Jindal cancels contract

Action follows grand jury probe of CNSI Medicaid award

The Jindal administration on Thursday announced it has canceled a controversial contract that has come under scrutiny by a federal grand jury.

Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols issued a prepared statement announcing the decision affecting a $185 million-plus contract to process Medicaid claims with CNSI, a firm with ties to state health Secretary Bruce Greenstein.

“Based on consultation with the Attorney General’s Office, today I am terminating the state’s contract with CNSI, effective immediately. The state will work with the current contractor, Molina Medicaid Solutions, to provide services during this transition and until a new RFP (request for proposal), overseen by the Division of Administration, is completed,” Nichols said. A part of the state procurement process, a request for proposal asks interested businesses to submit offers on what they would do and how much they would charge.

Nichols said the administration has asked the state inspector general to look into this matter and provide assistance. “We have zero tolerance for wrongdoing, and we will continue to cooperate fully with any investigation,” she said.

Greenstein’s office directed media inquiries to Nichols’ office.

Gov. Bobby Jindal declined a request to be interviewed on Greenstein’s job status. Jindal’s office released a prepared statement from Paul Rainwater, the governor’s chief of staff, that said: “We have confidence in Bruce.”

The development occurred just hours after news broke that a federal grand jury was investigating the administration’s award of the contract.

The Baton Rouge-based federal grand jury subpoenaed documents related to the state’s awarding of the contract to the Gaithersburg, Md.-based Client Network Services Inc. Greenstein was a vice president with CNSI from 1995 to 1996.

The company got the contract for Medicaid claims processing in 2011 amid some complaints that the firm “low balled” the price and made erroneous assumptions in its proposal.

The contract was awarded by the state Department of Health and Hospitals and signed off on by the Jindal administration amid complaints from other vendors.

At the time, Greenstein said he took himself out of the contract dealings. Documents revealed Greenstein influenced a change in the solicitation for proposals that allowed CNSI to compete.

Nichols said the state DOA complied with the federal subpoena and delivered the documents requested. She said she only recently became aware of its existence. “We have zero tolerance for any wrongdoing and are fully prepared to cooperate,” she said.

Nichols released a copy of the subpoena in response to a public records request filed by The Advocate.

The subpoena was issued by U.S. Attorney for the Middle District Don Cazayoux. The documents were to be returned to the grand jury room by Jan. 30. Cazayoux declined comment Thursday.

The subpoena sought:

  • All documents submitted by the four proposers in response to the state’s solicitation of proposals. The proposers were CNSI, ACS State Healthcare, LLC; HP Enterprise Services LLC; and Molina Medicaid Solutions.
  • All financial information, including but not limited to financial statements, income statements, balance sheets, and statements of profit and loss, submitted by the firms in connection with or response to the proposal.
  • Documents sufficient to show the date and time at which each response to the proposal was received by the state of Louisiana.

DHH released a prepared statement in response to questions: “DHH does not have any details regarding an investigation of the MMIS (Medicaid Management Information Systems) contract award. DHH has not received a subpoena and to our knowledge no employee at DHH has received a subpoena.”

CNSI was supposed to take over the processing of Medicaid claims from doctors, hospitals and others who provide health care services to the poor in 2014. At that time, the full conversion from current vendor Molina would occur.

Nichols said she learned of the subpoena March 15 from the Attorney General’s Office, which advised caution and to “just be aware of (CNSI contract) amendments in general.”

The CNSI contract has been amended once since it was signed, increasing its $185 million cost by about $9 million. A second contract amendment proposed by DHH that would have added another $40 million was sidelined recently by the state Division of Administration.

When the contract was approved, legislators — wary of the low price — said they would keep an eye on contract changes. At the time, state health officials said that CNSI was picked because it submitted the lowest price for the 10-year pact. The second-lowest price was $238 million, submitted by ACS State Healthcare of Atlanta.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (63)


1) Comment by Thurston_Howell_III - 17/04/2013

Can we cancel Jindal's contract?

