Superintendent says report backs voucher program

State Superintendent of Education John White joined faculty and students at Good Shepherd School in New Orleans on Tuesday, presenting a progress report on the Louisiana Scholarship Program to mark the program’s first quarter.

White called the Pelican Institute for Public Policy’s report a “thoughtful summary” of the program’s progress.

Allowing parents to choose between public, charter and private schools is “obviously a just thing,” White said.

The report details the statewide expansion of the program in which 4,944 children have been provided state-funded scholarships to attend private or religious schools. One of the 118 participating schools is a high-performing public school.

Based on his visits to a handful of the schools, the state director for the Black Alliance for Educational Options, Eric Lewis, said “kids are learning and attentive,” and parents are much happier about their children’s education than they were a year ago.

The expansion, approved in the April legislative session, added an additional 3,000 scholarships to the program that began in the New Orleans area in 2008.

Alijah Connor, whose child is attending Good Shepherd on a state-funded scholarship, said she wishes her older children would have been offered the same opportunities.

Because of the program, “We feel things are a little more even,’’ she said. “Every parent should have the same opportunity, and the same choice.”

Good Shepherd Principal Emily Paul said her third-graders recently performed higher on the standardized tests than any other third-graders in the scholarship program. The school is in its fifth year with the program.

“Seeing is believing,’’ she said.

Paul also stressed the magnitude of parental engagement in the children’s success. The program has “truly has made the difference in the lives of many, many children,” she said.

Archdiocese Superintendent Jan Lancaster also touted a rise in test scores as a sign of success. About 3,000 of the nearly 5,000 students on scholarship are enrolled in schools run by the archdiocese.

White acknowledged the program has had its critics, saying he sees opposition to the program, as “opposing the right to choose, and “trying to remove the rights of parents and the rights of children.”

White also said opposition to the program has “become a question of ethics and morals.”

The Supreme Court made it clear the state can allow parochial schools to participate because the money is given to the parents, and they choose where to spend it, according to Marjorie Esman, executive director of the ACLU of Louisiana.

In terms of promoting a religious education, Esman said, mainstream religious schools were not her concern — but rather the “Bible academies” that substitute a literal interpretation of the Bible as curriculum.

The requirement for the schools to have a curriculum that is “substantially equivalent,” leaves questions, Esman said.

“I don’t know what that means—how do you measure that,” she said. Esman said schools will not be held accountable under the end of the school year, after children have received a questionable education.

Addressing the concern regarding “fly-by-the-night’’ schools, White pointed to the report’s findings that 86 percent of the participating schools have been educating children in Louisiana for 10 or more years, 73 percent for more than 25 years and 47 percent of the schools have been in operation for 50 or more years.

“One of the most inherent flaws of the voucher program is that there simply aren’t enough facilities to accommodate the students,” said Dr. Lance Hill, executive director of Tulane University’s Southern Institute for Education and Research.

Hill said he was doubtful about the program’s ability to expand.

The state has 380,000 eligible students, he said, but less than 10,000 seats identified as available by the program.

“By and large, the private schools are already filled up with the students they want,” Hill said.

Hill also said that passage of expansion was somewhat of a “diversion from the real changes: the radical expansion of charter schools and expanded number of charter authorizers.”

He pointed out half of the 690,000 public-school seats are in schools the state regards as “failing.”

Theoretically, with the new legislation, “350,000 seats could be made available overnight.” Those numbers, Hill said, present a much larger potential impact on how children are educated in Louisiana

In terms of transparency with how the money is spent, White said, there is “accountability at every turn.” White said with the per-student spending decreasing from $8,500 to $5,000, the state will see $18 million in savings.

Taxpayers, he said, were not being served by low-performing schools, and through the scholarship program are “demanding what they deserve.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (12)


1) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 13/10/2012

If Supt. White really believes in "parental choice" then why does he only offer "parental choice" to less than 5% of the parents in the State?

2) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 13/10/2012

THe NO voucher program was "legal" because it was funded from general fund, not the MFP. Whether you agree with vouchers or not the legal nicities are a legitamate concern. Imagine if there was a pool of local tax money dedicated by the voters to the contruction of a partucular bridge, but then the Legislature and Gov. decided to ignore that dedication and build a sewer treatment facility. Both may be needed, but to shift the $$ without going back to the voters is illegal. If the Gov wanted to use the MFP for non-public schools, just propose an amendment to Art 8 Sec 13 of the State Const. and change the dedication of MFP $$.

3) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 10/10/2012

To WhoCares....Not a magnet school, not BRHS, not even in the same parish. Just some poor old country folk that care about their kids.

4) Comment by WhoCares - 10/10/2012

Concerned parent just sit back in your little magnet and self contained bubble and brag. VOMIT. We all know BRHS is special.

5) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 10/10/2012

To jeffsshadow.....My son scored Advanced and Mastery in all areas on both the iLEAP and LEAP. His class as a whole was the highest rated in Reading for the entire state. I think they did pretty good. What "data" could possibly be so telling in the first 6 weeks of a program to deem it a success? My question again is, what test scores are we comparing? This article provides "data" that is equal to asking PETA to provide a report on Louisiana's hunting laws. It was not an independant report. There is a clear tie to charter schools. I am all for holding teachers responsible and not letting them "coast under the radar". However, the sytem that has been put in place is flawed. Are you saying that teachers at private or charter schools don't give out A's? They have more incentive to do so than any public school teacher. Their salaries are dependant on school enrollment. No students, no salary. Why would they want to fail students and have them leave the school? All I want is for us to compare apples to apples. You can't have the state saying private and charter schools can serve students better because they have less governmental involvement, while at the same time you are further dictating to the public schools how they must teach. Talk about double-standards! Why should our top schools be forced to follow the same rules as the weakest schools? I don't know how that makes sense in anyone's mind. I could also tell you countless stories of A students that transfer from a private school to our public school who immediately become C students. I could also show you a comparison in the home life of the A and B students vs that of the D and F students. But doing something to fix that problem affects votes, so nothing will ever been done about it! It's much easier to blame the teachers and the schools for "failing" the kids. There is no test to become a parent, you can't be fired from that job, but you can walk around with your hand out and blame all your problems on others.

6) Comment by jeffsadow - 10/10/2012

Somebody page @NoelHammatt, in case he does not get enough satisfaction out of his obsession with Will Sentell's articles. Now he can add this poor woman to his list to rant about.

7) Comment by jeffsadow - 10/10/2012

So, according to @Concerned_Parent, because Pelican's leader is connected to charter schools, that invalidates the data. And so when we hear union thugs, schools officials who have coasted under the system, teachers who don't do their jobs well, and ex-school board members who aided and abetted this system tell us all these negative things, we are supposed to accept that as gospel? Interesting double-standards there, but, more to the point, the data are what they are. If you have any questions about it, get a look at the report to see if anything methodologically questionable is in there. If you can't find any (and I doubt there are, because I have seen how Pelican puts out quality stuff), then accept the facts, even if they run counter to your prejudices. By the way, how did you son do on his standardized tests, which are a much more valid and reliable indicator of actual performance? I can tell you countless stories of other faculty members at my institutions who gave out A's right and left whose students learned next to nothing and less than my C students did.

8) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 10/10/2012

Another thing....."Archdiocese Superintendent Jan Lancaster also touted a rise in test scores as a sign of success." What test scores are we comparing here? The public schools are being forced to compare IOWA, iLEAP, and LEAP scores from one year to another. Did all the voucher students already take these test to compare them to last years' scores? Did the test scores "rise" from F's to D's? My son came home with 8 test last week and they were all 100% A's. That is a sure sign of success!!!! No voucher money needed for those results. Just plain old hard work and reinforcement AT HOME. It's amazing what turning the TV off, studying with your PARENTS, and eating a home cooked meal can do for a student. All things that the teachers and schools have no control over. If you took the same teachers at these failing schools, had the kids spend 24 hrs a day at school, and THEN tested their progress, you would see a much different picture.

