Surge diversion sought 

Photo provided by John Wren / Aviation Specialists Inc. -- Acension Parish's Marvin J. Braud Pumping Station runs its five huge drainage pumps at full throttle Sept. 1 to keep flooding from Hurricane Isaac under control from its location at the confluence of Bayou Francois and Saveiro Canal. Now officials are looking for ways to avoid flooding in Ascension, St. John the Baptist, St. Charles and St. James parishes during future disasters. Show caption
Photo provided by John Wren / Aviation Specialists Inc. -- Acension Parish's Marvin J. Braud Pumping Station runs its five huge drainage pumps at full throttle Sept. 1 to keep flooding from Hurricane Isaac under control from its location at the confluence of Bayou Francois and Saveiro Canal. Now officials are looking for ways to avoid flooding in Ascension, St. John the Baptist, St. Charles and St. James parishes during future disasters.

Reversible flow advantages cited

Ascension Parish government officials say a proposed Mississippi River diversion project in St. James Parish may be a way to blunt the kind of high storm surge seen after Hurricane Isaac.

Parish President Tommy Martinez and East Ascension Drainage Director Bill Roux would like the diversion project planned near Romeville to be reversible as part of a broader flood protection plan in the Lake Pontchartrain Basin.

Under that concept, water would flow not only from the Mississippi into the Maurepas Swamp, as currently designed, but also from the swamp into the river in times of high water in the lake basin, the officials said.

Surge from Hurricane Isaac moving in from the east almost swamped the Marvin J. Braud Pumping Station, a key pump station for Ascension Parish. At the same time, parish officials said the surge water blocks drainage of the Amite River Basin to the west and north after heavy rains.

Martinez said there needs to be a way to drain that surge water.

“We need to look at the whole basin and come up with a solution that affects Ascension, St. John the Baptist, St. Charles and St. James (parishes),” he said.

Roux noted that a levee project along the south side of the basin alone could raise the same kind of concerns for parishes on the northern side of Lake Maurepas and Lake Pontchartrain as have been raised about the post-Hurricane Katrina improvements in New Orleans.

“Water is going to go somewhere. You can’t squeeze it into a smaller space,” he said.

The Blind River diversion is designed to bring fresh water, nutrients and sediment into the Maurepas Swamp, which has been cut off from the river by the Mississippi levee.

The diversion is part of the Louisiana Coastal Area program and was authorized by Congress in 2007 under the Water Resources Development Act.

The recommended project calls for a 3,000 cubic feet per second gravity flow diversion structure on the Mississippi with a transmission canal and a diffuse distribution system into the Maurepas Swamp.

St. James Parish President Timmy Roussel said parish leaders have looked at the reversible concept before, but environmental regulators raised concerns about the quality and higher salinity of the brackish Lake Maurepas water. The Mississippi is used for drinking water downstream.

But Roussel said he believes a reversible diversion is “a viable option” if retention levees are built to protect populated areas.

Unanticipated flooding from Isaac in LaPlace, St. James and other River Parishes have created renewed urgency in building flood protection as well as drawn speculation that the billions spent to improve the New Orleans area’s flood protection pushed water onto those communities to the west.

National Weather Service officials have said their models show no evidence of this and the flooding was more likely due to the size, direction and slow speed of Isaac. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also disputes the claim but has agreed to study the issue.

Some River Parishes leaders are calling for accelerated action on building the long-in-the-planning West Shore Levee, which would provide 26 miles of protection from Montz in St. Charles Parish to the Marvin Braud station in Ascension.

The levee would largely track along the north side of Interstate 10, which had flooding during Isaac. Versions of the project, which have raised environmental concerns, have been discussed since the mid-1960s.

Steve Wilson, president of the Pontchartrain Levee District Board, said the levee can be designed to address concerns about cutting off wetlands from tidal flow.

Wilson said the full project can be built with about $500 million.

“It’s just our turn. We’ve got to finish the job,” Wilson said.

He said making the Blind River diversion reversible would require some sort of redesign to be able to move water toward the river.

Also, Wilson said, he does not see how a diversion in Romeville/Convent would help flooding in St. John because the surge water moved from the east to the west through the Lake Pontchartrain Basin during Hurricane Isaac.

Ricky Boyett, corps spokesman, said making the diversion reversible was brought up in discussions but never was a primary feature.

He said that project is still in the planning phase, and a hydraulic analysis would need to be conducted to see if a reversible flow would be beneficial.

Boyett added that corps officials noted that the probability of high water in Lake Pontchartrain and low water in the Mississippi is extremely remote and would happen only for a short time.

But Garret Graves, chairman of the state’s Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority and executive assistant to Gov. Bobby Jindal for coastal activities, said the state is trying to look more holistically at the basin and making the Blind River and nearby Hope Canal diversions reversible will be considered for their effectiveness.

“It’s absolutely something we will be looking at over the next few months,” Graves said.

The state’s coastal master plan has $1.6 billion in funding set aside for future projects and new concepts, he said.

But he also noted some considerations, including the water quality concerns and the possible need to build pumps to move the water into the river.

He said an important project to him, however, is putting control structures at the Rigolets and Chef Pass. They are Lake Pontchartrain’s main connections to the broader Gulf of Mexico and hurricane surge.

