Lawmaker riled over hospice care cuts

A Baton Rouge legislator angrily accused the Jindal administration Thursday of misleading her and other lawmakers about the extent of budget cuts to hospice care.

State Rep. Patricia Smith, D-Baton Rouge, said agency leaders need to be reminded to tell the truth when addressing legislative committees.

“That was totally one that did not give us the right information on hospice care,” Smith said.

At issue is the impact of mid-year state budget cuts on dying patients relying on hospice services through the Medicaid program.

As part of a bid to erase a $166 million shortfall in the current $25 billion budget year, the Jindal administration announced that hospice care “provided outside of nursing homes” to Medicaid recipients would be eliminated beginning in February. Recipients already receiving care will continue to get the services.

Under the Medicaid program that treats the poor, hospice care is an optional service that states can eliminate. Nearly 6,000 Medicaid recipients in Louisiana got hospice care during the fiscal year that ended June 30.

Legislators thought the cuts meant patients dying at home would no longer receive hospice care, but that patients nearing the end of their lives in nursing homes would. Instead, the entire program is being eliminated.

“It may just be our obtuse choice of words. We are no longer offering that benefit,” state Department of Health and Hospitals Secretary Bruce Greenstein said Thursday.

Greenstein said people in nursing homes already have access to pain management and clergy visits so his main concern was what would happen to people in the community without the same infrastructure.

He said the Jindal administration had no other choice but to cut hospice after weak sales and personal income tax collections forced economists to lower their state revenue projections.

“We have had all optional services on our reduction list over the years. This is one of the benefits that is an optional service ... We don’t have the funding to continue funding optional services and so this is what we decided to reduce,” Greenstein said.

He said Medicaid recipients can turn to nonprofit or faith-based organizations for services.

Jamey Boudreaux, executive director of the New Orleans-based Louisiana-Mississippi Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, said hospice saves money by providing services outside a hospital.

He said patients will end up in emergency rooms, costing the state even more money.

The goal of hospice, Boudreaux said, is to make patients as comfortable as possible, usually at home, in the final weeks of their lives. “They’re going to be left to fend for themselves,” he said.

Hospice of Acadiana is a nonprofit organization that provides medical care, counseling and spiritual direction to people with life-threatening conditions.

The organization’s director, Louis “Buzzy” Hebert, said he is dismayed that the Jindal administration chose to cut hospice care through the Medicaid program. Now, he said, his organization will be forced to see patients for free and provide nursing, chaplain, social work and bereavement services.

“We’ve got to make a living ourselves. We can’t afford to be in the business to lose money,” Hebert said.

Boudreaux said other states looked at cutting hospice services only to shelve the proposal or reenact the care.

He said his fear is that dying patients won’t receive hospice care at all.

“They’re not going to have emotional support,” Boudreaux said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by Maui09 - 21/12/2012

Nursing homes do NOT have the ability/education to take care of the death/dying process of cancer patients. This is a very skilled profession to keep someone from being scared and pain free at the same time as allowing them to communicate with family. I agree with someone earlier. Let us take some money from other areas to make dying poor and dying comfortable a right. How about we take money from our state run camping sites. Maybe the campsites do not need personel or maybe the grass does not need to be cut weekly. How about cutting what the state subsidizes for the "Rice and Gravy" Festival or the "Cackling" Festival. or any other Festival. I would rather my taxes be taken away from the state parks than let somebody die in agony and pain. How about taking away the money come from the tax break the Chouest boat company gets at the large boat manufacturing company in South Louisiana. How about taking away the tax break from the Benson/Mercedes and use that money to let people get comfortable.

2) Comment by tradewinns - 21/12/2012

i don't think i agree with stopping hospice for the terminally ill. do they still get the drugs to keep them comfortable till their time comes? noone should suffer pain when it's time and my understanding the drugs stop the pain and reduce the fear of dying, which we all will have. i don't car how devout you are, you're going to be afraid. save money by not a/c in public housing.

3) Comment by Ivy - 21/12/2012

Long before hospice, I had a family member who, once diagnosed with cancer, opted to go home and die surrounded by family. Many people do not choose to have modern medicine prolong their suffering; they are ready to meet their Maker. Today's hospice allows them to do so with dignity and AND gives respite and support to the family members who want to be there for these people. There are some good nursing homes out there, but who wants to gamble that they will end up in one? I personally would rather gamble my entire retirement income on the lotto rather than invest a penny of it in a nursing care facility where it'd be a luck of the draw if I received care equal to or better than hospice care.

4) Comment by Loki - 21/12/2012

May the word generosity catch in your throat.

5) Comment by grimcity - 21/12/2012

Jeff Sadow, you're a caricature of yourself. "Convenient?" Are you insane? Do you have any clue what Hospice does? Have you ever been in a nursing home?

6) Comment by Pakistani - 21/12/2012

Tax base down because Pakistani boy shipping all the jobs to India.

7) Comment by jeffsadow - 21/12/2012

If Medicaid recipients want to continue to receive hospice care, there is the nursing home option for most. This is because the state pays for thousands of empty beds in nursing homes. It would cost next to nothing for the state, which already is paying for these, simply to have them occupied with people coming from home hospice care. Keep in mind these cuts do not affect the palliative relief they would get through regular Medicaid, only some of the ancillary services like respite care, the slack of which could be picked up by nursing homes. Yes, this is less convenient for some, but it is the generosity of the taxpayer that allows it to continue for these people who otherwise do not pay for these services.

8) Comment by phil - 21/12/2012

Does anyone in leadership in LA have a heart anymore? How about we cut the funds to pay legislator's salaries instead of cutting this? I am a fiscal conservative, and you have to draw the line somewhere, but this is not the place to draw it.

9) Comment by crabby - 21/12/2012

Balancing the budget on the backs of school kids, the sick, and the mentally ill -- we're the worst. Boobie is also cutting LSU's budget once again this winter..

10) Comment by SelfAwarePatterns - 21/12/2012

Apparently it's more important to keep taxes low rather than comfort the dying. None of us ever know where the vissicitudes of life may leave us or those we love at the end. If your luck puts you on hard times, don't die in Louisiana where the dying who happen to be poor will be on their own.

11) Comment by Maui09 - 21/12/2012

Representative Smith, The majority, but not all, patients going to hospice care have cancer as their diagnosis. Only a small portion of the chemotherapy that YOU would get is paid for by medicaid. As an example, if a medicaid recipient is diagnosed with colon cancer, that person may have his first chemo covered by medicaid but when his cancer spreads or recurs, medicaid will not pay for any other chemo and certainly not the newer drugs that YOU would recieve if YOU had colon cancer. Therefore, these poor people who cannot afford to pay for the expensive drugs will/do definitely go to hospice before You in the same situation. Medicaid covers very little of cancer treatment-- just call your local oncologist. I do not know how a hospice is paid by medicaid but I know some hospices do not take someone with neither medicare nor medicaid. There are hospices who take care of the truly indigent. If Medicaid no longer pays for hospice care and even now does not pay for cancer care, then the indigent and medicaid recipient will just not be treated in any way for that colon cancer. When you and other leaders of our state make decisions on issues, please, please talk with experts in the field being discussed. It is heart breaking when you make decisions on issues we know you know nothing about.