Crime prevention districts proposed

Residents to vote on fee for increased security

Residents concerned with crime in two Baton Rouge communities will vote Dec. 8 on whether to establish crime prevention and improvement districts in which property owners would be assessed a fee to pay for increased security patrols.

In Melrose East, two civic leaders are at odds over whether the crime prevention and improvement proposed for that district is a necessity for a community that has other needs.

The measure on the ballot would levy a fee of up to $200 annually per improved residential parcel and an initial fee of up to $500 for commercial property. The fee would be for 10 years, beginning in 2013 and ending in 2022, and would fund increased security and off-duty police patrols.

Proponents of the measure said, if passed, it would raise more than $75,000 to $100,000 in the first year.

Residents of Mayfair Heights, Mayfair Park and Mayfair Park East said they are concerned about rising crime and the welfare of older residents. The measure would place an annual parcel fee of $144 on each improved land parcel in the subdivisions for five years beginning Jan. 1, 2013, and it may be renewed after the initial five years. Proponents said they expect more than $61,000 to be raised in the first year.

In Melrose, Lewis Dill, owner of Lewco Specialty Products Inc., and president of the Melrose East Community Association, said he pushed to set up a crime prevention and improvement district in that area because he sees it as a sustainable way to deal with the major issues of crime and blight.

Melrose East generally extends from Lobdell Boulevard west to North Ardenwood Drive and from Florida Boulevard north to Renoir Avenue.

Dill said he and other business owners in Melrose East, through MECA, have funded security patrols since Aug. 2009, spending about $100,000 annually on security, beautification and cleanup. Lewis said he wanted a longer term solution that didn’t rely solely on himself and other business owners in MECA providing the financial support.

Dill said if the tax passes, he will use MECA’s money for beautification and clean-up projects.

Dill said he’s tried to recruit other businesses and residents to contribute voluntarily but they have declined to participate.

Carol Thornton, who represents apartment managers in Melrose East, said the community needs parks and after-school programs, not more police.

“I feel like Mr. Dill, who is pushing this and put this on the ballot, is not in touch with the community,” Thornton said.

Thornton, who worked at the East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Office for 13 years, said Melrose East residents should not have to spend money on security because she believes that crime prevention techniques she and other apartment managers implemented are proving successful.

Both Dill and Thornton said crime has decreased over the past three years and each takes credit, touting their contributions as the reason for the decline.

For the three Mayfair neighborhoods, State Rep. Franklin Foil, R-Baton Rouge, who wrote the bill creating the district, said some of his constituents strongly favored creating a security district and wanted a chance to vote on the issue.

The Mayfair district would encompass the physical boundaries of the three neighborhoods, which generally includes the area south of Hyacinth Ave., between Windingway Drive to the east, Mayfair Hill Drive to the west and Blackmore Avenue to the south.

Foil said Herman Holmes, a lawyer who has lived in the Mayfair area for 30 years, approached him with the idea, helped write the bill and spoke to the legislature about why a crime prevention improvement district would be beneficial for residents.

Holmes said population growth and more traffic have brought crime problems in recent years, including home burglaries, and said he views the crime prevention district as a means to hopefully deter violent crime in the area.

“We try to be proactive; we’re trying to get a jump on something before it gets bad,” Holmes said. “We’ve been fortunate in Mayfair not to have any violent activity.”

Holmes said he attended a Broadmoor Homeowners Association meeting when they were trying to get their district passed and learned that it is a good way to spread the cost of the security patrols over all the residents.

Metro Councilman Rodney “Smokie” Bourgeois, whose council district includes the Mayfair neighborhoods, said people in the area are getting older and the “punks are trying to move in and they are causing some trouble over there.”

