Finger-display case settled

The case of the unconventional holiday lights has been settled, city and American Civil Liberties Union attorneys said Friday afternoon.

While some people were putting up festive lighting displays depicting sleighs and reindeer in November, Sarah Childs riled some neighbors by erecting on her roof a display of an extended middle finger.

The city will not take action against her for the display, according to the settlement which was reached in principle Friday, attorneys said.

Childs said she put the display up because she was upset with some of the people who live on her street.

After a Denham Springs police officer arrived at her house to make inquiries about her roof display, Childs said, he threatened her with criminal action if she didn’t remove the lights.

She temporarily took the lights down rather than risk having to pay a fine of $300 or $400, she said at the time.

The ACLU Foundation of Louisiana filed suit on her behalf in federal court in Baton Rouge.

Childs put up her lights again Dec. 14, this time depicting a pair of hands extending middle fingers.

She said neighbors reacted by filing complaints that led to municipal citations being issued against her for allegedly “obstructing the flow of traffic,” “disturbing the peace” and “simple assault.” The assault citation involved a song about the dispute that neighbors said included obscenities directed at them.

U.S. District Judge James J. Brady heard testimony Monday on Childs’ request for a preliminary injunction forbidding authorities to interfere with her right to display the fingers display.

At that time, her attorney said Childs intended to keep the display on her roof.

That hearing was scheduled to resume next week, but the attorney for the city sent a letter to the judge Friday saying the hearing is no longer necessary.

“The parties request that the court enter a 60-day dismissal order and will be filing a joint motion to dismiss” the case of Sarah Childs v. City of Denham Springs, according to the letter signed by attorney Scott Huffstetler.

ACLU attorney Justin P. Harrison confirmed Friday afternoon that a settlement had been reached.

“Our client’s First Amendment rights were vindicated,” Harrison said, but he declined to give details.

Huffstetler said the city’s insurance company will pay a part of the ACLU’s attorney fees, but will make no payment to Childs, who is also known as Sarah Henderson.

The city assured Childs that there will be no action taken against her solely for the light display, but maintains authority to respond to neighborhood complaints for other reasons, Huffstetler said.

He said the city maintains it did nothing to violate Childs’ right to freedom of speech.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (15)


1) Comment by HMaltravers - 12/01/2013

The psychological impact on young children seeing "the finger" pales miserably in comparison to whatever they may see in video- games, on the Internet, or on their parents' five-foot flatscreen TVs.

2) Comment by Woody - 12/01/2013

you don't have to go to church to have class, but it sure doesn't hurt.

3) Comment by wendellenglert - 12/01/2013

If you think Michael`s story is surprising..., 5 weeks ago my bro made $9510 grafting an eleven hour week from home and there classmate's half-sister`s neighbour did this for 4 months and easily made more than $9510 part-time from their labtop. use the guidelines on this web-site.-=-=-=- BIT40.COM -=-=-=-

4) Comment by Preppy6917 - 12/01/2013

So many people feel so comfortable calling this lady "trash" simply for a light display. I'm sure you all hold well-respected leadership roles within your churches.

5) Comment by brlady61 - 12/01/2013

Trash. She must be so proud. Hope she doesn't have children. What a horrid example she is setting.

6) Comment by firefly225 - 12/01/2013

IMO the 1st amend. was not created to protect stupidity and vulgar behavior. I seriously doubt this is the type of behavior our forefathers wanted to protect. I wonder how everyone on here cheering Ms. Childs on would like it if she was their neighbor and you had to see it every day. All she is doing is exercising her "rights" by antagonizing her neighbors and getting away with it. When people go too far like this {and protesting at soldier's funerals, etc...} the ACLU needs to shut up and let common sense and reason prevail. It is unbelievable this moron gets a settlement!!

7) Comment by dday198 - 12/01/2013

maybe the Livingston parish officals should worry about their own guns and meth labs a little more than some angry woman with Xmas lights

8) Comment by dday198 - 12/01/2013

so this woman put up this display of lights for no reason? does it take white trash to know white trash?

9) Comment by Bighug - 12/01/2013

Another ACLU lawyer gets a fat check at the expense of Livingston Parish taxpayers. It is time even the ignorant rednecks there learn that they don't have the right to impose their narrow ideas of the law on citizens. Training sheriff's deputies in the law would be a good start. I know of a woman there who was recently handcuffed and jailed by deputies merely because of a false accusation they didn't witness. That will probably end up costing the taxpayers another bundle.

10) Comment by Chucky - 12/01/2013

Next time Livingston think before you act.

11) Comment by Woody - 12/01/2013

which amendment is it that allows you to be white trash?

12) Comment by twinkie1cat - 12/01/2013

An this is why I don't go to Livingston Parish. They are too busy being conservatives to read the Constitution. They could have avoided this whole mess by ignoring it.

13) Comment by Tally - 12/01/2013

This is why people in EBR tell Livingston Parish jokes.

14) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 12/01/2013

obstructing the flow of traffic,” “disturbing the peace” and “simple assault.” ????Then every one that has a light display should be charged with the same charges! I am sorry that she didn't continue her suit and teach them a lesson.

15) Comment by Mr. T - 12/01/2013

I am disappointed tht Ms. Childs didn't stick it to the city of Denham Springs, since she was clearly in the right. The real story here is her creepy neighbors thst caused her to erect the display in the first place.