2) Comment by for real - 22/03/2013

What about Jindal’s illegal campaign contributions T The state Board of Ethics filed a lawsuit last June against former executive of a failed Lacombe-based bank, charged last month with funneling illegal political contributions through the bank's board of directors, gave the $55,000 of allegedly illegal donations to the campaign that first ushered Bobby Jindal to the Governor's Mansion.. the alleged shell companies, suggesting that they contributed more than $300,000 in illegal campaign funs to Jindal and some 60 other candidates . http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2012/06/tammany_businessmans_allegedly.html . In court, Blossman's attorney, Michel Nicrosi, said Jindal's campaign will return those funds. #. http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2012/11/former_lacombe_bank_executive.html # . Well Jindal keep the money, "I would say that ethically, if any public official realizes that they received inappropriate campaign contributions, the ethical thing would be to return that money," Goyeneche President of the Metropolitan Crime Commission said. But Teepell tells us, that's not going to happen. # . It’s the same Bobby Jindal who two years ago promised to give $10,000 he received from a Florida attorney recently convicted in a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme to an unnamed victim’s compensation fund. # , http://louisianavoice.com/2011/07/17/jindal-cant-seem-to-find-victims-compensation-fund-to-accept-his-tainted-florida-campaign-contribution-money/ # . In November of 2009. A check of expenditures by Jindal’s campaign revealed 33 separate expenditures totaling $396,300 but nothing to any victim’s compensation fund. And Raphael Goyeneche, says the fact that Blossman has been charged in a bill of information rather than indicted, is telling. "It usually is an indication that the defendant has not only agreed to a deal, but is cooperating with authorities," Goyeneche commented.. # . http://www.fox8live.com/story/18671411/governor-jindal-recipient-of-possible-illegal-campaign-contributions # . Goyeneche commented, "That is a federal felony." How much did Jindal get in illegal campaign contributions and not get caught , He received more than $8 million in 2009 when was wasn’t even up for election. # . http://www.followthemoney.org/database/uniquecandidate.phtml?uc=15453&gclid=CLbDwuTQkbYCFaGqPAodJikA3g

3) Comment by Whatnow - 22/03/2013

Mygulfbleedsforu, so I guess it didn't happen, and neither did Solyndra nor Obama's bundlers getting contracts and appointments. And that's it's politics as usual when it's a Democrat in office. The Advocate and the rest of the lame stream media and Democrats don't mind it so much when it's a Democrat doing the same things and worse. And no, like I said, two wrongs don't make it right, but you have to quit acting like there is only one wrong and it's only done by the Republicans or Jindal. The Dems are just as guilty. Check out the White House where there is no accountability. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20071271-503544.html

4) Comment by ed171300 - 22/03/2013

What was baffling is there was no television news coverage of this story at all last night (at least not that I saw). Could it be that the only person willing to speak on camera may have been Marsha Shuler?

5) Comment by louisisanared - 22/03/2013

Why is it so hard for politicians NOT TO BREAK THE LAW. They appoint judges who judge the common man for infractions and threw them into jail, but they are not doing any better. I want to know how they can live with themselves. How do they look their own children in the eyes knowing they are not better than a thief. I have lost all faith in people. Murderers, rapists, etc. aren't any different from a elected or appointed official stealing from it's poor constituents. Like my father always said Bobby Jindal, WHERE THERE IS SMOKE THERE IS FIRE. You should have never entered the state into this contract. I am ashamed I voted for you.

6) Comment by Vernonbrew22 - 22/03/2013

One word: Self-Immolation.

7) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 22/03/2013

Oh good lord, whatnow. That Feinstein "story" is from 2007.

8) Comment by Scrooge - 22/03/2013

All the Obama haters are out having a party today. Its very amusing. Melisse3 is correct. This is not Iraq. Oh that's right - that was no big deal either. An earlier post said "Same old Louisiana Politicians". I would beg to differ. They are worse. Same old hackneyed, nescient partisanship. Yawn.

9) Comment by Scrooge - 22/03/2013

zealer99 makes a good point. Unfettered markets and rigid partisanship are fertile breeding grounds for corruption. "The selfish spirit of commerce knows no country, and feels no passion or principle but that of gain." --Thomas Jefferson 1809.

10) Comment by Scrooge - 22/03/2013

Whatnow writes "My point exactly, which always deludes Progressives" . That is funny, this does make great sport when one has the time.

11) Comment by nenie - 22/03/2013

I really was a Jindal supporter. I thought he would get things straight after the wonderful job he did with Health and Hospitals, but all the departments are really in a fix. It just goes to show the more power you have the more corrupt you will become. GREED, on of the seven deadly sins.

12) Comment by Melisse3 - 22/03/2013

All the Jindal haters are out having a party today. Its very amusing. Schmatzo is correct. This is not Benghazi. Oh that's right - that was no big deal either. An earlier post said "Same old Louisiana Politicians". I would beg to differ. There is a noticable difference in how this is being handled - decisive, corrective action has been taken (at least that is how it appears). Can't say that has always been the case.

