Session spelled big changes for schools

Public school debates dominated much of the 2012 regular legislative session and produced what may become some of the most far-reaching education changes in the past 20 years.

“Some of this is huge,” said Stephanie Desselle, who monitors school issues for the Council for a Better Louisiana, or CABL.

“It so fundamentally changes the way some of our school systems and school boards and superintendents operate,” Desselle said.

Most of Gov. Bobby Jindal’s education agenda — much of it now under legal fire — shot through the Legislature in a first month marked by late-night, often bitter debates.

One of the key laws will make it harder for public school teachers to earn and retain tenure, which is a form of job protection.

Another converts what used to be a one-parish voucher program to a statewide effort, and uses dollars long reserved for public schools for some students in troubled public schools to attend private and parochial schools.

Still another is aimed at overhauling the state’s early childhood education programs, which drew little controversy but has the potential to spark long-term changes at the all-important pre-school level.

Veterans of the statehouse said the 2012 school laws rival or exceed accountability policies launched in the mid-1990s, which led to high-stakes tests for fourth and eighth-graders, school performance scores and other sweeping changes.

The new laws will also shrink the influence of local school boards, require local superintendents to work under performance contracts and ban the exclusive use of seniority in layoff decisions.

Local school officials will be allowed to revamp pay schedules to include teacher effectiveness, teacher demand by subject and whether the school is in a remote location.

Other changes will allow community groups, nonprofits, universities and local entities that meet state rules to become authorizers of charter schools, which are public schools run by nongovernmental groups.

The Legislature voted to end tenure for future school bus drivers, a law which dates back to 1944.

Legislators also passed a bill to toughen rules against bullying in public schools.

Firms and individuals can qualify for tax rebates if they make donations for voucher students.

Voters will be allowed to decide whether to impose term limits on local school board members.

However, even after three months of debate key issues in the education arena remain as controversial as ever.

The Louisiana Federation of Teachers, which opposed the governor’s school agenda, filed two lawsuits on Thursday aimed at striking down the central parts of Jindal’s school agenda — the tenure and voucher laws.

The lawsuits say that, among other things, lawmakers violated the state Constitution by tossing in multiple bills into single pieces of legislation.

Attorneys for the group hope to get a preliminary injunction to halt implementation of the law while the lawsuits, and near certain appeals, play out.

“The passage of these laws has elevated legal challenges to acts of civic responsibility,” said LFT President Steve Monaghan.

Amid the uncertainty, parents are applying for up to 5,100 voucher slots for their children to move from C, D and F public schools to private and parochial schools, if they meet income and other requirements.

Steven Cook, the father of two children who attend charter schools in Baton Rouge, criticized the LFT’s challenge of the law that will link teacher job security to classroom performance.

“This is a power play for job security,” Cook said. “They are not concerned about making children the priority.”

Laura Lindsay, interim dean of the LSU College of Education, said public school changes that swept through the Legislature got the attention of prospective teachers and others.

One of the concerns, Lindsay said, is exactly how a new system will work in which half of a teacher’s annual review is linked to the growth of student achievement.

“It goes back to how it is implemented,” she said.

Cheryl Lott, the mother of three children in Baton Rouge public schools, praised one of the laws under challenge, which ends the exclusive use of seniority in layoff decisions.

Lott said it makes no sense to get rid of young, talented teachers while veterans keep their jobs because of seniority.

“Meanwhile, the children of Louisiana will suffer while our effective teachers are going to other places,” she said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by Warp7 - 09/06/2012

Yes, big changes. I am sure Jefferson Parish teachers are happy about what little Hitler and the Brown shirts did, especially since they were all layer off this week. Thanks little Hitler Jindal!

2) Comment by Warp7 - 09/06/2012

Yes, big changes. I am sure Jefferson Parish teachers are happy about what little Hitler and the Brown shirts did, especially since they were all layer off this week. Thanks little Hitler Jindal!

3) Comment by timesright - 09/06/2012

ABayouBoy, a question for you. Will the taxpayers get their money's worth by granting voucher acceptance to schools which have no track record at all or are dismal examples of schools that don't have facilities, books or other resources? There are some of those on the list. Your tax money is headed to those schools.

4) Comment by clott - 09/06/2012

spqr, You are right, most of our teachers are not the problem, but I've taught school alongside an extremely poor performing teacher in the past (who had tenure). One year in that classroom can be the straw that breaks the proverbial back of a student who is barely hanging on because of all the other factors you mentioned. There is no easy fix here, but holding teachers accountable and making placement decisions based on performance instead of seniority is a step in the right direction.

5) Comment by spqr - 09/06/2012

Bayouboy...start thinking for yourself and resist the propaganda of the government to sell their agenda. Teachers are not the problem when that same government weakens discipline, students reject education and disdain authority, class sizes are growing, absenteeism among students is rampant, parents are not involved, an increasing number of inner city students are felons, the gang culture gains strength, school systems fight budget constraints, the media never interviews teachers for balance in articles (how convenient they are always the villains), and all is undermined by greedy business orchestrating their desire for charter school profits despite those school failures and a welfare culture promising security. Stephanie Desselle is a puppet and Mr. Cook is ignorant.

6) Comment by jeffsadow - 09/06/2012

However those interviewed were found, they said a mouthful. There is no improvement indicator for the teacher ranking system. You score into a category and it doesn't matter what your previous years' rankings were, except for the determination of tenure.

7) Comment by lovemykids - 09/06/2012

Correct me if I am wrong. Baton Rouge Magnet High is an A not an A+ school. I believe the reason is because they could not show sufficient student improvement. If you are at the top, how do you improve? Will it work the same way for teachers?

8) Comment by ABayouBoy - 09/06/2012

My views on the subject are that the lack of teacher accountability for their job responsibilities, training, and performance are what got the EBRP school system into the current mess that its in. If a teacher cannot perform up to par in the classroom, not only are the students not receiving a proper education, but the taxpayers are not getting their money's worth either. The changes proposed by the Jindal administration were brought on by poor teacher performance due to the standards in place today. Opponents can argue all that they want as to the legalities of the proposed legislation, but, if these changes are implemented, our children will be much better educated as a result.

9) Comment by Mr. T - 09/06/2012

Just wondering how Steven Cook and Cheryl Lott were selected for this article...I never heard of either of the. Please tell why I should care what they think...it looks like the reporter selected them strictly for their political views. I guess he couldn't find anybody important to say what they said.