Vouchers get dose of religion

Taxpayer dollars in Louisiana’s new voucher program will be paying to send children to schools that teach creationism and reject evolution, promoting a religious doctrine that challenges the lessons central to public school science classrooms.

Several religious schools that will be educating taxpayer-subsidized students tout their creationist views. Some schools question whether the universe is more than a few thousand years old, openly defying reams of scientific evidence to the contrary.

Critics say it’s inappropriate to spend public money on such religious teaching, arguing such programs undercut a strong science education and threaten the adequate preparation of students for college science courses.

“What they’re going to be getting financed with public money is phony science. They’re going to be getting religion instead of science,” said Barbara Forrest, a founder of the Louisiana Coalition for Science and a philosophy professor who has written about the clashes between religion and science.

Superintendent of Education John White says annual science tests required of all voucher students in the third through 11th grades will determine if children are getting the appropriate science education in the private school classrooms.

“If students are failing the test, we’re going to intervene, and the test measures evolution,” White said.

Refusal to teach evolution or challenging it as refutable won’t get a school booted from the voucher program, which was pushed by Gov. Bobby Jindal as a way to improve educational opportunities for students in schools ranked with a C, D or F in the public school grading system.

For example, a handbook for Ascension Christian High School, posted online, declares among the goals of “Household of Faith Schools” that “the learner will be expected to defend creationism through evidence presented by the Bible versus traditional scientific theory.”

Ten voucher students have been assigned to Ascension Christian, along with another 41 voucher students for another Household of Faith school, Faith Academy. The schools, located in Ascension Parish, are set to receive more than $250,000 from the state.

A biology teacher at Northlake Christian High School, a St. Tammany Parish school slated to teach 18 voucher students this school year, outlines his curriculum on a website that talks of giving students the opportunity to challenge evolution against “a creation worldview of life origins.”

The website contradicts fossil evidence of millions of years of life on the planet, calling it incompatible with the Bible. Meanwhile, the school’s doctrinal statement says Northlake Christian, which will get $375,000 in state-funded tuition payments for its high school and elementary school, promotes “the creation of man by the direct act of God.”

College student Zack Kopplin, an outspoken critic of teaching creationism in science classrooms, found at least 19 of the 119 mostly religious schools in the voucher program either promote creationism or teach with curricula from Christian textbook publishers that are known to challenge Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution.

The schools cited by Kopplin’s research have been approved to take in more than 750 voucher students and receive more than $4 million in taxpayer funding, in the first round of announced voucher assignments for the 2012-13 school year that begins next month.

Several of the schools use A Beka Book for their instructional materials. A description for a fifth-grade science textbook from the Florida publisher describes the world as “presented as the creation of God and glorifies Him as its Sustainer and Upholder.”

“This teachable, readable and memorable book presents the universe as the direct creation of God and refutes the man-made idea of evolution,” says the description of a sixth-grade science book, posted on A Beka’s website. An eighth-grade textbook is described as rejecting “the unproven hypothesis of evolution, recognizing special creation as the only reasonable explanation for the origin of the universe.”

Before the voucher program, Louisiana had a series of controversies about science teaching.

A law mandating that “creationism” be given equal time in public school classrooms with evolution was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1987 as an effort to promote religion.

The state now has a law that allows public school science teachers to use supplemental materials in their classrooms in addition to state-approved textbooks. Guidelines adopted by the state education board ban the promotion of a religious doctrine in the supplemental materials, but without a specific ban on the teaching of creationism.

Jindal, who holds a college degree in biology, has supported the teaching of creationism, saying the theory of evolution has “flaws and gaps.”

The rules governing Louisiana’s voucher program give the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education oversight over the curricula used by participating private and parochial schools. White said BESE will make sure the standards are of an equitably quality to public schools.

“In the event that there is basic academic incompetence, the state (education) department can intervene,” he said. “The most effective way of testing all of this is to literally see what do the students know and what do they achieve, and we’re doing that through the state test.”

Forrest and Kopplin said since the schools are receiving public money, their textbooks and teaching material should be available for public review, a proposal that hasn’t been adopted by BESE.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (19)


1) Comment by phil - 31/07/2012

It seems that as it is described, the tax money will follow the student under the voucher system. Therefore the money only follows students to religious school when the parents want their children to attend those religious schools. I am against the voucher system for many, many other reasons. Basically, you cannot have your cake and eat it too, so people who are in favor of the voucher system just have to accept that some people WANT to send their children to religious schools. I personally think the voucher system is just a method to make some private school owners rich, and I am guessing there will be an increase in the number of large organizations in the private school business in the long term . This isn't a debate about religion, it is a debate about money and profits and who will get those profits. Those profits, by the way, are OUR tax money.

2) Comment by Being_Stupid - 31/07/2012

Catholic Schools teach Evolution in Science Class. They also teach Creationism in Religion Class. It is up to the Individual Student to decide which theory is true. Not the ACLU.

3) Comment by zealer99 - 31/07/2012

Faith vs religion, an interesting debate. When a person seek treatment from a medical doctor, the doctor will generally render an opinion and prescribe some sort of medication for the disease or disorder. Most of us take the doctor's opinion and the prescription because we have faith in the doctor not because we understand the disease or disorder nor do we understand the medication beyond what we read from an online resource. We choose sides in the evolution and creation debate based on what we want to believe. From what most of us actually "know" the monoliths that Sir Arthur Charles Clarke envisioned in the Year 2001 may be as accurate as evolution. Actually unless you take a very restrictive point of view, there is room for the monoliths, creation, and evolution. One man's religion is another man's science....