Bourgeois said the only item he insisted on, which was included in the bill, was a provision that the fee would not be assessed on a parcel if any of the owners are over the age 65. He said his main concern was to not impose a financial hardship for people living on a fixed income.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (25)


1) Comment by old yat - 27/11/2012

Hey Podnuhs: Let me run this by you.Last Friday,better known as "Black Friday", the FBI ran almost 155,000 background checks in one day. Now lets say that those 155,000 individuals only bought one firearm for each check,that is 155,000 more legally purchased firearms in the hands of American citizens.Bad Guys take note, we are not going to sit by quietly while you mug,rape,and steal from us any longer.You want to prevent crime?,arm yourself,get a CCP, and practice,practice,PRACTICE!!!! Remember: GUN CONTROL IS BEING ABLE TO HIT WHAT YOU SHOOT AT!!!!!! GodBless&GoTigers!!!

2) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 26/11/2012

http://youtu.be/UwTtSl-Ayc0?t=18s From the horses mouth

3) Comment by Chucky - 26/11/2012

Not sure how much protection we are getting from the Sheriff, it seems that he is always talking about his office responsibility to the unincorporated areas of the Parish and not the entire Parish. Heck, I think he even charges Central for law-enforcement. The sheriff is elected for the entire Parish and is the Chief Law-enforcement officer in the Parish, more should be expected of him.

4) Comment by nimby? - 26/11/2012

we could ask why crime is higher in certain areas , but....

5) Comment by DMJ - 26/11/2012

Who's making money? Cops and robbers. Same old, same old... While I would never presume to tell people they couldn't make their own crime prevention districts, it seems like a shakedown for residents to have to pay for police patrols when police should be patrolling in high-crime areas anyway. It's about allocation of resources. If it takes a dozen cops to operate a DUI checkpoint, that's 12 cops not on patrol. If it takes 50 cops to patrol Gov't Street on White Light Night, that's 50 cops that aren't patrolling somewhere else. Law enforcement is a zero sum business; if a cop is doing A, he's not doing B. Something to think about...

6) Comment by phil - 26/11/2012

People REALLY need to read the bills in the LA legislature that create these districts, The devil IS in the details. I have to ask the question - who is making money on crime in Baton Rouge? This appears to be a new industry in BR called the crime industry. Kind of reminds me of the crime families of years ago and the protection rackets that also existed. I agree with the comments being_stupid has posted here and I will not repeat what was already stated. Please wake up folks!

7) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 26/11/2012

When I purchase my next home, I can assure you it won't be in EBR. More people need to do likewise.

8) Comment by spiderman - 26/11/2012

While we are on the subject, I would like to propose a recall vote on the Broadmoor district. A portion of the subdivision was not allowed to vote because their precinct was not included. Haven't heard anything on the subject since the day after the election. It just stinks that we have to pay twice for police protection that we are supposed to receive anyway.

9) Comment by Woody - 26/11/2012

the recently re-elected third term mayor says there is no crime problem in baton rouge

10) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/11/2012

I want to thank the Local Republican Party for raising property taxes and stealing property from the Individual and giving it to the Greater Collective. Want to thank Woody Jenkins for doing absolutely nothing to stop this from happening. Also especially thank Dan Claitor, Steve Carter, Franklin Foil, Hunter Greene, and Erich Ponti. And of course thank Attorney General Buddy Caldwell. Here's to the 2012 Republican Leadership stealing my property from me. Ronald Reagan must be proud. Thanks.

11) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/11/2012

Mayfair Neighborhood is for old people over 65 only, NO punks better try and move in.

12) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/11/2012

The only "criminal" these Neighborhood Collectives target are actual property owners living in the neighborhood. Read the fine print - voting these Non-Municipal Taxing Districts basically imposes a Mandatory Home Owners Association onto your property without deed. Gives them the right to sue you for any infraction they deem offensive. Imagine being forced to pay dues to an organization that sues you. So while you are paying money to a lawyer to defend your property rights in court, at the same time you will be paying the Neighborhood Property Collective to sue you. The "Crime-Prevention" Non-Municipal Taxing District will turn your neighborhood into their dictatorship. The Self-Appointed Board will decide whoever, over whatever, will be sued and will have the unlimited funds to do so. They may not like the color of your house, or the height of your fence, or the flag on your front yard, or the too many "young punks" staying over at your house. And should the Neighborhood Association decide to pick on you, think of all the money you will spend defending yourself in court, while at the same time suing yourself too. It is partly a reflection of our increasingly litigious society.

