New operators say staff overwhelmed

Show caption
Heather McClelland / The Advocate
Hailey Clifton, 4, holds a puppy she and her family planned to adopt from the Companion Animal Alliance on Wednesday afternoon at the East Baton Rouge Parish Animal Shelter. The CAA took over the shelter Aug. 1 from the city-parish in an attempt to reduce animal euthanasia. On Wednesday, the nonprofit was chastised for creating ‘inhumane conditions.’

Just 3 1/2 weeks after taking control of the parish’s animal shelter services, the Companion Animal Alliance was accused of inhumane treatment of its animals by a Metro councilman and other members of the public.

Councilman Ulysses “Bones” Addison visited the animal shelter unannounced on Wednesday morning and said he witnessed “horrific” and “unacceptable conditions” for the animals.

Addison, prompted by emails from constituents, said he saw overcrowding of kennels, including one cage with eight dogs.

He said the kennels with animals were stacked on top of one another, stored in bathrooms and spilling out into the lobby.

“I have never seen anything like it. I won’t accept it as a council member, I won’t accept it as a citizen and it needs to be corrected forthwith,” he said. “If we’re going to save animals, we can’t put them in inhumane conditions.”

The Companion Animal Alliance, a nonprofit, took control of the parish’s sheltering services officially on Aug. 1 in an attempt to reduce the amount of healthy animals that were being euthanized because they couldn’t be adopted.

Previously, sheltering was under the umbrella of the parish’s Animal Control and Rescue Center.

The CAA runs the shelter out of the parish’s animal control building on Progress Road.

CAA Executive Director Laura Hinze said after the council meeting Wednesday that she disagrees with the statements about animals being put in inhumane conditions.

“We’re not doing anything that wasn’t already being done,” she said. “What is going on is we’re in a transitory place.”

Hinze said the public responded to news of the new shelter management by surrendering more animals, specifically dogs. She acknowledged that her staff was not prepared for the influx.

Animal Control Director Hilton Cole informed the Metro Council on Tuesday by email that he would launch an investigation into shelter conditions because a formal complaint was filed.

Susan Aronson, who spoke to the council Wednesday evening, said she filed a complaint after visiting the shelter.

“The cages are seriously and very dangerously overcrowded, several large dogs were in cages with cowering smaller dogs, food aggressive dogs in one cage were fighting, a cage clearly marked ‘aggressive’ had two dogs together, and the worst was a nursing dog in a cage with four large dogs,” she wrote in her complaint.

“The animals are no longer being euthanized, but now, due to stress and fear of being in these overcrowded cages, (the animals) are more likely to fight, be severely injured or killed,” Aronson wrote.

Caitlin Wyatt, 13, and her mother Christy Wyatt have been volunteering at the animal shelter for two years and said conditions have gone downhill since the CAA took over.

“They had no plan to handle the overflow of animals,” Christy Wyatt said after the meeting.

The Wyatts said they felt the CAA had misled the Metro Council about the conditions of the shelter.

“It looked like they were hoarding animals,” Caitlin Wyatt said.

The Metro Council, which was expected to approve some revisions to the CAA and city-parish contract, deferred the item for 60 days and directed CAA to provide the council with a strategy of how it plans address the grievances.

After the meeting, Cole, who shares a building with the CAA, said he would not comment until after the investigation was over.

But during the meeting, when asked to address the animal overcrowding, he told the council that animal pens generally should hold two to three dogs, and “any after that and it starts getting iffy.”

In other business:

MAIN LIBRARY: The Metro Council deferred an item to accept the low construction bid for the Main Library for two weeks.

The low bid for the project came in at $36.7 million from Milton J. Womack Inc.

But Councilman Chandler Loupe said he wanted the bids to reflect savings incurred if the project were to take advantage of the city-parish’s sales tax exemption.

Capital projects paid for by a dedicated tax can waive sales taxes, but the city-parish has historically not taken advantage of the provision.

“This is a dedicated tax we’re using. We’re collecting a tax and then taxing that tax,” Loupe said. “You don’t have to be a tea party member to figure out that just ain’t right.”

Loupe and other council members have pushed the city-parish staff to start taking advantage of the sales tax exemptions in recent months.

If the city-parish finds out that it can waive sales taxes, bids from contractors seeking business with the city-parish could be lower.

Public Works Interim Director William Daniel said he’d prepare a report for the council in the next 30 days about which projects should be considered for sales tax exemptions.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by phil - 25/08/2011

I admit this is a complicated issue. Generally speaking, I want to see a copy of the agreement between the city-parish government and this nonprofit organization, and at the end of a reasonable amount of time I also want to see a detailed itemized budget including salaries of the top people. I am not just picking on this nonprofit group, because I think this should be required of all nonprofit organizations that receive tax funds. Maybe they could post it all in the newspaper or on the Internet. I really hope this works out - but I have doubts.

2) Comment by Cousin Dave - 25/08/2011

This is a perfect example about privatization, and how it falls short when it comes to services. Can you imagine the mess if the Council had privatized the Department of Public Works, as Councilman Chandler Loupe had suggested?