13) Comment by arthor - 22/03/2013

The second place bidder was ACS. Funny how the new deputy commissioner over procurement and contracts worked for ACS when this was bid and awarded . The Division will take the lead in bidding the new contract. Hmmm, no conflict there (smirk smirk) this should be interesting. Looks like next award will go to ACS

14) Comment by Whatnow - 22/03/2013

Scrooge, Yeah, two wrongs don't make it right, hypocrite. My point exactly, which always deludes Progressives. Go on now and beat your chest trying to act all superior. I'm not impressed or moved. Preach to your little choir. If Jindal were a Democrat this article wouldn't even be here and neither would you, just like the MSM hasn't reported Feinstein's story.

15) Comment by Warp7 - 22/03/2013

Wow! Nichols claims the Jindal Administration has little tolerance for wrongdoing. No kidding, so why did you all approve this contract in the beginning when so many people questioned it?? Seems like the wrong doing starts with the Jindal Administration, including Nichols and Greenstein who rammed this contract through the process and were unwilling to listen to anyone outside the Jindal Gang! Hopefully the Feds are also looking at how this contractor was awarded a multi-million dollar contract by the Jindal Administration.

16) Comment by gvm - 22/03/2013

The Jindal team members are little more than thugs in Brooks Brothers suits in my opinion. No substantive differences between them and the thugs who reside in the "notorious" 70805 area that everyone loves to point the finger at. On second thought, the Jindal gang is definitely worse - much worse.

17) Comment by nenie - 22/03/2013

Same old Louisiana Politicians. Louisiana already has such a notorious reputation for crooked politicians and unfortunately the behavior continues. Jindal can close the door on the Federal level and the Republicans were hoping for a rising star, instead of a falling star.

18) Comment by RiverRat - 22/03/2013

Bobby said “We have confidence in Bruce.” This is not going to look good on your resume Piyush!

19) Comment by Schmatzo - 22/03/2013

I wouldn't get too invested in a story like this. In a state budget this size, $183 million is "tacos that didn't agree with you". The "Commish" pulling the plug, is more window dressing to show that they "run a tight ship". Regardless of who gets the pie to the face, this ain't Woodard and Bernstein material.

20) Comment by gary - 22/03/2013

@barmart, you do know who is Greenstein's boss? BJ is hands on - he and little tommie teepeewee calls the shots.

21) Comment by phil - 22/03/2013

Bail Out, Bail Out, they all know what is going on?

22) Comment by barmart - 22/03/2013

Greenstein is the responsible one here. He made sure CNSI was given an advantage in the process and that CNSI was awarded the contract. Then he lied about it--to the legisature and to Jindal.

23) Comment by zealer99 - 22/03/2013

I think Jindal and Co. just made the case against farming out large blocks of State government to private businesses. Maybe the private sector can conduct business more efficiently or maybe not but the opportunity for corruption boggles the mind. The main problem that I have seen with State government has been political appointees at the higher levels who are clueless as to how the agency functions. Try the Mike Foster technique if something did not work right and the manager could not fix it, he fired them. I would bet that the State's personnel count could be reduced by 10 percent and function more effectively with the dead weight out of the way.

24) Comment by gvm - 22/03/2013

Jindal has always struck me as being smug and arrogant. He really doesn't seem to have too much respect for the people of this state. What's even more amazing is that many of his chief backers are from the group of folks who will suffer the most under his retrograde and ill-conceived policies.

25) Comment by DMJ - 22/03/2013

Another Jindal idea is illegal. Go figure.

26) Comment by postscript56 - 22/03/2013

The latest from the Jindalites. This is the end result of radical right policies - grand jury probes, constitutionality rulings, laws overturned, falling poll numbers. Even in a state as red as Louisiana the radicals can overreach.

27) Comment by gvm - 22/03/2013

The Jindal juggernaut is on the ropes!

28) Comment by Michael Gary Scott - 22/03/2013

Let's see, a private company from the Beltway with connections to Republican politicians, looks like the feds have finally gotten their hands on RINO Bobby. Let's hope the legislature is paying attention, remember when this contract was awarded Greenstein showed up at the legislature with a lawyer on each side of him and mislead them with a wink and a nod from Bobby. Time for the legislature to wake up and stand up to the little punk.

29) Comment by Scrooge - 22/03/2013

Wasn't the Stelly plan approved by a majority of the voters? Why is Louisiana allowing these ideological buffoons to destroy the state?

30) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 22/03/2013

Of course Greenstein is going under a bus. He'll probably crawl under it himself; that must be where his family is that he surely wants to spend more time with, right about now. But you know ... I just don't see him as the next-to-be-slaughtered lamb. I think he was a wolf in sheep's clothing from the start, as far as Louisiana is concerned. All these A-Aiches know so much more than anyone else... lol ... Popcorn, please.

31) Comment by bettergovt - 22/03/2013

Proverbs 16:18

32) Comment by Bouncer - 22/03/2013

What a pleasure to behold.

33) Comment by dday198 - 22/03/2013

i wonder if it's going to be a cats or a greyhound that gov. jindal throws Greenstein under? one thing for sure he's gonna get thrown under a bus.

34) Comment by Scrooge - 21/03/2013

Hitler didn't last very long but he sure caused some damage

35) Comment by Scrooge - 21/03/2013

Why whatnow persists in making inept, comical posts is incomprehensible but it is great sport to address: Latin term for whatnow's abect fallacy is duo iniurias facere rectum, interesting that last word of the phrase which describes whatnow's incompetent claims of two wrongs make a right maybe whatnow should stick to the ultra right wing white power blogs where reveling in stupidity is revered and logical, reasoned discourse is irrelevant. See whatnow, partisan, prejudicial hateful ignorance cannot stand the light of day, a self- proclaimed Christian should know that. Better stick to hiding under a bushel.

36) Comment by KJNOKIE - 21/03/2013

Between court reversals and lawsuits, Jindal best be more careful. As he continues to demolish our state, the national Republicans are going to notice him more and more and hamper his future plans. And there are some that continually leave comments about him in national stories in national newspapers.

37) Comment by for real - 21/03/2013

brguy, not only: As with any subpoena we delivered the documents requested and then moved forward." Then less than 3 hours later she issues a press release that the contract is being cancelled. The subpoena was issued by U.S. Attorney for the Middle District Don Cazayoux. The documents were to be returned to the grand jury room by Jan. 30. Documents were delivered almost 3 month late, Jindal and his over paid corporate executive types are really on the ball . Any fool can see where the states money is being wasted

38) Comment by zealer99 - 21/03/2013

I think they threw Greenstein under the bus but I do not think that is going to be enough.

39) Comment by barmart - 21/03/2013

Why did it take a FEDERAL GRAND JURY to begin investigations? The Legislature smelled a skunk when this contract was first awarded years ago. WHY did they allow DHH to proceed? Mr. Greenstein did indeed adjust the playing field so that CNSI would be allowed to play. And the Administration was aware of Brucie's shenanigans. Ethical? Transparent? No, on both counts. So Jindal's efforts have been a smoke screen and Louisiana once again has a black eye. No wonder we are at the bottom of all the lists.

40) Comment by for real - 21/03/2013

Gov. Bobby Jindal declined a request to be interviewed on Greenstein’s job status. Jindal’s office released a prepared statement from Paul Rainwater, the governor’s chief of staff that said: “We have confidence in Bruce.” As if Greenstein or Rainwater would say or do anything with out Neapolitan Jindal’s approval. Greenstein you are headed for the bus, the underside that is.

41) Comment by brguy - 21/03/2013

@ for real: Thank you for providing text of the original article. I was not able to locate it on The Advocate's site for my post below.

42) Comment by brguy - 21/03/2013

Interesting that in The Advocate's first article today about the subpoena issued by the federal grand jury on January 30, Nichols stated "As with any subpoena we delivered the documents requested and then moved forward." Then less than 3 hours later she issues a press release that the contract is being cancelled. Would be very interesting to see the emails she sent and received during that 3-hour interval (assuming a private email account wasn't used, as has been the Jindal administration's practice in the past).

