Top teacher calls for end to tenure

Show caption
TRAVIS SPRADLING /
Holly Boffy, center, 2010 Louisiana teacher of the year, speaks Wednesday with Rotarians Dan N. Day, left, and Jamey Firnberg before her speech to the Rotary Club of Baton Rouge. Boffy, who now works for the Associated Professional Educators of Louisiana, said teacher tenure should be abolished.

Louisiana’s 2010 teacher of the year said Wednesday that teacher tenure should be abolished.

“We need to get rid of it as soon as we possibly can,” said Holly Boffy, who won the award as an educator at Paul Breaux Middle School in Lafayette.

Boffy, who plans to run for the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education this fall, made her comments during a question-and-answer session after she addressed the Rotary Club of Baton Rouge.

Under current rules, teachers earn job security — it is called tenure — after three years on the job, if they meet certain standards. But Boffy said the rules mean that, if teachers clear all the hurdles after three years, they essentially have a job for good.

“There are individuals who take advantage of that situation,” she said.

In a brief interview, Boffy acknowledged that any effort to change the state’s tenure laws would be controversial. “It is a very tough subject,” she said.

“But when you start looking at what is in the best interests of children, then you know the answer,” Boffy said.

“And it is not in the best interest of children,” she said of tenure.

Earlier this year, Chas Roemer, a member of BESE, launched a bid to abolish the state’s teacher tenure law, which he said protects poorly performing teachers. However, that effort failed to generate any action. In addition, a bill to revamp Louisiana’s teacher tenure law died last year amid opposition.

Backers of teacher tenure contend it protects educators from unfair firings.

In the interview, Boffy said she plans to run for the District 7 BESE seat from southwest Louisiana held by Dale Bayard of Lake Charles. Bayard declined comment on Boffy’s views on tenure.

The post is one of eight BESE seats on the ballot this year. Three others are named by the governor.

Boffy, who spent 10 years as a classroom teacher, told the Rotary Club she left the profession because her 4-year-old son has a bone disorder that requires more job flexibility than she had as a teacher.

She is director of professional development and university programs for the Associated Professional Educators of Louisiana, called APEL.

That group is one of three teacher organizations in Louisiana but often differs with the views of the Louisiana Federation of Teachers, known as LFT, and the Louisiana Association of Educators, called LAE.

Leaders of the LFT and LAE have denounced efforts to abolish teacher tenure.

In her comments to the Rotary Club, Boffy touted the work of a nonprofit group called Dream Teachers.

The organization includes business groups and others that work with the state Department of Education to elevate the annual teacher and principal of the year programs.

It also sponsors an annual symposium on education topics.

Boffy told the group that, aside from teachers, judges and university professors are nearly the only other jobs that offer tenure.

“That doesn’t help my profession to be viewed as a profession,” Boffy said of teachers.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (13)


1) Comment by Grannee - 14/07/2011

Sounds like conservative talking points to me so she can get elected. Teachers don't get raises (decent) and now you want them to give up their job security. Do that and see what you are really left with. Further, I am really sick of a certain group of people always wanting to do away with this and do away with that, just so they can get elected!

2) Comment by Get Real - 14/07/2011

It is easy to say what needs to be done when you work at a school that picks its students. And its is not just inner city schools....some of our rural communities are going through the same things but since it is no money in taking over rural schools you don't hear much about them. Go look at the scores in some of the parishes in North Louisiana and we will see that we have a state problem.

3) Comment by SuzanneMS - 14/07/2011

No, after three years a teacher can only be fired for cause, not at the whim of an administrator. I agree, though, that three years is not long enough. University faculty don't get tenure for six years. And they have to earn promotions and merit increases. I have yet to see anyone who claims that "tenure makes it impossible to get rid of bad teachers" prove that statement. What bad teacher are you referring to? What makes that teacher bad? But what does she mean, that being classed with judges and professors doesn't help her "profession to be viewed as a profession?" What are they?

4) Comment by twinkie1cat - 14/07/2011

Ms. Boffy is another tiresome conservative. Tenure is necessary for teachers to be who they are and to be free to enjoy their freedom of speech and relgion. I have heard of teachers fired for having a pro-choice bumper sticker and I myself was fired for being the wrong race. I know more than one gay teacher who has lived an hour from her job to keep the school out of her personal life. Principals do not necessarily evaluate fairly or professionally. More than one has wanted sex in return for a good evaluation. A lot are hired based on who they know instead of what they know. Tenure is absolutely necessary. Ms. Boffy needs to stay in the classroom and perhaps take her magic to a school that features disadvantaged children while getting some help in caring for her disabled child. The schools need good teachers and quitting and going into politics is not a good example to other teachers. Plus, Louisiana does not need any more conservatives downtown.

5) Comment by Chucky - 14/07/2011

Three years towing the line then surf for the rest ? things change and people change, so I agree, get rid of tenure.

6) Comment by Guess - 14/07/2011

I have seen an administrator evaluate teachers and give every teacher top rating no matter what. These teachers even had a specific lesson plan when evaluated. I'm not saying that this happens in every school, but it happens. When the administrators don't hold their teacher accountable, it's where our schools fail. With tenure and teacher's unions, it's almost impossible to get rid of a bad teacher or administrator. Ms. Boffy is correct. It is not in the best interest of the children.

7) Comment by Scrooge - 14/07/2011

Tenure should be eliminated, especially at the administrative supervisory levels. There are too many leeches at the administrative supervisory level taking advantage of tenure laws who should be put out to pasture.

8) Comment by ovation - 14/07/2011

I need to add to my previous comment. Growth can be accomplished at the high performing schools as well as schools in the 'inner city.' Growth is growth. In fact, it is harder for schools that have the 'highly motiviated' students to show growth because their students are at a higher level.

9) Comment by ovation - 14/07/2011

Good teaching does not mean all students are at the pinnacle of their potential. It means a teacher has shown growth in her students. Even minimal growth is good and something that can be built upon. Tenure is not necessary in education. Teachers should always be striving to become better each year, the same as everyone in our communities. Knowing that you need to stay 'on top of your game' is a great incentive.

10) Comment by wiliedog - 14/07/2011

Wow...a chance for real education reform... Hope this movement gains momentum...

11) Comment by spqr - 14/07/2011

All schools are not Paul Breaux Middle with such motivated pupils. If Boffy worked in a hard core inner city school with a large at-risk population we wouldn't know her name.

12) Comment by mytwocents - 14/07/2011

If Mrs Boffy worked in such an excellent school and still sees the need for ending tenure I think we should listen to her.

13) Comment by spqr - 14/07/2011

Congrats to Ms. Boffy. Really. But the pupil-teacher ratio is 13-1, Paul Breaux Middle has gifted and talented programs students must test to gain entry to, and students can be placed on academic probation and the school is not qualified for Title-I gov't funding because the the children there are not labeled "at risk". Not the real world, folks.