Suit filed in shooting resulting in paralysis

The driver and front-seat passenger of a car in which the teenage son of Metro Councilman Chandler Loupe was riding last February “bailed out” of the car shortly before Loupe’s son was shot in the back seat and paralyzed during what police have called a drug deal gone bad, a lawsuit alleges.

The suit, filed by Loupe and his wife Mary P. Loupe, contends that their son Thomas Loupe — who was 15 at the time — asked the driver, Nicholas Hooter, not to stop the car in the 1600 block of Mary Lou Drive in the Mayfair subdivision of Baton Rouge on the evening of Feb. 3, 2012, but Hooter stopped the car anyway.

Trey Mayer, the front passenger who also was 15 at the time, got out of the car and began talking with several nearby persons, including Tyler Coleman and Terrance Thornton, the suit claims. Mayer then handed over a sum of money and returned to the car with Coleman and Thornton, the suit says.

Thomas Loupe told Hooter, who was 17 at the time, that he should not let Coleman and Thornton into the car, but Coleman and Thornton were allowed into the back seat with Loupe, the suit states. Mayer returned to the front passenger seat.

“As Hooter began to drive with Loupe, Mayer and his two new occupants, Coleman drew a pistol and began to point it in the direction of Hooter, Mayer and Loupe. Coleman demanded the trio’s valuables,” the suit alleges.

“Once the demand was made and after the pistol was brandished, Mayer ‘bailed out’ of the car and was soon followed by Hooter,” the suit says. “As he abandoned Loupe on the back seat with Thornton and Coleman, Hooter took the ignition keys with him.”

Coleman and Thornton then robbed Loupe “of the little money in his possession,” the suit states, and either while in the car, getting out of the car or immediately after leaving the car, the pistol Coleman was carrying fired twice, with one bullet hitting Loupe and causing “severe and permanent injury to his spine.”

“Lying on the back seat, bleeding, alone, Loupe tried to move the vehicle, but could not,” the suit says. “Loupe called 911 for help.”

Hooter returned to the car and drove Loupe out of Mayfair to a shopping center on Staring Lane, where police and other first-responders met the Hooter car and took Loupe to Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center.

The suit, filed Friday in state district court in Baton Rouge, names as defendants Nicholas Hooter and his mother, Lisa Hooter; Trey Mayer’s father, Francis Mayer; Terrance Thornton; Coleman’s father, Rhett R. Coleman; and Virginia Ruth Trotter, the owner of the car.

“I have no knowledge of what you’re talking about,” Lisa Hooter said Tuesday when contacted by phone.

Francis Mayer said, “I don’t know what to say.”

The suit also lists Hooter’s and Mayer’s homeowner’s insurers as defendants.

Prosecutors have charged Coleman, 17, and Thornton, 20, both of Baton Rouge, with one count each of attempted second-degree murder and three counts each of armed robbery.

Dan Claitor, who represents the Loupe family in the suit, said the Loupes’ youngest child was “catastrophically injured due to the convergence of the conduct of several actors.”

“Unlike the criminal proceeding, the purpose of this proceeding is to examine, to determine, and to assess the civil responsibility of the driver of the vehicle, the other passenger that navigated the three youngsters to the scene, and the young men that entered the vehicle, as well as the parents of these actors in their supervisory capacity,” he said.

“In time, I am confident that justice will be done.”

Chandler Loupe said his family will not comment on any of the judicial proceedings.

Nicholas Hooter, Trey Mayer and Thomas Loupe initially told police they were cutting through the Mayfair area when Loupe was struck by a stray bullet, detectives testified in November.

Later, they acknowledged driving to the area to buy marijuana, the detectives said.

Mayer was booked on a count of attempted possession of marijuana.

The suit, which seeks an unspecified amount of damages, has been assigned to state District Judge Wilson Fields.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (21)


1) Comment by Whatnow - 07/02/2013

DMJ is correct by saying this is holding parents accountable for their kid's actions. We've been asking for that for years. Maybe if more parents got sued they would start wondering if their kids are up to no good.

2) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 06/02/2013

Bouncer, regardless of whether or not they are good or bad parents, the point here is that a stupid situation just got stupider. Loupe is casting a very dark shadow on himself by doing this. This city/state/country have enough stupid lawsuits as it is. Your son got shot because of his lack of better judgment. Let the prosecutor handle it criminally and be done with it. Just because your kid was shot doesn't grant you the right to a free pay-day on the backs of people paying insurance. You are the reason why insurance rates continue to rise. I'll bring this up again when the election rolls around. Quite an embarrassment to those of us who voted for you, Loupe. Out of sheer curiosity, why did your attorney choose not to include the following people as contributors to this: Gun manufacturer, bullet manufacturer, vehicle manufacturer, city parish for building the street, thereby giving the thugs a place to shoot your son, city police for not being there an instant before the shot was fired to thwart the crime, parents of all those involved and their parents as well (contributory negligence). Am I sounding ridiculous yet? Yeah, its because dragging this out any further than the criminal justice system is quite ridiculous. Hope the payday is worth you reputation.

