Unglesby: No sentence; no prosecution

The attorney for a teenager accused of first-degree murder in the June 2010 throat-slashing death of an 8-year-old boy filed a motion Monday to throw out the indictment against his client, citing a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on juvenile sentences.

Trevor Reese, now 19, is scheduled for trial next month in the death of Jackson Attuso, who was killed on a bike and hiking path at The Bluffs on Thompson Creek subdivision.

Reese was 16 when Attuso was killed. Reese has pleaded “not guilty by reason of insanity.”

The Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that a murder statute that mandates a life sentence without probation, parole or sentence suspension is unconstitutional. An earlier Supreme Court ruling prohibits juvenile offenders from receiving the death penalty.

The motion by defense attorney Lewis Unglesby, of Baton Rouge, says, “There is no legal sentence for this defendant and no prosecution can ensue.”

The motion points out that another Supreme Court ruling prohibits sentencing a juvenile to life without parole when the defendant commits a crime other than homicide, such as aggravated rape.

In response, the Legislature passed an act allowing for parole consideration when the juvenile did not commit first- or second-degree murder, the motion says.

“But nothing exists for homicide crimes today,” the motion adds.

“Where a penalty has not been endorsed through full legislative consideration, no penalty exists,” the motion says, adding that a judge cannot “play the part of a mind reader and guess as to the appropriate law that should be applied at trial.”

Twentieth Judicial District Judge William G. Carmichael ruled last year that Reese is competent to stand trial, but the ruling does not address his mental condition at the time of the slaying.

Reese was booked in the West Feliciana Parish Jail as a juvenile, but his case was transferred to adult court shortly after he was arrested.

Carmichael is holding prosecution and defense attorneys to an informal order not to publicly discuss the case.

West Feliciana Parish sheriff’s deputies arrested Reese after he approached members of a construction crew in The Bluffs and told them to call 911 because he had stabbed someone, Sheriff J. Austin Daniel said after the slaying.

Reese was a student at Baton Rouge Magnet High School when the attack occurred.

The victim was part of a group including his mother, brothers and family friends — all riding bicycles — when he was attacked on June 10, 2010.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (22)


1) Comment by ABayouBoy - 18/09/2012

Let me also say that I feel sorry for the kid, now an adult. But to forgive this person for such a crime would only make it possible for another act of violence one day in the future. I cannot forget the 8 yr. old whose life was taken, either. The person responsible must be punished for the good of society.

2) Comment by ABayouBoy - 18/09/2012

@CountryAttorney, I can certainly see your position. Your world, your sphere of knowledge, your idea of justice is defined by the letter of the law, since you are obviously an atty. But, the letter of the law, for all of Mr. Unglesby's brilliance, is simply being used to complicate a simple issue. To use delay tactics. If I were an atty. and billing by the hour, I guess that justice would be defined by my dedication to my wonderful client, too. But, most of us here would simply like to see this monster off of the streets. And yes, he is a monster to be capable of such an act at the age of 16. His mind is so warped that this person can not ever be rehabilitated. He needs to be put away for life.

3) Comment by CountryAttorney - 18/09/2012

Thanks, Chuck.

4) Comment by Chucky - 18/09/2012

Day about over, how many outraged posters called their legislator today to update our law so justice can be done ? I know I did.

5) Comment by Mildred Citizen - 18/09/2012

Our law is unconstitutional. The law is what it is. Either the legislature comports the law with the constitution or Mr. Unglesby is correct.

6) Comment by spiderman - 18/09/2012

Although Louis has represented the lowest of the low, he is acting within the law. Blame lawmakers for the ridiculous laws that these guys use. I will say that if you ever get wrongly accused of a crime, he is who you want on your side.

7) Comment by justicematters - 18/09/2012

tradewinns - great comment: The truth is the first casualty.

8) Comment by janiea - 18/09/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

9) Comment by Chucky - 18/09/2012

Kind of like the deference between a conservative and liberal , you're a liberal till you get mugged and a conservative till your accused of a crime.

