Groups offer input on design for new BR library

Advocate file photo by Richard Alan Hannon --The River Center Library Branch in downtown Baton Rouge. Show caption
Advocate file photo by Richard Alan Hannon --The River Center Library Branch in downtown Baton Rouge.

Screening rooms, a café, versatility and business accessibility should be key elements of the new $19 million downtown library, several interested groups told library staff in a series of closed-door meetings held late last year.

Library staff and the architect for the project conducted more than a dozen “stakeholder and potential partner” informational meetings that began in late August and ran through December, said East Baton Rouge Parish Library Assistant Director Mary Stein, who attended the meetings.

The meetings, which Stein called “brainstorming sessions,” were not open to the public or media. The first set of meetings were held with pairs of Library Board of Control members. The meetings were limited to two board members at a time to ensure no public meeting laws were violated, Stein said.

Outside organizations, including the Center for Planning Excellence, the Baton Rouge Area Chamber, Baton Rouge Area Foundation, Downtown Development District, the Greater Baton Rouge Arts Council, Visit Baton Rouge, residents of Spanish Town and Beauregard Town, the Greater Baton Rouge Literacy Coalition and others, were invited to provide input on the design of the new library, Stein said.

Longtime library critic John Berry said he was troubled that none of the meetings were open to the public.

“She (Stein) said there would be public meetings,” Berry said.

Stein said library staff plans to host at least one public meeting in the late spring to solicit input and present ideas on the plans.

The brainstorming meetings late last year resulted in a wish list of potential features, she said.

Suggestions ranged from putting LED lights on the building’s bicycle rack to putting a garden on the roof, Stein said.

There was “overwhelming enthusiasm” for putting a café in the library, she said.

“The general thinking about building libraries today is, if you can, try to go for the Barnes and Noble approach,” Stein said. “Everybody says ‘we want a café in our branch.’”

Stein said the library system itself would not run a café.

“The library is not in the food business,” she said.

There is precedent for the idea of a café as part of a library. The new main library on Goodwood Road will include a café run by the East Baton Rouge Parish Recreation and Park Commission.

Stein said a café could be combined with a bookstore that features the work of local authors and artists.

Some also suggested screening rooms for use by Baton Rouge’s burgeoning film industry, Stein said. The rooms could be used to show films during festivals, she said.

Stein said she envisions a “Maker’s Space” in the library, where individuals or groups could collaborate on a variety of creative projects, including film and music. Such a space could include a video-editing bay or sound studio, she said.

Several suggestions for ways to make the library more inviting and accessible for businesses and business people were offered, Stein said. Library staff already planned to request that rooms suitable for business meetings be included in the design, but some groups suggested that the rooms be made available to businesses for a fee.

“No meeting room that we currently have is available to a commercial endeavor,” Stein said.

Suggestions also included space for individual business people to work, she said, adding the library is considering “business pods” where a person could set up and work on his or her own computer.

The library also plans to offer an array of business databases such as Standard and Poor’s, Morningstar and ReferenceUSA that will be featured at the River Center Branch, Stein said.

Lauren Hatcher, a spokeswoman for the Baton Rouge Area Chamber, confirmed that officials with that organization met with library staff about the plans.

BRAC wanted to ensure “that the facility considers and meets the needs of the business community from technology and training to meeting space capacity,” Hatcher said an emailed statement.

Stein said the library’s rooms must be versatile and also consider the needs of families and children.

“We do want our rooms to do double- or triple-duty,” she said. “Robust programming is the key.”

Davis Rhorer, executive director of the Downtown Development District, said one of his main concerns is the library’s appearance.

“It’s a very public space there at Town Square,” he said. “You have the Shaw Center, the Old State Capital — it’s a very important corner.”

Rhorer said he wants to see a building that is welcoming and makes good use of both its indoor and outdoor space.

Boo Thomas, president and chief executive officer for the Center for Planning Excellence, attended one of the meetings.

“I think it becomes another one of the pieces in a community gathering space,” she said, adding that libraries must provide more than books. “The library could be the digital home for a lot of neighborhood groups.”

Stein cautioned that many of the ideas that were floated would eventually be jettisoned for one reason or another.

The meetings held in the fall were just the “pre-design phase,” Stein said.

“The things we heard just cemented our ideas, there were very few things that were brand new,” she said. “In the brainstorming phase, everything is possible and you can afford it all.”

In addition to the meetings, LSU graduate students working with the library solicited input from several other organizations, including representatives from the Old State Capital, the USS Kidd, several downtown churches, Teach for America, City Year and others, Stein said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (8)


1) Comment by nimby? - 31/01/2013

"and when we get behind closed doors" ....

2) Comment by mcBR - 31/01/2013

"So, will people from all over the city start demanding dedicated CATS routes to and from the library?" In so far as the library is downtown, then yes, I think it is reasonable that people will want to have public transportation options.

3) Comment by phil - 31/01/2013

I think the only people who are really the "Stakeholders" in this venture are the unfortunate taxpayers who will pay for it. The list of who actually attended the meetings seems to include a lot of groups who almost always seem to think they run downtown BR. How about look up libraries in the Unified Development Code (UDC) and see what it recommends for off-street parking spaces I actually agree that the downtown people pay taxes and deserve a nice library. However, I think this location is not a good one and it was chosen to stay there because of downtown politics. By the way, I guess it is cheaper to tear down a library building and rebuild it at the same site downtown, while it is also cheaper to purchase an old hospital and remodel it at another location. These stories sure get confusing. Then I read about the new courthouse needing a new parking lot in the same approximate area. Thank all you planners for all of this "smart-growth" planning (or the lack of it). On another subject, how many new downtown libraries does it take to equal the amount of ONLY the increased costs of the SSO sewer project which has recently gone from $1.2 billion to over $1.4 billion. I will let you do the math.

4) Comment by foldgers - 31/01/2013

So, will people from all over the city start demanding dedicated CATS routes to and from the library? I mean, since tax-PAYERS are paying for it, shouldn't EVERYone have easy access to it, at the tax-PAYERS expense? I also think that each bus stop should have wi-fi hot-spots so the riders can track the buses on their smart phones. Since having a data plan for smart phones is expensive at $40 or so a month. But really, I am kind of glad for all the development that is going on downtown. It truly is good for tourism and the city. Before, downtown was a crime ridden ghost land. As every major city "needs" a good transportation system, I truly believe every major city needs a downtown that is not scary, but has many activities for everyone to be a part of. NOW, with that said, I do think they are spending too much for the library. But then again, what do I know?

5) Comment by maybe_sparrow - 31/01/2013

The reason your snarky/sarcastic remark doesn't pack the punch you were hoping for, Bighug, is because people visit libraries for a lot more than reading books these days. You sound like you haven't visited one in quite some time.

6) Comment by Being_Stupid - 31/01/2013

How about that odd sculpture of what is supposed to be Oliver Pollock's head by Frank Hayden? Is there any talks of maybe removing that sculpture and burying it in the ground somewhere, so we don't have to look at it anymore?

7) Comment by Being_Stupid - 31/01/2013

Was John Berry invited to these special closed door meetings?

8) Comment by Bighug - 31/01/2013

I wonder why so few people used the old downtown library. They were probably thinking, "I would like to read a book, but I don't want to borrow it from people in an old building. I'll just wait until they build a new one to start reading." I'm being sarcastic, for those of you who don't understand. So why spend $21,000,000 of taxpayer's money on this building? Politicians can't steal money that just sits in a fund. Got to move it!