Metro Council debates allowing voters to elect police chief

The East Baton Rouge Parish Metro Council this week will weigh the pros and cons of allowing voters to elect future Baton Rouge police chiefs, a discussion fueled by the controversial ouster of Police Chief Dewayne White.

“I just believe that something has to happen in terms of the way it’s done now,” said C. Denise Marcelle, the councilwoman pushing the discussion item. “I don’t like the way it was handled this time.”

Such an amendment to the Plan of Government, if approved by voters, would strip the mayor-president of his authority to hire and fire the police chief. But unless a majority of the council agrees and calls for a special election — a costly undertaking several council members said they oppose — the move is unlikely to affect the search for the city’s next police chief.

“You’re talking months, maybe years,” Councilwoman Ronnie Edwards said of the time it would take to put the measure on the ballot and implement the change. Edwards said she is taking a “wait and see” approach to the discussion.

“If the position is an elected position, they’re going to be accountable to the community,” she said. “On the opposite side, I think it could perhaps polarize the two positions between the administration and the police, especially as it relates to budgetary differences.”

Council members offered differing views of the potential benefits and pitfalls of electing the police chief, but several expressed interest in a “compromise” that would call for the council to approve the mayor-president’s appointment and termination of police chiefs.

“I don’t want somebody being able to hire and fire a chief as they see fit. I think that’s bad business,” said Councilman Trae Welch. “There’s got to be some sort of checks and balances.”

Allowing council members to approve the mayor’s appointment of police chief also would require a change to the Plan of Government and would have to go before the voters, Councilman Joel Boé said.

“I’m going to throw it out there as just another option to consider,” Boé said, adding he opposes switching to an elected chief.

Marcelle said she remains undecided as to whether an elected chief is the way to go.

“It will be interesting for me to hear the public’s opinion about it,” she said. “As a council, we need to listen to the constituents and people in our community.”

Marcelle, who has been among White’s most vocal supporters, tried to bring the issue up for discussion at a council meeting earlier this month. The item required the rules be waived, which drew an objection from Councilman John Delgado.

Councilman Chandler Loupe, who chairs the Metro Council as mayor pro tem, said he opposes changing to an elected police chief. He also said he doesn’t think the council should have veto power over the mayor’s pick.

“I do not see how we could make informed decisions when we do not control and or direct any aspect of police operations,” Loupe wrote in an email.

In Louisiana, 98 municipalities have appointed police chiefs, while 210 elect their police chiefs, according to figures provided by the Secretary of State’s Office.

The state’s largest cities have appointed police chiefs, while many smaller communities elect theirs, including Baker, Zachary, Port Allen and Gonzales.

Slaughter Police Chief Walter Smith, a retired Baton Rouge police major, said he wouldn’t be in his current job if it were an appointed position. Among the advantages elected chiefs enjoy, Smith said, is a degree of autonomy that allows them to manage the department as they see fit without having to be afraid of ruffling the wrong feathers.

“It gives a person four years to be in a position to do a job, and then the people can decide. If they don’t like what they have, they can choose,” Smith said. “It takes a little time to convert and manage something to where it needs to be. You don’t have that in an appointed situation. Basically you’re there until they want you to go.”

The firing of White, less than two years into his term, drew praise from the police union but criticism from some community leaders.

The ousted chief, who is appealing to the Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board, has been accused of insubordination and repeatedly violating departmental policy.

Mayor-President Kip Holden told reporters last week that the community deserves a better chief, referring to White as “the master of deception.” White, in turn, accused Holden of micromanaging the police department, a claim that has fanned discussion of whether future police chiefs should be directly accountable to voters.

Delgado characterized the discussion as a “knee-jerk reaction.”

“The purported reason for doing it is to de-politicize things, and I cannot imagine that there would be any way to inject more politics into this situation than to make the chief an elected position,” Delgado said.

