EBR casinos allowed to serve alcohol all night

Advocate staff photo by PATRICK DENNIS --  Geno Iafrate, right, executive vice president of regional operations for Pinnacle Entertainment, answers questions during a regularly-scheduled Metro Council meeting Wednesday during discussion of a proposed change in the parish wine, beer and liquor ordinance to allow riverboat casinos to sell alcohol on a 24-hour basis.  Listening, at left, is Kim Ginn, vice president of marketing at L'Auberge Baton Rouge. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by PATRICK DENNIS -- Geno Iafrate, right, executive vice president of regional operations for Pinnacle Entertainment, answers questions during a regularly-scheduled Metro Council meeting Wednesday during discussion of a proposed change in the parish wine, beer and liquor ordinance to allow riverboat casinos to sell alcohol on a 24-hour basis. Listening, at left, is Kim Ginn, vice president of marketing at L'Auberge Baton Rouge.

Last call is a thing of the past for Baton Rouge casinos, which soon will be able to serve alcohol 24 hours a day.

The East Baton Rouge Parish Metro Council on Wednesday voted, 7-4, with one abstention, in favor of creating a special license for casinos that will allow them to sell alcohol past 2 a.m. — unlike other Baton Rouge bars and stores.

The council also took on some other tough topics at their meeting, including a discussion about whether the police chief should be an elected position and a debate about funding for a council member’s community center.

Baton Rouge’s casinos, while open 24 hours a day, are the only ones in the state that shut off alcohol sales at 2 a.m., per local law.

The change won’t go into effect for 12 days unless the mayor-president signs it into law sooner, and then the casinos will have to purchase their $5,000 licenses.

All three of Baton Rouge’s casinos have said they supported the change in the law and would purchase the license to extend their alcohol sales.

Geno Iafrate, executive vice president for regional operations at Pinnacle Entertainment which runs L’auberge casino, told the council the move would simply level the playing field for Baton Rouge casinos competing with other Louisiana and Gulf Coast casinos.

“For me it’s about competing for conventions, it’s about economic development, and it’s about jobs,” said Councilwoman C. Denise Marcelle, who proposed the amendment.

Councilwoman Tara Wicker asked if expanding sales to casinos would “open the flood gates” for other Baton Rouge businesses hoping to extend their hours.

Under the proposal, alcohol can only be sold after 2 a.m. on the floor where gambling takes place, and in bars and restaurants that can be accessed only by those floors.

Councilmembers Wicker, Joel Boe’, Buddy Amoroso, and Chauna Banks-Daniel opposed creating the new license. Ronnie Edwards abstained from the vote.

Trae Welch, Chandler Loupe, Scott Wilson, Donna Collins-Lewis, Ryan Heck, John Delgado and Marcelle supported the measure.

POLICE CHIEF: The Metro Council also debated changing the process of how the Baton Rouge Police chief is selected, and heard from seven members of the public who all supported the idea of having an elected chief.

Charles Bethley told the Metro Council that the Plan of Government, which dictates that the mayor-president appoints the police chief, is outdated — noting that when it was written in 1947, black residents couldn’t vote or run for office in Baton Rouge.

To change the way the chief is selected, the Metro Council would have to vote to put the proposed change on the ballot for voters to decide.

“We are not asking this council to decide between appointing or electing a police chief, or perhaps no police chief at all,” Bethley said. “That decision is too important for the 12 members of this council alone to make the decision. Let the people decide.”

Councilman John Delgado called it a “really terrible idea,” saying that having an elected police chief would only “inject more politics into the situation.”

He added, “We don’t, in this country, elect generals. The president appoints them and Congress confirms them.”

Delgado said he’d support a change in the Plan of Government to give the Metro Council power to veto the mayor’s appointment.

Councilman Scott Wilson said he didn’t support changing to an elected police chief because city police officers are forbidden from running for office and would have to quit their jobs to run.

“We’re eliminating the pool of quality candidates we should be choosing from,” Wilson said.

A few council members called the discussion a “knee-jerk reaction” to Holden’s firing of Chief Dewayne White.

Marcelle, who placed the discussion item on the agenda, said she thought the discussion was warranted. She said she would bring it back in a few months after White had his hearing with the Baton Rouge Municipal Fire and Police Board to contest his termination.

