Gerald gets 70 years in deaths

DWI driver killed seven in ’12 wreck

“I want Brett Gerrald to know  we are a loving family. We do forgive you,  but justice must be served.” john Gaines Jr.

Saying Brett Gerald knowingly created the risk of death and injury by drinking and driving, a state district judge sentenced the former Greensburg resident Tuesday to seven consecutive 10-year prison terms for killing seven people in a May 30 head-on collision in East Feliciana Parish.

Gerald, who pleaded guilty to seven vehicular homicide counts in December, also was fined $14,000.

Before 20th Judicial District Judge William G. Carmichael pronounced the sentences, Gerald, 30, struggling through tears, told the victims’ family members he was deeply sorry for their losses and that his thoughts and prayers go out to them.

Gerald called out each victim’s name during the statement and said he is regretful and sorry for the outcome “of my thoughtlessness and intoxication.”

“I trust in God that he will heal your pain because I know I cannot,” Gerald told the families, adding that he will be an advocate to prevent others from “drinking and driving in the future.”

Carmichael said Gerald’s conduct “caused the deaths of seven human beings and the devastation of several families, including your own.”

Carmichael sentenced Gerald to serve 10 years on each of the seven counts and ruled that five years of each 10-year sentence, or 35 years, would be served without the possibility of probation or parole.

Gerald, however, is eligible to earn “good time” toward each day of the 70-year sentence, said Tommy Damico, his attorney.

Parole and “good time” are two separate avenues for an inmate to gain early release. When an inmate applies for parole, he appears before a state parole board and asks to be released early. The parole board either approves or denies the request.

The other avenue for early release is to earn good time from the state Department of Public Safety and Correction. Under a law passed last year, the prison terms given for nonviolent and nonsex-related offenses may be reduced for good behavior at the rate of 1.5 days for every day an offender serves in prison, Corrections Department spokeswoman Pam Laborde said.

Damico said he believes his client will be eligible for a good-time release in about 23 years.

Laborde said she cannot comment on specific sentences.

Gerald’s pickup collided with a car occupied by seven Baton Rouge residents returning home from Clinton church services.

Five people in the 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis driving on La. 67 about a mile south of the Comite River died instantly in the collision with Gerald’s 2007 Dodge pickup: the driver, Brenda Gaines, 64; Denise Gaines, 33; Diamond Johnson, 12; Jyran Johnson, 6; and Angela Matthews Mosely, 36.

Two other passengers, Willie Gaines Jr., 15, and Rogerick Johnson Jr., 13, also of Baton Rouge, died several days later.

All but Mosely were members of the same extended family.

As a result of the pleas, Gerald faced five- to 30-year prison sentences on each count and possible fines ranging from $2,000 to $15,000 per count.

A state trooper who investigated the crash testified earlier that an analysis of a blood sample taken at Lane Regional Medical Center showed Gerald’s blood-alcohol content was 0.15 percent.

In Louisiana, a blood-alcohol content of 0.08 percent is considered presumptive evidence of drunken driving. Gerald had three other DWI arrests before the crash and one conviction.

Seven people related to the victims gave emotional statements during the sentencing hearing.

“I don’t want you to think in no way that I hate you. I don’t. I will keep you in my prayers,” Otis J. Mosely, Angela Mosely’s husband, told Gerald.

The Rev. John Gaines Sr., who lost his wife, daughter and two grandchildren, said, “God has kept us with sane minds” despite the loss to his family.

“All I want people to know is that he (Gerald) is forgiven,” Gaines said.

“I want Brett Gerald to know we are a loving family,” John Gaines Jr. said. “We do forgive you, but justice must be served.”

John Gaines Jr. said later his family will become involved in efforts to strengthen the state’s drunken driving laws.

“We have forgiven you, brother,” added Ray C. Gilbert, speaking for his nephew, Roderick Johnson Sr.

Alvin Matthews, brother of Angela Mosely, said his sister would want him to forgive Gerald.

“However, I find it very difficult to do so. Your unremorseful face has been forever engraved in my mind,” Matthews said, adding later he is satisfied with the sentence.

Addressing complaints that Gerald did not express his regrets earlier, Damico said Gerald did so on his advice.

“That was me. Don’t blame him,” Damico said.

Following the hearing, members of Gerald’s family met briefly outside the courthouse with the Gaines family to express their condolences.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (28)


1) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 13/03/2013

doesn't take measures

2) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 13/03/2013

Whether he got 70 yrs or 170 yrs is meaningless if the courts take measures to remove drunk drivers from our roads permanently. Boiled Crabs had a good idea on forfeiting the vehicles. This would be a good step for sooner or later they would run out of cars to drive or borrow. Second offenders should be locked up, no if's, ands, or buts. Third offenders should be on the way to Angola, Period. Any one who commits a first offense DWI, may have made a terrible mistake but anymore than that they could care less about the rest of us. But remember Mr. Gerald could have committed this deadly act, if this was only his first time behind the wheel.

