CATS critic asks tax protest

The businessman suing to invalidate the parish bus tax that voters approved in April is urging opponents of the tax to take advantage of a state law that will prevent the Capital Area Transit System from receiving the funds until after the lawsuit is resolved.

The East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff’s Office sent out property tax bills this month that included the newly approved 10.6-mill property tax for CATS. Taxes are due back to the sheriff at the end of the month and will be remitted to the respective taxing agencies on Jan. 10.

Milton Graugnard, the businessman who filed the suit, is telling tax opponents that they should write the Sheriff’s Office asking that office to hold in escrow the portion of their individual property tax bill that would otherwise go to CATS until the litigation is resolved.

CATS will be free to spend the tax money collected unless a property owner files a protest letter asking the sheriff to hold the amount in escrow, he wrote in an email addressed to CATS tax opponents.

“If the tax is later determined to be unconstitutional all CATS taxpayers will be entitled to a refund,” Graugnard wrote. “But if the money collected has been spent, the source of that refund is unclear and it may not be available at all.”

If CATS prevails in court, the escrowed funds would be returned to CATS.

CATS Board President Jared Loftus would not comment on the impact the escrowed account could have on CATS’ ability to deliver on the service goals promised in exchange for the passage of the tax. He also declined comment on what plan CATS has to refund money to taxpayers in the event the tax is deemed unconstitutional.

“We believe the most recent tax vote was legal and constitutional, and no court has said otherwise,” Loftus said in an emailed response. “Having said that, we would never discredit the opponents of the tax vote, nor would we initiate any ploy that would discredit the electoral statement made by the people of East Baton Rouge Parish.”

He said spending time to address every attack on the actions of CATS would be a “waste of valuable time.”

“We are focused on our efforts to continue to make CATS one of America’s most efficient and responsible transit systems,” Loftus said.

Casey Rayborn Hicks, spokeswoman for the Sheriff’s Office, confirmed in an email Tuesday that the Sheriff’s Office would hold funds in escrow at the request of tax payers.

“In the event a taxpayer advises the tax office that their tax payment is being protested or in other words paid under protest in accordance with the requirements of La. R.S. 47:2134, the Sheriff’s Office will ‘segregate’ the disputed funds — i.e., place the tax payment in an interest-bearing escrow account — and hold the funds until the issue regarding the protested taxes is resolved by the courts.”

Hicks said as of Tuesday afternoon there had been one inquiry to the tax office regarding the tax protest, but no official protests.

The deadline to protest is Dec. 31, Hicks said.

In July, Graugnard, a Cajun Industries executive, filed the lawsuit alleging that the CATS tax violates federal and state equal protection rights. A second petitioner, William L. Smith Jr., has since signed on as a plaintiff.

The crux of the plaintiffs’ argument is that the tax was levied within the city limits, yet some areas outside the city limits, such as the Mall of Louisiana and Perkins Rowe, will receive service without having to pay a tax.

In October, state District Judge Todd Hernandez denied CATS’ request to dismiss the lawsuit, but CATS has appealed that decision.

The 1st Circuit Court of Appeal issued an order halting all proceedings in Hernandez’s court until the appeal is concluded.

Graugnard’s attorney, Kyle Keegan, said their team was hoping to secure a court order requiring the sheriff to escrow all CATS tax collections, but the effort was hindered by the appellate court’s decision to halt proceedings in Hernandez’s court.

“We can’t do anything if the litigation remains stayed,” Keegan said. “So it’s very difficult for the plaintiffs to protect the taxpayer’s interest when not given access to the courts.”

Encouraging individuals to use the property tax under protest statue allows the Sheriff’s Office to escrow individual tax collections without a court order, Keegan said.

On Tuesday afternoon the CATS Board of Commissioners approved a $17.7 million operating budget for 2013 that it says will cut wait times for buses from 75 minutes to 20 minutes during peak hours.

The CATS tax is estimated to bring in $15.3 million, according to the budget, but only $9.2 million would be applied to the operating budget. The rest would be split between a CATS Board reserve account and to pay off a loan CATS took out this year to help stay open amid a budget shortfall.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (18)


1) Comment by Bouncer - 19/12/2012

This tax has made a lot of money accessible to incompetents. I'm just waiting for the first charges of corruption or misappropriation to be levied.