COMMUNITY CENTER: The Metro Council meeting also generated tension as 11 members of the council refused to allow Marcelle to redirect $51,000 of self-generated revenue from the Martin Luther King Jr. Community Center to provide additional services within the center.

Community centers, which typically serve the low-income parts of the parish with services, are under the control of the Metro Council members whose district they’re in.

Marcelle reacted angrily after her motion to approve the funds died for lack of a second and a separate motion to defer the item for two weeks also died for lack of a second. She accused the council of “micromanaging” her community center, and outside of the meeting questioned whether she was being retaliated against by her colleagues.

However, she said, she didn’t know why they were retaliating against her.

“It’s disheartening. I don’t know where this is coming from,” she said to the council. “I’m wondering what you think the funds are for, and what you would like me to do with them?”

Some council members responded that Marcelle did not answer questions they posed about the funds.

Since the self-generated revenue is above what was approved in the city-parish’s 2013 budget, its uses have to be approved by the Metro Council.

Marcelle said the funds would have paid for back-to-school supplies, prom dress give-aways and meals for low-income residents. It also would have provided a contract for Cleve Dunn, a local consultant, who she said would have served as a liai son between her and the community.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (16)


1) Comment by foldgers - 14/03/2013

Well, I still find it funny how a month or so ago, it was $40k a year for ANY bar to serve 24/7, if they chose to, and none of them supported it (of course). But now, they reduce it $35k a year and do not extend it to the private businesses that are all local? Wrong wrong wrong. And I have always felt that video poker was removed because the casinos were losing money. Bring them back. And if you do not like to gamble, DON'T. But, do not deprive us of that choice to do with our money as we please. And not all conventions are for companies or whatever to give speeches or attend at the expense of their employers. Some are like the bowling convention we just had here and stuff like that. Also, more tickets will be sold for concerts there as well, bringing in more money, brings in larger talent. I think this is good and hopefully local businesses fight to have the same courtesy extended to them, if they so choose, because I can guarantee you that very few bars will choose to stay open 24/7 here in BR, but they have the right to have that option. Bring video poker back! :)

2) Comment by Being_Stupid - 14/03/2013

old yat makes a good point below about bringing back video poker.

3) Comment by old yat - 14/03/2013

Do not hold your breath,waiting for the casinos to pay off the local contractors and various suppliers that they have bilked!!! They have done the same at nearly every venue they have.Do not take my word for this check out how many local businesses in New Orleans went belly up after doing business with the Vegas boys.Remember this:THEY ARE IN BUSINESS TO TAKE YOUR MONEY AND NOT GIVE YOU ANY.Trust me I have friends in N.O. that were put in the "poorhouse" after doing business with Harrah"s.The council should have made them settle the pending lawsuits before granting them anymore concessions. Oh well too late now!!!! By the way a percentage of alcohol sales past 2:00am will be next to nothing since most of those drinks are supposedly free,make the permit a $100,000.00 a year per boat take it or leave it.Another B.R. council "okie doke". If you do not know what that is you probably would not understand it anyway..B.R. COUNCIL KUDOS ON A ANOTHER GREAT JOB!!!LOL LOL

4) Comment by twinkie1cat - 14/03/2013

That was weird what happened in the Council Meeting with Denise Marcelle? The female council members from 70805 and 70806 usually work well together, even coming to each other's community meetings. And she couldn't even get a Second on her motion. Anyone have insight into this?

5) Comment by twinkie1cat - 14/03/2013

Rather than a sales tax on drinks as I suggested earlier, which might feed into the wrong coffers, for a rides home program, tack a 5 cent surcharge on each drink purchased. Remember, a lot of local people go to the casinos too. Rides would increase business. There is no such thing as a responsible drunk! Getting drunk MEANS you are irresponsible unless you have a designated driver. (When I went to a New Years Eve party and got drunk, I told the people who rode with me ahead of time that I would NOT be driving home. Fortunately the house was only about 10 blocks. I spent the night, got up in the morning and drove home for my hangover.) Even then it is not wise to assault your liver on a regular basis. >>>>> And what business does a person in town for a professional conference have with getting totally plastered and staying out all night??? Their organization is paying them to speak, gain education or make contacts. Whatever! You are not supposed to be going to a conference to vacation although you can certainly have fun while you are there. Most people do. You are not going to be able to do your job if you have to carry a paper bag to the keynote address! Reminds me of the Secret Service guys who picked up the prostitutes in Brazil!