3) Comment by Bouncer - 06/02/2013

Sorry....meant to say "Thomas."

4) Comment by Bouncer - 06/02/2013

My opinion is that unless you have firsthand, intimate knowledge of their family life and are in a position to observe them regularly, nobody knows what sort of parents the Loupes are. Common sense and experience should tell you that even exemplary parents can have a "bad" child, so to attribute Chandler's behavior to "bad parenting" is a gross oversimplification. Maybe they spoiled him, or maybe they didn't. Maybe they disciplined him too harshly and he rebelled, or maybe they always let him get away with anything and everything. We don't know and can only speculate. All that is clear at this point is that a young person's life has been forever changed.

5) Comment by phil - 06/02/2013

This sounds suspicious to me like maybe there was a setup. Both people in the front seat bail out and leave Loupe with the two robbers that were not originally in the car? And yes, DMJ, I will agree that these kids (and one adult?) should not of had access to a gun in the first place. I think that adults who give guns to kids should be given very long prison terms.

6) Comment by Whatnow - 06/02/2013

I don't know DMJ, why don't you ask the Advocate that question. The article didn't tell us that part. A policeman friend of mine told me that they usually get them at pawn shops or from someone else in their neighborhood. They didn't use my guns.

7) Comment by DMJ - 06/02/2013

You folks are always talking about holding the parents accountable. Now, you got your wish. By the way, anyone notice the article neglects to even mention where the shooter could have gotten his hands on a handgun? Are shootings so common we don't even bother to think about how people get the weapons? Great. Everyone feel safer knowing that?

8) Comment by Whatnow - 06/02/2013

mh1949, yeah, I caught that, too. The Loupe's want others to pay for their son's mistakes and bad judgement? I hope you all, along with me, keep an eye on which judge is assigned and what the judge does in this case.

9) Comment by mj6338 - 06/02/2013

To " staaah " : As Forest Gump would say, stupid is as stupid does

10) Comment by mj6338 - 06/02/2013

To Attila: Read the article. they're not expecting money out of underage thugs, it's the homeowner's insurance company of the parents. It's another shameless attempt of a lawyer working the system for EZ cash. And we all pay because claims like this are reflected in what is charged for our homeowner's policies.

11) Comment by mh1949 - 06/02/2013

If you read the story carefully you can see what this liberal media would like you to believe is to blame. " The pistol Coleman was carrying fired twice ". Fired all by it's wittle self.

12) Comment by Attila - 06/02/2013

This is just an attempt to salvage their sons public image...it must be that because to think that they will be able to win monetary compensation from that underage group of thugs....or their parents, if they know who they are, is sheer folly.

13) Comment by staaah - 06/02/2013

So sad this has come to this. I don't see how they can blame the others for their son's poor judgement. These kids were wrong, but so was the Loupe kid. I doubt that he was forced into this situation.

14) Comment by Ivy - 06/02/2013

This is sad. That poor child has to live the rest of his life with the results of a poor decision. Now mom and dad want others to pay? The result of disobedience and acting out gets steeper and steeper each generation.

15) Comment by Chucky - 06/02/2013

Lawyer talk, that is all it is. My client would like money and me also for (not said) actions in a illegal dope transaction. Maybe Loupe should have bailed before the drug transaction, did not call in a drug transaction .

16) Comment by MissCotillion - 06/02/2013

This looks to me as if the Loupes are putting a price tag on their son's injuries, and that final price will be hashed out once Jr's own failings are dragged out for all to see. How much is this paralysis worth for them? I understand they may be tapped out due to Jr's medical expenses, but this just looks so bad. My sympathy for these parents just plummeted.

17) Comment by arin - 06/02/2013

One thought. Don't hold someone else responsible for your bad judgements.

18) Comment by squiggly - 06/02/2013

I'm sure y'all did everything your parents told you to when you were coming up; and when you didn't, it was because they didn't raise you right. That being said, Loupe, jr is probably telling his parents what they want to hear, and being parents, they believe him because love is blind. They must remember that birds of a feather flock together.

19) Comment by tradewinns - 06/02/2013

the only thing this kid did right was not die. yet he wants someone esle to pay the piper for his stupidity. i hope they counter sue his parents for raising their child improperly.

20) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 06/02/2013

tally..You hit the nail right on the head.

21) Comment by Tally - 06/02/2013

And yet another set of parents holding others responsible for their failure to properly parent their own child.