Livingston-Ascension parkway plan met with optimism

Ascension-Livingston Parkway alternatives Show caption
Ascension-Livingston Parkway alternatives

Officials and residents in Ascension Parish are optimistic about a possible four-lane, north-south parkway that would connect Interstates 10 and 12.

The parkway, an alternative to a private toll road that has been discussed for the past two years, would use mostly existing state highways to connect I-10 in Gonzales and Sorrento with I-12 near Livingston and Walker.

The three possible alternatives — one using the existing bridge over the Amite River at Port Vincent, and two that would construct new bridges east and west of Port Vincent — were presented by designers at a public meeting in order to get feedback from Ascension residents.

Ray Miller, the senior project manager for Ascension Parish, said officials do not have a preferred alternative at the moment, but he said there were several reasons for supporting the project.

“It would provide a better, safer, faster connection” between the two parishes, he said.

Ben Laurie, Ascension Parish government’s chief engineer, said the parkway would help “lessen the load” on parish roads. Many people commute from Livingston Parish into Ascension Parish because they work at plants near the Mississippi River. When La. 431 gets backed up, Laurie said, drivers cut over to parish roads such as Roddy and Joe Sevario roads, as well as La. 44.

“It would help pull a lot of traffic off a lot of local roads,” he said.

Designers with Burk-Kleinpeter Inc., the engineering firm serving as the lead consultant on the project, were on hand to answer questions about the project, as well as take feedback from the public.

Those suggestions, as well as others gathered from a similar open meeting in Livingston Parish on Tuesday, will be consolidated in a new report and delivered to parish officials.

Gonzales resident Don Weinell said he attended Wednesday’s meeting to make sure designers are including bicycle and pedestrian access into plans for the parkway.

“It’s a brand-new project, and now’s the perfect time to make sure that it’s bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly,” he said.

Weinell said he didn’t have a preference among the three alternatives, but he’s hopeful the project can move forward.

“Livingston and Ascension parishes are both going to continue to grow,” he said. “There’s no doubt about it. You can either be proactive and plan for growth, or 20 years from now you can shake your head and say, ‘What happened?’ ”

Skeptics, however, wondered if the project would even get started in that time frame anyway. Because the project is still in the feasibility study segment, there’s no real timetable as to when funding from the state Department of Transportation and Development would be available.

Miller said construction could begin in eight to 10 years. However, Ascension Parish Councilman Todd Lambert isn’t a believer yet.

“They say 10 years, but that’s kind of doubtful,” he said.

Lambert, who joined the Parish Council in 1996, said council members were discussing expanding La. 42 then. That project is expected to begin construction later this year.

The top priority would be funding the parkway project, which is estimated to cost between $225 million and $285 million. Lambert joked with state Rep. Johnny Berthelot, R-Gonzales, Wednesday night about where the legislator would find $250 million for the project.

“The federal government is cutting back. The state is cutting back. That’s where the majority of the funding comes from,” Lambert said.

His skepticism, however, doesn’t mean Lambert doesn’t support the project. While he said he believes it would help Livingston residents more than Ascension residents, he said a new route across the Amite River has been needed for quite some time.

“I think it would be a heavily used highway both ways,” Lambert said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (14)


1) Comment by 36racin - 25/02/2013

Melisse3, While any improvement on ANY Ascension Parish road is a improvement over what we currently have and need. The point I was trying to get at is Parish Officials knew full well before hand that this proposal was in the works, yet they still tried to convince the residents in the area to vote "YES" to the Lanes of Change Tax proposal that a few intersections would be improved along the Hwy 431 corridor. If they are smart they will focus their attention and TAX dollars where the traffic is truely at. All day, everyday!!! Not just 6am and 5pm commuter traffic.

2) Comment by Melisse3 - 23/02/2013

36racin -- what are you trying to say? You oppose this idea? Is it a bad or idea or not? Try getting to the point. IMO, this proposal is a good idea.

3) Comment by 36racin - 21/02/2013

Lets look at a few items here. Just a month or so ago Ascension Parish was pushing road improvements that if added up would have taken care of 61.1 million dollars of this proposed 285 million dollar project. And that was 4 lanes of road from Hwy 61 to Hwy 621 going northward on Hwy 431. 285 million would probably not even get the road on the Ascension Parish side of this Parkway completed with a new bridge. A new bridge alone will cost 30+ million dollars and the parishes and DOTD are already looking for alternatives to replacing the aging bridge at Port Vincent. One without a draw bridge meaning it would need to be elevated even higher than the current one. Parish officials cannot tell any of us that they didn't know anything about this project back when they were pushing the "Lanes for Change" road tax!!!! Heres something else to chew on. The Parishes are pushing building roads for 10 thousand PASS THRU vehicles a day and still ignoring the road conditions where 40 thousand TAX paying, voting residents work, live and spend their hard earned money and raise their families. I know where I would spend my money!!!

4) Comment by nimby? - 21/02/2013

meanmink , some can also think of an alternate moniker for Plank Road ...

5) Comment by BRmoderate - 21/02/2013

As much as I want this parkway and I really really want this parkway. I just can't see state/fed funds being shaken loose for it.

6) Comment by meanmink - 21/02/2013

And they shall call it: "Redneck Road"

7) Comment by nimby? - 21/02/2013

both 447 and 431 need to be widened due to the volume of traffic they carry . problem , when construction sets in , and there will be temporary road closure , re-routing of traffic will be an issue as there are no convenient alternate routes .

8) Comment by all2neat - 21/02/2013

I'm having a tough time on this. Why does the parish tell me to appose the loop but support this. They look very similar.

9) Comment by DMJ - 21/02/2013

I feel sorry for the guy who wants this to be bicycle/pedestrian friendly. He's in for a disappointment.

10) Comment by jonbourg - 21/02/2013

YES! This is progress, build it and don't think about it just do it! Use one of the alternatives with a new bridge. All you haters forget about it. Don't you want Louisiana to come kicking and screaming into the 20th century or not?

11) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/02/2013

Building new bridges would really help alleviate traffic.

12) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/02/2013

The new parkaway is south of Watson, where all the NIMBYs live, so this plan should work.

13) Comment by Woody - 20/02/2013

wouldn't taking hwy 431 north and tying it in to walker south (447) where it already intersects hwy 16 accomplish the same thing? or is that too easy?

14) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 20/02/2013

2009 - "Hey Livingston, we want to plow through your backyards to build a roadway that will take you from Livingston Parish to Ascension. This road will also loop you around Baton Rouge and back to Livingston, whaddya say?". HECK NO, NOT IN MY BACKYARD....... 2013 - "Hey Livingston, we want to plow through your backyards to build a roadway that will take you from Livingston Parish to Ascension." HEY THAT SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT IDEA.... LOL...