Budget office: Health law to reduce deficit

President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul will shrink rather than increase the nation’s huge federal deficits over the next decade, Congress’ nonpartisan budget scorekeepers said Tuesday, supporting Obama’s contention in a major election-year dispute with Republicans.

About 3 million fewer uninsured people will gain health coverage because of last month’s Supreme Court ruling granting states more leeway, and that will cut the federal costs by $84 billion, the Congressional Budget Office said in the biggest changes from earlier estimates.

Republicans have insisted that “Obamacare” will actually raise deficits — by “trillions,” according to presidential candidate Mitt Romney. But that’s not so, the budget office said.

The office gave no updated estimate for total deficit reductions from the law, approved by Congress and signed by Obama in 2010. But it did estimate that Republican legislation to repeal the overhaul — passed recently by the House — would itself boost the deficit by $109 billion from 2013 to 2022.

“Repealing the (health care law) will lead to an increase in budget deficits over the coming decade, though a smaller one than previously reported,” budget office director Douglas Elmendorf said in a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

The law’s mix of spending cuts and tax increases would more than offset new spending to cover uninsured people, Elmendorf explained.

Tuesday’s budget projections were the first since the Supreme Court upheld most of the law last month but gave states the option of rejecting a planned expansion of Medicaid for their low-income residents. As a consequence, the budget office said the law will cover fewer uninsured people.

Thirty million uninsured people will be covered by 2022, or about 3 million fewer than projected this spring before the court ruling, the report said.

As a result, taxpayers will save about $84 billion from 2012 to 2022. That brings the total cost of expanding coverage down to $1.2 trillion, from about $1.3 trillion in the previous estimate.

The Congressional Budget Office has consistently projected that Obama’s overhaul will reduce the deficit, although previous estimates aren’t strictly comparable with Tuesday’s report because of changes in the law and other factors.

At the time it was approved in 2010, CBO estimated the law would reduce the deficit by $143 billion from 2010 to 2019. And CBO estimated that last year’s Republican repeal legislation would increase deficits by $210 billion from 2010 to 2021.

That may sound like a lot of money, but it’s actually a hair-thin margin at a time when federal deficits are expected to average around $1 trillion a year for the foreseeable future.

When the law is fully in effect, 92 percent of citizens and legal residents are estimated to have coverage, as compared to 81 percent now.

Democrats hailed Tuesday’s estimates as vindication for the president. “This confirms what we’ve been saying all along: the Affordable Care Act saves lots of money,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

Actually, the government will spend more. It just won’t go onto the national credit card because the health care law will be paid for with a combination of spending cuts and tax increases.

Republicans said they remain unswervingly committed to repealing what they dismiss as “Obamacare.” When combined with other budget-cutting measures, GOP leaders say that repeal will ultimately reduce deficits. Romney says if elected he will begin to dismantle the law his first day in office.

Medicaid has been one big question hanging over the future of Obama’s law since the Supreme Court ruled.

Some GOP-led states, such as Texas and Florida, say they will not go forward with the expansion. Others are uncommitted, awaiting the voters’ verdict on Obama in November.

Although the federal government would bear all of the initial cost of that expansion, many states would have to open their Medicaid programs to low-income childless adults for the first time.

CBO analysts did not try to predict which specific states would jump in and which would turn down the Medicaid expansion. Instead, they assumed that many states would eventually cut deals with the federal government to expand their programs to some degree.

As a result, the budget office estimates that more than 80 percent of the low-income uninsured people eligible under the law live in states that partially or fully expand their programs.

The big coverage expansion under the law doesn’t start until 2014, with middle-class uninsured people signing up for subsidized private plans and more low-income people picked up through Medicaid.

Associated Press writer Laurie Kellman contributed to this report.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (22)


1) Comment by phil - 29/01/2013

Isn't part of the healthcare law already in effect? I do not think the annual deficit has been reduced enough yet to actually decrease the overall federal debt, has it? Seems to me like the national debt still goes up every year. These discussions of smaller deficits always seem to result in an even larger national debt. This doesn't make sense to me - maybe someone needs to take a basic math course.

2) Comment by agagent - 28/01/2013

Before the Supreme Court rule that Obamacare illegally coerced states into expanding Medicaid to those making 138% of the poverty level the government estimated that 17 million would be added to Medicaid. Now that estimate is down to 6 million added to the already unsustainable Medicaid program for those living in poverty.

3) Comment by agagent - 28/01/2013

In 2010 the government estimated that 4 million uninsured would pay the Obamacare tax/penalty of the individual mandate. In 2012 the government changed that estimate to 6 million people. I guess the forecast was “close enough for government work.”

4) Comment by agagent - 28/01/2013

Democrats are scrabbling to repeal the Obamacare tax on medical devices because the tax is hurting jobs in their states. Maybe they will read the law because many did not read the bill before they voted for it. Rules were ignored and votes purchased with bribes to help Obamacare to pass Congress on a partisan votes. The best thing about Obamacare is that it sent many of its supporters home following the 2010 Congressional elections.

