Monsour seeking more funding from city-parish

Advocate staff photo by PATRICK DENNIS -- Walter Monsour, president of the East Baton Rouge Redevelopment Authority, talked about the agency's accomplishments and its need for a stable source of funding during a   Metro Council budget hearing Tuesday. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by PATRICK DENNIS -- Walter Monsour, president of the East Baton Rouge Redevelopment Authority, talked about the agency's accomplishments and its need for a stable source of funding during a Metro Council budget hearing Tuesday.

The president of the East Baton Rouge Parish Redevelopment Authority told the Metro Council on Tuesday that his agency has only secured funding for the next three-and-a-half years, and would like to eventually receive a dedicated revenue stream from the city-parish budget.

Walter Monsour, the RDA’s president since 2009, made his pitch at the Metro Council’s final budget hearing.

The council has hosted a series of hearings for various publicly funded agencies and departments to explain their 2013 budgets, but the RDA — a quasi-public organization that develops under served areas — was the only agency to present that does not receive a regular allocation from the city-parish.

The only funding the RDA has received from the city-parish was $200,000 included in a budget supplement this year for the Mid-City Urban Renewal District and the Smiley Heights Urban Village Development Project.

Monsour said he will present a report to the mayor and the Metro Council in the next few months making a case for permanent funding.

Asked after the hearing if he was seeking to be included in a possible midyear budget supplement for 2013, Monsour said, “Obviously, I’d like to get permanent funding settled for the RDA as quickly as possible.”

He said he would let the mayor and council ultimately decide the appropriate level of funding for the RDA, but added that if he could receive “steady revenue of $3 million, we could turn it into $45 to $46 million easily.”

He said the sooner he gets permanent funding in place, the sooner he can hire more staff and plan additional projects.

The agency, which employs 10 people, was created by the state Legislature in 2007 and staffed in 2009.

Its $1.1 million operating budget primarily comes from grants from the East Baton Rouge Parish Mortgage Finance Authority and fees on New Market Tax Credits it has applied for and allocated for redevelopment projects. Those funds will last the agency for the next three-and-a-half years, Monsour said.

The agency has applied for more New Market Tax Credits, and Monsour said he feels the agency is well-positioned to receive them. But he said that source is not a steady or secure stream of revenue.

“Our task now is to set the future for East Baton Rouge Redevelopment Authority,” he said after the hearing. “We need to stabilize its funding so we can get much-bigger business, even more than we’ve already undertaken.”

Monsour said in the past three years the RDA has delivered on many of its promises and proven that it is worthy of permanent funding.

“I’m convinced we’ve made a substantial case for permanent funding and we’ll be able to show the assets we bring in terms of economic development, helping education as well as helping reduce crime,” Monsour said, after the hearing.

Monsour also noted that his agency has recently been charged with implementing FutureBR, the city-parish’s new land use and development policy.

But Monsour, a former chief administrative officer to Mayor-President Kip Holden, knows first-hand how tight the city-parish’s budget is and how difficult it can be to get elected officials to provide additional funding for agencies.

He noted that it was the mayor and the former council’s idea to create the agency in the first place, adding that “this is not just any agency coming forward.”

“The problem is not, ‘What if we go away?’ ” Monsour said. “It’s how do you implement FutureBR, how do you eliminate blight and how do you reach the underserved areas? That’s why we were made. And the council and the mayor will have to determine how to prioritize funding.”

Last month, Monsour said he would not seek a tax, but suggested additional city-parish funds could be raised for the RDA by increasing fees on code enforcement violations.

Monsour delivered only a brief presentation to the council, mostly outlining the RDA’s successes since its formation, with little discussion from council members, who were also hearing presentations from other agencies at Tuesday’s budget hearing. The council is set to vote on the mayor’s proposed budget for 2013 on Dec. 11.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (10)


1) Comment by phil - 28/11/2012

Also check out a public notice issued May 8, 2011 about funds related to the purchase of Smiley Heights Track that mentions $1.5 million in CDBG funds to be provided through the City-parish . Where do those funds come from?

2) Comment by phil - 28/11/2012

Sorry, but I think this is a big joke. People around here need to see what happened in California recently concerning redevelopment. See Redevelopment.us website. We can learn from others mistakes on this before we get deep into the same thing that happened in California. How much does in salary does Mr. Monsour make a year from the RDA? A news article in 2009 indicated that his compensation package was about $365,000 . Someone also needs to also see who makes money off of those NMTCs and where that money actually comes from. Follow the money (follow YOUR tax money)!.

3) Comment by Being_Stupid - 28/11/2012

I have mixed feelings about this RDA. Walter Monsour is the architect of the Red Light Program. The man that will stop at nothing to raise money for the city by any means even if it means infringing on your property rights. And now he wants to raise an Army of Code Enforcement Officers to wage war on blight? Property owners being fined over 3 million to pay for developments by BIG NAME Developers that are politically connected with Walter Monsour’'s RDA via Tax Credits? The only thing curbing the RDA's appetite for expropriation is Louisiana Law that makes it illegal to expropriate land and then give that land to a politically-connected Private Developer for "economic redevelopment" (basically expropriation that would allow the RDA to steal property they deem blighted and turn over to private developers for redevelopment in accordance with the FutureBR Manifesto). If Code Enforcement comes onto my property, they better be armed with a legitimate search warrant or I will sue this city for every penny in punitive damages. Soon we will have drones scouting private property from the air to search for unkept swimming pools, abandoned sheds, dead trees, unmowed grass, and unused automobiles and equipment. The New Army of Blight Patrol Officers will do anything to get around your 4th Amendment Rights to privacy (or over it by air) if they have to. All in the name of raising money via fines to pay for their Re-Development Authority. Then again, perhaps I am paranoid and have no idea what I am talking about. This RDA may do some good but at a cost of some serious consequences, much like the Red Light Program. Good but at the cost of Big Brother watching over your shoulder ready to invade your property if you don't keep in line when the light turns red. The RDA will help developers pressed for money to build their developments in certain parts of the city needing redevelopment, but at a cost that will create an unfair advantage for those BIG NAME Developers that have political connections over those Small Business Developers that don't. The future is hard to see. I sense Crony Capitalism and infringement of property rights to achieve the goals this ReDevelopment Authority as set out for itself.

4) Comment by Illuminate - 28/11/2012

Out of all the people/agencies/organizations that have presented to the Metro Council, it seems that the RDA is the only presenter producing or promising a return on investment (just food for thought). Seeing the epic differences other similar organizations have created in other cities, I would think that this RDA is paving the way for some well-placed steps into a brighter future for Baton Rouge.

5) Comment by welcometothebananarepublic - 28/11/2012

+1 for how The Advocate conveniently left out details of this pauper's salary at the RDA.

6) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 28/11/2012

Walter has his hands in the Government's pockets, surpassed only by the mayors hands in white women's pockets at Sullivan's.

7) Comment by tradewinns - 28/11/2012

everyone wants their own dedicated revenue stream. i understand, i want one also. so where do i go to start the process? i'm going to need the money to fight poverty, stupidity, loneliness,hunger, boredom, etc. wait, i also want to fight blight in my yard!

8) Comment by 8point6 - 28/11/2012

Gimme mo money! Gimme mo money!

9) Comment by Woody - 28/11/2012

walter, how about a great big ol' helping of NO!

10) Comment by Tigerman66 - 28/11/2012

Not surprised he's looking for more money, he did the same thing in Bocage trying to get everyone to pay for security dues.