May 16, 2013 21:13 Feds probe Shaw Lake Charles facility over allegations Feds probe Shaw Lake Charles facility over allegations RAY HENRY| Associated Press May 16, 2013 Comments Associated Press file photo -- Workers help construct a new nuclear reactor in December at the Plant Vogtle nuclear power plant in Augusta, Ga., which received components from the Shaw Modular Solutions plant in Lake Charles. Federal regulators are looking into whether workers at the Shaw facility broke quality control rules and falsified records.ATLANTA — Federal regulators are investigating whether workers at the Shaw Modular Solutions facility in Lake Charles, which supplies parts to nuclear plants, broke quality control rules and falsified records, according to regulatory filings. CB&I, which acquired the facility’s owner Shaw Group, of Baton Rouge, in February, said it is cooperating in the probe and has turned over all the requested documents. A dozen workers at the facility admitted to a manager that they sometimes entered the identification codes for other workers while recording who performed welds, according to the company’s legal filings. The filings do not offer further details on the incident. The NRC would not comment on the ongoing probe, but its rules state that only a worker who performs a weld can document that it was completed, agency spokesman Scott Burnell said. If true, the allegations do not necessarily mean that the factory’s parts are defective or unsafe. But the allegations would represent a breakdown in the process intended to guarantee that parts installed in nuclear power plants meet strict standards to ensure safety. The case is being handled by the NRC’s Office of Investigations, which probes allegations of wrongdoing. The factory makes large parts destined for two nuclear power plants now under construction: Plant Vogtle in Georgia and Plant Summer in South Carolina. “When CB&I first learned of the employee’s concerns, we took immediate action,” company spokeswoman Gentry Brann said in a written statement. “Today, the documentation issue has been corrected, and we have a full corrective action program in place to ensure this does not happen again.” The allegations are a setback for a factory that has been the subject of a large number of whistleblower complaints, struggled to meet production schedules and, according to analysts, had difficulty mastering the strict quality control process required in the nuclear power industry. NRC officials requested information in October about the dozen workers who admitted they used other workers’ codes, according to documents filed by company lawyers. The company told the NRC which workers were involved, but it initially resisted handing over other internal reports. The firm said it was concerned that the NRC might be forced to publicly release the documents, undermining the promises of confidentiality to company whistleblowers who report problems. NRC commissioners voted April 2 to reject a request from Shaw to revoke the subpoena. The federal safety agency noted that the documents may be shielded from release under the federal open records act. “We therefore do not expect such document requests to unduly burden, or otherwise create a chilling effect on, a facility’s effort to promote a safety conscious work environment,” the commission said in its order. The company has been under scrutiny. Last month, the NRC proposed a $36,400 fine against CB&I for discriminating against an employee who raised a quality concern. In addition, the NRC has accused Shaw, now CB&I, of creating a workplace that discouraged employees at the Lake Charles factory from raising quality concerns. Federal officials said they received 19 allegations from people based at the factory from January 2010 to January 2013, more than a third of all vendor-related allegations received during that period. “The NRC takes seriously the ability of employees to raise safety concerns without fear of retaliation, and employee protection from discrimination,” said Glenn Tracy, director of the Office of New Reactors, in an April 18 letter to the company. A survey conducted at the request of Shaw found that 27 percent of workers were not confident they could raise a quality concern without fear of retaliation. In addition, 30 percent of workers knew someone who suffered a negative reaction from management after raising a quality concern, according to federal documents.