3) Comment by nimby? - 13/03/2013

thats 70 years he won't be able to get behind the wheel of a vehicle ...

4) Comment by ABayouBoy - 13/03/2013

@ HMaltravers, Can't you see that your attitude is no different than that of a Muslim terrorist?. Because of your vindictiveness, must consider you a cretin as well. Gerald should be punished for his actions, yes. But 70 years is simply not acceptable. No punishment meted out will bring back those who were his victims. The taxpayers will thus support Gerald for the rest of his life - both during and after the end of his jail term. As he will be to old to work, and will receive SSI benefits after a lifetime as a non-productive ex- con. I must agree with foldgers. Vengeance is not the answer here.

5) Comment by chevyman - 13/03/2013

I understand the pain and devastation that this man has caused this family, My sister who's birthday is today was killed by a drunk driver in 1986, she had three small children who were left without a mother! So I have lived through it. I also understand that this young man this young man did not go out one day and decide to kill anybody, this was a horrible thing that could have been avoided had the system done it's part. But for this young man to be locked away for 30 years is nothing more than vengence, There are many ways that this man could be punished or made to educate others about the mistakes that were made by both him and the system, And for nothing to be said about seven people piling up in that car without proper safety equipment well that says a lot about the same system. I think that it is wrong for the family to steer the out come of the punishment that is handed down, and we all know that is just what happened here, This is a case of vengence not justice.

6) Comment by wtf-over - 13/03/2013

ogt - You're right. It's likely that none of them would have survived even if wearing seat belts. Some wrecks are just too destructive for seat belts to be effective. On that topic, it's amazing how many people still do not wear seat belts, or at least put their kids in seat belts/safety seats. I see kids in cars on the road all the time without any safety restraints on. How much public education can someone possibly ignore? It's unacceptable to allow a child to be unrestrained in a car in 2013. A wreck at just 20 MPH is more than enough deceleration to throw a kid out of a window, or into a windshield, causing major injury or death. I don't mean to sound insensitive to the victims of this accident. It's just that this seat belt topic came up in this thread and it's a widespread problem. I'm actually an opponent to adult seat belt laws. I believe in the right to make stupid decisions as long as no one else is directly affected. But children should be forced to wear them until they are old enough to make informed stupid decisions.

7) Comment by HMaltravers - 13/03/2013

All of you sympathetic to this cretin would be singing a different tune if YOUR family been among those killed.

8) Comment by foldgers - 13/03/2013

For those that say he didn't intend to kill anyone and it was too harsh of a punishment, what if a drunk grabbed a gun, shot it in the air and a few moments later, the bullet came down on the other side of the neighborhood and hit your baby in the head? An illegal act that caused a death. Yes, an accident, but only caused by an illegal act in the first place, heck, even if the person who shot the gun was sober, what would you feel should be the sentence? In cases like this, I say, leave the sentence up to the victim's family, any amount of time, but not the death penalty. And at any time, the family can reduce the sentence if they feel they end up forgiving that person down the road. Either way, I see some good that can come from this. He should volunteer to talk to 1st time offenders, maybe order 1st offenders to go to "classes" where this guy is the speaker. Show these people the real life consequences of driving drunk, even if you feel that you are safe to drive. Maybe have him go to schools and give speeches about this experience, before the young students make the same mistake. I am NOT saying the death of that family was a good thing, but I do believe some good can come from their deaths. I just think that making this guy sit in jail all day everyday, would be a waste. Let him go talk to people, not reduce his sentence, but spend it trying to prevent tragedies like this from occurring so many times in the future.

9) Comment by Thurston_Howell_III - 13/03/2013

This sad. Regardless of color or race, a family of 7 died at the hands of a drunk driver.

10) Comment by ogt - 13/03/2013

for everyone commenting on the lack of seat belts, its wouldnt have made a difference. The articles from when the crash happened had pics of the car The engine compartment was in the back seat, The car was unrecognizable. They would have been dead with race car restraints and helmets

11) Comment by Vernonbrew22 - 13/03/2013

I feel for the families and believe the system will and should let this guy out in appx. A decade. That punishment will be realistic. Not 70 years. Come on.

12) Comment by nimby? - 13/03/2013

we forget , forgive too easily ...

13) Comment by yep - 13/03/2013

"After the first DWI the judge and the DA should be charged as an accessory." Absolutely!!! Although, had the occupants of the "1996 Mercury Grand Marquis" (a car that is designed to carry 5, 6 at most passengers) been properly restrained there may not have been 7 deaths.

