Hughes’ win also victory for GOP

Livingston Parish propels judge to Supreme Court

A huge lead in Livingston Parish was a big factor in Republican Jeff Hughes’ successful campaign for the District 5 seat on the Louisiana Supreme Court, Baton Rouge pollster and political analyst John M. Couvillon said Monday.

“He (Hughes) got nearly unanimous votes out of both Central and Livingston Parish,” Couvillon said.

Hughes’ win on Saturday gives Republicans a four-member majority on the seven-member Supreme Court.

Republicans now hold the Governor’s Mansion and a majority in both houses of the Legislature. The GOP also holds every statewide elected office but the one held by Democratic U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu.

The newest member of the state’s highest court did not return calls seeking comment on Saturday and Monday. An eight-year jurist on the 1st Circuit Court of Appeal, Hughes is the first Republican justice elected from District 5.

Hughes won only two of the district’s eight parishes, Couvillon said. Couvillon added, however, that Hughes’ collection of 89 percent of the Livingston Parish vote powered his six-percentage-point, district-wide victory over Democratic Party candidate and fellow appellate court Judge John Michael Guidry.

Guidry led in the Nov. 6 primary election with 27 percent of the vote. Hughes finished second with 21 percent of the vote in the eight candidate race.

Hughes, a 60-year-old Walker resident, won the runoff with a vote margin of 5,680 votes. He captured 53 percent of ballots in the district, where turnout was only 19.5 percent.

“He (Hughes) only carried two parishes, but he managed to keep it close everywhere else,” Couvillon explained.

Guidry, 50, of Baton Rouge, attempted to become the first black Supreme Court justice from District 5. He claimed the most votes in East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, West Feliciana, Iberville and Pointe Coupee parishes. Guidry is a 15-year member of the 1st Circuit Court of Appeal.

But the 5,577-vote margin Guidry managed in East Baton Rouge Parish was dwarfed by the 10,659-vote margin achieved by Hughes in Livingston Parish. Hughes also claimed Ascension Parish, but his vote margin there was 2,243 votes.

The Republican achieved his win in a district in which only 29 percent of voters are registered Republicans. Forty-eight percent are registered as Democrats.

“Hughes did well with his Republican base,” said Couvillon. He said Hughes received 83 percent of the vote in Central, 69 percent in southeast Baton Rouge and 52 percent of the voters between Highland Road and Perkins Road.

“That was the icing on the cake,” Couvillon said, as he noted that Hughes took 60 percent of the vote in the Kenilworth and Pollard Estates subdivisions.

Supreme Court races in Louisiana are usually relatively low-key campaigns.

But Hughes broke free from that tradition. He proclaimed that he favored the death penalty and described himself as “pro-life, pro-gun and pro-traditional marriage.” In the final days of the campaign, he argued his election to the high court would establish a four-justice Republican majority on the seven-member Supreme Court.

Hughes told district residents his election would prevent Guidry from aligning himself with “liberal Democrat Bernette Johnson,” who will become chief justice in January.

Guidry, however, campaigned as a moderate candidate and picked up the endorsements of all four political action committees of the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, as well as some labor groups.

Jeffrey Sadow, a political science professor at Louisiana State University in Shreveport, predicted in early November that Hughes would win the election because of his unconventional commercials and tactics.

“For a Supreme Court race, the mold certainly got broken on this one,” Sadow said Monday. “In the past, there had been small intimations by some candidates about general ideology, but never a wholesale introduction of issue preferences or talk about court alignments.”

Sadow said he could not predict whether Hughes’ campaign tactics will be replicated in future Supreme Court elections. He added, however, that big primary fields or highly competitive runoff elections could exert pressure for use of such tactics.

“If we equate discussion away … from competence in campaigns as livening them up, we’re likely to see that in competitive contests,” Sadow said.

Woody Jenkins, chairman of the Republican Party of East Baton Rouge Parish, said: “Judge Hughes had a tremendous campaign. When you have these low-interest elections, it’s hard to get people to come out and vote. Judge Hughes did that, though. And this is the first time the Republicans have had a majority on the Supreme Court.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (14)


1) Comment by DMJ - 11/12/2012

You guys are missing the point.... You're not supposed to vote for someone for judge who says how he/she is going to rule BEFORE the case even comes up. Judges are supposed to be above politics, not neck-deep in it. Ugh.

2) Comment by Isabella11 - 11/12/2012

After the BIG FAIL in November (Bama and O-BAMA). I am glad something has turned around! I am sure after some of the Bush Tax cuts are phased-out in 2013, it will be a wake-up call for the rest of America.

3) Comment by Duckyluve - 11/12/2012

The right man got the job. There is hope

4) Comment by Being_Stupid - 11/12/2012

At least 1 thing went in our favor this year.

5) Comment by WhoCares - 11/12/2012

Hughes was financed by the trial attorneys. They're the go to money guys for the Dems and Guidry was supported by the business community. Wonky stuff. I voted for Guidry. Hughes induces vomiting. LawyerDan makes two great points. It gives credence to the saying a broken clock is right twice a day.

6) Comment by MBW - 11/12/2012

Hughes' victory is yet another win for the loudmouth rightwing busybodies in this area. When will the Dems wake up and go vote??

7) Comment by DMJ - 11/12/2012

We're now electing politicians as supreme court justices now? Terrific. I'm sure this will be great for Louisiana.

8) Comment by MBW - 11/12/2012

Hughes' victory is a victory for those seeking to politicize the courts. It's total ***** to say that you're just "calling balls and strikes" when you announce ahead of time your views on a wide range of topics you have yet to rule on.

9) Comment by DMJ - 11/12/2012

"He (Hughes) got nearly unanimous votes out of both Central and Livingston Parish." Shocker.

10) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 11/12/2012

The article must be balanced, since two commentators holding apparently diametrically opposing views both were mad.

11) Comment by 8point6 - 11/12/2012

Congratulations Judge Hughes!

12) Comment by 8point6 - 11/12/2012

"The newest member of the state’s highest court did not return calls seeking comment on Saturday and Monday". Why would he? All this medium does is print/report negative articles about Republicans. Do you see a pattern? Vitter and Jindal don't "return calls" either. And I don't blame them. democrats get a free pass and are praised by this medium constantly.

13) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 11/12/2012

This is the first time in my memory where a Supreme Crt candidate basically told the voters how he intends to vote on cases that he has yet to hear. Unlike other elected officials, whom we elect to make public policy and thus need to know how they are likely to vote on various policy issues, Judges, particularly those on the Supreme Crt, are supposed to be chosen for their ability to apply the law and uphold the constitution against the particular facts of each case before them. One wonders if Justice Hughes has already decided how he will vote on the voucher case.

14) Comment by Mr. T - 11/12/2012

Why does the Advocate insist on quoting this John Couvillon, who is a Tea Party activist and Woody Jenkins' pollster? Whatever happened to fair and balanced reporting? Don't you have anyone else who can look at the election results and provide the superfiial analysis that Couvillon is providing - but hopefully without his political spin?