Lafayette police: Murder suspect’s family had history of break-ins

Seth Fontenot’s mother awakened him just after midnight on Dec. 14 and told him someone was trying to break into his Chevrolet Avalanche outside their Green Meadow Road home, according to Lafayette police records.

The Dec. 14 incident, in which Fontenot chased the would-be robbers, was the third such incident in the past four months involving the family, police and court records show.

Less than two months after the December incident, however, Fontenot was in jail, accused of murder and attempted murder in the Feb. 10 shooting death of high school freshman Austin Rivault and the shootings of two other teens who were riding in a pickup truck and reached a hospital.

Fontenot, a former University of Louisiana at Lafayette accounting student, left the Lafayette Parish Correctional Center on Monday.

Fontenot is now living with a relative outside Lafayette, a bail condition set by state District Judge Kristian Earles that requires Fontenot to leave his family’s home, which sits doors away from the Rivaults’ home, according to court records.

Fontenot’s attorney, Thomas Guilbeau, did not return messages seeking comment this week.

Police have said in an affidavit that Fontenot confessed to firing three shots from his Beretta handgun at a fleeing vehicle “he believed to contain suspects” whom he had seen on his property, where his truck had been broken into multiple times.

The incident took place at 1:45 a.m. on Feb 10.

“Mr. Fontenot stated that his intentions were to only scare the victims, not to inflict bodily harm and/or death,” Detective Larry Theriot wrote in the affidavit.

Rivault was later pronounced dead after a bullet struck the back of his head, Lafayette police and court records indicate.

The other two youths, William Bellamy and Cole Kelley, both 15, were each hit once but survived, police said.

Fontenot was arrested hours later at his workplace, his sister has said.

The Dec. 14 and Feb. 10 incidents, which both occurred after midnight, were the second and third time Fontenot and his family believed someone was trying to rob them, records show.

On Nov. 26, at just before 11 p.m., police were called to the Fontenots’ home in south Lafayette because someone had broken into the family’s Chevrolet Tahoe and stole a black handbag worth $300, records show.

Police records do not indicate whether anyone was arrested in the November and December incidents.

On Feb. 21, Fontenot, 18, was indicted on one first-degree murder charge and two charges of attempted first-degree murder in the Feb. 10 shootings.

Thirteen people, mostly family members, pledged property to help Fontenot post bail of $700,000, court records show.

Fontenot’s mother and stepfather, Brooke and Derrick Talbot, testified at his bond hearing that they heard the 1:45 a.m. shots, and that Fontenot told them he believed the bullets hit the tailgate of the truck.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (59)


1) Comment by Buck - 18/03/2013

Nice try at trying to change focus of discussion. Suggested reading that has caused significant safety measures in auto industry, "Unsafe at Any Speed".

2) Comment by Cajun12 - 16/03/2013

But even with all the checks and balances, taxes, etc.....that you mentioned, they still kill more Teens every year than anything else. Where is the public out cry over automobiles?

3) Comment by Cajun12 - 16/03/2013

Many good points Buck.

4) Comment by Buck - 15/03/2013

Don't recall saying I mentioning "have a problem with guns?" Am adverse to anyone, public/private entity and/or industry that utilizes deception that tries to hoodwink the community into believing that when they are marking their potential harmful products they are like motherhood, apple pie and the American flag. Do I need to enumerate all the scams which have been exposed? As per the analogy of car manufactures to gun manufactures, this is the funnies tact around. Let's see, anyone who buys a car must show proof of insurance for the vehicle, a valid drivers license issued by the State police that are renewed, the requirement of a brake tax that can only be issued after an inspection and show they are of good credit/character rating if there is need to finance. If there is an accident as a result of faulty manufacturing, the car maker can be sued. Oh, finally every time you fill up with gas pay a excise tax. Therefore are you proposing that to purchase a firearm you must have insurance for such? Have a license issued by the State police that must be renewed ? Have a third party check weapons on a yearly bases to insure they are properly functioning. Have a good credit and perhaps character rating? If a firearm is used in accidental/ say maybe in a suicide the gun manufacture could be sued. Every time you purchase ammo, you pay an excise tax? Great concepts. You should contact your legislature and encourage consideration. Should I go on? Suggest you find a better analogy. Try cigarettes next time.

5) Comment by Cajun12 - 15/03/2013

Buck, the #1 killer of teens in America today is motor vehicular accidents (MVA). Do you feel the same towards auto manufactures as you do towards gun manufactures? Are do you just have a problem with guns?

