Governor previews budget

Advocate staff photo by HEATHER MCCLELLANDGov. Bobby Jindal gave  a preview of the state budget in his office Thursday. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by HEATHER MCCLELLANDGov. Bobby Jindal gave a preview of the state budget in his office Thursday.

Gov. Bobby Jindal will present legislators with a $24.7 billion proposed state operating budget Friday that hinges on what the governor characterized as money-saving partnerships.

The spending plan for the fiscal year that starts July 1 banks on savings materializing from the privatization of public hospital operations.

Public-private partnerships already are planned for the operations of LSU hospitals in New Orleans, Lafayette and Houma, as well as the $1.1 billion academic medical center in New Orleans, which is under construction.

Jindal previewed the budget for the media Thursday at the Governor’s Mansion.

“We think this is a good budget, a responsible budget,” he said.

The state faces a $1.3 billion shortfall in the upcoming fiscal year, partly because the federal government trimmed back on how much it pays toward the Medicaid program that provides health care to the poor.

House Appropriations Chairman Jim Fannin, D-Jonesboro, said earlier in the day that he left a budget discussion with the Jindal administration feeling better than he thought he would.

“I can’t say I’m happy about the budget,” Fannin said. “I can say ... I’m considerably happier than last year.”

Fannin said a number of factors will help fill the gap, including public-private partnerships, college tuition and a tobacco settlement refinancing.

The Jindal administration anticipates generating as much as $85 million by possibly refinancing a settlement. The settlement stems from the state opting to sell part of the money that major tobacco companies agreed to pay states over decades for health-care costs related to smoking.

Any savings from refinancing the tobacco settlement would go toward the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students, or TOPS. However, an infusion of money for the free college tuition program would decrease the state’s financial obligations for TOPS, generating more money for the budget.

At the same time, the governor is working on a proposal to eliminate the state’s personal income and corporate taxes.

He said that proposal will not affect the budget because he plans to replace the roughly $3 billion in tax revenue.

Jindal said there will be no new college tuition increases outside of the hikes already allowed through the LA GRAD Act, a 2010 law that gave campuses permission to raise tuition by up to 10 percent each year if they meet goals.

At the lower education level, basic state funding for public schools will remain largely frozen for the fifth year in a row. Jindal said the only increases will be for student enrollment growth.

The governor said doctors and other health care providers who treat Medicaid patients will not see further drops in the compensation they receive.

Jindal laughed when asked if he would reverse course like Florida Gov. Rick Scott and expand the state’s Medicaid rolls with federal government assistance that eventually will drop from 100 percent to 90 percent. Jindal said the answer remains “No.”

The expansion would provide federally funded health insurance to tens of thousands of Louisiana’s working poor, but the governor has said the program is too expensive.

State Rep. Brett Geymann, R-Lake Charles, said he hopes the governor steers away from using nonrecurring money for expenses that must be met year after year.

“I hope the executive budget includes no contingencies or one-time money used on recurring expenses. These practices of the past have put us in a position of always dealing with midyear cuts and beginning year shortfalls as we fill the holes left by accounting gimmicks,” Geymann said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (15)


1) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 22/02/2013

“Jindal laughed when asked if he would reverse course like Florida Gov. Rick Scott and expand the state’s Medicaid rolls with federal government assistance that eventually will drop from 100 percent to 90 percent. Jindal said the answer remains 'No.” I guess Jindal can laugh, he has health care paid for by the state. This is so hypocritical on Jindal's part. Almost 47% of his projected budget of $24.70 billion dollars will be provided by the US Government. (State Budget Solutions, Federal Aid to States, 12/11/2012). Only Mississippi(49%) has a higher percentage of federal budgetary support than Louisiana. But Jindal, in his historical pose of “Bobby knows best”, insist on continuing to reek hardship and horror on the underprivileged of Louisiana. I'd just like to ask Bobby one question: who died and made you the consummate know it all with respect to everything government? Reminiscent of Obama, “where's your certificate?”

2) Comment by agagent - 22/02/2013

Right, Louisiana would be really smart to expand Medicaid and shift more than 200,000 residents from private insurance to Medicaid. Only the geniuses in Washington, who never balance the federal budget, could come up with that plan.

3) Comment by GardenVariety - 22/02/2013

Calling it a preview is even a stretch. As with Guvvy Bubby's education and healthcare "plans," there's really not a plan as such--just an ideologico-political gimmick with corresponding propaganda. Any details are imaginary or are too unpalatable, so GuvBub will hide, be vague with, and/or perpetually revise (mis-)information; then he and his legislative thralls will force the half-baked, ALEC- and Teabagger-friendly poison through during the last couple of days of the legislative session. Just another awful sequel in the Jindal franchise.

4) Comment by Notauser - 22/02/2013

whodat70816 - Medicid covers a whole lot more that what hospitals are required to cover regardless of ability to pay.