43) Comment by for real - 21/03/2013

This is the original article posted on The Advocate at 1:30pm Until they changed it to the Story at link now. QUITE A CHANGE. Federal grand jury looks at Jindal administration contract By Marsha Shuler Capitol news bureau March 21, 2013 2 Comments A federal grand jury is investigating the Jindal administration’s award of a $185 million contract, according to a subpoena. The Baton Rouge-based federal grand jury subpoenaed documents related to the state’s awarding of the contract for Medicaid claims processing to a company for which the state’s health chief once worked. Client Network Services Inc., called CNSI and based in Gaithersburg, Md., was awarded the contract in 2011 amid some complaints that the company “low balled” the price and made erroneous assumptions in its proposal. The contract was awarded by the state Department of Health and Hospitals and signed off on by the Jindal administration amid complaints from other vendors. At the time, state health secretary Bruce Greenstein, a one-time CNSI executive, said he took himself out of the contract dealings. Documents revealed Greenstein influenced a document change that allowed CNSI to compete. Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols said the state Division of Administration complied with the federal subpoena and delivered the documents requested. She said the subpoena was handled by the division’s general counsel and she only recently became aware of its existence. “They processed the request like all subpoena requests. They simply produced the documents and moved forward,” Nichols said. “We have zero tolerance for any wrongdoing and are fully prepared to cooperate.” Nichols released a copy of the subpoena in response to a public records request filed by The Advocate. The subpoena was issued by U.S. Attorney for the Middle District Don Cazayoux. The documents were to be returned to the grand jury room by Jan. 30. Cazayoux declined comment Thursday. The subpoena sought: • All documents submitted by the four proposers in response to the state’s solicitation of proposals. The proposers were CNSI, ACS State Healthcare, LLC; HP Enterprise Services, LLC, and Molina Medicaid Solutions. • All financial information, including but not limited to financial statements, income statements, balance sheets, and statements of profit and loss, submitted by the firms in connection with or response to the proposal. • Documents sufficient to show the date and time at which each response to the proposal was received by the state of Louisiana. Greenstein was not immediately available for comment. The state Department of Health and Hospitals released a prepared statement through its communications office in response to questions: “DHH does not have any details regarding an investigation of the MMIS (Medicaid Management Information Systems) contract award. DHH has not received a subpoena and to our knowledge no employee at DHH has received a subpoena.” CNSI takes over the processing of Medicaid claims from doctors, hospitals and others who provide health care services to the poor in 2014. At that time, the full conversion from current vendor Molina would occur. Nichols said she found out about the subpoena March 15 from the attorney general’s office, which advised caution and to “just be aware of (CNSI contract) amendments in general.” The CNSI contract has been amended once since it was signed, increasing its $185 million cost by about $9 million. Some work that current vendor Molina was contracted to do, has been moved to CNSI. A second contract amendment proposed by the state health agency would have added $40 million more to the contract to cover advanced fraud detection, in both pre-claims payment and post-claims payment. The amendment that would have increased the contract was sidelined recently by the Division of Administration. Nichols said the size of the contract addition gave her pause. “I felt it was a large amount for an amendment and in consideration of full transparency and full competition it would be prudent to do a request for proposal,” Nichols said. Nichols said the decision to seek new proposals for the expanded work was made before she knew about the subpoena. When the contract was approved, wary legislators said they would keep an eye on contract changes. Legislators are required to review contract changes over a specific amount. State health agency executives said CNSI had agreed to live with the price for the work in the contract. At the time, that CNSI was picked because it submitted the lowest price, according state health agency officials. The firm set a $184.9 million price for the 10-year pact. The highest projected cost was $394 million for HP Enterprise Services of Palo Alto, Calif. ACS State Healthcare of Atlanta submitted the second lowest price at $238 million. The aborted $40 million contract amendment would have put the price at close to what ACS offered. Molina, the current vendor, was disqualified because its score in the technical evaluation of proposals did not hit the score required to advance. 1:30pm

44) Comment by BRLA1982 - 21/03/2013

@Whatnow, reading anything on www.wnd.com will turn you into a vegetable.

45) Comment by brguy - 21/03/2013

No doubt about it, the only reason the contract was cancelled is because Jindal wanted the whole matter quashed before the national media caught wind of it.

46) Comment by gvm - 21/03/2013

What about all of those no bid contracts that went to Haliburton and all of those other bloodsucking profiteers during the run up to, and during, the debacle in Iraq?

47) Comment by Whatnow - 21/03/2013

Hey, Dawson...how about this one... Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has abruptly walked away from her responsibilities with the Senate Military Construction Appropriations Subcommittee after a report linked her votes to the financial well-being of her husband’s companies, which received billions of dollars worth of military construction contracts she approved. Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2007/03/40845/#oAsQrJJBlRlOqGH3.99

48) Comment by crazycajun - 21/03/2013

Ouch....that's gotta leave mark, huh booby? It's called KARMA booby. If ever there was dirt bag that deserved it, ur the poster child. LOL

49) Comment by zealer99 - 21/03/2013

"what will you do when they come for you?"

