Superintendent White suggests school action

School chief told state not doing enough

State Superintendent of Education John White on Thursday said the state and the East Baton Rouge Parish school system both share blame for several chronically low-performing schools in north Baton Rouge, but said he’s hopeful they both will join forces to fix them.

“When I look at north Baton Rouge, I see an immense opportunity,” White said.

White has been visiting school boards around the state to explain changes that are being made in public education — changes outlined in a document titled “Louisiana Believes.” The East Baton Rouge Parish School Board on Thursday was his latest stop on that tour.

White last spoke to the board in December, shortly before taking over as state superintendent. He was pitching an idea at the time that was later unveiled in April as the “Baton Rouge Achievement Zone.”

The zone, which now includes six state-run schools in Baton Rouge, aims to improve student achievement at low-performing and poverty-ridden schools in north Baton Rouge through a mix of greater principal autonomy and generous, outside philanthropic support for special services for students.

The parish school system, however, has yet to enter into any formal partnership with the state in connection with the zone.

After White finished his presentation, board member Vereta Lee began the questioning.

Lee expressed indignation that the state is requiring schools and teachers to do a lot more but has frozen school aid for the past three years. She also complained that the state, through the Recovery School District, is taking poor care of the schools in Baton Rouge it has taken over.

White responded that Louisiana has done better than other states that have cut school funding. He said he would have loved it if the state’s economy had been doing better so school funding could have been increased.

“We were playing defense on the budget,” he said.

“Does this make things easier for teachers? No, it does not,” he acknowledged.

Lee said she recently visited Crestworth Middle, one of the schools taken over by the state, and found it in atrocious condition.

“If we get those schools back, they won’t be fit to have a dog educated in them,” Lee said.

White didn’t deny that Crestworth has had problems, but said that East Baton Rouge Parish also let its schools decline badly before they were taken over by the state. Crestworth until recently had been operated as a charter school.

“It is the product of a long time of neglect,” he said.

White said that both the school system and the RSD have had problems and that RSD has been trying to fix those problems by ending contracts with charter school groups that “weren’t getting the job done.”

“We have to get our act together and get our schools running better, and you have to get your act together and get your schools running better,” he said.

White said the Achievement Zone remains a good option. He said he’s glad that the school system finally has a superintendent, Bernard Taylor, who started work in mid-June. He said he and Taylor have had great conversations full of “innovation and new ideas.”

After Lee spoke, the questioning from board members grew less charged and more cordial.

Taylor sat quietly and did not speak during White’s talk.

After the meeting, White said he would like to forge an agreement on the Achievement Zone with the school system this fall.

White said he thought the presentation and question-and-answer session went well.

“I expected nothing other than a decent reception,” he said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (12)


1) Comment by Traveler - 03/08/2012

Leaders of teachers' unions don't like to talk about it, but the truth is that they work just as hard as the central office administrators to rid the school system of ineffective teachers. Why don't the union leaders talk about it? It's "bad for business"----when a union agent is working to build membership, he doesn't like to turn anyone away. But why do the union leaders also work "behind the scenes" to "weed out" those employees who habitually receive poor evaluations or who are "repeat offenders" when it comes to mistakes in disciplining students? It's simple----those ineffective employees put excessive demands on the union's time, energy, and money by "going back to the well" again and again for assistance. In addition, of course those poor teachers do reflect badly on the entire profession. Have some ineffective teachers "slipped through the cracks" and been able to hold on to their jobs despite poor performance? Absolutely! But any union leader will tell you privately and "off the record" that it's not in the union's best interests to aide and abet that situation.

2) Comment by Being_Stupid - 03/08/2012

C school is not good enough. Students trapped in C schools should have the option to attend a better school via the Voucher System.

3) Comment by bourbon-soda - 03/08/2012

The government will never do enough. It is like giving your wastrel brother- in-law enough money.

4) Comment by WhoCares - 03/08/2012

Patient Warning: Veretta Lee has been known to induce vomiting.

5) Comment by vicwill - 03/08/2012

A "C" school is not a bad or low-performing school. I have continued to ask the question why were C schools lumped in with the D and F schools? Was it to boost the number students elgible for the voucher? Was it to make it pretty hard for an "F" school to get off the list to avoid losing students to vouchers? If we call a C school failing, then Central Middle School in the Central Community School System which everyone says is a good school district is failing, because they were a C school last year. So please explain how Central is not doing a good job of educating its students.

6) Comment by Being_Stupid - 03/08/2012

The only solution is a Voucher System for kids trapped in C,D, & F Schools. Abolish the C,D,&F Schools, which will allow for the School Board Micro-Managers to focus on their A & B Schools. Allow the Private Schools to fix the mess created by the Teacher's Union and School Board. The C, D, & F Public Schools that are unsuccessful need to be shut down and those kids that were trapped in those horrible schools need to be given vouchers to obtain quality education from a private school.

7) Comment by Being_Stupid - 03/08/2012

Don't blame the parents. The parents are a direct product of the current public school system.

8) Comment by Chucky - 03/08/2012

P.S We are going to make that horse drink that water no matter the cost.

9) Comment by Chucky - 03/08/2012

Nonperforming students not schools. I agree with the last two post.

10) Comment by Attila - 03/08/2012

The major problem with the EBR school system is defined by the culture of the people it serves. Chew on that for a while and see where it leads.

11) Comment by spqr - 03/08/2012

We don't have lousy public education in our school system. Our teachers are very good and highly trained, despite the effective porpaganda generated. We have apathetic students with horrible attendance and serious discipline issues created by parents who do not care (the majority) who live with an entitlement mentality. The Jindal puppet, White, could not last one week in these classrooms as he is terribly unqualified. Taylor thinks putting teachers on a school bus for a two hour pep rally at Southern University next week is going to rally demoralized teachers whose pay has been frozen for three straight years while their paychecks shrink as medical costs rise and class sizes grow. But it will be great for soundbites on the 6 p.m. news.

12) Comment by tradewinns - 03/08/2012

what these two entities are doing is, nothing. each one states the other isn't doing either anything or enough. instead of joining to fix the number one problem, useless parents, they want to set the other up as the "bad" guy. politics as usual, nothing changes, including the lousy education from our public school system.