CATS members blast report

The parish bus system’s governing board began a series of meetings Thursday to discuss how to move the system forward following a recent report that recommended replacing CATS’ top managers with contracted employees from a transit management firm.

Some members of the Capital Area Transit System’s Board of Directors expressed skepticism about the report by TMG Consulting, questioning whether the firm’s recommendations were based on a fair assessment of the bus system’s operations.

TMG Consulting was hired by CATS in October to conduct an evaluation and made its final recommendations to the board on Jan. 15. Thursday was the first time the CATS board members gathered to discuss whether the changes would be seriously considered.

“I think there’s a lot of misinformation out in the public, and there’s a lot of distrust and a lot of tension,” CATS board President Jared Loftus told board members at the CATS finance and executive committee meeting.

He added, “This is a big deal. But what we have to remember is that we have an obligation to give the taxpayers who are funding this system, the system we promised in the tax election.”

All eight current members of CATS were invited to the committee meeting and six members attended.

Loftus said the board should explore any opportunities there are to improve the system.

Board members noted there was no estimate in the consultant’s report of how much extra it would cost to contract management, and discussed putting together a Request for Information or a Request for Proposals from interested firms to get an idea of what those cost could be.

“We know it is going to be more expensive but is it going to be $300,000 or is it going to be $3 million?” said board member Deborah Roe.

Roe also questioned some of the findings in TMG’s report about the bus system’s operations.

CATS Chief Financial Officer Gary Owens told the board there were many inaccuracies in TMG’s presentation. For example, he said, the report took issue with CATS budget because it said it did not include employee pay raises.

“That’s not true,” Owens said.

He later requested access to the full report so he could correct misstatements in the report for the board’s consideration.

“There are several insinuations and statements of fact that were inaccurate in the presentation,” Owens told the board. “My job is on the line, and I haven’t even seen the full report.”

Owens declined to comment after the meeting.

Board member Montrell McCaleb called the report “chicken scraps” and said he would not support contracting out management.

“So we paid a consultant for a presentation with mistakes?” McCaleb said angrily. “I could have had my niece do a better job with a presentation.”

CATS Chief Executive Officer Brian Marshall said the bus system has been consistently improving under his management team.

“I don’t know any deadlines that we’ve missed, I don’t know where we struggled,” Marshall said. “We delivered the GPS system three months early ... All of the performance metrics out there, we’re meeting or exceeding.”

Dalton Honore II, a CATS board member, reminded the board that they were not bound to adhering to the report’s exact recommendations.

“We don’t have to take the package as it exists,” Honore said. “Maybe we ought to look at creating our own alternatives.”

The board also acknowledged the report was having an impact on staff members who are concerned about keeping their jobs.

“All of the board members recognize how hard the staff has had to work without a pay increase for three or four years, and we are thankful and grateful for that and we expect you to continue to do the same,” Roe said. “Have some faith is all I’m saying. No one can be productive if they’re anxious, anxious, anxious.”

Roe said after the meeting she couldn’t guarantee that everyone would keep their jobs, but wanted staff to know the board is appreciative of their work.

The CATS finance and executive committee will meet again next Thursday at 11 a.m. to continue discussing the management report.

Loftus said they hope to meet weekly until the board decides to take action.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (19)


1) Comment by rdj! - 07/02/2013

Simple Solution: CATS has no long-range (10 year) OR short range (every 2 year) TRANSIT PLAN! Every major transit system has this information on the FRONT page of the agency website. The plan clearly explains operations, fleet, expansion, overall budget and infrastructural plans. Check it out Oakland, Houston, Chicago, San Francisco even New Orleans!... ALL of them keep and update TRANSIT plans ANNUALLY... CATS... non existent, non accessible or incomplete.

2) Comment by Mildred Citizen - 01/02/2013

You fogot the mayor of NOLA, the "chocolate city", RightWay.

3) Comment by RightWay - 01/02/2013

Unfortunately, this seems to be the trend when you give black people money and power. Just look at the mayors of White Castle, St. Gabriel, New Roads and Port Allen.

4) Comment by 8point6 - 01/02/2013

mr loftus. Do you and/or your management personnel use CATS to get you to and from your offices? Could this medium follow you and/or your management for a normal business day, starting with leaving your residence? Why don't you and your associates "take a walk" to the nearest bus stop? "Loftus said they hope to meet weekly until the board decides to take action." Here's a thought. Have the group take the bus to the meeting!

5) Comment by nimby? - 01/02/2013

the pandora box is slowly opening . question , how many young professionals are going to give up comfort , convenience , leather seats , climate control to ride the bus ? Baton Rouge could do what a few other cities have . limit the amount of parking in certain areas forcing more to ride the bus .

