Protesters picket Wal-Mart stores

Advocate staff photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCK -- Baker Wal-Mart employee Janet Sparks, left, is asked by Baker Police to end a protest Friday outside the Plank Road store. Members of the Occupy movement, right, participated in the protest. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCK -- Baker Wal-Mart employee Janet Sparks, left, is asked by Baker Police to end a protest Friday outside the Plank Road store. Members of the Occupy movement, right, participated in the protest.

Wal-Mart workers and supporters marched in protest at a number of stores nationwide Thursday and Friday, including a store in Baker, blasting the wages, benefits and treatment of employees of the world’s largest retailer.

The efforts seemed to do little to keep shoppers away, though — Wal-Mart said it was its best Black Friday on record.

A lone Wal-Mart employee and more than a dozen members of the Baton Rouge and New Orleans chapters of the Occupy movement staged a protest outside the retailer’s Baker store on Plank Road.

The 45-minute protest, which started at 6 a.m. just outside the front door, was part of the national Making Change at Walmart campaign against the retail giant. The group claims the Bentonville, Ark., company underpays employees, understaffs stores and retaliates against workers who speak out.

A union-backed group called OUR Walmart has said that it was holding an estimated 1,000 protests in 46 states. The exact number is unclear. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has denied that estimate, saying the figure is grossly exaggerated and that the protests involved few of its own employees.

Janet Sparks, a customer service manager at the Baker store, was the only local Wal-Mart employee to take part in the Baker protest, which included signs and chants including, “They say rollback, we say fight back” and “Hey hey, ho ho, retaliation has got to go.”

Sparks said she has worked at the Baker Wal-Mart for three years and led a similar protest this spring. She said other employees expressed interest in joining the protest but backed out. She said that while her protest is protected speech, she wasn’t sure whether her decision to picket her employer would get her laid off or her hours cut.

Sparks said she was protesting to let employees, customers and investors know that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. can be a better corporate citizen and employer if it would provide workers with better pay and benefits and staff its stores better.

Sparks, who makes about $12 an hour, said she enjoys her job, but thinks workplace policies Wal-Mart began enacting in 2006 have hurt employees at the expense of shareholders.

“I truly believe the company can afford to pay us better,” she said.

The national campaign was timed to coincide with Black Friday, but Sparks said the issues she was protesting are ongoing.

The Baker parking lot was mostly empty early Friday morning. Wal-Mart’s door-buster sales were held Thursday at 8 p.m. and 10 p.m. and Friday at 5 a.m., an hour before the protest started.

Wal-Mart estimated that fewer than 50 associates participated in Thursday and Friday’s protests nationwide. Company spokesman Dan Fogleman said the number of associates who missed their shifts during the two days of events is 60 percent lower than last year.

“It was proven last night — and again today — that the OUR Walmart group doesn’t speak for the 1.3 million Wal-Mart associates,” the company said in a statement.

The union group estimated that “hundreds” of employees participated nationwide.

In Paramount, Calif., authorities arrested a small group of protesters Friday outside a Wal-Mart. Elizabeth Brennan, of Warehouse Workers United, said nine people, including three Wal-Mart employees, were arrested shortly after noon for blocking the street outside the store in Paramount. At one point, however, more than 1,000 people blocked traffic outside the store, Sheriff’s Capt. Mike Parker said.

In Lakewood, Colo., shoppers hesitated as they passed dozens of protesters outside a Wal-Mart but entered without incident.

Some protesters held signs playing off of the retailing giant’s corporate slogan, “Live better,” accusing the company of corporate greed and underpaying its workers.

A number of demonstrations and walk-outs occurred last week at stores but were scheduled to culminate on one of the year’s busiest shopping days.

The size and impact of the protests varied greatly by site. OUR Walmart, made up of current and former Wal-Mart employees, was formed in 2010 to press the company for better working conditions. Wal-Mart has criticized the group for relying largely on other unions and non-employees to make up the ranks protesting outside its stores.

The retailer also filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board last week against the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. The company said that the demonstrations organized by OUR Walmart threatened to disrupt its business and intimidate customers and associates.

Advocate business writer Chad Calder and Associated Press writer Sarah Skidmore contributed to this report.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (4)


1) Comment by Bouncer - 24/11/2012

Lack of education should not of necessity mean living in poverty. Even the meanest among us who choose to work for a living should be paid a decent living wage. Cough it up, WalMart! You can afford it. The outrage is not that these workers are protesting, and the point is not that they can "just get another job" if they are unhappy with WalMart. The outrage and the point is that a corporate giant is so miserly and tight-fisted that it is unwilling to pay its employees a livable wage with benefits. I hope that someday, some of you who are sneering at Ms. Sparks and her co-workers will be in a similar position. Let's see then if you're so glib about dismissing your own situation.

2) Comment by NearBarbarian - 24/11/2012

If corporations are going to be "citizens," then they'd better get used to the tenets of democracy--such as protest (aka, criticism). And if the boot-strapping right is going to insist that everyone gets a job, then it should also insist that employers pay a living wage, treat workers with respect, and be beneficial members of society. (Please no moral relativism, guys.)

3) Comment by Attila - 24/11/2012

I salute Ms. Sparks for having the personal responsibility to at least work for a living. I do agree that if one does not like the pay or working conditions they have the right to drag up and find another job. The problem is that many of the people who work at WalMart and other big box retailers do not have the education, initiative, or capacity to do any better than they are doing. C'est la vie.

4) Comment by biglsufan - 24/11/2012

So, Ms Sparks, is someone forcing you to work there? If not, you have the RIGHT to find a place to work that will give you what you want. You are your own business, YOU CHOSE to accept Walmarts terms when you agreed to go to work for them. If you're not happy, leave!