Ascension council raises its pay

Advocate staff photo by ADAM LAUAscension Parish Councilmen Oliver Joseph, Kent Schexnaydre and Travis Turner, from left, vote for a pay raise for the 11-member council during its meeting Thursday night at the Ascension Parish Courthouse in Donaldsonville. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by ADAM LAUAscension Parish Councilmen Oliver Joseph, Kent Schexnaydre and Travis Turner, from left, vote for a pay raise for the 11-member council during its meeting Thursday night at the Ascension Parish Courthouse in Donaldsonville.

DONALDSONVILLE — The Ascension Parish Council granted final backing Thursday on a 33 percent pay increase for themselves and rejected a push to allow voters to decide on the increase and delay its effect until the next council term begins.

Approved on a 7-3 vote, the increase will boost the pay of the recently seated 11-member council from $1,200 to $1,600 per month and take effect this year, the first raise for the body since 1997.

The increase makes the council one of three governing bodies in the nine-parish Baton Rouge metro area to earn at least that much before taxes. The others are the St. Helena Parish Police Jury and the Baton Rouge Metro Council.

Before the raise motion passed, a substitute motion to hold an election on the raise on Nov. 6 and delay when it would take effect until Jan. 1, 2016, when the next council assumes office, failed on a 3-7 vote.

Voting for the increase were Council members Teri Casso, Randy Clouatre, Dempsey Lambert, Benny Johnson, Oliver Joseph, Kent Schexnaydre and Travis Turner. Voting against the increase were Councilmen Todd Lambert, Bryan Melancon and Daniel “Doc” Satterlee.

Votes for the earlier substitute motion were the reverse of the vote for the raise, with Councilmen Todd Lambert, Melancon and Satterlee for it and the others voting against.

Councilman Chris Loar did not vote on either item as chairman.

The pay increase proposal drew no public comment Thursday during a lightly attended meeting at the Parish Courthouse in Donaldsonville but sparked council divisions seen last month when the proposal was introduced.

Melancon proposed voter backing of the raise and delay of its effect until 2016.

Melancon, who started his first term in January, said residents told him the council has been in office four months and members knew what the pay was when they ran. He said residents also told him they did not like that the council could vote for its own raise.

“And the thing about it is most of them have said, ‘We may support it, but the fact that you are going to take that on yourself and vote for yourself ...’ it just doesn’t sit well with very many people,” he said.

Councilman Oliver Joseph, who was assigned the job of researching the issue, said he disagreed with an election because the home rule charter says the council has the right to vote on the raise.

He said the council asked the public to make other changes to the charter a few years ago and they did not go so far.

The items failed at the ballot, though none dealt with council pay.

Joseph, who is starting his second term, also asserted that a council pay increase was discussed at the start of the prior council term but did not happen.

“We tabled that the last four years, so you know, here we are four more years and we have another recommendation to table it for another four years. I disagree with that, and I am in favor of this raise,” he said.

Councilman Kent Schexnaydre voiced support for the increase, citing the 15 years that had passed since the last increase.

Satterlee and Todd Lambert also spoke against voting for the raise and supported holding an election instead.

Changes allowing council reimbursement for taxis and other ground transportation when members travel on council business also passed without opposition.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (10)


1) Comment by Whatnow - 05/05/2012

Woody is correct about things being decided before meetings. It doesn't matter who's against it when the council wants something. They do not listen. Period. These little peons, along with their employees act like little demi-gods. And it's not just about this raise. Try to get anything done when you have a problem. It's like asking for blood or the moon.

2) Comment by rdm41234 - 04/05/2012

IanMoone: You ask why wasn't Theresa Robert or Kathryn Goppelt there to oppose it and then you attempt to answer it. How would you know why they were not there? Were you there in favor of it? Doubt it. I am not arguing for or against this raise. I just can't stand it when idiots the likes of you show up purporting to represent yourself as a spokesperson for the 72.1% of the people that voted, not 72.1% of all who live in AP. Voter apathy has a way of skewing numbers. Now that TM is in his last 4 years, things will be very different come next election. Oh, I am still looking for those Siamese twins. There were not at the Sonic like you said.

3) Comment by ex-louisianian - 04/05/2012

I mustn't be so cynical about the motives of a Louisiana publication that selects a photo incorporating the only two black members of the Ascension parish council to accompany an article about their pay raise.

4) Comment by Woody - 04/05/2012

newsreader, if you would take time to attend or watch an ascension parish council meeting you would come to realize that it doesn't matter how many people speak for or against something. the decision has already been made ahead of time.

5) Comment by NewsReader - 04/05/2012

Article pretty clearly states nobody from the public voiced an objection. If voters can't be bothered to attend council meetings, then they deserve what they get.

6) Comment by ex-louisianian - 04/05/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

7) Comment by IanMoone - 04/05/2012

Whatnow - You have a voice, it's just that it only represents 27.9% of the people. Why wasn't TR or KG there to oppose the raise? Because DS wanted it, that's why. tball - You failed miserably the last time when you tried to vote them out, perhaps in 3.7 years you can muster more than 27.9% of the vote, but I doubt it. Woody - Get a girl, a hobby, or a job. Whatever you desire. There's more to life than being a lonely unemployed bore. tradewinns - How can 27.9% of the population recall someone? Being an award winner is an honor, being a councilperson is a JOB.

8) Comment by tradewinns - 04/05/2012

council membership is suppose to be an honor not a job. time for a recall of everyone who voted themselves a raise. it'll only take one and the rest will sheepishly reverse themselves and decide an honor is plenty.

9) Comment by Woody - 04/05/2012

sadly, by the time elections roll around again the parish may be too far gone to ever recover.

10) Comment by tball - 04/05/2012

I wish I could give myself a raise! Nice raise $400/mo., the raise should not go into effect until their next term. Hope the citizens are paying attention, they might become like Bell City, Calif. making bigger salaries.....Vote 'em out, send them a message!!

11) Comment by Whatnow - 04/05/2012

Of course they passed it. And we know it wouldn't do any good to drive all the way to Donaldsonville to speak against it. We have no voice anyway. We will remember at voting time who voted themselves a raise.