Hearing proceeds without defendant, attorney

Advocate staff photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCK -- John Gaines Jr., left, and other family members speak with 20th Judiciial District Attorney Sam D'Aquilla, second from left, Tuesday outside the East Feliciana Parish Courthouse in Clinton prior to a hearing in the Brett Gerald case. Gerald is accused of driving while intoxicated at the time his pickup collided with a car May 30 on La. 67, killing seven people. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCK -- John Gaines Jr., left, and other family members speak with 20th Judiciial District Attorney Sam D'Aquilla, second from left, Tuesday outside the East Feliciana Parish Courthouse in Clinton prior to a hearing in the Brett Gerald case. Gerald is accused of driving while intoxicated at the time his pickup collided with a car May 30 on La. 67, killing seven people.

— Confusion reigned for a few minutes Tuesday as relatives of seven people killed in a head-on collision arrived at the East Feliciana Parish courthouse to learn neither vehicular-homicide defendant Brett Gerald nor his attorney was present for a routine court hearing.

Twentieth Judicial District Attorney Sam D’Aquilla also was caught by surprise, telling members of the Matthews and Gaines families he had learned only “15 minutes ago” that Gerald’s attorney, Tommy Damico, could not appear for the hearing because he was involved in a Baton Rouge trial.

After D’Aquilla addressed the family members, some of whom were visibly angry, he went into the courtroom, spoke with an assistant, and emerged to say the hearing would proceed.

“Mr. Damico doesn’t have to be here,” he told the group.

Five people in a 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis driving on La. 67 about a mile south of the Comite River in East Feliciana Parish died in a May 30 collision with Gerald’s 2007 Dodge pickup: the driver, Brenda Gaines, 64; Denise Gaines, 33; Diamond Johnson, 12; Jyran Johnson, 6; and Angela Matthews Mosely, 36, all of Baton Rouge.

Two other passengers, Willie Gaines Jr., 15, and Rogerick Johnson Jr., 13, also of Baton Rouge, died later.

Gerald, 30, who suffered ankle injuries in the collision, has been taken to and from the courthouse in a wheelchair pushed by deputies in earlier appearances. Parish jail Warden Ray Newman said early Tuesday that Damico had waived Gerald’s appearance.

Gerald, who is being held in jail in lieu of $1 million bail, faces seven counts of vehicular homicide.

Tuesday’s hearing was a continuation of a Sept. 11 “discovery” hearing at which D’Aquilla and Damico agreed to provide information about the case that each is entitled to review for trial.

D’Aquilla filed into the official case record a report on the truck’s computerized event data recorder, or “black box,” a report on how evidence was transferred from one investigator to another and the credentials of the nurse who drew a sample of blood from Gerald the night of the collision.

State Police have said an analysis of a sample of Gerald’s blood taken at Lane Regional Medical Center in Zachary showed his blood-alcohol content was 0.15 percent.

In Louisiana, a blood-alcohol content of 0.08 percent is considered presumptive evidence of drunken driving.

Gerald has had three earlier DWI arrests.

Twentieth Judicial District Judge William G. Carmichael ruled that the state had fulfilled its obligation on the discovery motion.

Before court began, family members of the victims complained that they were not notified of Tuesday’s developments and had taken off from work to attend the hearing. They also said they were not notified that an earlier hearing had been canceled at the last minute because Damico was unavailable.

The family also said they believed Tuesday’s matter had been postponed until Oct. 23, but D’Aquilla told them that date was set for status conferences among prosecutors, defense attorneys and the judge regarding trials set for the week of Dec. 10.

“Hopefully, the trial will go in December,” D’Aquilla said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (10)


1) Comment by CitizensArrest - 10/10/2012

Being arrested on a 4th offense DWI does not mean this is his fourth DWI. The laws regarding reporting this stuff should be changed. From what I understand two were thrown out so this is his second. Don't get me wrong, even two is two too many, but this won't be a fourth offense conviction. Sad story. If alcohol were invented today I can't imagine we would say it's okay. Worse than "bath salts"...

2) Comment by Stephanie1957 - 10/10/2012

I think Mr. Gerald's family is truly suffering and they, too, need our prayers, just as much as the victims' families do.

3) Comment by Stephanie1957 - 10/10/2012

I think the

4) Comment by wherearewegoing - 10/10/2012

Six comments and no one brought up the fact that this was this man's FOURTH DWI? I appreciate CitizensArrest educating everyone (myself included) on the procedures and why this wasn't a big deal, but the big deal to me is that this man should've been tarred, feathered, and shot long ago, and then maybe the 7 folks piled into a 5 seater car would still be alive.

5) Comment by BR is Ruined - 10/10/2012

@Citizens - Thank you for saving me the trouble of answering those ignorant posts.

6) Comment by CitizensArrest - 10/10/2012

#1Fan, any trial is more important than a preliminary discovery hearing, The fact that people dies has no impact on the procedural insignificance of a discovery hearing. D'Aquilla and the reporter makes it seem as though this was a slap in the face. It is routine procedure that if discovery is satisfied then no appearance is necessary. Everybody needs to save their outrage for the trial as it is is clear you don't know how pre-trial procedures are handled. And tradewinns, no lawyers are being enriched by the delays associated with unworkable dockets. For the most part criminal defense attorneys are paid a flat rate. Delays do not enrich them, to the contrary they hurt the bottom line. The prosecutors and judges are salaried. They see no benefit to having these matters stall either.

7) Comment by BoiledCrabs - 10/10/2012

The lawyer planned to not be there and only give a very short notice on purpose. He figures if he does this a few times it will discourage all the relatives and supportors of the victims from showing up at the trail. This is a planned strategy.

8) Comment by #1Fan - 10/10/2012

Mr. Damico needs to get his priorities in order. Just what trial is it that is more important than a case with seven counts of vehicular homicide? And to give no notice shows blatant disrespect for the court and the families involved in this case.

9) Comment by ScotB - 09/10/2012

The defendent's attorney didn't know he was going to be in a trial? He couldn't let anyone know? He should be reprimanded by the judge - right?

10) Comment by tradewinns - 09/10/2012

why the long long long delays? justice delayed is justice denied. that phrase isn't just for the defendant but for the vitim and/or their families also. our broken "justice" system is truly set up to enrich lawyers.