Experts: Early education helps

Early childhood education, such as Louisiana’s LA4 program, can lower the chances that students will be held back or placed in special education while increasing the chances that they will stay in school or attend college, two experts said Wednesday.

Craig Ramey, a professor and scholar at Virginia Tech’s Carilion Research Institute and the chief science officer for LA4, and his colleague, Frances Campbell, a senior scientist at the Frank Porter Grahm Child Development Center at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, spoke as part of the Academic Distinction Fund’s Distinguished Speaker Series.

The Cecil J. Picard LA4 Early Childhood Program, established in 2001, is offered in nearly all school districts and several independent public charter schools. Four-year-olds who qualify for free lunch or reduced-price lunch are eligible to attend the program, although children from families with higher incomes are also eligible, using local funds or tuition.

“LA4 has consistently produced both short-term large effects and lasting benefits (at least through 4th grade)”, for successive classes, Ramey said. “LA4 is a beacon in this country.”

Students who participate in LA4 consistently score higher than the state average on state assessments in the third grade, Ramey said.

“It’s a bigger effect than I expected,” he said.

Ramey said that to continue to improve the program’s performance, administrators must jettison a “one-size fits all” approach and tailor the program based on local programs and resource availability.

He also cited public reporting of student progress and program development as a key to help administrators and parents evaluate the program’s worth.

Campbell said that intervention even earlier than 4 years old was key.

“You cannot do as well if you wait until they are 5,” she told the audience. “Supporting early brain growth is very important.”

Ramey was a founder and Campbell one of the lead researchers on the Abecedarian project, a 30-year study that tracked the impact of early childhood education on a group of about 100 at-risk students in North Carolina.

During the Abecedarian Project, the children started as infants and went to the center every day for the full days yearround, Campbell said.

Students from the program had better test scores, were less likely to be held back and were less likely to report symptoms of depression, she said.

They consistently tested higher in reading and math through age 21 than their counterparts in the control group, Campbell said.

Campbell encouraged ADF members to persuade local business leaders that an investment in early childhood interventions provides significant returns.

The next ADF session will be June 26, and will feature University of California researcher Dr. Greg Duncan presenting a talk, “Impact of Poverty on Academic Achievement.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (5)


1) Comment by bourbon-soda - 10/05/2012

For the interested reader, peer comment from the U of Maryland on the North Carolina Abecedarian project: http://www.welfareacademy.org/pubs/early_education/pdfs/Beshar ov_ECE%20assessments_The_Abecedarian_Project.pdf showing little effect extending into adult life, of a highly intensive early childhood program.

2) Comment by bourbon-soda - 10/05/2012

The Picard report at http://www.picardcenter.org/Publications/Lists/Publications2/Atta chments/50/LA%204%20iLEAP%20and%20LEAP%20Report.p df does not appear to have any description about assignment of children to the study group versus general population. A search for the words "assign" or "assigned," "random," and "select" or "selection" reveals no hits. This leaves the possibility that the study group was selected by parents motivated enough to get them into the study. The "policy implications" are propounded before most of the study itself, consistent with the study having been performed to reach a predetermined conclusion. The graphs have a baseline of 40%, a technique for exaggerating the visual impression of the results. If a drug company sold got a drug approved on the basis of this kind of data, they would be testifying somewhere, if not prosecuted.

3) Comment by bourbon-soda - 10/05/2012

The hothouse effect seems to last until maybe 4th grade. Big deal.

4) Comment by timesright - 10/05/2012

Just ask any kindergarten or first grade teacher how quickly they can identify children who have had good quality preschool experiences. It doesn't take long. Study after study has proven that early childhood education is beneficial. For those of you who still call it "glorified baby-sitting", ask a preschool teacher. I think you will get an ear full.

5) Comment by bourbon-soda - 10/05/2012

These findings are more controversial than this puff-piece indicates. None of these studies would suffice in rigor to get a new drug approved. Opinion is pretty much divided by conflict of interest; people trying to grow government versus those who will have to pay for this. If it turns out to be nothing but glorified babysitting, it will encourage more irresponsible fecundity. As a government program, it will be virtually impossible to do away with no matter how worthless (Head Start, for example).