Federal funds to CATS increasing

The Capital Area Transit System will receive an additional $10 million in federal funds over the next four years that CATS officials said was made possible by leveraging new property tax revenues.

CATS will receive about $2 million this year, and an additional $2.7 million for the next three years, from the federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality improvement program, said Brian Marshall, CATS chief executive officer.

While CATS officials welcomed news of the additional federal funds, they also learned Monday that $470,278 in tax revenue is being withheld from the agency in escrow by the Sheriff’s Office until a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the tax is resolved.

Taxpayers, under state law, had until Dec. 31 to contact the Sheriff’s Office to request that their tax payment to CATS be withheld, to ensure they are refunded if the tax is declared unconstitutional by the courts.

Businessman Milton Graugnard alleges in his suit that the CATS tax violates state and federal equal protection laws because only taxpayers in Baton Rouge and Baker city limits pay, while people outside the city limits will also receive service.

A total of 1,190 properties were “paid in protest,” meaning the CATS tax for the property is being withheld from the bus service, said Casey Rayborn Hicks, spokeswoman for the Sheriff’s Office, which collects property taxes.

If the courts ultimately rule the tax is constitutional CATS will receive its money back, with interest.

“Ultimately at the end of the day, we think we are going to get that money because we believe that the tax was constitutional,” said CATS Board Chairman Jared Loftus.

CATS will receive its first property tax payment of $8,898,024 on Tuesday, Hicks said.

The agency expects to receive about $15 million in new tax revenue this year.

Delinquent tax payments will continue to be collected by the Sheriff’s Office and distributed monthly to CATS and other taxing agencies and departments, Hicks said.

Loftus said it appears the protested funds would be covered by the additional federal funds.

“It sounds like that loss will be offset by the news of getting additional money,” he said. “But we’ll plan and move forward accordingly. Where that shortfall will be directed, I can’t specifically say yet.”

In 2012 and 2011, CATS received $800,000 a year from the same CMAQ grant program, so the additional federal funding will represent a more than three-fold increase in 2014.

Louisiana received a total of about $5 million for the CMAQ grant program this year, Marshall said, which means CATS will be receiving a significant share of the state’s total annual allotment.

Since the 10.6-mill property tax was approved by voters in April, the agency has learned it would receive about $6 million less in total revenue than initially expected due to several factors, including the failure of the tax to pass in the city of Zachary and the city-parish’s decision to stop funding its $3 million contribution.

The Attorney General’s Office also said the state’s homestead exemption would apply to the tax, which further reduced the amount of revenue CATS had expected to collect.

Marshall said the new federal funds would help offset many of those losses.

“The beauty of this funding is that where we lost that funding before, this recovers some of that,” Marshall said. “This firmly puts into place the stuff in the operating plan for 2014.”

CATS will provide a local match of $675,000 this year toward the grant initiatives, and $900,000 in the following years, which was part of the requirement to receive the federal funds.

Without the additional tax revenue this year, CATS likely would not have had enough money for the local match portion of the grant, Marshall said.

“It would have been a lot more difficult to achieve,” Marshall said. “The tax made a major impact.”

This year, the grant money is outlined for three initiatives: $1,125,000 will be used to purchase 10 compressed natural gas vans, $375,000 will be spent on upgrades at the maintenance facility on Florida Boulevard, and $525,000 will be used to improve the spread of information about the bus system.

Marshall said the grant will help the system build a campaign to educate the public about upcoming service changes, including route changes and expansions.

The following three years the money is designated more generally for “service expansion,” Marshall said, which gives the agency a rare opportunity to use grant money for operational costs rather than just capital costs.

CATS expects to receive the money in February, Marshall said.

In other matters, CATS board member Thomas Govan confirmed Monday that he has resigned from the board.

Govan served as chair of the board while the agency engaged in two tax elections in recent years — the most recent one being successful. Govan quietly submitted his resignation letter on Jan. 2, effective immediately.

The Metro Council is expected to appoint someone to his seat on March 27.

Govan did not respond to a phone call and email asking why he decided to resign.

“He was with us before and during the tax, and helped see us through that,” Loftus said. “We understand he has some other obligations he has to attend to and we appreciate the work he’s done here.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (19)


1) Comment by Attila - 15/01/2013

Lets see here. Black Mayor....black President...free federal money....hmmmm.