14) Comment by ABayouBoy - 13/03/2013

@ ceeli, You are wrong. It was an accident. By someone who was foolish and irresponsible enough to drive drunk again after three prior offenses. I cannot forget what he has done, but I can forgive him for his mistake - which cost the lives of seven innocent victims. I also believe that Gerald is no longer the same individual that he was previously. I believe that the accident had a profound effect on the man and he is forever changed because of it. He must live with what he has done for the rest of his life. I do think that 70 years was a little extreme, but I can understand that an example must be set also. Maybe one day, an appeal to a compassionate judge and jury can be made. A hard lesson learned....by all those affected.

15) Comment by spqr - 13/03/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

16) Comment by Watson - 12/03/2013

He is guilty and deserves to be punished and my thoughts and prayers go out to the victims families. But I have not once heard nor read anything about the victims and the wearing of seat belts. From the information that I have seen, there were seven people in a car the could only have six seat belts. Just saying...

17) Comment by Holinyx - 12/03/2013

it's a shame that i see people busted on this website all the time with 3+ prior DWIs and they are not getting real jail time. we have to wait until they kill a bunch of people before we actually send them to jail.

18) Comment by ceeli - 12/03/2013

This was vehicular HOMICIDE... it was not an "accident". He should have gotten life in prison with no possibility of parole.

19) Comment by BoiledCrabs - 12/03/2013

There's no incentive for drunks to stay off the road. When someone is found guilty of driving drunk they should forfiet the vehicle they were stopped in. It should be sold at auction. And they should not be allowed to ever own, rent, or lease another vehicle. And borrowed vehicles should be confiscated as well and sold. There really needs to be some common sense with these drunks but because so many lawyers, judges, and politicians are also drunks it will never change.

20) Comment by ABayouBoy - 12/03/2013

@ jesuisintelligente. I agree. I can only hope that the ones who need to read this article will do so.

21) Comment by jesuisintelligente - 12/03/2013

Every young person, every college student, every high school student NEEDS to read this and think about this. One stupid decision - and your life is bascially "over." This guy didn't set out one day and say "I'm going to kill some people today." But, his stupidity killed innocent people and sent him to jail for many years. Think before you act!!!

22) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 12/03/2013

LOL at Ivy calling 70 years light. What exactly would you consider harsh since the life expectancy of humans is barely 67 years currently. With a brain like yours it doesn't surprise me that you make a weak attempt at playing the race card.

23) Comment by mh1949 - 12/03/2013

Put him in a cell with Lavern and let them keep each other company. They both got off extremely light considering they both murdered multiple people. Crazycajun I agree that the judges need to be held accountable when they release someone to continue their crimes. I could promise lives would be saved, number of multiple offenders would drop and the number of multiple DWIs would be drastically reduced.

24) Comment by twinkie1cat - 12/03/2013

I think the sentence was a little steep. The family is in heaven. They have a very good life now. Plus the lungs of one of the boys went to a woman who was dying and needed a transplant. But he is going to spend at least 35 years in hell. His parents will be right there with him, their spirits broken. When he gets out he will be old enough to retire having after having no life at all. If he does not get paroled in 35 it's a life sentence. I would have given him 20 and required that he serve all of it.>>>>>>> The thing is that the DWI laws need to be stiffer from the start so they serve as a deterrent. First one you get an interlock, drive only to school, work, medical appointments and church, education and 50 hours of community service. Second that plus a hundred hours and regular injections of a drug that will make you sick if you touch alcohol for a year, substance abuse counseling and 90 days in jail. Third: jail 1-5 years plus the above with the drugs for life. Kill someone---20 years or 10 if it is your first DWI.

25) Comment by crazycajun - 12/03/2013

After the first DWI the judge and the DA should be charged as an accessory. This would end this situation from happening again for good.

26) Comment by welcometothebananarepublic - 12/03/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

27) Comment by Springer98 - 12/03/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

28) Comment by Whatnow - 12/03/2013

Ivy what a racist statement! I think you may want to look at how many repeat offenders there are in the black community.

29) Comment by foldgers - 12/03/2013

Ivy, please, don't bring race into this. I also agree he got off light and believed he deserved life, at LEAST. But, I am pretty sure it wasn't because he was white that he got less than that. How did OJ get off his murder rap? Or was he falsely accused because he was black and the woman who died was white? With your thinking, I am glad you are not a judge or on a jury.

30) Comment by Ivy - 12/03/2013

3 other DUIs? And all he'll get is 70 years, which, if the family isn't vigilant, will miraculously be reduced. He will get out. The justice system is not working correctly. He got off light because he was white.

31) Comment by BRmoderate - 12/03/2013

good riddance