3) Comment by Trish210 - 25/08/2011

Ms. Aronson, how involved are you with CAA (animal control)? it is easy to take picture and point fingers, but I know FIRST HAND this was going on when Hilton was over AC. Pictures were taken all the time, and funny how NOW he wants to investigate. Before he BANNED cameras from these areas because he didn't want the public to see them. People, this was an inherited problem and while yes, they are in crisis mode, Ms. Aronson should have met with Ms. Hinze before doing this. I don't care how long she has been in animal rescue, she isn't at AC helping...THAT I know. Let Ms. Hinze AND Hilton do their jobs...they are separate now, live with it.

4) Comment by spiderman - 25/08/2011

This is the result of crazy animal people taking over where they shouldn't. They let emotion get in the way of handling things that are difficult. The shelter will now be overrun by unwanted animals. They think they are being humane by keeping unwanted pets alive but they are just creating a larger problem. I am a responsible dog owner who loves his pets. I do not like seeing animals suffer. By keeping them penned up for extended periods of time, they are suffering. Hilton Cole did a fine job of managing, bring this system back or we will all be paying for this disaster.

5) Comment by Beat of My Own Drum - 25/08/2011

I understand the concerns of the councilman. However I think it is ridiculous that he should comment, when he has never experienced the hard work that goes in to helping these animals. Yes the conditions are not up to standard. But whose fault is that. I blame the city which the councilman works for. Mr. Addison obviously didn't see the state of which the facility was in prior to CAA taking over. The facility is out dated and needs an extensive facelift. Band aids to the facility are no longer working. Mrs. Hinze is doing the best she can with what she has got. She spends more time there and is working very hard. Mr. Addison needs to come out on a Saturday and Sunday spend some of his personal time cleaning kennels, walking the dogs, giving love to the animals who are scared. The libraries can wait. The city clearly needs to put funds into the facility for the animals. On the contrary the comment made by phil there are a lot more people who can afford to save a dog or cat then you think. It’s about bringing awareness to those who don't know about the program, who are thinking about purchasing a dog from a breeder or from pet store. Every day someone spends on average $250-$1000 buying a dog when they could save a dog or cat for $70.00. (Which prices will be changing hopefully) Best of all most of the time the animal you choose are already full trained. Also maybe the adoption numbers need to be shown as I can bet that since CAA has taken over, more dogs and cats have been adopted in that time frame.

6) Comment by phil - 25/08/2011

I can actually agree with both giving more time to CAA and also closely watching what happens in the future. Unfortunately, we live in a parish with a lot of poverty where many school children have to be on the free lunch program at school. It is sad, but I think there are a very limited number of people who actually will be able to afford to adopt pets, feed them and pay for vet bills etc. That is one reason I do not fully agree this will work for the long-term, and I am back to saying what I already stated in my first comment. However, I have to add that I imagine almost everyone including me does agree with the no kill concept.

7) Comment by Lisaw - 25/08/2011

While the concerns expressed by Councilman Addison, Mrs. Aronson and Mrs. Wyatt are valid and need to be addressed, it needs to be considered that Mrs. Hinze is undertaking a monumental task in attempting to turn the Animal Control and Rescue Center into a No-Kill shelter. It is a daunting process and they clearly do not have sufficient space to house the animals being surrendered, nor do they have sufficient resources to get the animals into foster homes until permanent placements can be made. It takes time to build those resources, build additional kennels, organize adoption events, establish relationships with rescue organizations and raise funds and public awareness. Being less than 30 days into the process, I feel that Mrs. Hinze is doing a phenomenal job with the limited resources currently available. Unfortunately the complaints and comments by Councilman Addison, Mrs. Aronson and Mrs. Wyatt have resulted in a request from the powers that be to euthanize 90 animals. Perhaps if they send out emails to their entire email list requesting assistance in getting the animals fostered until permanent housing could be arranged, they could become a part of the solution rather than contributing to the gross inhumanity being caused by this complaint.

8) Comment by jcfelker@gmail.com - 25/08/2011

Councilman Addison should spend an entire day at the shelter operated by CAA instead of just a few minutes, volunteering with the animals and staff, to see how difficult a job it is, and how hard the staff and volunteers work with these animals. He should see how many of the animals are owner relenquished because they "just don't want them anymore" and see how many strays are brought in and not reclaimed because of bad pet owners before he goes off on something to which he does not have the full picture.

9) Comment by phil - 25/08/2011

Concerning the library, I think this is too much money and so is the estimate for the downtown branch. So here it is, I have stated that both are too expensive.

10) Comment by phil - 25/08/2011

The creation of another group to use tax dollars probably will just result in more tax dollars being spent. I think this new nonprofit is already heading well into the direction to prove this. I really hope that the nonprofit gets its act together, and is not just another nonprofit group that will pay large salaries to its top people (with tax funds) and do little to solve the problem. Actually, I personally believe the only real way to solve the overall problem is to prevent more animals from being born by the elimination of puppy mills and by people getting their pets "fixed". I hope someone continues to watch this.

11) Comment by spqr - 25/08/2011

And don't dare complain to the old guard at the Animal Shelter about conditions because they were just plain vindictive. I have personally seen AC throw animals into cages at adoption fairs with no blankets, water, or food. Many of the animals were terrified and filthy making it difficult to adopt them. Those in charge were cruel and indifferent. I witnessed it more than once and I wondered why they did the job at all. Volunteers picked up the slack and cared for the animals well-being more than those paid to do it. They cleaned the cages and many of them fed animals with money from their own pockets. They are the real heros. Animal Control needs major reform and now!