Greg Phares, a former Baton Rouge police chief, said the question to be answered is whether it’s worthwhile to change a system that has “worked well” for decades over one episode.

“It’s rarely good government to solve personnel problems with huge changes in plans of government,” Phares said. “You solve personnel problems by replacing personnel, and you’re able to do that every four years in Baton Rouge with the mayor.”

Phares also served for a time as East Baton Rouge Parish sheriff. He was named to the position in December 2006 after former Sheriff Elmer Litchfield resigned for health reasons but lost to the current sheriff, Sid Gautreaux, in an election the following year.

Boé said the controversy over White’s firing could lend momentum to the push to merge the Baton Rouge Police Department and the East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff’s Office.

“This couldn’t happen at a better time,” Boé said. “Our first unification committee meeting is March 6, so I think it will only give us additional reasons why unification is a good idea.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (24)


1) Comment by NewsReader - 26/02/2013

MBW, what are you talking about? The number of elections has been cut down to just 4 basic ones during the ensuing years and all items are consolidated. The only times/reasons there are additional ones is if the legislature changes something, an office needs to be filled within a stipulated time, or there are run-offs (guess we could solve that one by just tossing a coin?). Go to the SoS website and look for yourself.

2) Comment by phil - 26/02/2013

Electing the police chief would be silly, like it is already being done in other cities? Those silly people are so silly.

3) Comment by MBW - 25/02/2013

Louisiana's voting system needs serious reform. Condense all of the elections onto 1 or 2 days....don't have 50 different elections during the year that only 5 people show up for. And stop requiring a stupid constitutional amendment everytime some random town wants to build a building or have a new school district. It's just stupid. Oh, and how about the novel idea of putting a sign in front of the polling places so that people actually know an election is taking place??

4) Comment by MBW - 25/02/2013

An election for police chief would be silly....and it would be yet another among the dozens of miscellaneous elections that LA has in any given year. Just another election that only 10% of voters would show up for.

5) Comment by MBW - 25/02/2013

If you don't like who the mayor appoints, vote for a different mayor. But the public doesn't need to vote for police chief any more than they need to vote for Head Librarian, Dog Catcher, or Payroll officer.

6) Comment by MBW - 25/02/2013

If the mayor is the one setting priorities in terms of public safety policy, then he/she should be able to appoint someone who will carryout those policies. We already have enough turf wars among our elected officials as it is.

7) Comment by MBW - 25/02/2013

No. The police chief should NOT be an elected position. The public does not know enough about the details of the job to make an informed decision. It would just be more politics and more polarization over symbolic issues rather than about having the right person for the job.

8) Comment by Chucky - 25/02/2013

Let the people vote on it.

9) Comment by BRmoderate - 25/02/2013

sorry for typo's...should read "save money by the elimination"

10) Comment by BRmoderate - 25/02/2013

Dissolve the BRPD. Expand the EBR Sherrif's office by hiring the good EBRPD officers and create a dedicated unit to serving the BR city limits. Save money but elimination the duplication of resources we currently have.

11) Comment by phil - 25/02/2013

Good point about the dog catcher and the fire chief. Of course I could take a view from the other direction. How about we just let Governor Jindal appoint all of the Mayors in the State? Maybe we could just let President Obama appoint all of the Governors too? Think of all of the money we could save on State and local elections. I think the question is, where do YOU want to draw the line? I personally believe a police chief is important enough of a position that the position should be an elected position.

12) Comment by phil - 25/02/2013

This is interesting to me to see that people you might think would believe in the democratic process also think that one person who appoints everyone is a better choice than being able to elect the police chief, etc. Personally I would prefer to have the entire voting public to decide instead of just one person making the decision and also just one person having almost total control over the police chief. If we elect a bad police chief then I believe there are methods to get him/her out of the position, like a recall etc. (Perhaps we also need to look into that for some other elected officials right now.) Some people are also not familiar with some boards in this area that have appointed board members, and some of those board members are appointed by the same old groups year after year. That is another problem that I think needs to be looked into. Then there are LA revised statutes like RS 33:9039.11 that give a board a lot of power that I personally think should have never been passed by the Legislature. I think the metro council can possibly do a lot of things like possibly waive rules etc if a vote is taken. It seems like we have some scheduled elections coming up so why can't we add this on to one of those elections to save money? This is getting too long so I will end, but I think you get my point

13) Comment by dday198 - 25/02/2013

and the dog catcher

14) Comment by dday198 - 25/02/2013

we could elect the fire chief also.