13) Comment by BR is Ruined - 26/11/2012

“We’ve been fortunate in Mayfair not to have any violent activity.” ... That's a joke, right?

14) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/11/2012

The people over 65 get to vote for a tax that they don't have to pay and can pass onto others. How convenient. WHERE IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL? Why doesn't somebody declare these property tax votes by people that don't have to pay the tax, yet get to vote for it, unconstitutional?

15) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/11/2012

Within time the Self-Appointed Neighborhood Association will raise the fees and the frequency of the fees. $200 a year will become $200 a month. They will use the same unfair tactics to raise mandatory dues like they are doing now to pass them with an unconstitutional vote. In the near future, nobody will own their property in East Baton Rouge Parish. Property will belong to the Association and you will be forced to rent your home from the Association. Neighborhood Association = Neighborhood Property Collective. YOUR PROPERTY WILL BELONG TO THE GREATER COLLECTIVE.

16) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/11/2012

Why doesn't the Republican Attorney General Buddy Caldwell declare these Non-Municipal "Crime Prevention" Taxing Districts to be homestead exempt like he did for the CATS Tax? These Non-Municipal "Crime Prevention" Taxing Districts should be homestead exempt. Why aren't they homestead exempt like the CATS Tax?

17) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/11/2012

Should you be obligated to pay twice for police protection?

18) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/11/2012

Amazing how a small number of politically connected busy-body, nosey-neighbors can raise our taxes and steal our property to fund their self-appointed neighborhood property collective.

19) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/11/2012

These "Crime-Prevention" Non-Municipal Taxing Districts are a guise for Self-Appointed Neighborhood Property Collectives (Associations) and the Federation of Greater Baton Rouge Civic Associations (FGBRCA) to steal property from the Individual and force them to pay mandatory dues and forfeit their property rights to the Greater Collective. The Local Republican Party and their local State Legislators (Franklin Foil, Steve Carter, Dan Claitor, Hunter Greene, and now even Erich Ponti) all support the stealing of property rights from Individuals and mandatory dues to fund these Self-Appointed Property Collectives.

20) Comment by nimby? - 26/11/2012

in late 20's early 30's Chicago this was referred to as "protection" . expect more of these to appear within the city limits . WE ARE BATON ROUGE !!!!!

21) Comment by speakthetruth - 26/11/2012

Another tax. These people already pay for police protection and should be putting pressure on the Mayor for police patrols. The associations says it is concerned about the elderly residence' welfare, but they don't mind taking $500 from them. Most of these elderly people are on fixed incomes and can't afford this tax, which is why they haven't moved once the democrats moved in. Lets not forget about the corruption that always comes with taxes. Will the money go where its suppose to? Who's "friend" will get the contract? At what point will the home owner association board members think they need to be paid? Hello BR is right. This neighborhood, at one time, was a great place to live, but as the demographics changed the crime when up. The spiral downward continues, and money will not fix it. Only accountability for one's actions, and higher moral values will. And I don't see that happening any time soon.

22) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 26/11/2012

Crime? The "Stink-eye" Mayor said there is no crime problem.

23) Comment by 8point6 - 26/11/2012

Looks like the property owners in these districts will be getting the shaft, as did other property owners in this city. This time it's a "fee". Welcome to the world of "tax/fee" the property owners. Thank you, Hello Baton Rouge. Excellent comment.

24) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 26/11/2012

Form all the crime prevention districts you want. Until we stop paying women to have children when they are only in it for the paycheck, we are literally breeding children who are raised to think that the government will pay for everything they want. When that's not enough, they steal, kill, sell drugs to get more. They are out breeding non-criminals 3-fold. Attack the problem at its root instead of wasting time and tax money to give citizens a false sense that something is being done.

25) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 26/11/2012

Residents are already being taxed to fund both the city po-leeces AND the sheriff's office. Now they are going to be taxed AGAIN? Something is wrong here, terribly, terribly wrong.