5) Comment by agagent - 28/01/2013

CLASS, the long term care Obamacare program, stipulated that it would be scrapped if it was not sustainable. It has been scrapped because the planning was wrong, and it was not sustainable. Obamacare’s program supporting those with preexisting conditions has enrolled a fraction what was forecast . . . Another example of faulty Obamacare planning. The unions were huge supporters of Obamacare and now most those exempted from Obamacare are union members.

6) Comment by Whatnow - 28/01/2013

"Romney says if elected?" This article was before Obama was re-elected. The Advocate is really pushing it's liberal agenda with old stuff. Okay, "the health care law will be paid for with a combination of spending cuts and tax increases." Okay, we got the tax increases, now where are the spending cuts??

7) Comment by wherearewegoing - 28/01/2013

But I do agree with you when you say "People only believe what confirms what they already think." Question is.....is that what you're doing right now? Just saying......it goes both ways.

8) Comment by wherearewegoing - 28/01/2013

It goes both ways, DMJ. When studies came out reporting Obamacare as an inevitable failure, or driving the country much much deeper into debt, the libs in support of it cried out in protest. This is not new. Any report, any correlation, and any set of numbers/statistics can be spun to support whoever wants the support. I don't know whether to believe this report or not, but that doesn't matter to me anyway. I don't support this health care act on my own, not because of some partisan or nonpartisan report.

9) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

Some people are too invested in the idea that the ACA will add to the deficit to believe a nonpartisan report. People only believe what confirms what they already think. Just look at agagent. He's having a small breakdown, a veritable crisis of self-identity. What a devastating blow to his worldview this report is. On the plus side, for those incapable of recognizing good news....the CBO says the ACA will lower deficits. This is a good thing, folks...even if it means you were wrong, personally.

10) Comment by foldgers - 28/01/2013

These are all the same people who are telling us that unemployment is below 8%. Also the same people who print money to pay debts... I don't trust anything these people say up there. BOTH parties.

11) Comment by yadodge0501 - 28/01/2013

Obama doesn't care about deficits or reduced spending. Why would he care about this bogus fact.. This article should show us the math, because it doesn't add up

12) Comment by phil - 28/01/2013

There are conspiracy theories, and then there are those conspiracies that are not theories. One thing for sure, time will tell. However, under the existing administration, how much has the national debt actually decreased? I do not think that situation is a theory - but it might be a conspiracy.

13) Comment by tradewinns - 28/01/2013

same old story: figures don't lie, but liars figure.

14) Comment by MBW - 28/01/2013

Republicans stil can't come to grips with the FACTS: Obamacare is the same basic plan that Republicans supported from at least 1993 up until about 2007 (when Obama started talking about it). In 1993, 26 GOP senators co-sponsored a similar bill. And in Mass., Mitt Romney was widely praised by Republicans for Romneycare. But now that Obama has done it...it's crazy socialism? Shut up. Please.

15) Comment by MBW - 28/01/2013

Agagent- I love that you're citing the Weekly Standard as your source of information. Now, sit back while I rebut you with quotes from the Huffington Post. and The Nation. LOL

16) Comment by MBW - 28/01/2013

Ah yes, I see the right-wing conspiracy theorists are awake this morning. "It's all a lie!!!!" lol.

17) Comment by phil - 28/01/2013

Quote - “Believe only half of what you see and nothing that you hear.”

18) Comment by slye753 - 28/01/2013

a government programs that cut deficits? and puts 30 million more people on the roles? come on, who are they trying to ***** ***** in, ***** out.

19) Comment by agagent - 28/01/2013

"A Senate Budget Committee analysis (based on CBO estimates and growth rates) finds that that total spending under the law will amount to at least $2.6 trillion over a true 10-year period (from FY2014–23)—not $900 billion, as President Obama originally promised."--Weekly Standard

20) Comment by agagent - 28/01/2013

The truth about Obamacare is closer to our experience with Medicare: the real Medicare costs were many time more than the federal government’s estimate. Obamacare is a huge drag on the economy and it creates another wasteful federal bureaucracy in Washington.

21) Comment by agagent - 28/01/2013

Obamacare takes close to a trillion dollars from Medicare. Medicare is already unsustainable and a huge unfunded liability of the federal government even before Obamacare raids it. Obamacare also takes about $1 trillion in taxes. The Obamacare reimbursement reductions to health care providers are paid through a separate “doctors fix” bill which is not counted against the cost of Obamacare. In addition the CBO does not score the increased costs of health insurance premiums because of Obamacare.

22) Comment by agagent - 28/01/2013

The CBO can only score what is given and the Democrats specifically instructed the CBO to score 2010 as the first year of Obamacare. That CBO 10 year cost was initially $940 billion (10 years of taxes and 6 years of benefits). When comparing 10 years of taxes and 10 years of benefits the CBO estimates the true 10 year cost (2014-2023) of Obamacare is closer to $2 trillion.