10) Comment by CountryAttorney - 18/09/2012

People hate lawyers until they need one. Lawyers must act within the confines of the law. The legislature makes the law. Your blind hatred of lawyers is misplaced and shows ignorance of the fundamental concepts of the judicial and legislative functions.

11) Comment by Being_Stupid - 18/09/2012

This is why people hate lawyers. See comment below.

12) Comment by CountryAttorney - 18/09/2012

Ok. Let me explain what is happening since all I see in your posts are rage. The US Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional to sentence a person who was under the age of 18 at the time of the crime to life imprisonment without the benefit of the POSSIBILITY of parole. Since that time, the Louisiana Legislature has not amended the murder statutes to allow juvenile defendants the possibility of parole. What Unglesby is doing is legally correct, and actually quite brilliant. It may delay the trial until the Legislature can amend the murder statutes to accommodate the Supreme Court's ruling. Now, if proven guilty, this kid needs to be severely punished, but the rage toward his attorney is misplaced. If anything, be upset with your legislators for dragging their feet in amending the statutes...that is where the real blame lies. I think we can all agree that the murder statutes are pretty important, so the Legislature should have called a 7 day special session to amend them after the Supreme Court handed down its ruling. Instead, it has thus far decided to just put it off until next March, meaning that the law would likely not change until August 2013. So Mr. Unglesby, a very well respected member of the Bar, is doing his job; and a darn good one. If I was accused of a serious crime, that's who I'd call.

13) Comment by ABayouBoy - 18/09/2012

Not guilty by reason of insanity. Doesn't murder by a 16 yr. old define "insanity"?. I don't believe in the insanity plea. It's like a tax loophole. The circumstances behind the crime doesn't matter either. You do the crime, you do the time. Simple as that. But it might just put 90% of the lawyers out of business.

14) Comment by justicematters - 18/09/2012

This kid is a monster, just waiting to kill again. There is no justification for this attorney's actions. In or out of the courtroom. His legacy is written. Time and time again, he has proven he is as big a failure as a human member of this society as he was a father. This 8 year old's entire life was stolen for no reason. Reese can not be allowed to take another, next year or 50 years from now.

15) Comment by Chucky - 18/09/2012

OK guys and girls don’t change it, whine and rage instead.

16) Comment by tradewinns - 18/09/2012

another example of our failed "justice" system. trying to justify the lawyers actions for this criminal by saying "he's just doing his job" is the problem with our system. finding the truth should be the only function of the "justice" system. the truth is the first casualty in our system. winning and money are the prime drivers.

17) Comment by Being_Stupid - 18/09/2012

Blame the System. Blame the Supreme Court. Justice for the Victim has been replaced with Rehabilitation for the Perpetrator. We have a court system that cares more for criminals than for their victims.

18) Comment by LastManStanding - 18/09/2012

Unglesby is scum. This kid needs to be exterminated, not let to sit in a mental facility for 5 years.

19) Comment by Chucky - 18/09/2012

I have seen L. Unglesby try jury trials in the past and he is a very good defense lawyer,he is also a decent human being (well, for the most part). He is doing his job and doing it well. What goes on in the court room has nothing to do with a person's life out side of the court room or at least I do not think it should. This is our system at work if you want a better one get elected or elect better politicians.

20) Comment by speakthetruth - 18/09/2012

This is very sad, and has to be very hard on the family of the victim. Politicians, judges, and lawyers are always saying we have the best legal system in the world. But to the working people that have to live with the laws created by the politicians, the rulings of the supreme courts, and the court room farce, it is obvious the system is broken.....very broken, and its not going to change until the political atmosphere changes. I speak the truth.

21) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 18/09/2012

Unglesby, when you dance with the devil, you will sooner or later have to pay the band.

22) Comment by ABayouBoy - 18/09/2012

Unglesby has sold his soul to the highest bidder - namely the devil.

23) Comment by Get Real - 18/09/2012

The crime is the lawyer trying to get the is scum off. This monster/thug killed an innocence 8 year old child for no reason and then blamed it on looking at television. You can put him away for 40 years under manslaughter but to let him be free and walking around would be unspeakable.