15) Comment by speakthetruth - 25/02/2013

No matter what happens, I hope the next mayor takes note that this is what happens when you appoint weak leaders just so the mayor can have his hands in the running of a police department. leduff was merely a figure head, there to smile for the camera and listen to holden on what to do. The "open door" policy allowed anyone to walk into the chiefs office, going around the chain of command to voice their displeasure with their assignments or supervisors. By taking advantage of a weak leader the union was able to place the family members and cronies in leadership positions that had no checks and balances attached to them. As a result the department fell apart and the crime rate goes up. The business leaders said they wanted change. leduff is gone and White is in. White is a plus for holdens campaign and it gets him re-elected, but now you have a leader from the outside making the necessary changes to become a functional PD again. The union is in a uproar, they divide the department and cry to holden calling in the favor owed them for endorsing him, and White is gone. I think electing a chief will give the union more power since the union is so political, and since they have the money to "buy" a chief through political donations. I know there are laws against that but there are always ways around them. Remember its politicians that wrote the laws. But something has to be done because it can't go on like it is and this whole ordeal has brought to the city's attention that the PD is broken thanks to holden and the union.

16) Comment by tradewinns - 25/02/2013

what! allowing the voters a say in who controls the police dept in BR? what the heck, where will this democracy stuff end? next the voters will be wanting a say in how their money (taxes) are spent. we cannot have that. it's chaos!

17) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 25/02/2013

markedwardmarchiafava if the city police was dissolved who would you call when your motorcycle was stolen? Who would you call when your home was burglarized? Who would you sue for raising their voices at you?

18) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 25/02/2013

Duckyluve makes a point, however, its disappointing that we have to seek a new chief because the mayor is unhappy with him, regardless of what the people he serves think. What does the mayor and that seemingly slow CAO of his know about fighting crime that they are telling a 25 year State Police Major what to do and what not to do? That's absurd. You should have seen the amount of support from the 70805 community that was present at that meeting and followed White out to his car afterwards. No communities from any of the higher crime areas has ever stood behind a police chief before in this city. Those were the people he serves. The people that should have a voice in his hiring.

19) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 25/02/2013

Or, the city police can be dissolved, end of story.

20) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 25/02/2013

"Worked well?" For who's benefit?

21) Comment by Duckyluve - 25/02/2013

So instead of being owned by the mayor the chief would be owned by big political contributors. Why stop at the police chief? Why not elect the fire chief?

22) Comment by zealer99 - 25/02/2013

“It’s rarely good government to solve personnel problems with huge changes in plans of government,” This is not a one time or recent suggestion, I first heard it in 1974 and I understood at the time that it had already been around for awhile. The City of Baton Rouge is part of the City Parish Government, which I admit is an odd arrangement of East Baton Rouge Parish and the City of Baton Rouge but the municipalities of Baker, Zachary, and Central have their own police force, mayor, and municipal governments. They still vote for the Mayor-President and have representation on the City-Parish Council but not the Metro Council. Under the circumstances, it would make as much sense as anything else for the Sheriff, who is elected, to head the law enforcement department for the Metro area as well as the Parish.

23) Comment by zealer99 - 25/02/2013

A quick and easy fix would be to merge BRPD into the Sheriff's Office since the Sheriff is already elected by the people of the Parish.

24) Comment by anonomous - 25/02/2013

UNIFICATION will solve a lot of this.