EBR school chief to ask restructuring plan OK

East Baton Rouge Parish school system's  blue and white logo. Show caption
East Baton Rouge Parish school system's blue and white logo.

After more than a month of delay, East Baton Rouge Parish Schools Superintendent Bernard Taylor is asking the School Board on Thursday night to move forward with pieces of his ambitious school restructuring plan and plans to bring more of it forward in April.

For the moment, Taylor is asking only that two schools, Delmont Elementary and Mayfair Middle, both in danger of state takeover for chronic low academic performance, be restructured in advance of the 2013-14 school year, which starts in August. Delmont would shift from an elementary school to a pre-kindergarten center, while Mayfair would become a “laboratory school” modeled after LSU Lab School.

Taylor has for months floated plans to remake schools in four parts of town into “attendance regions” with each having what he called a “family of schools” at the center that would offer families a variety of options and choices.

Taylor is asking the School Board on Thursday to approve only one of those, for the Scotlandville “family of schools.”

A key aspect of the new structure is that middle and elementary schools would compete against each other for students. So three elementary schools in the Scotlandville area — Crestworth, Progress and Ryan elementaries — would cease to have attendance zones and families could choose which one works best for their children.

Plans for the other regions, Capitol, Glen Oaks and Woodlawn, remain on the shelf for now.

Taylor also wants the School Board to approve changes in alternative schools, including the creation of a “Superintendents Academy” on the campus of the former Beechwood Elementary. Students older than their peers and in need of special help and accelerated classes would be invited to attend the special school.

The School Board plans to meet at 5 p.m. Thursday at the School Board Office, 1050 S. Foster Drive, to discuss Taylor’s plans.

The proposed school changes, which the board has not discussed previously, were posted online late Tuesday on the school system’s website with only brief descriptions.

In an interview late Wednesday, Taylor said he hopes to release additional information before the meeting starts. He said he has talked to nine of 11 School Board members about his proposals and wants to first talk to the other two he has not yet reached.

“There’s nothing new here,” Taylor said.

Taylor said he intends to move forward with the “family of schools” proposals for the Capitol and Glen Oaks regions in April, with the goal of implementing them in time for the start of the 2013-14 school year. He said it will take more time to address the Woodlawn area. He said he needs to better address concerns of residents there, some of whom are supporting an effort to turn the area into an independent school district.

Starting with a series of community forums in November, Taylor announced he was looking to convert as many as 36 schools into attendance regions, and to restructure many of those schools into regionwide schools with a more-traditional focus, specialized magnet programs or charter schools.

He also laid out plans for Capitol High, Crestworth Middle and Glen Oaks Middle schools. All are former East Baton Rouge Parish schools now under the control of the state, specifically its Recovery School District, or RSD.

Since starting as superintendent in June, Taylor has been in on-and-off discussion with state and RSD leaders, seeking greater say in what the state is going to do with Baton Rouge public schools it has taken over.

He he informed the School Board in early February that the “family of schools” proposals, with the exception of Woodlawn, were ready, but then pulled them at the last minute, saying he was still trying to work things out with state leaders.

Taylor said Wednesday that Capitol High School is the only RSD school he is still talking with state leaders about including in the “family of schools” for that area.

Throughout, Taylor has released his proposal bit by bit through copies of Powerpoint presentations, discussion at public meetings and in interviews. He has yet to release publicly a comprehensive written plan, even in draft form.

Employees at some of the affected schools in some regions have waited months to see if they would have new principals and would have to reapply for their jobs.

Taylor acknowledged the unusual way the plans have developed, saying it’s been far from a “coherent process” and there are too many “interested parties that have to be satisfied.” He also noted the difficulty in trying to reach common ground with the state.

“It’s taken a lot more time than I thought it would,” he said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (6)


1) Comment by Ozere - 21/03/2013

Please! BT...another wolf in black sheep's clothing! Where is all the funding coming from to continually reinvent ourselves to prevent takeover by the state?? And what a joke; the state performs no better! Knock off some of those zeros on your top level salaries, get rid of some of those contract employees that are not necessary, remove those weak but tyrant administrators, and put together a team of real thinkers who can move this system forward! (yes, there are gifted problem-solvers in the system who are more concerned with educating students than creating a public image!) Yet another masquerade is not the answer!