2) Comment by phil - 15/01/2013

Also NewsReader I think your statement about road taxes is inaccurate. I personally do not think road taxes need to be increased any more either. Besides, those roads will also be used by the CATS bus system and by people who ride bikes, so I certainly will not be the only to use them. If course, if you want to raise taxes to pay for my car and for my auto insurance then I might have to think about that possibility for a while (just kidding). The rock I am living under is a system that wants to tax me to the point that I might actually have to live under a rock one day. Of course I guess then I can move into a "redeveloped" area into HUD housing. By the way, who is making all of the money building HUD and other government-supported housing projects around BR? (another subject)

3) Comment by phil - 15/01/2013

Newsreader - You forgot to add that college math is also a waste of time. I am sure all of the engineers etc out there will agree with you (not). Sorry, but I do not follow your logic in your next-to-last comment. You are correct about the homestead exemption in your last comment and I actually have stated the same thing in my posts about the CATS tax prior to the tax election. So in reality we have the poor getting poorer so the poor can ride a bus, which was exactly my point a long time ago. Rich folks are not the only ones who are negatively affected by large wasteful taxes and large wasteful public entities that receive local, state and/or federal funding. Waste is still waste.

4) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 15/01/2013

@ dday198... Nor I in yours.

5) Comment by NewsReader - 15/01/2013

And btw before everyone starts whining that those using CATS are for the most part not property owners thus not being taxed for it, let me remind you that effectively tenants pay proportionately MORE than homeowners because 100% of the property tax gets passed on to them as part of their rent and being a rental that property doesn't have the benefit of a $75K homestead exemption.

6) Comment by NewsReader - 15/01/2013

Phil: well then you comprehend that the courses offered in college for economics generally are given by educators only familiar with conceptual ideas who have never actually had to work in industry and/or generate a profit. And I'm sure you're also aware of the multiple variations on those ideas taught? I'd also love to hear your solution because whenever there's a call for a tax increase you're one of the first to voice your opinion against it. As a state we draw far more from the federal coffers than we contribute, so realistically we are due for a massive income tax hike, right? You also seem to consistently only feel items you personally use are acceptable to have excessive funds spent on them. Why for example shouldn't all our roads become toll roads? After all we spend far more on that infrastructure than is generated by our DMV fees. And it would have the added benefit that maybe higher road tax would steer more people to public transportation. That would in turn cause an expansion of that and maybe propel this area into joining the 21st century. Unless you're living under a rock, you'll notice that the growing cities in the USA all have far better alternative transportation systems than this area.

7) Comment by phil - 15/01/2013

True that all public entities do not make a profit. I personally took civics and also economics and math in school. Apparently some of our leaders (local, state and federal) neglected to take the economics and math classes.

8) Comment by DMJ - 15/01/2013

Public transit is not supposed to be "profitable." Not everything is supposed to make money. It's a public service. Didn't anyone take Civics in middle school?

9) Comment by DMJ - 15/01/2013

"Paid in protest"? Since when is it legal to only the pay the taxes you feel like paying? Oh right....it's not.

10) Comment by tradewinns - 15/01/2013

cats is a waste of money. now that cats has more money than ever, is ridership going to increase to a profitable arena? if so, perhaps it is a good investment. if not, it's like a boat, a hole in the water into which one pours money. what is the ridership mile vs. dollar expendature? both past (when cats was broke) and currently (cats floating in money).

11) Comment by phil - 15/01/2013

CATS = Can't Afford To Support

12) Comment by dday198 - 15/01/2013

i'm very thankful that i don't live in marked or hank jr.'s world

13) Comment by Duckyluve - 15/01/2013

Mem go get back under your aluminum foil rock

14) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 15/01/2013

It's time for a new motorcycle, which gov't agency will provide the $$$$ needed ?

15) Comment by dday198 - 15/01/2013

good deal, now use the funding wisely and make the buses run on time so someone other than the needy will ride.

16) Comment by Duckyluve - 14/01/2013

What a complete waste of money

17) Comment by Chucky - 14/01/2013

please sir i want some more

18) Comment by 8point6 - 14/01/2013

phil. Exactly! “I just found out today but it sounds like that will be offset by the new of getting additional money from another source,” Hey, loftus. The "other source" is taxpayers. Same as the unfair property tax. Duhhhhh.

19) Comment by phil - 14/01/2013

So even more "free" money from heaven will continue to fall upon us? People need to do a little thinking and figure all of this out. Now we also will pay more federal taxes in the long run that will come back to CATS, so in reality we taxpayers (and others) now are being soaked twice for CATS. Of course the fact that the federal government (which is really us) is already about 16 TRILLION in debt is not mentioned in this discussion. Sorry, there are just NO free rides, not even for CATS. Of course, not to mention all of that money (about $3 million) the local government will now keep instead of giving it to CATS. and spend on who knows what. Seems like they got some "free" money from heaven too. Or maybe we taxpayers really get soaked 3 times? Now just replace the word "heaven" with the word "taxpayers" above and perhaps you will understand the big picture better.