50) Comment by brguy - 21/03/2013

It's sad that we now have to rely entirely on the Federal and State justice systems for any type of checks and balances of the executive branch. This results from the majority of our state legislators being completely spineless under this Jindal regime.

51) Comment by Toldyouso - 21/03/2013

When are they going to look into Alan Levine's involvement in the more recent discussions on privatizing hospitals. It's the same deal there though the contracts may not yet be finalized. Also worthy of close scrutiny is the Teepell OnMessage relationship with the administration. Finally, Jindal's own personal wealth not all of which may be in his name.

52) Comment by Schmatzo - 21/03/2013

"Anew", the contractor was terminated based on consultation with the AG. So, yes you can terminate contractors. When you contract with an agency to do this type of work, it is usually a staff of people who have formerly worked for CMS, or one of it's divisions or agencies, who know the "ins and outs", what works, what doesn't. That is what you are paying your "$50 per hour for. You could not duplicate the same expertise by paying someone off the street for $12 per hour. Again, contracting specialized services to help manage complex programs like these need not be interpreted as an evil conspiracy to eradicate honest hardworking public employees. Nothing personal, and I understand this is an issue you have strong feelings about. It is good that people question programs like this. Thanks.

53) Comment by Dawson - 21/03/2013

The most corrupt thing Jindal did was give a few billion to the "green companies" like Solyndra and steal the equity from GM lien holders and give the company to the unions. Oh wait....

54) Comment by GardenVariety - 21/03/2013

Reason tells me you're right AnewKINDofFeeling--just holding onto any fiber of hope at this point. I also love to imagine that officials from the Justice Dept. and FBI are en route. One can dream.... But thanks for the reality check, ANKOF.

55) Comment by Ben Yay - 21/03/2013

That contract deal was fishy from the start. Add this latest problem to the list of reality checks (court rulings, plunging poll numbers, CPAC debacle) that are landing body blows to Jindal.

56) Comment by Scrooge - 21/03/2013

see Humpty-Dumpty

57) Comment by AnewKINDofFEELIN - 21/03/2013

Don't get your hopes up, GardenVariety. It's all about the fall guy. Ms. Nichols has to be nervous. I'm sure she'll get a cush job with some connected consultant to cushion the fall.

58) Comment by AnewKINDofFEELIN - 21/03/2013

Schmatzo, you can't just end a contract without cause like you are implying. Also, you still have to have government employees to manage the contractors, so the overall cost skyrockets. You have contractors being paid $50 per hour for an employee who only makes $12 per hour, all while the contractor's employees are housed in government facilities at no overhead cost to the contractor. Seems efficient...

59) Comment by Schmatzo - 21/03/2013

Let us not compare "apples and oranges". Contracting for management of provider contracts has been around for a long time, for the most part, the expertise to manage complex and specialized contracts and the myriad compliance issues that go along with it, is not always feasible or practical at the government level. At least with these guys, you can fire them or not renew their contract. If this was a state department, it could resemble Dr. Demento's "Cockroach that ate Cincinnati". It would devour large chunks of your budget, you couldn't get rid of it, and it would likely multiply endlessly. In other words not much different from a lot of state agencies currently in existence.

60) Comment by for real - 21/03/2013

Cat is out he bag now. This is the tip of the iceberg. Jindal has problems following the law when it comes to all this privatization ALEC demands to make profit for its members http://louisianavoice.com/2013/03/09/letter-to-u-s-attorney-louisianavoice-claims-continuing-pattern-of-rfp-bid-rigging-vendor-favortism-at-ogb-doa/ http://louisianavoice.com/2011/05/19/heres-how-privatization-works-first-get-the-contract-then-sell-the-company-for-a-profit-and-walk/ http://louisianavoice.com/2011/12/12/doa-apparently-allowed-several-major-violations-of-contract-through-poor-oversight-management-of-orm-privatization/

61) Comment by Pakistani - 21/03/2013

Smells like dead fish...

62) Comment by beabea - 21/03/2013

Private (i.e. for-profit) company trying to make money by taking over a function the government used to do on a non-profit basis. And in competing with other private companies for that lucrative government contract, it appears that personal connections may have inappropriately come into play--which now needs to be investigated, at taxpayer expense. And yet we are constantly told (often by people whose friends and political supporters make money off government contracts) that privatization is supposed to save us money.

63) Comment by GardenVariety - 21/03/2013

Could it be?! Could this be the card that, once pulled, begins the fall of Jindal's house of cards? Please, please, please let it be...