6) Comment by Buck - 15/03/2013

Nothing, good luck on your search for truth. As you may have discovered it is a solitary effort. A scary aspect is the will to surrender to a higher power. In my case this leads me to question everything in an effort to find cause and effect. For instance in the tragic event of focus in this post, and the overall motivation over the current debate re. firearms as I see it, its simply an industry that has a marketing plan to sell a dangerous product that has to counter the public health issue. As per some posts, there is mention of legal curfews. My question why do we need curfews? Long ago when I was a teenager growing up in a city, there were no such things. Can one conclude that perhaps there has been an introduction of a product that has fostered such a need. When I was an adolescence, conflicts were settled with fist fights. A shift occurred in the 80's when the arms industry reached its saturation market with men and realized another untapped market was, women. To address such, it developed a smaller weapon, based around 9mm. It was also in this period that the NRA was converted from a gun owners organization to a lobbying entity. Of course all good intent was too naught, as it soon became apparent to another market, adolescence, that these products also meet their requirements, sadly to what they perceive as a tool to a street economic development opportunity, illegal drugs.. Thus one ask, as this was an economic driven decision to sell more products, what is the upshot. A report by the CDC, before NRA legislation was adopted to curtail it's reporting, was that society is overall negatively economically impacted by the numerous firearms in civilian hands. Will our policy makers, for sure not in Louisiana, address this issue? I'm not counting on them. Interesting that law and order Pres. Nixon was in favor of banning hand guns. Do I have a solution? Not yet. I suspect when we get get more unbiased demographics and facts, that perhaps the business and medical communities will have an impact on this debate. Stay focused and seek the truth.

7) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 15/03/2013

credibility? How about firing 3 shots at a moving vehicle down a residential street, then not filing a police report? How's that for credibility?

8) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 15/03/2013

for those with poor reading comprehension (cajun-whatever, wouldn’t know the truth if it bit him, and dud): "Police have said in an affidavit that Fontenot confessed to firing three shots from his Beretta handgun at a fleeing vehicle “he believed to contain suspects” whom he had seen on his property, where his truck had been broken into multiple times." DOES NOT mean that he saw those teens on his property. If he had, he would have stated that he chased the teens from his property and saw them get into the truck, or something along those lines. For him to say he “believed” instead of he “saw” is very telling, and obviously beyond your understanding. ///// “ I do not tell them that a feel good story (drive a friend home) gives you the right to break the Law. Credibility. “ I never said it did. (again, reading comprehension). I said that a consequence for breaking that law should not be a gunshot to the back of the head by a vigilante. //// and Mr. Truthiness: I could give a flip what you “heard” or believe about these kids. You get me upset because you are assassinating the character of these kids with NO PROOF. You are the one trying to “dis-credit[sic]” the victims. I just ask for your proof, to which I have seen none. And that is why you are despicable. And for another lesson in reading comprehension, NONE of these kids belong to me. I specifically posted that I was reposting something from one of the fathers. At no point did I say it was my post. I don’t claim to be a genius, but compared to some, I am. Have fun with your mutual admiration club....

9) Comment by Cajun12 - 15/03/2013

And yes Tea something or another, I think it is good parenting to NOT allow my children out after curfew. Can I get a witness? But then again.......I run my house! I tell my children how it is! NOT the other way around. I do my best to teach my children to follow the Law. I do not tell them that a feel good story (drive a friend home) gives you the right to break the Law. Credibility.

10) Comment by Cajun12 - 14/03/2013

Where is the "older brother" who let the teens take his truck? Did he actually give the teens his consent to take the vehicle? Was there a parent home at the time the teens left the house? Was a parent home at all that night? Did the teens ask a parent if they could go out after curfew? Did a parent give the teens permission to "drive a friend home" (break the law)? What was in the truck the teens were driving? Was the vehicle impounded by police and taken in as evidence? If so, where and when did they take possession of the vehicle and was a chain of custody established? Have the teens been in trouble with the law? Have they been in trouble at school? Are they innocent victims? Or, were they shot "fleeing" the scene of a crime? So many unanswered questions.

11) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 14/03/2013

Sometimes there are innocent victims, and sometimes we do things thinking "Surely, I can get away with this small action!" and like Russian roulet - we find out we were wrong. However, the parents and teens and Seth are innocent until proven guilty.

12) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 14/03/2013

Buck, my man, I am a searcher. If you professor would like to evangelize me into the truths, I may be a willing victim! The truth is hard to find, and not so pleasant sometimes.

13) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 14/03/2013

TeaKiller, For not being too smart, you sure are trying hard to dis-credit me. The truth hurts, man. Sorry. Your kids were up to no good. Being out past curfew, hidden secrets from parents, drinking? drugs? past records, maybe even school troubles. I sure get you upset, asking these questions. Cursing, etc. I guess that is the same character of those boys who got the whole situation going. Can you give a resume on your intelligence? I would like to know how smart you are since most of it is from putting someone else down. I do feel for you. seriously.

