Woman removes lighted ‘finger’ off roof

Thanksgiving has just passed and Sarah Henderson has already taken the holiday lights off her roof.

A visit from the police prompted by complaints from her neighbors might have hurried the process.

The lights were in the shape of a hand flipping the middle finger, neighbors said. Henderson said that’s what she intended.

“I got to looking, and I said is that what I think it is?” said Gemma Rachal, who lives at the far end of the street. “I put on my glasses just to be double sure.”

“I’m furious,” Rachal said “My 6-year-old tried to make the symbol with his hand.”

She said she was afraid her son might mimic the gesture again at kindergarten.

Neighbor Hunter Lee said the lights bothered him because of his children, ages 3 and 9.

He said he didn’t like “having to explain to the kids what it means.”

Amy Bryant, who lives a block away, said that when she first saw the lights this weekend she thought, “I can’t believe she did it.”

Police Chief Scott Jones said an officer went to Henderson’s house on Starlite Drive on Monday and talked Henderson into taking the lights down.

Jones said the officer “played on her sense of fair play” and the idea that neighborhood children would see the decoration.

Henderson said she got on her roof in the rain and removed the offending rooftop decoration after the officer mentioned the possibility of a $300 or $400 fine for violating a city ordinance.

The finger was intended for neighbors with whom she’s had a yearlong disagreement over personal matters, she said.

“This is how I expressed myself,” Henderson said. “It’s the only means I have to express myself to these people.”

She said she has thought about replacing the extended finger with a swastika.

Henderson said she felt her original decoration was within her First Amendment rights but agreed to remove it rather than face the possibility of having to pay a fine.

Cpl. Shawn Perkins said they had a discussion about First Amendment rights and the city’s obscenity statute, and he told her that if she insisted on putting something up as a message to neighbors, it would have to be less offensive.

Henderson, who has four children between the ages of 4 and 16 living with her, said she’s overdone Christmas lights in the past, but has never put up anything neighbors complained of as being offensive.

“I’ve always been a little different,” she said smiling Monday afternoon as she looked down the street where neighbors had begun returning home from work.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (38)


1) Comment by HMaltravers - 01/12/2012

Hey Len2881! Funniest thing I've read in a long time. You hit the nail on the head.

2) Comment by Mildred Citizen - 29/11/2012

Hey old yat! You're admonishing someone who calls themselves "twinkiecat". Ya got me?

3) Comment by old yat - 29/11/2012

Hey Twinkie: What in the world is wrong with you?Lady you need some serious help as soon as possible!Do you ever read your comments before you press the submit button?I think not.How can you make the type of comments about Livingston Parish and it's many residents using terms like "gun toting,meth head,Republican rednecks"that can't spell, only to say they should "take the high road" and "reach out in Christian love". Ms Henderson did attack her neighborhood and in turn you attack an entire parish.So where is all this "peace on earth and good will to all people"that you talk about?Is that what you are doing,showing them some good old "high road Christian love". Come on Twinkie start reading your comments before you push the button,that way people will not see you for the hypocrite you really are!!! Somebody needs to send a pastoral counselor to your house so they can help you get rid of some of that hate that you have in your heart.God Bless&Happy Holidays!!!!!!

4) Comment by twinkie1cat - 28/11/2012

The parents in the neighborhood need to take the high road on this. They also might want to reach out in Christian love to Ms. Henderson and the neighbor she has the problem with. As for the questions of the the children, what you do is tell them. "Miss Henderson is mad at somebody. She is saying a bad word with her lights. That picture is a bad word so don't you make it, ok. We don't say bad words" That is all you have to do. That is what I did when my mentally handicapped students would come to school saying bad words. It works very well and doesn't usually need to be repeated more than twice with children who are mentally or chronologically 3-8. Speak calmly but firmly and don't make a big deal of it or they will learn to use the finger when they are mad. Then assure them that the bad word on Miss Henderson's roof will not make Santa forget their house.

5) Comment by twinkie1cat - 28/11/2012

Livingston Parish. Where they believe in guns, voting Republican, meth labs and settling their arguments with the neigbors like good rednecks do, especially in the season of Peace on Earth and good will to all people. Livingston Parish where they need to secede for the good of Louisiana because they are an embarrassment. Livingston parish where the major crimes are making meth and domestic violence. Instead of attacking the entire neighborhood Ms. Henderson could put up a sign in her own yard saying, without curse words, describing what her neighbor did to inflame her. That would be a more effective way of expressing her freedom of speech. But maybe she can't spell. Seriously, one of the churches in Baton Rouge needs to send out a pastoral counselor and defuse this. It looks like a feud to me and you know the folks in Livingston pack guns.

