Award nomination debated

Show caption
/

A high-ranking LSU administrator recommended the university next week award an honorary doctorate to a booster whose company pays the official a six-figure salary.

Opponents to awarding an honorary doctorate in Humanities to Sean Reilly, chief executive officer of Lamar Advertising Co., say the award is a conflict of interest because LSU Provost Jack Hamilton is paid more than $100,000 to sit on the board of directors at Lamar.

Reilly said Friday he’s “delighted” to receive the honor and called the conflict allegation “interesting.”

Reilly is the co-chairman of the Louisiana Flagship Coalition, a group of business leaders that formed in 2011 to support LSU.

The process to award honorary degrees generally begins with a nomination from faculty. The nomination is scrutinized by a series of committees — picking up endorsements and recommendations along the way — and culminates with a vote by the LSU Board of Supervisors.

In Reilly’s case, one of the recommendations he picked up along the way came from LSU Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost Hamilton. The provost is the university’s chief academic officer and second-in-charge on campus.

Hamilton, 64, has served on Lamar’s Board of Directors since 2000. He was paid $107,440 in 2011, according to the company’s filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

In a Dec. 19 letter to LSU Chancellor Michael Martin, Hamilton wrote: “Mr. Reilly is deserving of this prestigious degree based solely on his leadership and love of LSU. His other prominent accomplishments, however, bring significant honor to LSU as well.”

Hamilton said Friday that no conflict exists.

But LSU Faculty Senate President Kevin Cope described both Reilly receiving the award and the recommendation letter from Hamilton as “problematic” and a “conflict of interest.”

According to the LSU System office, the criteria for awarding honorary degrees should be based on a person’s contribution to their occupation or to society. A person’s substantial contributions to the development of the LSU System or the nation, should also be considered, the criteria says. The guidelines further say nominees should be of such outstanding character and distinction that their acceptance of such a degree would honor the LSU System.

According to the profile on the Lamar website, Reilly graduated Harvard Law School and was a state legislator from 1988 to 1996. He has served in leadership positions on a number of different boards including the Louisiana Recovery Authority, the state agency that coordinated the state’s hurricane recovery efforts, and the Louisiana Public Affairs Research Council, commonly known as PAR.

Cope said he sits on an eight-member committee made up of academics from the different university campuses.

At least two committee members voted against Reilly receiving the award, Cope said. Most nominees “are of such distinguished achievement” they are voted in unanimously, he said.

When the Board of Supervisors approved Reilly’s nomination without objection on March 16, they disregarded about 25 percent of the academic committee’s wishes, Cope said.

“This whole thing is fishy. It is the business of faculty to give degrees. It doesn’t look good for an academic institution to do academic things in a decidedly unacademic fashion,” Cope said.

LSU Board member Tony Falterman, said he was at the meeting when Reilly was approved but didn’t vote.

“I was sitting there and I couldn’t believe it,” Falterman said. “I’d like to know why Jack Hamilton thinks Sean Reilly deserves this. I don’t see what sets Sean apart, other than him being a wealthy businessman and being on the coalition. It’s a shame what’s happening to LSU.”

Hamilton said Friday while he is on Lamar’s board, Reilly is not, and therefore has no control over board members’ pay.

Hamilton also said he sits on one of the LSU committees that debated whether Reilly should get the doctorate, but did not vote and was “careful” to tell the other members to “vote their conscience.”

On the conflict of interest issue, Hamilton said, “What did I get? What did I give him? You don’t have the right to raise a question about a conflict. There would have to be a situation where I get something or gave something. I didn’t vote for him. I endorsed him, that’s as far as I went.”

Reilly said, “People can say things, but I don’t even know how the process works ... All I can say is I want to thank my good friends at LSU for honoring me with this degree. I’m delighted with it. I love LSU.”

And, like Hamilton, Reilly dismissed the idea that a conflict of interest exists because of their association with Lamar.

“I’m not on the (Lamar) board,” Reilly said. “I can’t affect his compensation.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (3)


1) Comment by citizeninBR - 14/05/2012

Why is this even an issue? I'm sure LSU awards honorary degrees to people who have done less for LSU or the community and/or who have other ethical conflicts, but we never hear about these. This is an issue with the faculty senate not because Sean Reilly is unworthy of the honorary degree, but because he is on the Flagship Coalition and words like "efficiency" and "budget shortfall" are words that scare people in academia. The issue is not Sean Reilly's involvement with Lamar or Hamilton, it's that he's on the Flagship Coalition. And shame on The Advocate for not including any information about Sean Reilly's community work and the many causes this family is involved with or supports. Their philanthropy is amazing and I hope anyone who knows Sean Reilly will thank him for all he and his family do for Baton Rouge. I agree that LSU needs to consider these ethical conflicts and board compensations, but what's wrong with LSU awarding an honorary degree to someone who financially supports them and has other qualifications such as civic involvement, public service, and putting in personal time to be on committees at LSU? He certainly doesn't have to spend his time or his money on LSU. He could DONATE his money to another school or organization. Or he could just keep it. And that family donates to so many other causes. Why not give him an "honorary" degree? It's not like he will go use this for anything, it's a gesture. I couldn't pick this man out of a crowd, but I don't think this is about whether or not he deserves this honorary degree.

2) Comment by henryjohnson - 13/05/2012

Ok, so Mister Jack Hamilton is compensated to the tune of $225876 per annum (roughly speaking) by the taxpayers and adds an additional 47.5659% with the $107440 paid by the Reilly's for sitting on their board for a grand total of $333316, not counting any others of which we're not aware. Yet. (let's see if he's nominated any other honorary PhD's) Mister Hamilton's previous claim to fame was as the highly acclaimed Dean of the Manship School of Mass Communications, which educated and trained many (if not most) of the journalists in our community. As overseer of ethics training for said journalists, did he use the old-fahioned "do-as-i-say-and-not-as-i-do" method, or did he encourage his understudies to rake in any and all cash/checks/tips/honoraria upon which they could get their hands? Perhaps LSU is ready for a good enema and a fresh start!

3) Comment by Rebel with a cause - 13/05/2012

The real outrage of this is not about Mr. Reilly receiving an honorary degree. Well-connected, wealthy businessmen do this all the time – donate to a university and you eventually receive an honorary degree, no big surprise. The outrage is to learn that Mr. Hamilton has been receiving a salary from an outside company while serving as Provost (and before as Dean of Journalism). Whose interest has Mr. Hamilton been watching out for – LSU, Lamar Advertising, or just Mr. Hamilton’s? Hard-working taxpayers of this state are always reminded that excessive salaries to Provosts and many other university administrators are justified because they work so hard. Obviously this Provost has enough free time to earn $100,000 last year on the side. Or perhaps he didn’t have to do too much to “earn” the money. Either way, this demonstrates in stark terms the shenanigans of top LSU administrators – use the system to line your own pockets and if anyone questions you just tell them that “You don’t have the right to raise a question about a conflict.” Such arrogance may not go unnoticed by state lawmakers who are in the midst of weighty budgetary decisions that could have major consequences for LSU’s future.