NCAA chief: LSU needs support

Advocate staff photo by RICHARD ALAN HANNON -- Mark Emmert, who is former chancellor of LSU's Baton Rouge campus and now president of the NCAA, was the key speaker Friday during the 40th anniversary celebration of the LSU Public Administration Institute. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by RICHARD ALAN HANNON -- Mark Emmert, who is former chancellor of LSU's Baton Rouge campus and now president of the NCAA, was the key speaker Friday during the 40th anniversary celebration of the LSU Public Administration Institute.

Generating dollars for LSU should be a bigger priority than whether to merge the jobs of Baton Rouge chancellor and system president, former Chancellor Mark Emmert said Friday.

“The university needs a lot of support,” Emmert said.

“It has got some significant financial challenges like a lot of public universities, and I think those are a more pressing issue for them,” he added.

Emmert, who is president of the NCAA, made his comments in a brief interview after speaking at the 40th anniversary celebration of the LSU Public Administration Institute.

He is also here for LSU’s game on Saturday night against the University of Washington, where he used to be president.

LSU’s budget has been tight in the past four years as state funding for higher education was sliced by more than $420 million, including $66 million this year. That includes $19 million in reductions at the Baton Rouge campus, which triggered program mergers and less money going to some academic departments.

Former LSU System President John Lombardi was dismissed in April.

Former Baton Rouge campus Chancellor Michael Martin left last month to become the head of the Colorado State University System.

William Jenkins, who has served as both system president and chancellor of the Baton Rouge campus, came out of retirement in the spring to fill both vacancies temporarily.

Last month members of a consulting firm helping LSU find a new president presented the Board of Supervisors with three options, two of which included consolidating the president and Baton Rouge chancellor positions.

Asked about that, Emmert said neither option offers anything like a silver bullet for issues facing the school. “You can make it work either way,” he said.

“The board is going to have to look at all the options,” Emmert said. “They have a complex organizational structure, especially with the medical schools and hospitals in there.”

Emmert said the need for a top-flight flagship school is vital.

“What I know is that in the 21st century economy, a state like Louisiana has to have a university that can attract the best and the brightest to drive its economy, to provide its citizens with world class education and research,” he said.

“You look at the communities and states across the country that are successful and in the core of that is always a strong, research-intensive university,” Emmert said.

“You go to Austin, Texas, you go to Stanford and Palo Alto, you go to Seattle, Wash., you go to Boston, at the core right now what is really driving the economy is innovation and research,” he said.

“And the state has got to have at least one university that can play at the highest level and that is LSU,” Emmert said.

Emmert was chancellor of the Baton Rouge campus from 1999-2004.

He left to become president of the University of Washington, which he attended, before becoming head of the NCAA in 2010.

Emmert, whose name surfaces periodically as a hoped for target to return to LSU, was asked during a question-and-answer session what it would take for that to happen.

“I’m here,” he laughed.

Emmert added, “I absolutely love what I am doing now. It has no shortage of challenges.”

He also complimented the decision of the LSU Athletic Department — essentially the football program — to transfer $7.2 million per year, or $36 million over five years, to support university academics.

The LSU Board of Supervisors approved the move on Friday.

“It is a very, very unusual circumstance,” he told a crowd of about 200.

Emmert said LSU and the University of Washington are two of just 17 Division I schools with positive cash flows in their athletic departments.

“Everyone else has to subsidize the athletic department,” he said.

Ron Richard, president and chief executive officer of the Tiger Athletic Foundation, rose during the question-and-answer session to ask Emmert who he will be cheering for during the game Saturday night.

“I dearly love watching LSU football,” Emmert said.

“I want them to win every game every year unless they are playing the Huskies,” he said, a reference to the nickname of the University of Washington.

However, Emmert said the point spread — LSU by just over 23 earlier this week — was “probably about right.”

“There will be no bet,” the NCAA president laughed.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (4)


1) Comment by zealer99 - 08/09/2012

Peter Pan needed Pixie dust to fly. For LSU (and all of the colleges and universities in Louisiana), the Pixie dust that makes them fly is sprinkled on them by students who get it from Federal Student Loans. The State has continuously reduced the level of appropriations to LSU (as well as all of the other State funded colleges and universities in Louisiana) and they have increased tuition depending on the students to increase their debt load and with student loans bearing the value of home mortgages, there is an estimated 1 trillion dollars i n student loans that will be in default within a couple of years . Can you see where this is going, a sudden drop in .enrollment, no Pixie dust and LSU falls into the swamp.

2) Comment by TommyRucker - 08/09/2012

You got to hand it to people like this guy, they are making tons of money in a bad economy and are asking for more and more from people who are having less and less money in THEIR pockets as the government can't get enough. The goose that lays the golden egg will eventually die if this continues.

3) Comment by TommyRucker - 08/09/2012

It needs more $$$$ so it can pay people like him BIG bucks as this guy is making over a million dollars a year. The problem today is to much money is going into the pockets of administrators and professors and society is not getting enough bang for its buck. This is the problem across the board in public education and in many things in our society today and until that changes, we are going to continue to have trouble. Public education is going to have to demonstrate that it is worth all the money it is getting and it is getting billions today-they want more as they have always wanted more. Higher education is not leading but is exploiting an addiction to entertainment in athletics today.

4) Comment by bourbon-soda - 08/09/2012

The athletic side is a profit center. The academic side is a cost center. Transfer of money from profit to cost centers is standard practice in most viable institutions. Why wasn't this done on a systematic basis a long time ago?