5) Comment by Melisse3 - 22/02/2013

Speaking of HS civics, sounds like Suzanne needs some help of her own. "There has been a federal budget passed every year". Really? Ah, no. Not since 2009. The House has passed a budget bill. The Senate (Democrats) has not. The federal government has continued to function through appropriations bills passed during the fiscal year. Also -"Bobby hasn't presented a balanced budget in 6 years." Ah, also wrong again I'm afraid. Every governor in Louisiana presents a balanced budget. They are requred to. The fact that mid-year adjustments have to be made is nothing new. That is the way our system is set up in Louisiana. The governor does not control the projection adjustments, but must respond to them. And during poor economic times, guess what? The projections will likely drop. And that is what a governor has to deal with. Has nothing to do with his budget being out of balance. Thank you.

6) Comment by foldgers - 22/02/2013

Suzanne, Yes, the prez presents his budget and it is up to congress to approve it. But, even so, with whatever you say, and once again, I am NOT a fan of Bobby by any means, but at least when he realizes too much is being spent, his solution is to cut spending, not raise taxes. NOW, with that said, I do not like how he cuts so much from education, but I do like how he has cut down the number of state employees but I do NOT like how he has increased the number of unclassified state employee positions, mainly for his friends. I am sure there are many other programs that we can cut from, not from health or education. Like MEM said, state police for one. Why do we need 4 police agencies operation in Baton Rouge? State police, DPS, Sheriff and City police. Just an option, but other than that, I am sure I could find MANY millions of dollars being wasted on needless programs in this state.

7) Comment by Diogenes - 22/02/2013

"The (Medicaid) expansion would provide federally funded health insurance to tens of thousands of Louisiana’s working poor, but the governor has said the program is too expensive." Of course leaving tens of thousands of Louisiana Citizens is expensive as well, because they are forced to go to a hospital emergency room for their medical needs and the rest of us foot their bill through higher health care costs. Gov. Jindal is being penny wise, but dollar foolish.

8) Comment by SuzanneMS - 22/02/2013

Where to begin? There has been a federal budget passed every year. There has to be or the federal government ceases to function. That is self-evident. So much for Faux News talking point one. As for talking point two, neither the governor nor the president pass a budget, as anyone who has taken high school civics should know. The legislature passes a budget. Of course, in Louisiana, there is no difference between the governor and the legislature; they exist simply to do his will. The same cannot be said of the federal government. If you meant a balanced budget -- take it up with Congress. They are the ones who authorize the spending. And Bobby hasn't presented a balanced budget in 6 years -- not once since he rescinded the Stelly Act have the state sales tax revenues actually met his projections. That's why we have had mid-year spending cuts every year -- because his budget was out of balance. And now he wants to completely eliminate the only revenue source that has been stable and replace it with the one that never has come up to snuff. Of course they are, phil. What private institution would take on a partnership with anyone, public or private, that did not benefit it financially?

9) Comment by foldgers - 22/02/2013

Well, whatever I feel for the guy, trust me, not a fan at all, but at least he can pass a budget every year. Unlike a certain politician who has yet to pass even ONE budget in over 4 years and operating with only TRILLION dollar deficits... sure, that is smart and responsible leading.

10) Comment by phil - 22/02/2013

I am beginning to believe that many of these public-private partnerships are partnerships for individuals to figure out how to hide where taxpayer money really goes to. If we are going to increase these partnerships, they need to be transparent and fall under the public records request laws of LA. Does anyone really have any idea where all of these federal and state funds are going to and who is really making the profits?

11) Comment by Thurston_Howell_III - 22/02/2013

Booby has all of you fooled. He is the WORST thing to happen to our state. IMPEACH PIYUSH

12) Comment by whodat70816 - 22/02/2013

@notauser...What exactly makes sense about refusing 90% of the cost to expand Medicaid? Guess what, we do and will continue to pay 100% for the uninsured. So I really don't get Jindal's logic (and yours). States have the option of paying 10% of the cost or 100% of the cost. Let's say the feds go broke and discontinue paying the 90%, 5, 10, 20 years down the line.....How is refusing the money while they will pay it better?

13) Comment by Notauser - 22/02/2013

I can’t say I think much of Bobby overall. But he is actually on to something that is a win-win when it comes to public-private partnerships in the hospital area. And he is smart to not expand the Medicaid rolls. The feds require you stay with it even if they cut all funding for it. They say they will only cut to 90% but the feds are broke. The likelihood they will cut further is high, leaving the state with bills it can’t afford.

14) Comment by Warp7 - 21/02/2013

Looks like once again the Louisiana Press failed to ask real hard questions of substance. Jindal played you all again.

15) Comment by bettergovt - 21/02/2013

Jindal laughed when asked if he would reverse course like Florida Gov. Rick Scott and expand the state’s Medicaid rolls with federal government assistance that eventually will drop from 100 percent to 90 percent. Jindal said the answer remains “No.” Is this some kind of a joke to him???