Fire insurance rates raise ire

Alsen residents seek action by Metro Council

About a dozen members of the Alsen community, upset over the high rates they have to pay for fire insurance, attended Wednesday’s Metro Council meeting planning to urge the council to replace all members of the board that oversees their volunteer fire department.

But they weren’t given an opportunity to speak to the council on the board appointments, and left the meeting voicing frustration that more isn’t being done to address the fire department’s dismal fire rating that has caused their fire insurance rates to skyrocket.

In August 2011, the Alsen/St. Irma Lee Volunteer Fire Department’s rating dropped from a Class 5 to a Class 10, the lowest possible rating. The rating by the Louisiana Property Insurance Rating Association affects the insurance premiums homeowners and businesses pay.

The council followed the recommendations of Councilman Ulysses “Bones” Addison, who represents the area, and reappointed three sitting members of the volunteer fire department’s board and two new members.

Alsen residents who attended the meeting said afterward they had hoped all five volunteer members would be replaced with new people.

The Alsen community members were not able to speak at the meeting, and after the meeting complained to some council members, Trae Welch, Ronnie Edwards and C. Denise Marcelle. Addison left immediately after the meeting.

“Our rating has dropped from a five to a 10,” said Moses Evans. “If this happened in any other area in Baton Rouge, they’d declare a city emergency.”

Evans said Addison would not return their calls to discuss the fire department’s rating and their concerns about the board.

“Bones is a termed-out councilman, he won’t return our calls,” Evans said. “He’s playing with our lives.”

He said community members reached out to all 12 council members asking them to replace the Alsen fire department board.

Edwards told the group after the meeting that council members deferred to Addison because they thought he’d met with the community members.

Addison said in a phone call that he didn’t think it would be wise to replace all of the board members at the same time because the fire department’s rating was being appealed early next year, and he wanted to keep some level of continuity. He said he has been working nonstop with the interim fire chiefs, the fire board and other parish fire departments to ensure the rating appeals process goes smoothly.

Welch told the residents he would put an item on the agenda to ensure the Metro Council discusses the Alsen fire district rating at its next meeting.

In other business, the Metro Council approved an ordinance requiring door-to-door salesmen to obtain a $5 permit that would identify them as legitimate salesmen.

John Berry, who represented the Southdowns neighborhood watch, said his neighborhood asked Councilman Rodney “Smokie” Bourgeois for help addressing the salesmen, who are often persistent to the “point of intimidation.”

Berry said it’s impossible to know whether these salesmen are actually criminals, “looking for houses to burglarize and valuable items to steal.”

But Berry said Bourgeois’s ordinance change did not go far enough, and should have banned all unwanted solicitation.

Joseph Scott, assistant parish attorney, said they could not entirely ban door-to-door solicitations.

Some council members said they were concerned the ordinance change was unnecessary because residents can put “No Soliciting” signs up, and violators would be charged with trespassing.

The council passed the item 7-3, with Welch, Scott Wilson and Joel Boé voting against the item. Addison, Edwards, Marcelle, Mike Walker, Tara Wicker, Alison Gary and Bourgeois voted in favor. Chandler Loupe and Donna Collins-Lewis were absent.

The ordinance will not impact those with political, religious or charitable purposes.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (6)


1) Comment by NewsReader - 23/08/2012

And as an afterthought, if ANY group of people should be charged a fee it would be those knocking on doors with political or religious purposes. They are the most persistent and least likely to quickly leave when you tell them you're not interested. People making money by knocking on doors are smart enough to realize there's no point in wasting time so they continue on to the next house. Religious nutjobs appear to think it's their duty to save everyone particularly those who say they're not interested.

2) Comment by NewsReader - 23/08/2012

Illegitimate solicitors can't afford $5? This kind of regulation is about as pointless as the Do Not Call list that there are a million and one exceptions to.

3) Comment by Being_Stupid - 23/08/2012

Solicitation has nothing to do with the 4th Amendment which is intended to protect the home from Unwarranted Government Intrusion. The front entrance, front door, front sidewalk, and driveway is not protected by the 4th Amendment unless posted. Only the inside of a house and fenced in private areas of the property are protected by the 4th Amendment. If a home owner does not want solicitors coming to the front door they can post a "No Solicitors" sign or tell the unwanted visitor to leave their property which they must do immediately if unwanted by the property owner. The $5 Government Permit not only denies Solicitors their First Amendment Right, it also denies Property Owners their right to allow solicitors onto their property. The Government is taking away that right of permission from the property owner and dictating who will be allowed or not allowed to come to their front door. I decide, not the Government. When you get my age, you look forward to solicitors, because nobody else comes to visit you.

4) Comment by albermarle52 - 23/08/2012

Privacy and peace in your own home is a Fourth Amendment right. You're wrong, Being_Stupid.

5) Comment by Being_Stupid - 23/08/2012

Soliciting is a First Amendment Right. Don't need a $5 permit. All you need is the First Amendment to the Constitution.

6) Comment by Being_Stupid - 23/08/2012

The only thing more annoying than a solicitor is John Berry and his Federation of Neighborhood Nazis. Does this ban on solicitors also include a ban on Neighborhood Associations from knocking on my door during their annoying membership drives? The Federation of Greater Baton Rouge Civic Associations has already stole my property rights. Now they want to steal the First Amendment to the Constitution.

7) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 23/08/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****