College tuition set to rise

More than 40,000 Baton Rouge college students can expect to see a 10 percent increase in their tuition when they return to campus later this year.

The state’s top higher education board Wednesday paved the way for all but two of Louisiana’s public colleges to raise tuition when classes resume in the fall.

Only LSU at Eunice and Southern University at Shreveport did not meet the standards spelled out in the 2010 LA Grad Act which ties student performance to tuition-raising authority.

The 10 percent tuition incease is all but certain at area schools including LSU’s Baton Rouge campus, Baton Rouge Community College, the Capital Area Technical College and Southeastern Louisiana University in Hammond as management boards for the LSU, University of Louisiana and Louisiana Community and Technical College systems have already voted to approve increases for the fall semester.

Southern System President Ronald Mason said he will recommend Southern follow suit at their board meeting scheduled for Friday morning.

The GRAD Act consists of up to 62 benchmarks mostly based on student success. The law gives colleges authority to increase tuition by up to 10 percent a year, if they meet those performance goals.

Additionally, the state’s performance-based funding formula ties 15 percent of overall state funding for each college on meeting the GRAD Act goals.

The only caveat for institutions is that they do not exceed Southern regional averages for tuition charged.

All of Louisiana’s public colleges, excluding the two that didn’t pass, were given “green” designations — the highest evaluation score possible on the state’s four-tiered scoring system.

Colleges signed six-year GRAD Act agreements in 2010 which set school-specific targets annually and over the long term.

All of the state’s public colleges reached their targets last year, said Meg Casper, the Regents association commissioner for public affairs.

The GRAD Act has generally been talked about as one of the only tools institutions have to mitigate declining support from the state.

The Louisiana Legislature has cut roughly $360 million from higher education in the past four years. Additionally, Louisiana’s four college systems will have to absorb another $66 million in the fiscal year that starts Sunday.

But at Southern, meeting the GRAD Act targets was especially high-stakes Chancellor James Llorens has said.

Declining enrollment and state budget cuts prompted Southern to declare a financial emergency, called exigency, last year. Exigency allows administrators to more easily cut personnel and programs.

The school is facing an estimated $6 million cut from the state next year.

On Wednesday, Llorens said reaching their targets, and the benefits that go along with them, will boost Southern’s ability to balance its budget.

“This was a challenge for us, given our financial and enrollment problems,” Llorens said. We took the benchmarks very seriously.”

LSU’s Baton Rouge campus is looking at an expected $18 million reduction in state funding starting in July.

Chancellor Michael Martin said he was “feeling good” after the Regents meeting but cautioned that LSU will not be able to absorb budget reductions for much longer.

“Today is indicative of the fact that people will rise to the occasion because they love the institution even under trying times,” Martin said. “Continuing to succeed will be difficult, though. I hope no one believes we can continue if we have to deal with further budget cuts.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (7)


1) Comment by vicwill - 29/06/2012

Yeap, just trying to privatize everything.

2) Comment by NewsReader - 28/06/2012

jeffsadow, maybe you would like to re-read your post, fix the grammar errors, fix the sentences where there are obvious changes of thought process that took places between you beginning and ending the sentence, and most importantly explain to everyone exactly where or when this state has been awash in revenue(s). I am assuming you looked at some data from 2009 that lists Louisiana as 7th in the nation with an average revenue to the state of approx $9900 per capita. However, you may want to take note that two other states which rely heavily on the O&G industry have almost TRIPLE the revenue generated here. And one also needs to factor in that our expenses will be higher while there is such a huge proportion of the population stuck in poverty.

3) Comment by jeffsadow - 28/06/2012

As a university professor with over two decades teaching here, I can assure readers of the overwrought nature of the previous comments, including and especially those of identified as coming from a former BOR staffer. Those comments illustrate precisely the attitude that has made the state underachieve so much with one of the highest per capital costs of higher education -- this pernicious idea that we have subsidize massively a lower common denominator education for the masses where it is more about warm bodies enrolled than in providing incentives to encourage quality. That includes having those who reap the most benefit from it, the students themselves, pay their fair share, even though many will get close to a free ride by meeting the minimal TOPS standards while finding themselves. Funding reductions have been a challenge -- and my institution was one of the leanest to begin with -- but it has helped introduce the efficiency badly needed in the delivery system. The real problem, of course, is a straitjacketed fiscal structure that takes a state awash in revenues and misallocates it, leading to bogus calls for more taxation. We need to take care of the spending side, including efficiency improvement and fiscal reform.

4) Comment by BayouPhilosopher - 28/06/2012

The Board of Regents has become just an extension of Gov. Jindal's policy to essentially privatize state colleges by making students pay for the entire cost of their education. As a former member of the Regents' staff, this is a shameful abandonment of their proper role which is to avoid / moderate political agendas. Is this really what the people of Louisiana want? -- to abandon affordable public education for all? Only the wealthy who send their kids to private colleges benefit because their taxes go down. The middle class and poor pay through the nose and get in debt with loans. Chancellor Martin is the weakest man to hold that position in 40 years in my opinion. Good riddance to him -- though I fear we will get someone just as weak who will not stand up for strong state funding of LSU and higher education. When you all see schools like U. of Arkansas, Texas A&M, and even Alabama ranked above LSU by US News, you will see the damage done by these cuts. LSU is not a sports franchise -- it's a university -- and its headed back to mediocrity with these cuts. Wake up Louisiana.

5) Comment by BRmoderate - 28/06/2012

Pushing more and more of our youth out of this state...

6) Comment by spqr - 28/06/2012

Let's call it the Piyush Jindal tax.

7) Comment by NewsReader - 28/06/2012

It would be nice if now that tuition costs are at or above a pretty good section of state colleges across the nation when looked at as a percentage of those other states income levels, the various colleges here would start living within their budgets instead of just going for automatic tuition increase and fee additions.