LSU finalist considered an up and comer

F. King Alexander Show caption
F. King Alexander

“He is awesome; a visionary and a leader who would be really helpful in Louisiana.” Sandra Woodley,  University of Louisiana System president

LSU’s finalist to be president, King Alexander, is regarded as a nationally respected up-and-comer who pushed for new taxes to support California universities and said in a recent speech that big businesses or millionaires are not real “job creators.”

He’s also met recently with President Barack Obama on the impact of rising higher education costs.

The president of California State University in Long Beach was named the sole finalist for LSU’s top position on Monday. Alexander is scheduled to arrive in Baton Rouge late Wednesday night to meet with faculty, students and staff on Thursday.

He could be named LSU’s next president as early as March 27 during a special board meeting.

Just before announcing Alexander as the university’s pick on Monday, LSU’s presidential search committee chairman Blake Chatelain said the selection process was free of any “political interference.”

Some of Alexander’s positions would appear to contradict those of Gov. Bobby Jindal and his supporters. For instance, Alexander spoke favorably about an effort last year to raise California taxes to help support higher education in that state. Jindal repeatedly has argued against tax increases of any kind.

In an August “State of the University” speech to his students in California, Alexander was clear that voting “yes” on a state tax proposal would “protect” the school’s budget.

CSU-Long Beach spokesman Rick Gloady said state funding to the school’s approximate $510 million annual budget has dipped $85 million since 2008. The tax referendum sought to mitigate some of those losses by raising sales taxes and increasing taxes on affluent Californians.

“From my perspective, the wealthy or millionaires of this country have been mislabeled by some as the ‘job creators,’ ”
Alexander said in an August 2012 speech to college students in Long Beach. “The real job creators are in our kindergartens, middle schools, high schools and all of you in this room. You are the real job creators.”

Alexander spoke of his own family history to bolster his point.

“With reference to the term ‘job creators,’ all I know is that it was not Mr. Peabody’s coal train or Mr. Buck Duke’s tobacco wagons that led my grandparents out of Noy Hollow, Kentucky. It was public education and an opportunity to attend a public university with a mission very much like ours,” Alexander said.

In Louisiana, Alexander would find himself in a similar situation to what is going on in California. Jindal and the Legislature have cut $625 million from Louisiana’s public colleges and universities since 2008, according to the state Board of Regents.

On Tuesday, as people around LSU clamored to learn more about Alexander, members of LSU’s Board of Supervisors repeated their belief that they made the right pick. Chatelain and board Chairman Hank Danos praised Alexander’s record of academic success and said he is the right person to lead a university in transition.

LSU is in the middle of a top down reorganization of its autonomous academic campuses, law school, agricultural center, hospitals and clinics spread out across the state.

LSU board members said they hope to have a more streamlined and efficient university organized under the main campus in Baton Rouge by 2015.

But while board members have predicted that Alexander will be well-received on campus, LSU Faculty Senate President Kevin Cope, a frequent board critic, accused them of rushing to a conclusion.

Monday’s selection of Alexander was somewhat of a surprise when search committee members emerged from a routine, closed-door session and announced they’d reached a consensus.

Cope said the rush to pick Alexander and the secretive nature of the search cheated the LSU community out of debating who among the shortlist of candidates would be best for LSU.

Cope said CSU-Long Beach, one of 23 campuses in the California State University system is considered a regional university and not a major research institution like LSU.

But University of Louisiana System President Sandra Woodley had a much different take. She worked with Alexander a few years ago in Kentucky when she was a part of a postsecondary education committee and when he was president of Murray State University.

Woodley said Alexander is highly regarded nationwide for improving his school’s graduation rates and spearheading initiatives boosting student success measures at a time of declining state budgets.

“He is awesome; a visionary and a leader who would be really helpful in Louisiana,” Woodley said.

“He is very committed to policy issues he feels are important, he’s a policy wonk and a data geek, which are some of the best things to be” in higher education.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by suqian2010 - 24/03/2013

My open statement: This gentleman have a good dad. However, I do not believe that he is a good fit for the Presidency of LSU. LSU needs a comprehensive and strong leadership from a similar setting, similar size, but a school better than LSU. This gentleman, only handle Murray State University ( a good school, but way below LSU, may only in McNeese State level), CSU-LB, a school in CSU system, but CSU is way below than U of California system. That is not a first-tier research u, it is just a "flagship" of CS state system, not UC system. So, I strongly recommend LSU search committee do most other search committtes do, release at least three finalists' name or six semi-finalists' name. Let LSU community voice their opinion. My preference: a senior high education leader from a bigger public university with knowledge of how to handle the budget cuts issues. I recommend someone like Provost at Michigan State Univeristy or Provost from University of Arizona OR a college dean from IVY league. Of course, if no one interested, I may recommend in-state guy like Dr. Savoie from UL.

2) Comment by Ohsofedup - 21/03/2013

There is no way this man is qualified to have this position. He has about as much experience as John White did and we can all see what a disaster that appointment turned out. This will remove LSU from being a top grade university to a mediocre one is a short amount of time. LSU has had some tremendous leadership in the past but this will be a complete turn in the wrong direction. I guess with Jindal taking the State down the dead end road and White sitting beside him they figured they needed a passenger that would be perfect fit and make them the three stooges.

3) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 20/03/2013

There is no way this guy is philosophically the polar opposite of BJ. *****

4) Comment by SuzanneMS - 20/03/2013

He wasn't "kicked upstairs," jeffy. He got there the hard way -- he inherited it. Daddy appointed him to take over his position at Murray State. Before deciding that he's "anti-business" based on a single quote taken out of context -- this is the kind of thing every speaker says at graduation and orientation. What do you expect him to say? "You're wasting your time and your parents' money getting a college degree?" Take a look at his c.v. It's filled with articles and presentations about shifting higher education funding from the state to other means. http://www.lsu.edu/ur/ocur/lsunews/MediaCenter/MediaResources/item59160.pdf My fear is that he was selected because he's the only candidate who didn't withdraw or turn them down. And he'll be here only as long as it takes him to climb the next rung on the ladder of how own success -- something else he and Bobby have in common.

5) Comment by GardenVariety - 20/03/2013

Here comes the transformation of the LSU system into a community/technical college system--a transformation which will fit well with the "workforce development" agenda beloved by Jindal and the tax-dodging industries that dominate the state. Here's the rub: we already have a poorly supported, mediocre--but inexpensive--community/technical college system (LCTCS). Outside of football, an LSU community/technical system would offer little more than a sprawling, mediocre--but expensive--alternative. After the right- wing's trashing of the state is complete, the choice will be obvious to any LA high school graduate or GED recipient who wants training for the sorts of jobs that will be available (not innovative, toward-thinking, or upwardly mobile jobs, mind you). It ain't gonna be LSU Community and Technical College.

6) Comment by GeauxTigers1208 - 20/03/2013

The fact that this guy seems to be so anti-business is certainly disturbing. Guess he forgot the fact that most millionaires went to kindergarten, middle school, and high school too. And do the board members REALLY think that Alexander will be able to work effectively with Jindal, given the fact that their opinions on higher education policy at the state level seem to mix as well as oil and water? Something tells me that this could get ugly, and he will not be an effective leader. And jeffsadow, CSU-LB might have more students on its campus than LSU does on its Baton Rouge campus (California's population is huge, after all), but Alexander is being hired to run the entire LSU SYSTEM which encompasses MULTIPLE campuses all over the state - NOT just the one off of Dalrymple Drive. It truly is like apples and oranges when comparing his current position to the one he is being hired for.

7) Comment by jeffsadow - 20/03/2013

Actually, in 2010 CSU-LB enrolled about 4,000 more students than did LSUBR. Also note that he does not have a traditional academic degree, but one of the designer degrees that became a fad starting in the 1980s, in "leadership development" -- that's why he did not go through the process of tenure but was kicked upstairs much more quickly. And for those of you disappointed in his faith that government "built that," it is impossible to get to these heights in academia without being a true believer of the left. Which is why higher education is in such a mess these days.

8) Comment by Dawson - 20/03/2013

Wow, a guy that fights for higher taxes while saying businesses and people with money don't create jobs? And this is the guy leading our institution? If businesses and individuals with money don't create jobs, who does? Government? This guy will be the choice for the Advocates Person of the Year if he is for higher taxes and is anti-business.

9) Comment by jeninegiommi - 20/03/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

10) Comment by SuzanneMS - 20/03/2013

I'm dizzy from the spin on this. No one at LSU had ever heard of this guy, so how much of "nationally-recognized up and comer" is he? According to his c.v., the man not only has no experience as the head of a tier 1 research university, he has never even been tenured. Tenure is awarded based on the amount and quality of research. He went from untenured assistant professor to president of Murray State. And LSU doesn't need someone who will be learning on the job; it needs someone who can do the job from day one. The article is also contradictory. He did not push for higher taxes. He made the factual statement that increased taxes would protect the school's budget. Even Jindal would agree with that. Speaking of his family history, he got his first job as President of a university from his father, who appointed him. None of the claims for his achievements mention what the situation was before he improved it -- "highest graduation rates in its history." Fine, but how much did he improve them? Did he double them? Or did they increase by .5%? It's the same for all of the rest -- vague terms such as "increased" but no hard figures. "Awesome?" What kind of executive uses that word to describe another executive? This guy wouldn't even be considered for a dean's position in most schools.

11) Comment by rockynoggin - 19/03/2013

Up and comer? Maybe for BRCC head, not LSU. Bobby J. is an "up and comer" and how's that working out for Louisiana???

12) Comment by jeanvalmont - 19/03/2013

Come on, who are we kidding here? King Alexander may or may not have done a nice job at his regional California school, but we are asking a person who has never been involved with a flagship research campus not only to run such a campus but also oversee the consolidation of several campuses. Really? Imagine how all of us loyal LSU football fans would feel if we had to search for a new football coach and found that LSU had decided to hire the “up and coming” head coach at Sam Houston State because his team was 11-4 last year and finished second in the country at the FCS (formerly Division 1-AA) level. Of course all of us would be crawling all over ourselves to point out that it is an apples and oranges comparison between coaching at the FBS and FCS levels and that doing a good job at the FCS level does not necessarily prepare one to coach a team with national championship aspirations at the FBS level. The same is true here. Being the president of a regional campus in the second-tier Cal State System is not likely to be adequate preparation for someone to lead a major research university and work to consolidate several campuses. It is not surprising that the president of the regional UL system would mistakenly equate an “up and comer” who directed a regional campus as being ready for the task of directing a university system at the next level. But just as LSU football should not be looking to Sam Houston State or Georgia Southern or UL for its next football coach, neither should LSU be looking to someone from the Cal State system or its equivalent to lead a research university and direct the consolidation of LSU system campuses. This represents the kind of underachievement in which the LSU Board of Supervisors specializes.