Judge: BR discriminated

Code blocked group homes for alcoholics, drug addicts

Baton Rouge city officials discriminated against recovering alcoholics and drug addicts in 2011 by attempting to prevent them from living in group homes leased in single-family neighborhoods, according to a federal judge’s ruling.

“We are pleased with … (the) ruling because it upholds the civil rights of people with disabilities,” James Perry, executive director of the nonprofit Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center, said in a written statement Wednesday.

“We’re disappointed and evaluating our appellate options,” Special Assistant Parish Attorney Joseph K. Scott III said in an interview in Baton Rouge.

The fair-housing group provided attorneys — Morgan Whitney Williams and Cashauna Hill — who helped win the summary judgment in favor of another nonprofit, Oxford House, in Baton Rouge. Steven G. Polin, an attorney in Washington, D.C., also represented Oxford House.

U.S. District Judge James J. Brady issued his judgment late Tuesday, court records show.

In 2011, Brady issued a preliminary injunction that barred city-parish officials from using a disputed universal housing code to evict Oxford House residents from single-family neighborhoods. The judge’s latest decision makes that injunction permanent.

In his decision, Brady did not address the issue of damages and attorney fees that possibly could be awarded to Oxford House.

Kate Scott, assistant director for the fair housing group, said in an email that its attorneys will file a motion asking that the judge order Baton Rouge to pay both damages and attorney fees.

Brady concluded that Baton Rouge violated the Fair Housing Act “by refusing to grant a reasonable accommodation” for two Oxford House residences. Those residences are leased for women in the Westminster and Goodwood Villa neighborhoods in the 4200 block of Drusilla Lane and 1800 block of Shawn Drive, respectively. At least six women were assigned to each of those homes two years ago.

The judge noted that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, acting on a complaint by Oxford House, also determined that the city’s actions violated the Fair Housing Act.

And a city ordinance that defines “special homes” discriminates against people such as Oxford House residents, Brady ruled.

Maryland-based Oxford House was founded in 1975. Court records show the nonprofit had established 1,500 group homes across the nation by 2011. At least 58 of those residences were in Louisiana.

Court records also show men and women do not share Oxford houses. Each of the residences is exclusively for either women or men.

No supervisors are assigned to the homes, but Oxford House rules are strict, according to court records.

Each resident is required to obtain employment and contribute $400 per month toward the household lease and other expenses. Any resident caught using drugs or alcohol must immediately be expelled by the other members of the household. Anyone found not to have reported another person’s use of drugs or alcohol also must be expelled.

“People recovering from addiction need a stable, supportive environment in order to be successful,” Perry said of the fair housing group in New Orleans. “Oxford houses offer this important resource, and also safeguard the surrounding neighborhood by strictly enforcing a no-tolerance eviction policy.”

Brady said he received “sufficient evidence to find discriminatory intent” behind both Baton Rouge’s rules for single-family neighborhoods and the manner in which they were used in an effort to force Oxford House residents out of Westminster and Goodwood Villa.

The judge agreed with Oxford House’s claim that actions by city officials amounted to retaliation against Oxford House for its complaint to HUD.

And Brady said “affidavits of the residents and the testimony presented at the preliminary injunction hearing establishes that the residents of Oxford houses have a handicap and/or a disability that substantially limits their major life activities.”

Brady also noted, though, that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the existence of such disabilities must be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Fifteen other Oxford House group homes are operating in Baton Rouge at the present time, the judge noted.

Asked whether that means separate court decisions would be necessary for those 15, Scott, the assistant parish attorney, said that would not happen.

“He (Brady) is really stating the rule for the Middle District of Louisiana for Oxford House operations,” Scott explained.

The Middle District encompasses the parishes of East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, West Feliciana, Pointe Coupee, Iberville, Ascension, Livingston and St. Helena.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (19)


1) Comment by Being_Stupid - 25/03/2013

The City of Baton Rouge illegally breaks Federal Law and the Fair Housing Act and nobody cares? Hello, media?! This should have been a major news story.

2) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/03/2013

Nosey Busy-Body Neighbors do more to bring down property values than a group home for recovered alcoholics. Get Off My Lawn.

3) Comment by Attila - 21/03/2013

Winkchance: This is just another example of your Federal government at work. They are here to help you,...as long as you are an additct, unemployed, gay, lazy, supposedly disabled, a tree hugger, belong to the so called "poor", or belong to a "protected" class in which case you benefit from Affirmative Action. Did I mention the middle class tax payers? Oh, that's right all they get from the government is the shaft disguised as higher taxes to support all of the above mentioned folks.

4) Comment by Winkchance - 21/03/2013

Basically, this sounds like people who live in a neighborhood have less rights than a non-profit organization that assist drug addicts, even though the bills for that non-proft is paid for by the citizens who pay taxes.

5) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/03/2013

Where was Attorney General Buddy Caldwell when the HUD Complaint was filed? Why did his office not take the complaint seriously? Why did the AG Office not intervene and stop the Parish Attorney before it got to this point? City of Baton Rouge, Parish Attorney, Planning & Zoning will be dealt some serious punitive damages for breaking FEDERAL LAW, and we the taxpayers (including phil) will be paying the bill.

6) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/03/2013

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/louisiana/lamdce/3:2011cv00391/41856/111/ = Link to filing by the Middle District Court of Louisiana.

7) Comment by phil - 21/03/2013

DMJ I agree with you this time but I think the "within reason" part in your comment is really what all of the problems with zoning laws are really about. Who decides what is "within reason"? On this issue it apparently is the federal government and not the local government or whoever wrote the original local zoning laws. I am personally not against having new zoning laws passed if and when needed, but apparently it will be "big brother" in the federal government who will make all of the final decisions for local zoning issues..

8) Comment by phil - 21/03/2013

I am sorry but this seems to be like letting prisoners in a prison police themselves and run the prison, since no supervisors apparently live inside the homes along with the recovering drug addicts etc. The extreme case could be - what if all of the people who live inside the house decide it is OK to use drugs or alcohol?

9) Comment by DMJ - 21/03/2013

We need serious deregulation of zoning laws in B.R. Those who love to talk about small government are more than willing to have the local government mess with people as long as it benefits them personally. People should be able to rent the houses they own to anyone they want, within reason.

10) Comment by phil - 21/03/2013

Also what I really think is important here is that now recovering alcoholics and drug addicts apparently are considered to be people who have a disability, according to federal law. So just start doing drugs and/or become an alcoholic, and maybe then you can qualify for federal benefits? I think it is great to help these people recover, but to call them disabled under federal law is another total issue which I think is ridiculous..

11) Comment by phil - 21/03/2013

What needs to be looked into is how much supervision the people have at these houses by supervisors who actually live in the houses along with the recovering alcoholics and drug addicts. Will people who live next to these homes be discriminated against when they try to sell their home and people do not want to pay the going rate because it is next to a group home? Also if this can always be allowed, then who cares what zoning laws there are concerning who can rent a home in a residential area? Sounds to me like most zoning laws are really a big joke now.

12) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/03/2013

Oxford House is NOT an entitlement program. Oxford House is completely self sufficient.

13) Comment by Attila - 21/03/2013

@MildredCitizen: You may be more right than you know. Give this out of control federal government enough time and resources they will eventually have being lazy covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act...add in those that "is mental" as described by CBCS below, and we have a whole new entitlement demographic....and they can all join the union and compete with dday198 to see who can do the least for the most money, for the longest amount of time.

14) Comment by Tally - 21/03/2013

The ladies who live in the Oxford House in our neighborhood are GOOD neighbors. They keep their yard mowed, the garage tidy, and don't park all over the yard and street. There are homeowners in this neighborhood who could take a lesson from them. Oxford House is a strict (private) program, unlike some group homes run by the State of LA where the "clients" roam around all day unsupervised with nothing to do. These women work full-time jobs and don't hang out in the yard smoking and staring at cars.

15) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/03/2013

The Parish Attorney should have known better. This case was already decided by the Supreme Court in 1995, City of Edmonds vs Oxford House. This was a no-brainer, my only critique is why did it take Judge Brady so long to make such a simple ruling based on a previous hearing already settled by the Supreme Court in 1995?

16) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 21/03/2013

2 Mildred Citizen being lazy is a handicap now. The other day while waiting to renew my drivers license, I over hear this part of a conversation between two people sitting behind me. One asked the other and I quote "where do you work at and she answered I don't I gets a government check because I am handicapped. The other asked what kind of handicap do you have and she replied I'm mental. Upon hearing that the man said I'm gonna see if I can get a check, cause I'm mental too" and they both laughed as I wanted to puke.

17) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/03/2013

Time for the Taxpayers of Baton Rouge to bail out the Parish Attorney, Department of Public Works, Planning & Zoning, and Westminster Crime Prevention District for all the punitive damages they will now owe Oxford House. Oxford House will easily be awarded over $100,000 in punitive damages and they deserve every dime of it.

18) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/03/2013

God Bless Ronald and Nancy Reagan. They are the one that made Oxford Houses possible. Oxford House is a great organization that has helped lots of people and families.

19) Comment by Mildred Citizen - 21/03/2013

Being a drug user or alcoholic is a handicap now. Riiiiigghhht! Next thing you know, being lazy will be defined as a handicap, too. The patient is diagnosed with severe chronic motivational deficiency disorder, your honor! His employer should restore his employment and make an accomodation for his condition, allowing him to complete less tasks per shift. Furthermore, we ask for compensation for the stigma and loss of dignity & social status due to his employer calling him "lazy". The employer has caused my client mental distress and anxiety. Blah, blah, blah. Everybody but the hard worker and the employer is protected these days.