 12.

The course expansion stems from one of Gov. Bobby Jindal’s key public school overhaul bills, which won legislative approval in April.

But the bill, known as Act 2, also includes a major expansion of Louisiana’s voucher program, which got most of the attention and debate when the measure went through the Legislature.

What got less attention is the fact that the bill also paves the way for colleges, online firms, private companies, business groups and others to offer courses, if they win state approval.

Steve Monaghan, president of the Louisiana Federation of Teachers, said expansion questions are symptomatic of a bill that went through the Legislature with too little scrutiny.

Monaghan, whose group has challenged the law in court, said private providers are likely to be lined up to take a “large swab of funds” from Louisiana’s already hard-pressed public school treasury.

“There is a tremendous amount of concern about it,” Monaghan said.

Under the plan, classes taken by students in troubled public schools will be paid for with state tax dollars.

Others taken by students at A and B schools who have no access to classes they are pursuing could also qualify for state aid.

Classes can be online or in person.

State Superintendent of Education John White, who is Jindal’s chief public schools lieutenant, said in a prepared statement Tuesday that the expansion of course providers will give students “customized options” that fit their school needs and interests.

White said the first priority is additional providers that would offer core courses — like math and science — for students in C, D and F schools.

Course providers are supposed to spell out how students who take the classes will be assessed, districts where they will be offered and how the classes are aligned with diploma requirements.

Providers would be authorized for three years.

If student performance fails to meet state standards the provider would be placed on probation.

The department is holding webinars on Wednesday and Thursday for school guidance counselors, teachers, administrators, parents and others.

State officials will visit BESE districts with information sessions on July 23-25.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (8)


1) Comment by redstickhornet - 27/06/2012

Ok if all the schools in La are failures, the same reform agenda and approach should be on the table wherever else failure exists 8point6. Let's see, La is the 5th most violent state in America , so I want my taxes to fund a private army or security force, not the current failed local/state police system. We have one of the worst healthcare systems, so I want taxes to provide me with a voucher to purchase healthcare insurance (Is there a guy in the white house doing that?). LSU ranks 63 out of 111 (bottom half) public universities, so again we finance failure. The answer is to let the money follow the student right? LSU and other state college students must need tax-funded supplemental tuition vouchers to offset costs for private online colleges or public online degree programs offered in other states. Why should they wait? Isn't the "problem" urgent? College kids getting a "failed" education have a greater and more immediate impact on our economy right? And why require LSU professors to have any degrees? All that research going on over there is obviously not producing a better result. ;) Replace those PhD obstacles to the top with with some non-tenured profs. I just don't hear or see the same arguments being presented for solving problems in crime and higher ed that we are applying to lower ed. Why is that? Are these other areas less urgent? I see and hear a lot frustration with local law enforcement, but I don't see that the same solutions are in play. Why not reward good police chiefs and cops who catch thugs while "penalizing" police departments that fail to lock up criminals or reduce the crime rate. Has someone introduced this bill? http://www.census.gov/statab/ranks/rank21.html http://statesnapshots.ahrq.gov/snaps11/index.jsp? menuId=1&state=LA

2) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 27/06/2012

The "huge" amount of money being "thrown" at education in this state is not going to public education. Taxpayers need to wake up and smell the bait and switch.

3) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 27/06/2012

Another piece of legislation not needed but intended to pad the coffers of private enterprise and political favoritism. Students who QUALIFY for advanced courses not offered in the system are already offered on-line classes and supplemental tutoring. I have had several gifted students (in St. Tammany) who qualified for advanced math courses but wanted to remain in their respective grade level classes for all other courses. After the requisite research and discussion with parents to make sure their requests would fill their needs appropriately and with adequate assurances of accountability, the school district paid for the additional courses. More focus should be put on educating parents and personnel about these options and more rather than burying their existence and claiming the public schools are not providing CHOICE for children. The LDOE and BESE are NOT DOING THEIR JOB. They have become a huge human resources department (employment agency) for Teacher for America and other alternative instructional service providers WITH A TWIST. They don't get paid for the service - in fact THEY PAY MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO PROVIDE IT. (They being YOU, the taxpayer)

4) Comment by spqr - 27/06/2012

8 point6...your taxes have not been going to a failed public school system. Your taxes have gone to a entitlement student body who does not like to study, follow rules, respect authority, does not fear failure or success or life or death, is heavily influenced by the evils of the street, knows more and worships frequently at the alter of rap music and MTV, despises school and proves it in student bodies where nearly 50 percent miss 20 days of school or more per year, and students arrested for felonies are common. Reform that and suddenly everything will change. Those are the issues. "Reform" does not address them.

5) Comment by bourbon-soda - 27/06/2012

A "large swab of funds"?

6) Comment by vicwill - 27/06/2012

1. Let's not say a failed public school system, because you have many school systems in this state that are doing a great job. 2. What it should show you is that no matter how much money you throw at it, the school still needs the support of the community to be successful. 3. The current "reforms" really do nothing to address the real problems at the schools.

7) Comment by 8point6 - 27/06/2012

“There is a tremendous amount of concern about it,” Monaghan said. I wouldn't expect any other statement from him. I've paid public education taxes to a failed public education system for 45 plus years. That's why I support the public education reform being implemented.

8) Comment by vicwill - 27/06/2012

A lot of stuff going on in such a small amount of time. How is all of this being funded?