2) Comment by phil - 21/03/2013

I will try and keep this short. I think there WAS a defined plan back when the tax for capital improvements was passed. Since the plan apparently can change after a tax election, shouldn't taxpayers have the option to also change the tax?

3) Comment by e.ducator22 - 21/03/2013

OMG, tell me people that you can see through this. "Family of Schools", really. BT has been is the area 5 minutes. He has no idea what EBR has already been through. He's just like Jindal and White. Let's privitize public education and see how much money I can make. He sits back with his "buddies" who all make 6 figure salaries (one who gets paid to do the website and just recently been made the head of parent liasons in the schools) and will blow out of here after he has reaked havoc on EBR. Oh, and yes our magnificant board will have to pay out his ridiculous contract. Yes, another decision they made by caving to the pressure of the chamber, who I am sure is full of educators who know more about education than, oh lets say teachers.......... Those of you who have not be reading the paper from Grand Rapids, may I suggest you do so now. Yes, he is suing them for not paying him the balance of his contract. He reaked havoc there, just like he is doing here. He got booted out. He will tell you that he was on "leave". He was seeking this job, and we hired him! A reject! What's up with that? Are we really this stupid. When was the last time anyone's board member asked them about what they wanted for their district. I never have been asked. The last time I checked, I live in the USA where we elected people to represent what we want, not what will benefit them or get them re-elected. This is a very bad state of affairs. Someone wake me up and tell me this has all been a bad dream. I'm begging! FYI, the board is not only voting tonight on this, but also on the relocation of Lee High and Valley Park so they can tear down the old school and build a brand new one so he can form another special school for our low income, poverty stricken children whose parents are no more interested in their educations than the man on the moon. This is unbelievable. Talk about poor use of funds. Can we just get rid of this "guy" and all his "buddies" and get to the business of what actually helps the children. Oh yes, remember them, the people everyone forgets to mention, including JW and BJ.

4) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 21/03/2013

Why not focus on making what we have better and taking back the schools the RSD has taken.

5) Comment by Traveler - 21/03/2013

I don't know whether to feel sorrier for our poor children or our poor teachers! More upheaval for this public school system is being proposed! Bernard Taylor is playing right into the hands of those who would tear down the EBRP School System.

6) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 20/03/2013

There are a number of disturbing things in this article, not the least of which is the fact that the public has never seen a comprehensive plan of just what the Superintendent is planning. In addition, when this plan was pulled at the last meeting, it was stated that there would be a meeting on just the plan, to give the Board and the public time to understand it. This idea that the Superintendent meets with every Board Member to brief the plan, when the public still has not seen it, and they are going to vote on in on Thursday, is moving totally away from transparency, and skirting the laws on sunshine. There is a dark cloud over this system right now. Also, given what happened with the on-again- off-again RFP for a media campaign to tout "the changes the Superintendent has made and the approval of the new Strategic Plan. Wait, what changes? There have been lots of them talked about, but I can't point to any real changes that the Superintendent or Board has made, and did I miss the approval of the "Strategic Plan"? Was it stealthy? Now, finally, a new plan for Mayfair, and talk about new. This is the first time I or others I have spoken to have heard it mentioned! And a new "Lab School" like LSU's? There is no way that EBR is going to have a demographic anything like the exclusive one at LSU. I would not allow my students to observe at the "Laboratory" school at LSU, since they have NO special education students, and few minority students, and less than 3% of their students qualify for free meals. In other words, they look nothing like the local school systems. Any of them. Instead, the Lab School is, at best, a "laboratory" to see just how exclusive and elitist a school can be while still being called a "public school." Any attempt to reproduce this is a joke. Now, how in the world can the teachers at the Lab School, who have never worked with large numbers of urban poor, pretend to be experts at educating these students? This makes no sense at all!