Jindal proposes $47M in property sales in budget

Advocate staff photo by TRAVIS SPRADLING -- Deputy Commissioner of Administration Ray Stockstill, left, Ternisa Hutchinson, center, State Deputy Director of Planning & Budget, and Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols smile during an exchange between legislators and Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne, as they wait to present the new fiscal year state budget to the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget, at the State Capitol in this Feb. 22, 2013, Advocate staff photo.. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by TRAVIS SPRADLING -- Deputy Commissioner of Administration Ray Stockstill, left, Ternisa Hutchinson, center, State Deputy Director of Planning & Budget, and Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols smile during an exchange between legislators and Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne, as they wait to present the new fiscal year state budget to the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget, at the State Capitol in this Feb. 22, 2013, Advocate staff photo..

An art deco landmark in downtown Baton Rouge, a slice of a St. Tammany Parish psychiatric hospital campus and prime property near the Louisiana Capitol need to be sold within the next year to make Gov. Bobby Jindal’s budget balance.

Jindal proposes unloading six tracts of state property around south Louisiana to drum up $47 million, money that he’s using to help pay for public colleges in his budget proposal for the 2013-14 fiscal year that starts July 1.

None of the deals are done, and lawmakers have been reticent about making some of the sales, which need legislative approval before “for sale” signs can be planted on the sites.

The governor’s chief budget analyst, Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols, describes the sales as practical.

“As state government has consolidated and reduced its footprint, it makes sense to sell underutilized state government property, returning it to more productive use and generate savings that can be re-invested in services to taxpayers,” she said in a statement Tuesday.

Lawmakers question whether the sales will be done in time and if it’s appropriate to budget dollars that aren’t yet in hand.

“I don’t want to come back again and face some of the tough cuts that have to be made” if the dollars don’t pan out, said House Speaker Chuck Kleckley, R-Lake Charles.

Nichols said buyers are identified for nearly all the property.

As she presented Jindal’s budget proposal to lawmakers, Nichols said it was reasonable to use dollars the administration anticipated to have in hand, rather than make more reductions in state programs and services.

State Sen. Ed Murray, D-New Orleans, noted that the state still doesn’t have all the money in hand for a lease of the New Orleans Adolescent Hospital that the Jindal administration used to balance the current year’s budget, with only four months remaining in the fiscal year.

If the new property sales proposed by the Jindal administration hit snags and the money doesn’t arrive as expected, Louisiana’s colleges would face a new round of cuts under the governor’s spending plans.

Used to balance the governor’s budget are anticipated sales of the Point Clair Farm, a nearly 2,200 acre-site in Iberville Parish that is an unused piece of prison property; a now empty 1970s-era Baton Rouge office building called Wooddale Towers; a portion of the Southeast Louisiana Hospital campus in St. Tammany Parish; and the State Office Building, an art deco-era property in downtown Baton Rouge.

The governor’s budget also assumes the state will bring in $4.8 million from the sale of the former insurance building across the street from the Capitol, currently the site of a parking deck.

Several of the sales could face hurdles.

For example, lawmakers have agreed to sell Wooddale Towers, but for a required minimum bid of more than twice the amount anticipated by the Jindal administration.

For the old insurance building site, dueling appraisals greatly differ on its value, and lawmakers have expressed reservations about selling real estate so close Louisiana’s historic Capitol building to private investors rather than using it for government office space.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (16)


1) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 27/02/2013

FOLDGERS: I wish you were correct with respect to the payment of property taxes. One can only hope the companies purchasing the state owned properties would pay property taxes, however, I seriously doubt they will. Why? Because, our illustrious, intelligent governor has the ability to and has not been shy in handing out property tax exemptions as part of his business incentive program. It would not be surprising nor out of character for Jindal to “wave” his “gubernatorial wand” and provide the purchaser(s) property tax exemptions. Now, a gubernatorial exemption is effective on both the state and local governments. Therefore, there is no way for the local governments to benefit from the sale(s)of such properties from either property taxes nor a sales taxes. Real estate sales are, by virtue of a 2011 amendment, exempted from sales taxes. Real estate sales are therefore exempted from state, local, parish sales taxes. In effect, from a property and sales tax standpoint, there is no way the state nor the local governments can/will benefit from the sale of such properties.