2) Comment by phil - 19/12/2012

DMJ - I guess now I need to explain to you that my first comment here stated that the tax needs to be thrown out..

3) Comment by foldgers - 19/12/2012

Thing is, MOST of the people that voted for this are more than likely not paying property taxes. Either way, my tenant for my rental property just renewed his lease with a $25 a month increase to pay for this. He was OK with it and understood. People who do not own property do not understand that this increase in property taxes for their landlords will be paid for by an increase in rent. And I am not wealthy by any means, I have just worked my whole life and saved and was able to buy a property to rent out, but when I saw an $800 a year total increase in my home and rental property combined, I had to catch my breath. I can't afford $800 a year, especially when I do not use what it is going to, so, if you rent your residence, be ready as I am sure I am not the only one. (Disclaimer, he is ok with the increase in rent because I keep up the property and if there is ever any problem, I fix it right away and he has even said I have been his best landlord ever, so no, I am not a slumlord trying to get more money)

4) Comment by Costanza - 19/12/2012

I am writing a letter making this request. I almost had a heart attack when I saw my property tax statement. More than a 25% increase from last year, mostly due to the CATS tax, but also due to other reasons (like reassessment of property values, even though property values in my neighborhood are on the decline). I have about had it with this city.

5) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 19/12/2012

There's always at least one socialist in any crowd.

6) Comment by nomoretax - 19/12/2012

It would be different if this was a useful service. Most I have ever seen on one of their busses is 6. What a waste of fuel as well as money!!

7) Comment by nimby? - 19/12/2012

perhaps now people will be more cautious/careful , will read more thoroughly as to what is/isn't what or who they are voting for . I'd bet it will be a while before another tax vote passes ...

8) Comment by DMJ - 19/12/2012

I think you're righ, phil. I think this lawsuit will be thrown out, it having no merit and all. Some judge or judges may face judicial review for letting it get this far.

9) Comment by phil - 19/12/2012

There were people who contacted government agencies about this CATS tax before, during, and after the tax vote to make those agencies aware that this tax was not supposed to be a municipal tax and that the homestead exemption should apply. After the CATS tax actually passed, the Attorney Generals's office came out with a legal opinion that indicated this CATS tax was indeed not a municipal tax and the homestead exemption should apply. Unfortunately, the only way apparently to protest a tax like this is to file a lawsuit, which most folks cannot afford to do. The basis for the current lawsuit might work to get this tax thrown out. However, I think it should be thrown out just on the basis that voters voted on something but got something different than what they thought they were voting on - or I personally call this tax a bait and switch, or a pig in a poke. I personally think the government should do what should have been done prior to the actual tax vote. That is, write a tax proposition that is not ambiguous, let let the public know what they are really voting on, and completely start over from scratch on this tax election with all of the correct facts.

10) Comment by Being_Stupid - 19/12/2012

Non-Municipal Taxing District = Theft by the Self-Appointed Board of Dictators

11) Comment by Being_Stupid - 19/12/2012

Food Truck Vendors should not be allowed to operate in any of these Self-Appointed Non Municipal Taxing Districts. Unless they pay the mandatory tax via permitting fees. If their permit shows they paid the mandatory taxes that the brick and mortar vendors have to pay, only then should food trucks be allowed to operate in that Non-Municipal Taxing District. And that goes for all Non-Municipal Taxing Districts, whether it is for CATS or "Crime Prevention".

12) Comment by DMJ - 19/12/2012

Sore losers are taking it to the next level, it seems. Why am I not surprised?

13) Comment by Being_Stupid - 19/12/2012

What belongs to you also belongs to them.

14) Comment by Being_Stupid - 19/12/2012

Can we withhold from paying the "Crime Prevention" - Neighborhood Nazi Association Tax too?

15) Comment by Mr. T - 19/12/2012

More biased reporting from the Advocate, which unsuccessfully fought the passage of the CATS tax and has given this frivilous lawsuit way too much coverage. The lawsuit is going nowhere, and everybody knows it.

16) Comment by tradewinns - 19/12/2012

you have nothing to lose by requesting escrow and a chance of paying more by doing nothing. once the money is spent, where do you think the refund is going to come from? YOU of course!

17) Comment by Duckyluve - 19/12/2012

Good luck with that.

18) Comment by 8point6 - 19/12/2012

I WILL be requesting the sheriff's office to hold my CATS tax in escrow until this litigation is resolved.