Will Superstorm Sandy change  U.S. role at climate conference?

DOHA, Qatar — During a year with a monster storm and scorching heat waves, Americans have experienced the kind of freakish weather that many scientists say will occur more often on a warming planet.

And as a re-elected president talks about global warming again, climate activists are cautiously optimistic that the U.S. will be more than a disinterested bystander when the U.N. climate talks resume Monday with a two-week conference in Qatar.

“I think there will be expectations from countries to hear a new voice from the United States,” said Jennifer Morgan, director of the climate and energy program at the World Resources Institute in Washington.

The climate officials and environment ministers meeting in the Qatari capital of Doha will not come up with an answer to the global temperature rise that is already melting Arctic sea ice and permafrost, raising and acidifying the seas, and shifting rainfall patterns, which has an impact on floods and droughts.

They will focus on side issues, like extending the Kyoto protocol — an expiring emissions pact with a dwindling number of members — and ramping up climate financing for poor nations.

They also will try to structure the talks for a new global climate deal that is supposed to be adopted in 2015, a process in which American leadership is considered crucial.

Many were disappointed that Obama didn’t put more emphasis on climate change during his first term. He took some steps to rein in emissions of heat-trapping gases, such as sharply increasing fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks. But a climate bill that would have capped U.S. emissions stalled in the Senate.

“We need the U.S. to engage even more,” European Union Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said. “Because that can change the dynamic of the talks.”

The world tried to move forward without the U.S. after the Bush Administration abandoned the Kyoto Protocol, a 1997 pact limiting greenhouse emissions from industrialized nations. As that agreement expires this year, the climate curves are still pointing in the wrong direction.

The concentration of heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide has jumped 20 percent since 2000, primarily from the burning of fossil fuels like coal and oil, according to a U.N. report released this week. And each year, the gap between what researchers say must be done to reverse this trend, and what’s actually being done, gets wider.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (3)


1) Comment by yadodge0501 - 25/11/2012

Another climate fear mongering article from AP. No , this wasn't a super storm , just a standard hurricane in an unusual place. No respectable climate scientist claims this is due to global warming, which has been on hold for the last 13 years. No, the United States can't effect CO2 output significantly compared to China and India Yes, CO2 has increased in the atmosphere. Another enviromental so-what. CO2 has been shown to be an insignificant driver of climate temp.

2) Comment by TommyRucker - 25/11/2012

If the climate fearing people get the massive number of people in the northeast stirred up over this, they can do whatever as it is all about POWER. If this storm would have hit down south, it would have practically been ignored or written off as just another storm but because it happened to the 'special people', the 'most deserving' people, we won't hear the end it until they get billions and billions of dollars and everyone else's life is drastically changed. Unfortunately it is all about politics and has little to do with the truth.

3) Comment by TommyRucker - 25/11/2012

The Northeast is going to get a lot more federal money out of the storm than Louisiana did as they have more political muscle. They are going to 'take advantage' of the situation just like they did with 9-11. It is amazing how many billions of dollars some of these people can extract out of the taxpayers and how they can exaggerate the magnitude of the problems. it takes a special talent to be able to exaggerate the damage and the amount of money needed to make things better than they were before the storm.