6) Comment by DMJ - 28/11/2012

“It’s the only means I have to express myself to these people.” The ONLY means? hahahaha! This is hilarious! I can just imagine her thinking: Well...I tried to talk to them, but it didn't work. The next logical step is to make the Bird out of Xmas lights and put it on my roof. Haha! Priceless! That being said, I think she's well within her rights to put whatever she wants on her roof. It's her house, right?

7) Comment by HerbF - 28/11/2012

First, the ACLU has gotten involved, and will defend her right to free speech. Second, I think the lady has already made her point, to a degree she really never anticipated. Thus, there is really no need to replace the lights. Third, Ms Rachel is clearly entitled to her opinion. She was ASKED for comment. And, if her opinion does not agree with yours, too bad. She also has the same freedom of speech, and she certainly did not comment for attention. That's absurd.

8) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 28/11/2012

To Gemma Rachal don't try to back peddle now. You could have told the reporter NO COMMENT! No you did just what you wanted to do, get your 15 minutes of fame. I'll bet you bought all the papers in town and mailing the article to all your relatives.

9) Comment by Spudaroonski - 28/11/2012

Come on people, this is Livingston Parish we're talking about here. This is the place where the person who has the most job security is the Tooth Fairy. Yeah boy, nothing says peace on earth goodwill toward men like a big lighted finger on your roof. And please, for the love of god someone talk Honey Boo Boo down from that roof before she hurts herself.

10) Comment by Len2881 - 28/11/2012

She should simply refer to it as a Livingston Parish menorah.

11) Comment by ScotB - 27/11/2012

This may be offensive to some, but is clearly within her first amendment rights. This is an easy lawsuit win, had she chosen to pursue it.

12) Comment by 2smart4u - 27/11/2012

Judge not, lest ye be judged. People do things for all sorts of reasons...until you've walked in her shoes, you should not judge. And for those neighbors who are offended: why not be a good Christian, walk over to her house and see if she needs help, a friend, someone to talk to? Although I personally would never do this, I commend her for having the guts to do it. So many people like to "talk-the-talk" but rarely, if ever, "walk-the-walk."

13) Comment by Emmarld - 27/11/2012

First of all I am Gemma Rachal, and i want to clear up a few things, The 6 yr old is a foster child, and he has been raised different then most children, We love him very much and i am trying to shield him from things that he may have seen to much of already. No I am NOT the neighbor she has issues with, I live over a football field away from Sarah. I barely know her, but I have seen a lot of drama down at that end of the street. and at times it has gotten so loud we could hear the yelling at the end the road. The drama has not always been with Sarah, there was other neighbors involved in disputes, I don't know the details and I don't care to know. The few conversations I have had with Sarah have always been nice, i have nothing against her, and to me this is not a matter of *freedom of speech*. it a matter of seeing the world thru the eyes of a child at Christmas. and the image on her roof in is the first time that "X"-mas light really applies. It's about morals and doing whats right. It should be about seeing the wonder and joy in a childs eyes as the lights go up all over the neighbor hood. We have a lot of young children in our neighborhood, I don't want them to see that. Let them be children as long as possible. I just happened to be the neighbor at home when the paper came by and asked to talk to me. So I guess I get all the blame? What about the other neighbors who was all out Sunday night when the police came by, Jason & Hillari, Mrs Gayle, Amy, Hunter & Kayla, Liz & Linda, Kelly, Marlene & Felix, Cord & Hope, Shantel and and many others. We all agreed this was an ugly thing to do for the childrens sake, if it was meant for 1 person it totally went above and beyond that. I wish Sarah well, I Thank her for taking the lights down, I hope she can find new ways to express herself, I wish that her and what ever neighbor she has personal issues with, can work out their problems, and that it does not involve the whole neighborhood. Thank you Gemma Rachal

14) Comment by BobJohannessen - 27/11/2012

Henderson says, "The e finger was intended for neighbors with whom she’s had a yearlong disagreement .." I think it is pretty obvious who initiated this disagreement.