2) Comment by foldgers - 27/02/2013

Well, before anyone accuses me of not being business minded, as I graduated in Finance, I do feel like the state should sell all unnecessary property. BUT, I do not think they should use it to balance the budget. Rainy day fund earning interest, or like I stated before, beautify our state somehow. And again, if these properties are sold, the new owners will, guess what all you tax loving people, PAY PROPERTY TAXES! It is a win win. NOW, I may wrong there, as I do not know for sure that if the state owns, let's say 500 acres, in Denham Springs, does the state pay property taxes to Denham? I tried looking it up, but I would just assume no. It would be more money to local governments if I am right.

3) Comment by crazycajun - 27/02/2013

Mel, yeah right I believe that foolishness. This is not downsizing for the sake of downsizing, this all smoke and mirrors to give the impression the budget is balanced. Let's just you and I just sit back until mid year and see if a shortfall just appears out of thin air.

4) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 27/02/2013

Judging by some of the comments here, Kevin Reilly was right.

5) Comment by Melisse3 - 27/02/2013

Actually Crazy, I did major in Business - 2 degrees in fact. And yes, down-sizing and shedding useless property, equipment, inventory is all part of business, whether private or government. Oh, but you obviously believe that size of government can never decrease and any property the government acquires should be kept by the government for eternity. That is a nice, simplistic world you live in. Enjoy.

6) Comment by crazycajun - 27/02/2013

Mel, obviously by your comment you did not major in business. Being you haven't, it would be impossible to explain the reasoning to you.That being said, enjoy your little ride with booby at the helm because by now it's too late to tell you you're on the Titanic

7) Comment by foldgers - 27/02/2013

While I do not agree using the money made from the sale of these properties to pay for expenses in the budget, I do agree with the state selling this land that it isn't using nor needs. BUT, they should add the money to our rainy day fund and let it earn interest. Or heck, use it to update many schools in the state. Or use it for some project to bring the state into the 21st century, including some schools. I am sure there are hundreds of millions of dollars that the state could receive by selling unused property all over the state. Why not earn something from it, like interest, why not make schools look modern, why not make the state look appealing to people from around the country so they would want to come here by cleaning it up or something. I don't know. I don't think the government should be in the land owning business... not to mention, how much in property taxes is the state giving up by owning said properties?

8) Comment by Melisse3 - 27/02/2013

Crazycajun -- You really want your state government to hold on to useless property like Wooddale Tower? Seriously? You might be the only person who thinks the state should hold on to that property (and others). I get the impression that if Jndal proposed purchasing property, y'all would burn him for that too. We get it - you hate Bobby Jindal.

9) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 27/02/2013

Before you people go to bashing Bobby "jump ship" Jindal too badly, remember, he didn't appoint himself, your neighbors elected him. Attack them.

10) Comment by crazycajun - 27/02/2013

Business 101...You don't sell your assets. You may need them someday.

11) Comment by Crawdaddy - 27/02/2013

So from the guy who ran on a platform that is "wrong" to use one-time revenue for recurring expenses, Jindal proposes using roughly $400 million of one-time revenue (much of it contingent) to avoid a 19% cut (his figures) in higher education for FY 2013-14. What about FY 2014-15? Now that is leadership! The legislature should just say no....

12) Comment by Warp7 - 27/02/2013

Here we go selling away the State of Louisiana. Is there nothing sacred to this joke of a governor and his puppet staff! Sounds like he has figured a way to pay back is financial supporters by giving them access to State property.

13) Comment by swinham - 27/02/2013

Can we be far from the day when the governor proposes the sale and lease-back of the State Capitol?

14) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 27/02/2013

Odd, didn't notice any mention here of radical spending cuts.

15) Comment by gjnyc - 26/02/2013

I live in Iberville Parish, I hope the 2200 Acres will not be sold to a chemical plant

16) Comment by crazycajun - 26/02/2013

Smoke and mirrors along with onetime monies along with we hope revenues get better. That has been the L'il booby budgets four the last five years. Ya'll really voted a genius in that position. It's not really hard to fool the public. All u need is a key ring with shiny keys to jingle in front of them. LOL