4) Comment by SuzanneMS - 31/07/2012

It's not about where parents choose to send their children. It's about using public funds -- our tax dollars -- to support religious education. That is blatantly unconstitutional, and those of you who are trying to reframe the argument as being "anti-Christian" are well aware of that and are simply trying to muddy the waters. John White would be proud. And let's not forget that the state will intervene only if there are 40 or more voucher students in the school -- and that the intervention will consist solely of not allowing them to enroll any more voucher students. They'll still keep the ones they have and still get public money to do it. Parents are quite free to send their children to a religious school, using their own dollars to do it, not mine.

5) Comment by ScotB - 31/07/2012

So, a parent's choice is to send their kid to a failing school or a good school that teaches religion? Let's imagine the only locally available school was at a mosque. What would you do as an impoverished parent? It's probably easier to send the child to the mosque and tell them to study hard and get a good education (and by the way, ignore all that Islam stuff they're putting out) than to sacrifice them to being uneducated. The people benefiting from the voucher program are poor and don't have too many options. At least their child can get an education, now.

6) Comment by redstickhornet - 31/07/2012

“In the event that there is basic academic incompetence, the state (education) department can intervene,” he said. “The most effective way of testing all of this is to literally see what do the students know and what do they achieve, and we’re doing that through the state test.” But does that ensure that a student does not waste any more of their time? At least one whole school year of can possibly go to waste. I hope it doesn't happen. However, don't these students need and deserve a world-class science and math education RIGHT NOW, LIKE RIGHT THIS MINUTE? Our state needs graduates ready to compete with the top math & science countries in the world today. Wasn't that the point of the extreme urgency to legalize, fund, then implement the program? I'm confused.

7) Comment by mempho420 - 31/07/2012

I think this has more to do with the argument of 'State Supported' religion rather than any type of discrimination or bigotry. I have no problem with someone teaching their children a creationist version of the reason we are here (Evolution handles the how, not the why, by the way; an interesting way to see both sides of the coin if you will) but I do have a problem when tax dollars are spent teaching it. The constitution strictly prohibits a state supported religion and this is getting awfully close to that line in my eyes.

8) Comment by DMJ - 31/07/2012

Criticising psuedo-science masquerading as actual science doesn't make one a bigot; it makes them a rational person. Besides, bigots engage in discrimination. What are creationists being prevented from doing by "anti-Christian bigots"? Nothing? That's what I thought.

9) Comment by phil - 31/07/2012

I do not support the voucher system. However if parents do not want their own children to lean about religion then they can just NOT send their own children to religious private schools. END OF SUBJECT! Is this issue being brought up to start a crusade to end private religious schools and possibly religion in general? Are the people who want a totally atheist nation pushing this issue? I have to wonder what the motives really are.

10) Comment by Riroon - 31/07/2012

Enough, people. People who know me know just anti-Jindal, anti-voucher I am. But this is less about Jindal and more about the anti-Christian bigots getting a free shot at believers. All this 'reject science for Christianity' is ***** Period. Yes, there are different beliefs on how the world began. But that's it. Do Christians reject physics? medicine? chemistry? A few years ago, I was in bad shape and a team of six doctors helped me recover through three months in a hospital (including two weeks in ICU). My physicians were all Christians. Did they treat me with holy water and animal sacrifice? NO. They treated me by using their knowledge of ... oh my ged... SCIENCE! Do you see Christian engineers refuse to work on gasoline motors because 'the fuel came from dinosaurs and dinosaurs are the work of the Devil's imagination'? Of course not. Again, I'm no fan of Jindal's or vouchers. But I've got to call out this bias and bigotry.

11) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 31/07/2012

The ALEC intent is to privatize public education. All we have to do is give an inch...

12) Comment by Whatnow - 31/07/2012

Is the state forcing these children to go to a parochial private school?

13) Comment by warreni - 31/07/2012

@lovemykids: I believe you can be a hypocrite without being an idiot and I think that's true in this case. There's a world of difference between being smart and being right.

14) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 31/07/2012

Now and then, it dawns on me just how many steps backward our society has taken, and this is one of those very scary moments. Give the religious crackpots an inch and they'll dive for the minds of our children every time. Trying to keeping the masses ignorant and obedient is a story as old as societies themselves.

15) Comment by DMJ - 31/07/2012

This is embarrassing. Not surprising....but embarrassing. Louisiana...leading the race to the bottom. Look out, Mississippi! We got your number!!

16) Comment by bettergovt - 31/07/2012

You only qualify for a voucher if you have a household income of less than $55,000/yr for a family of 4. If that is all you make then you likely could not afford the $5000 to $10,000/yr in tuition now. Plus you would have had to have your kids enrolled in a public school the previous year. This reform is of no assistance to anyone with kids already in a private school. If my wife quits her job and we enroll our kids in public school next year, maybe we get picked in the lottery but with my luck, I doubt it.

17) Comment by 8point6 - 31/07/2012

Wow, this one should get my "progressive" friends fired up! I wish this voucher program would have been available when I sent my kids to parochial school. I could have used the financial help.

18) Comment by bettergovt - 31/07/2012

Wait until the Muslim schools want in... I am a Christian but I understand my religious beliefs are based on Faith which is the belief in something without evidence or to the contrary of evidence. I understand the evidence behind evolution but have Faith that God was behind it. If I believe there is scientific evidence that God created the universe, that is not Faith, it's ignorance. These people are teaching religion and don't understand what Faith is? Maybe they should not be teaching religion either...

19) Comment by lovemykids - 31/07/2012

I have to pay for my children to go to a very good private school. Now my tax dollars that are not used for my children will go to teach pseudo science and religion. I can not believe that this is constitutional. I believe that if you have a biology degree and do not believe in evolution you are an idiot and a hypocrite.