Graves said that project would not preclude the diversion concept, which could be another tool to prevent flooding from hurricanes.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (8)


1) Comment by jokerctx - 14/09/2012

Obviously everyone has different definitions of abandoned, but from my unfortunate experience with this project it leads me to believe that USACE temporally abandoned CRDC due to the lack of interest in providing funding without delay since the beginning of construction and the lack of organization. When USACE somehow just irresponsibly failed to acquire the 700 acres of mitigation property, they violated their own regulations concerning wetlands construction. Oh and I am well aware that ARBC and LADOTD have taken responsibility for acquiring the necessary mitigation. When they signed the cooperative agreement to handle the acquisition process at the end of 2010, numerous public comments and private assurances were been made to CRDC landowners that mitigation property acquisitions would take place soon but still nearly 2 years later ARBC or LADOTD have acquired not 1 single acre of mitigation land. What's worse is the lack of cooperation by LADOTD during this process. LADOTD the 20% local sponsor, has yet to even list CRDC on their list of public projects.They don't even mention its name anywhere on the site. Both ARBC and USACE have different construction timelines that neither consider it important enough to update for the public. The lack of communication with the public especially the unfortunate souls that own property needed for the project has been pathetic if not worthless. Don't believe what I'm saying just ask any of the 300+ property owners that have had their land somewhat taken without being compensated or the small business owners forced to shut down due to the lingering intent of the governments plans to acquire one day. Stand in their position for a moment and think about not being able to sell or improve your property and possibly your home for the last 5-6 years maybe longer for some. They know it's coming but are forced to endure unreasonable hardships without any assistance from those responsible. Even the local leaders and politicians are kept out of the loop concerning what is happening with the project currently. Regrettably what I've mentioned is just a small portion of problems concerning this project. If it weren't for the executive director of ARBC and a handful of dedicated individuals working to keep it going, CRDC would have been scraped a long time ago. At some point you would think our local politicians would stop making the same promises concerning CRDC and start actually helping get this project finished before the fed's decide to use all that money elsewhere.

2) Comment by BRFAN - 13/09/2012

Comite Diversion Canal has not been abandoned by the USACE. The project is now acquiring all of the necessary mitigation property for the project. DOTD and Amite River Basin Commission is working on funding phase 1 of the project. This will provide some relief in the Baker and Zachary Area. If the band of rain that hit east of Baton Rouge, fell on the upper reaches of the Comite and Amite, the flooding would have been substantially worst than the record floor of 1983. Funding stopped on the project becuase sufficient mitigation land had not been acquired. That issue is now being dealt with. We now need the USACE to fund the project and continue construction. There is local and state money to acquire the canal right of way. One big differnce in what is being discussed in Ascension/St James--Becuase of the high bluffs north of Baton Rouge, there is no fear that water discharged into the Mississippi would ever flow back up the Comite. WE have come to far and spent to much to not finish this project.

3) Comment by jokerctx - 11/09/2012

NewsReader, my comment regarding USACE's abandonment of CRDC is true unfortunately. I have plenty of respect and patience concerning USACE's actions involved with CRDC, but ultimately they are solely responsible for the start to the delays with construction. During construction of phase I (Lilly Bayou Control Structure) USACE failed to purchase the required 700 acres of mitigation land destroyed during its construction. Breaking their own rules for construction in wetlands USACE requires a permit. Before approval of any permit they require the mitigation property be purchased before any construction can begin. Ignoring that rule and the requirements that CRDC received by Congressional approval in 1996, they didn't begin the process of acquisition of the 700 acres of bottomland hardwood classified property for CRDC until April 2009. Construction of Phase I began March 2003. Six years into it is a shocking realization that USACE had made a tremendous mistake that was compounded by at the time Rep Mack Bodi White who decided to unconstitutionally remove USACE's power of expropriation for mitigation property only pertaining to CRDC. Followed by USACE giving responsibility to unqualified officials from local sponsor Amite River Basin Comission. My family and business have been destroyed by this project and it's many failures starting from the federal level to the local level.

4) Comment by albermarle52 - 11/09/2012

It's a good idea. All of the drainwater from Baton Rouge flows into the Maurepas basin. The river is very low in the summer and could've relieved the situation.

5) Comment by NewsReader - 10/09/2012

And btw it's worth noting the engineering firm involved in the diversion canal is one and the same as the one involved in advising BR about the loop. ABMB.

6) Comment by NewsReader - 10/09/2012

jokerctx, I don't think ti's the ACofE who has abandoned the Comite Diversion Canal. I am pretty sure it's at a state level that things have gone sideways: http://theadvocate.com/home/1784186-125/ruling- a-setback-for-canal.html

7) Comment by jokerctx - 10/09/2012

This looks like another diversion canal project that local taxpayers will be forced to pay for but will never see completed. USACE has made their intentions clear after spending 14 billion on Levees around New Orleans that flood control is just merely a broken promise. USACE abandoned Comite River Diversion Canal after Hurricane Katrina and has left the project's future up to unqualified local officials. The unanswered questions remains when will state politicians take time to investigate this mess and protect the rights of local residents that were promised flood control many years ago. I bet nothing will be done until we have to endure a catastrophic flood event. Then it may be something important enough to finish. Too the residents expecting a new diversion canal all I can say is good luck if the project is any other place but New Orleans. Might be a better idea to just move to New Orleans if you want protection.

8) Comment by NewsReader - 10/09/2012

Can they at least finish the Comite Diversion canal first seeing as taxpayers in that basin and those downstream on the Amite have been paying into that project for over a decade with no completion in sight.