9) Comment by deutsch29 - 10/10/2012

WITHHOLDING 2012 SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORES SO THAT THE OUBLIC CAN KNOW WHETHER SCHOOLS ARE STILL "FAILING."

10) Comment by deutsch29 - 10/10/2012

Thank you for your thoughtful comment, Concerned-Parent. John White fails to acknowledge the pending lawsuits over the constitutionality of sending MFP money to nonpublic schools. He also fails to acknowledge that VERY FEW parents of students "eligible" for vouchers actually took advantage of the program (around 2%), supporting the recent public opinion survey conducted by Lane Grigsby (who, interstingly, attempted to buy BESE votes last spring), the results of which note that approx ONE THIRD of respondents support the voucher program. OVER HALF RESPONDED THAT THEY DO NOT SUPPORT THE VOUCHER PROGRAM. Another fact that John White fails to acknowledge is that HE IS WITHHOLDING ACTUAL NAMES OF VOUCER STUDENTS FROM THE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS BEING FINANCIALLY PENALIZED FOR THE LOSS OF SUCH STUDENTS. Thus, the districts CANNOT VERIFY WHETHER THE STUDENTS ARE ACTUALLY THEIR STUDENTS AND COME FROM SO-CALLED "FAILING' SCHOOLS. John White is ALSO

11) Comment by deutsch29 - 10/10/2012

Thank you for your thoughtful comment, Concerned-Parent. John White fails to acknowledge the pending lawsuits over the constitutionality of sending MFP money to nonpublic schools. He also fails to acknowledge that VERY FEW parents of students "eligible" for vouchers actually took advantage of the program (around 2%), supporting the recent public opinion survey conducted by Lane Grigsby (who, interstingly, attempted to buy BESE votes last spring), the results of which note that approx ONE THIRD of respondents support the voucher program. OVER HALF RESPONDED THAT THEY DO NOT SUPPORT THE VOUCHER PROGRAM. Another fact that John White fails to acknowledge is that HE IS WITHHOLDING ACTUAL NAMES OF VOUCER STUDENTS FROM THE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS BEING FINANCIALLY PENALIZED FOR THE LOSS OF SUCH STUDENTS. Thus, the districts CANNOT VERIFY WHETHER THE STUDENTS ARE ACTUALLY THEIR STUDENTS AND COME FROM SO-CALLED "FAILING' SCHOOLS. John White is ALSO

12) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 10/10/2012

I find it very interesting that following information was left out of this article concerning the Pelican Institute. "Kevin Kane serves as the president of the Pelican Institute for Public Policy, which he founded in 2008. The Institute’s mission is to advance sound policies based on the principles of free enterprise, individual liberty and limited government. Kevin is a graduate of Tulane University and the Loyola University School of Law, and is a fellow of the Loyola Institute of Politics. He sits on the board of the Choice Foundation, which operates two charter schools established after Hurricane Katrina" So, Mr. White wants to make us believe that the voucher program is so great b/c an institute with direct ties to charter schools says so? You are not fooling anyone. Also..."Based on his visits to a handful of the schools, the state director for the Black Alliance for Educational Options, Eric Lewis, said “kids are learning and attentive,” and parents are much happier about their children’s education than they were a year ago" We have 350,000 students in "failing" schools, and Mr. Lewis is able to claim that things are much better for those receiving vouchers 'based on his visits to a handful of the schools receiving vouchers'. No mention of how many voucher students are in these 4-5 schools he visited. Was it 5? Was it 500? I challenge Mr. White, Mr. Lewis, and Mr. Kane to visit and speak to the teachers and parents at the top performing public schools in the state. Please do a study and provide a report on what you find out. It is a joke that an institute that promotes "limited government involvement" is providing a report on a topic that is riddled with WAY TOO MUCH government involvement. Let our teachers teach, and let our kids learn!