15) Comment by mcarter - 27/11/2012

I know, first amendment, freedom of speech, expression.....blah, blah but really? Grow up Mrs. Henderson. Parent of 4 children. I am sure they are so proud. Glad this busy body lives far away from this mother of the year.

16) Comment by BRmoderate - 27/11/2012

If this was put up in my neighborhood, I would have been offended too. But rather than call the cops, I would have personally asked her to take it down.

17) Comment by HerbF - 27/11/2012

She made her point.

18) Comment by Stephen - 27/11/2012

Clear cut First Amendment violation. The police officer needs to be sued and made to pay a money judgment--a good sized one at that.

19) Comment by Ivy - 27/11/2012

Also, any 6 year old who "tries to make this symbol with his hand" and is not successful, has absolutely NOT been exposed to ANY media. God bless him.

20) Comment by Ivy - 27/11/2012

If she felt that way, why wait until right before the holidays??? She could have put them up much much earlier, say, around late August which is when retailers start reminding us that the holidays are nearly upon us!!! They had no right to tell her to take that display down!!!

21) Comment by CitizensArrest - 27/11/2012

If she's in a HOA then its a different story. I doubt she is as there was no mention of same in the story.

22) Comment by Being_Stupid - 27/11/2012

A swastika would have been more appropriate.

23) Comment by Being_Stupid - 27/11/2012

Her next door neighbor must be one of those typical nosy-busy body type neighbor that is in charge of the neighborhood association.

24) Comment by The Realist - 27/11/2012

Way to stay on top of the important stories, Advocate!

25) Comment by CitizensArrest - 27/11/2012

Hey Gemma, get a handle on your bird flipping kid. It's not society's job...it's yours.

26) Comment by CitizensArrest - 27/11/2012

Welcome to the nanny state. Those that believe that Jesus of Nazareth was a zombie and teach their kids that a fat man in a red suit flies around the world are safe from the evil eyes of Livingston Parish. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for both of those traditions if it fits your family. But why must this lady remove her lights? Because you don't want to take the time to talk with your kids about the fact that people have different opinions? Mind your business people. If everyone did that we wouldn't be in this state. The Constitution doesn't give you the right to not have your feelings hurt or to explain reality to your grand kids (who should be being raised by their parents).

27) Comment by gmanderson - 27/11/2012

Maybe she was just protesting FEMA's decision not to pay for the hurricane work in the parish?

28) Comment by Get Real - 27/11/2012

I think she should contact the ACLU to keep her lights up.

29) Comment by 8point6 - 27/11/2012

Denham Springs? L.P.? Hey, Sarah. Wanna REALLY aggravate the neighbors? Put a lighted picture of hussein on your roof.

30) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 27/11/2012

And by the way the police would have lost this one in court big time.

31) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 27/11/2012

This is ridiculous. The lights were not that offensive and she should be left alone. I would help her to pay legal expenses if she wanted to fight it...go Grannie! PS: 2 JenniferW1126 maybe there is hope for you after all :)

32) Comment by JenniferW1126 - 27/11/2012

While I find it a little crazy (coo-coo crazy), I don't understand people who say they have a difficult time explaining it to their children! You tell them it means a bad word and not to do it. Pretty simple actually. I think if my neighbor put that up, I would shake my head, laugh, and see how long their crazy behinds left it up.

33) Comment by spqr - 27/11/2012

By expressing her opinion in such a vulgar way she imposed it on others forced to witness it. She was wrong. And not very mature. Grow up, Ms. Henderson.

34) Comment by Traveler - 27/11/2012

When I saw the photo, I thought, "This looks like a saguaro cactus. It must be an Arizona Christmas tree!"

35) Comment by Grannee - 27/11/2012

In the free state of Livingston parish - why can't she do this?

36) Comment by gary - 27/11/2012

@Bighug - your comment is very close to reality in LP, I bet a future canidate for parish wide office will run on that platform and win.

37) Comment by ABayouBoy - 27/11/2012

Oh Jesus, poor Santa. With the index finger to point the way for the sleigh....I wonder what she gives her kids for Christmas?.

38) Comment by Bighug - 27/11/2012

The ACLU lawyers must love Livingston Parish. They've made a bundle winning cases in the parish. I expect the parish to pass a law any day now requiring church attendance on Sunday.