6) Comment by DMJ - 14/03/2013

So...only casinos can have this special permit and it only costs $5,000? Why not make it $50,000 and at least raise some money. Heck, why not make it a % of all sales past 2:00 A.M.? I've got no problem with serving alcohol whenever, but I DO have a problem with giving casinos special favors. Is it not enough that these places are basically clearinghouses for Louisianians' money to go elsewhere?

7) Comment by phil - 14/03/2013

Maybe this potential extra income will help the casino pay off their building contractors? What is that all about?

8) Comment by phil - 14/03/2013

Cousin Dave - watch Metro 21 if you can to see the council meeting. You might find it interesting.

9) Comment by phil - 14/03/2013

More gambling and more alcohol ! BR will be the next greatest WHAT? Where are all of these so called religious groups when you need them ?! How much to sell your soul? OK, why do only the casinos get to have a special permit? Also, how about the news relative to the Sewer debt that was discussed at the council meeting?

10) Comment by old yat - 14/03/2013

To:B.R. Metro Council; Ladies and gentlemen your recent vote to allow 24/7/365 consumption of alcohol at the three casinos in East B.R. was ill advised as was outlawing of video poker in the parish.Why not just send a big fat check to Vegas every month?Why do you continue to allow the Vegas mob to rape and pillage our parish on a daily basis.How much of the money generated at the casinos stays in our parish and city?I am not talking about the few hundred "chump change" jobs that they created for the locals,what about the "real" money.I bet not many of you really know how much stays here and how much goes to Vegas.If you really want to make a change,why not reinstate video poker and allow the bars/restaurants to sell alcohol 24/7/365.That way the money stays here!!!!!

11) Comment by foldgers - 14/03/2013

Yes, it always irks me when someone here, who obviously does not drink, assumes that longer alcohol sales means automatically more drunks on the road. If people are coming in for conferences, concerts or whatever, chances are they will be staying at the hotel. And they would be more willing to come since they will be able to drink all night and they will be sleeping in the hotel or taking a cab to a nearby hotel. And chances are, this will increase the number of conferences, increasing the need for more hotel rooms and so on. Considering this was the only parish not allowing casinos to serve alcohol 24/7 was actually hurting us. I said it yesterday, I am a casino person. The thing is, I rarely went to, let alone, stayed at the casinos here due to this rule. I would go to Lake Charles, Biloxi and even Marksville. This will make me think twice about bringing my money out of the city. And if I am there drinking all night, you can bet that I will be staying there or taking a cab home. Because not all people who choose to drink all night are irresponsible drivers.

12) Comment by Being_Stupid - 14/03/2013

The sale and consumption of alcohol is NOT illegal. Driving while intoxicated is illegal. Neoprohibitionists often assume that the sale and consumption of alcohol automatically correlates to that consumer of alcohol driving erratically while intoxicated, when in fact that is rarely the case. The law should target driving erratically while intoxicated not the simple act of drinking alcohol, doing drugs, having a blood level of .08 or .10, etc. but target instead, driving erratically while under the influence. 99.9% of people can drive responsibly or make comments to Advocate after drinking alcohol or doing drugs without any side effects which rarely poses a threat to the public.

13) Comment by Cousin Dave - 14/03/2013

Does anyone happen to know what happened to the financing for Woman's Hospital lat night? You know, the issue that was on the front page yesterday? To me, it a lot more important than the elected police chief and the community center that didn't pass.

14) Comment by Woody - 14/03/2013

this picture does not do kim ginn any justice.

15) Comment by twinkie1cat - 13/03/2013

Oh fun, more drunks on the roads and having wrecks on the "new" bridge! While they are at it the Council needs to sponsor a Rides Home ordinance, use some of the sales tax to pay for it, and give anyone who is drunk a free ride. We have got to stop these DWIs. Too many lives are being wasted and with our lousy public transportation system most people have no choice but to drive.

16) Comment by LuckySo-n-So - 13/03/2013

24 hour liquor sales. Jeebus would not approve.