6) Comment by jdk944 - 01/02/2013

PRIORITIES, in order of most important 1st. A GPS system NOW?? REALLY?? I thought this "rigging" of the area to get the tax passed was to help the existing poor who depended on this form of transportation!! Just amazing!!

7) Comment by foldgers - 01/02/2013

DMJ, I do see your point. I was not really thinking about that, but it does make sense. With that said though, I would still think, and this is only me speaking, that they would first and foremost try to keep the riders they do have. GPS not considered, I wonder how many people rode the bus in the past and swore they would never again. The busiest bus stop I see is the one across from Wal-Mart on College Dr. Constantly the bench under the "shelter" is full and people are forced to stand in the sun. I just think that for the ones that are already riding and paying into the system, though a small amount, that they would be "rewarded" in a sense with decent stops. And I do think that installing some sort of screen showing the GPS location of the buses would be a huge benefit. Of course not all stops could have this, like the one in my front yard, but the major ones that are the busiest, to begin with at least.

8) Comment by phil - 01/02/2013

HA! Now tell me exactly why I should trust the board president? Who is supposed to be running this show? Sorry, all of this should have come up prior to the tax election and not after it, in my opinion. Where does this stop? Now we are told that we need new management in ADDITION to a newly designed bus system? This is getting to be a joke - a joke on us taxpayers. I am NOT laughing.

9) Comment by tradewinns - 01/02/2013

is anyone suprized the magnt disagrees with the report which calls for their replacement? ASK THE NEXT PERSON WHO'S FIRED IF THEY DESERVED TO HAVE BEEN FIRED. i'll bet the no's far exceed the yes's.

10) Comment by DMJ - 01/02/2013

Foldgers, the GPS tracking and app aren't meant for people who don't have smartphones, obviously. They're meant to attract new riders (and fares). One of the main obstacles to attracting new riders is uncertainty about when the next bus is coming. This is where the GPS comes in.

11) Comment by Chucky - 01/02/2013

TMG Consulting was hired at what cost? They were chosen over who ? Now the experts say do this for a better service and the board turns up the nose. I suggest they never hire a firm in the future till they know what said consulting firm will say so they can agree with them, $ well spent.

12) Comment by foldgers - 01/02/2013

I am already sick of hearing about this GPS being installed. Like that is a big thing. Cool? Maybe. A major development, no. I would venture to say that most of the people who ride the bus would rather if CATS spent that money upgrading actual bus- stops. I am not a big fan of CATS, but when I see people waiting at some of these stops with just an old bench covered in advertisements and that's all, I do feel bad for them. Especially in the summer. I always had an idea to start off with upgrading the most popular stops and as part of it, have an electronic screen(powered by solar) showing the GPS locations of the buses. People waiting could then know how long they had before a bus showed up. But, no... they assume that a lot of bus riders have smart phones AND have internet data plans as well. It was funny, the other day with the article saying that GPS was started now with CATS, they actually had a couple of sentences explaining what a "smart phone" was.

13) Comment by buzz - 01/02/2013

@banana. The CFO said there were mistakes in the TMG presentation and that he hasn't seen the full report. That's two different documents. I think you miss-read the article.

14) Comment by Sandy - 01/02/2013

So let me see if I have this straight. CATS hires a consultant to perform a study of how to improve their service. The consultant performs the study and issues a report. CATS doesn't like what is in that report, so they trash the consultant and their report. Is that correct? If they only wanted a report issued that supported what they already want to do, and aren't really interested in other ideas, then they are just wasting money hiring a consultant. Is it really surprising that no one trusts CATS?

15) Comment by Whatchange - 01/02/2013

You see that bus to huh CBCS, I see that bus all the time, big bus with 3 riders at the most. I firmly believe in public transportation and have seen it work effectively in other cities, just not here in BR. Now you have a board blasting a report they haven't read and some haven't seen, then you have two board members that didn't even brother to show up. Yep, time for big changes within CATS, apparently just as the report states.

16) Comment by welcometothebananarepublic - 01/02/2013

I read a lot of general whining about inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the consultant report, but I don't read anything specific about what the report got wrong. The CFO says their are "misstatements" in a report he hasn't seen. The CEO doesn't have a clue about missed deadlines or where CATS struggles. If CATS is so sure it's wrong, then lay out some details. The only "performance metric" they crow about is that they bought a GPS system to track nearly-empty buses. Whoop! Whoop! This clown troupe know their jobs are on the line . Outsource the entire CATS, not just management, to a private company that can deliver a real public transit system for Baton Rouge.

17) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 01/02/2013

Yesterday in Zachary, I saw a big CATS bus with 2 people on it, the driver and one passenger, what a joke!

18) Comment by Being_Stupid - 01/02/2013

Oh oh. We ran out of money, we need to pass more taxes onto property owners by non-property owners.

19) Comment by Duckyluve - 01/02/2013

What a joke