House backs bullying bill

A scaled-down bill to curb bullying in public schools won Louisiana House approval Wednesday in less than five minutes, a rarity for an issue that often sparks heated arguments.

The House endorsed the measure 73-16, which now moves to the state Senate and is sponsored by state Rep. Patricia Smith, D-Baton Rouge. Sixteen state representatives did not vote.

The key issue now is how that bill can be reconciled with a rival plan that passed the Senate last week 33-0, and which is backed by Gov. Bobby Jindal’s office.

Earlier in the day the House Education Committee approved that measure, Senate Bill 764, after some bickering on crucial issues between Smith and state Sen. Rick Ward III, D-Port Allen and sponsor of the legislation.

Differences include reporting requirements, free speech protections and the role of the state Department of Education in tackling bullying problems.

Smith said there has been talk of a sit-down session to try to agree on one bill.

“I will wait and see whether we have that meeting,” she told reporters after the vote.

In brief remarks, Smith told the House her bill is meant to address problems that have surfaced in classrooms around the nation. “Louisiana has a law but it really doesn’t go far enough,” she said.

The bill would ban bullying, including cyber-bullying, and defines the act as fear-inducing, threatening or abusive actions.

Local school boards would be required to spell out the bans in a code of conduct.

School employees would be required to undergo at least four hours of training on how to detect and curb bullying, including the relationship between suicide risk factors and harassment.

The legislation would also require the state Department of Education to compile a list of best practices on how school employees can address the problem.

Under the plan, school officials who receive a complaint of bullying would be required to verbally report the allegation to the principal that day, and in writing within two days of the incident.

The principal would then be required to notify the student’s parents, launch an investigation within one school day and finish it within 10 days.

Smith’s bill, like the Senate-passed version, excludes specific prohibitions against bullying aimed at gay students or for reasons of race, disabilities, religion or political ideas — a source of heated controversy in past debates.

“That’s off the table,” she said.

Ward told the House committee that his proposal tries to address the problem without unfairly singling out students for routine horseplay.

“I don’t want to do anything that keeps kids from being kids,” he told the panel.

But Smith disputed several parts of Ward’s bill.

One section in the Senate-passed measure says the new anti-bullying rules would not be aimed at infringing on the rights of students or school employees to exercise free speech.

Smith said that section could be a license to bully.

On another issue, she said it is unfair to require a “pattern” of bullying before action can be taken, not just a single incident.

Smith also criticized a provision in Ward’s bill that would allow a student to transfer to another school if school officials failed to act on four complaints.

She said that would amount to “taking the victim out and not changing the culture” of the school.

Ward said the free speech provision is designed in part to protect the bill if it is challenged in court.

He also said that moving the student to another school is merely an option for parents, not a requirement.

Smith’s bid to make 29 changes in Ward’s bill failed 2-12

Backing Ward’s bill were the Louisiana School Boards Association, the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, the Louisiana Family Forum and the Louisiana Baptist Convention.

Opponents included the Louisiana Association of Educators, a teachers’ union.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (5)


1) Comment by phil - 17/05/2012

Also I thought it was actually the gays that are bullying the Christians. Or is it actually the atheists who are bullying religious kids? The law needs to cover all of that too, right? Like I already stated, teachers and parents need to handle this and we already have enough laws on the books to cover this.

2) Comment by phil - 17/05/2012

Yes, we need more laws to define what bullying is so those who bully can figure out how to bully outside of the written laws. We also can give pre-K and young students a copy of the bills and laws so they can read them and figure out exactly what is covered under the law. The laws/bills need to be posted on the walls of every public, charter and private school. Oh I forgot, the younger students can't read yet so teachers can have a separate class to read it to them. Also, we need to make it mandatory that this becomes a felony and prison is an option. We do not have enough first graders etc in jail and we need to change that. Besides any children who bully should have a felony on their records for life. In summary, we already have enough laws to cover this issue and this serious issue should really be handled by parents and teachers.

3) Comment by jeffsadow - 17/05/2012

Neither commenter appears to have read SB 764. Here are the highlights: http://jeffsadow.blogspot.com/2012/04/anti-bullying-bill-ready-to-overcome.html. Actually, this bill itself is watered down as it used to carry more severe specific penalties. Bullying is not a matter of intent, but of behavior, so it's a good idea (and consistent with the First Amendment) not to create thought crimes in statute. "Bullying" is, for example, not expressing from one student to another the practice of homosexuality is sinful, which under the original formulation of HB 407 would have been defined as such. By rejecting the thought crimes language, SB 764 accomplishes the objective without violation of our First Amendment rights.

4) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 17/05/2012

"A scaled-down bill to curb bullying in public schools won Louisiana House approval Wednesday in less than five minutes, a rarity for an issue that often sparks heated arguments." REALLY? Shotty reporting. The Advocate knows darn well why there were no "heated arguments". (because the words "sexual orientation" were removed from the bill). Gene Mills needs to be called out for the bully he and his hate organization really are, but the legislature is too scared. To Gene Mill, you are a BIGOTED BULLY.

5) Comment by lovemykids - 17/05/2012

As long as so called christians can still bully gays it's a good bill for Louisiana. NOT