14) Comment by Cajun12 - 14/03/2013

TS we have nothing further to discuss because after talking yourself into a corner there is nothing further to discuss. And my kids are not "afraid of being shot just because they are out after curfew", my kids are NOT out after curfew unless accompanied by an adult or another parent (hope you can grasp the concept). Kids sneaking out at night are usually up to no good (hope you can grasp the concept). Credibility.

15) Comment by Thatdude985504 - 13/03/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

16) Comment by Thatdude985504 - 13/03/2013

Police have said in an affidavit that Fontenot confessed to firing three shots from his Beretta handgun at a fleeing vehicle “he believed to contain suspects” whom he had seen on his property, where his truck had been broken into multiple times. THAT WOULD BE WHERE IT SAYS HE SAW THEM ON HIS PROPERTY.

17) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 13/03/2013

"The fact is, the kids were most likely out looking for trouble and they found it. " here's the thing. What you just stated was NOT a fact but an unfounded supposition. There is absolutely no evidence to support your claim. You can keep making your assumptions, so you can scare your kids. The FACT is, you kids should not be afraid of being shot just because they are out after curfew. If you feel that is good parenting, then we have nothing further to discuss

18) Comment by Cajun12 - 12/03/2013

I could not agree with you more Tea_Slayer. But the question still remains. What are the results of the drug screens of Seth and the teens? Were any obtained? The jury needs to know. Credibility. Kids who sneak out of their homes in the middle of the night are usually not out singing Kumbahya on acoustic guitars and watching Disney movies with their friends. To minimize the teens actions to "driving a friend home after curfew" sounds like a Hallmark Movie, so picture perfect. The fact is, the kids were most likely out looking for trouble and they found it. His name was Seth.

19) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 12/03/2013

and my point is that being shot should not be a consequence of driving a friend home after curfew.

20) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 12/03/2013

"fleeing" according to "information" provided by the man accused of murder, not by me... reading comprehension is difficult for some, isn't it?

21) Comment by Cajun12 - 12/03/2013

Sorry about that..."information" provided by Tea_Slayer in a comment seven comments below this one.

22) Comment by Cajun12 - 12/03/2013

A "fleeing" vehicle is not an opinion of mine. A "fleeing" vehicle comes straight from "information" provided by Tea_Slayer in comment #5 of this blog. Oh what a short memory we have. My only opinion is that actions have consequences. The same opinion I shared recently with my teenagers, when informing them of the importance of not being out after curfew (because you just might get shot), not cruising around with kids who are not supposed to be driving (because it is a criminal act), not sneaking out of the house at night (because you just might get shot), and most importantly, don't shoot at anyone unless your life is in danger.

23) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 12/03/2013

yep, driving your friend home so he doesn't have to walk has consequences.

24) Comment by Cajun12 - 12/03/2013

That is a very good question? One I am sure the jury will ask. Could be fear. After all, he did fire off his gun. Not the best decision given his life was not in danger. I never said that Seth's decision was a good one. In fact, what I said is that Seth will have consequences for his actions. Using lethal force to defend yourself is one thing, but using in to scare people is a very poor decision. Actions have consequences. Just ask the teens.

25) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 12/03/2013

the only way he would know it was "fleeing" would be to have seen the kids get in the vehicle. He did not see that so his assertion that it was fleeing is his own flawed opinion (and yours). They were slowing down because they were dropping Austin at his house 3 doors down. Not fleeing. They didn't flee until they were all shot in back by a cowardly young man who was in no danger from these kids. Again, you and NBTT want to disparage the kids and believe everything that comes out of Seth's mouth because you claim he was a good student...Who cares??? One question: why didn't he file a police report that night if he caught someone burglarizing his property??

26) Comment by Cajun12 - 12/03/2013

fleeing (verb) 1- Run away from a place or situation of danger. 2- Run away from. Why were they fleeing? If they were minding their own business they would have no reason to flee. If they were caught in a criminal act by a man with a gun (in the wee hours of the morning), the logical reaction would be to flee. Thus the shots fired at a fleeing vehicle.

27) Comment by Cajun12 - 12/03/2013

Seeing someone on his property or something to that affect is clearly stated in paragraph 7 of the above article and you have just given another reference from some police report, so that is two sources that say Seth saw someone on his property in the wee hours of the morning. Yet you still ask, where is it stated that he saw them on his property? Really? Remember that "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" can be a hard thing to obtain if there is a shred of gray area in the findings presented to a jury.

28) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 12/03/2013

I see Cajun12 is taking a page out of NothingButTheTruth's playbook. Where did Seth ever say that he saw these kids on his property? So quit lying like NothingButTheTruth. And even if he did see them on his property, he waited until they were in the truck to start shooting? Really? Get a life... From the police affidavit: "While interviewing Mr. Fontenot, he confessed to firing his gun at a fleeing vehicle, which he believed contain the suspects he had seen on his property as well as his neighbor’s property at the time of the incident." At no point did he say that he saw the teens get into the truck and drive away. So how would he know these were the perpetrators he saw on his property.

29) Comment by Cajun12 - 12/03/2013

Credibility. All comes down to credibility. Two sides to the story. A jury of 12 will have to decide. Teens say they were just driving by and out of the blue they were shot. Seth says they were on his property and he shot to scare. Seth has no criminal history, is a 4.0 college student, has a job, and by all accounts is a good kid. Teens are sneaking out at 2 am breaking laws. Credibility. Who has a criminal background? Who does not? These things will be weighed by the jury. Was Seth tested for drugs or alcohol? Were the teens tested for drugs or alcohol? All the teens I knew growing up who snuck out of their house did so to either drink alcohol or smoke pot. Seth will have consequence for his action, as did the teens.

30) Comment by Buck - 11/03/2013

nothing, there is nothing in your post that inspires me to address. I suspect I went over your head. Actually I find your nothing posts very boring. Of only question raised is your reference to "karma". Are you Hindu or Buddhist? One of my children is a professor of such, and thus would be curious of your perception of this ancient physiology, especially how it relates to unjust law.

31) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 11/03/2013

more vile comments from NBTT. You sicken me, and prove what a horrible human being you are by laying EVERY BIT of the blame on the teens. Seth pulled that trigger. He and he alone is to blame. You believe in karma???? In other words, these teens had it coming just because they wanted to bring their friend home so he didn't have to walk???? Because they were out after curfew, they deserved to be shot and killed? You are despicable, and not even deserving of being called human. And you can shove your sarcastic "hurting' comments where the sun doesn't shine.

32) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 11/03/2013

we have a industry marketing plan targeted to a dysfunctional base regardless of the effects it has on our children and the negative impact it's products have on the economy. Is this not true of the film and game industry? I'm still interested in who were the folks that posted the property bond for Seth, and if defense will use the La. stand your ground law. I am missing your point here. Please expound. I am only blaming the parents for allowing their teens to break the law. If they had been law abiding, the teens would not have been targets. A case of two wrongs do not make a right. Heck, as a teen in my former life, I would have loved to have parents who were not watching my every move and making me be home at 11 pm. And when I have kids, will it be ok to teach them that some laws are ok to break? The point I make is that if the teens had been abiding by the law they would not be victims. And, I am sorry that Tea Killer is hurting so much. REALLY. It is very sad. Especially since the parents could have avoided this problem. That is my point. I believe in karma, and I don't want any bad vibes; I think there is a lesson to be learned about guns, wayward teens, in-attentive parents, and following the law no matter how great or small.

33) Comment by Buck - 11/03/2013

I've refrained from commenting on the tragic events in Lafayette till additional facts are forthcoming, however a recent post by Nothing in an attempt to place some of the blame on the parents, has made me realize that we have learned noting and that the firearms industry, and it's customer base will once again, as it tried with the Haymakers years ago, try to shift focus away from the real issue. That is, we have a industry marketing plan targeted to a dysfunctional base regardless of the effects it has on our children and the negative impact it's products have on the economy. You may recall the criminal case against the shooter of the Japanese student was thrown out, but in the civil suit he was found guilty and a heavy penalty imposed. I'm still interested in who were the folks that posted the property bond for Seth, and if defense will use the La. stand your ground law.

34) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 11/03/2013

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site.

35) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 11/03/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

36) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 11/03/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

37) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 11/03/2013

Oh, sorry I assumed you were a parent. But the questions still hold. I am not whining, but do want to point out your character. I do not believe that the young man is a murderer; however, I do believe what he did was a mistake. I also believe that the teens had no business breaking the curfew and driving laws. Seth's report will be backed by police reports. And if it is true that the boys are great students - never have been in trouble - and were not breaking the law that night by being out past curfew, against their parents will, and have 4.0 gpa - then the proof is in the pudding. I do not scorn you. I just want to point out that there was some wrong doings on the part of the teens. And if they have a past history of wrong doings - then I know by experience as a teen - they will be great at covering up and lying. Well, I guess unless you are some God, I should not have to worry about your image of me. Do you not think that it is against the law to drive without a license or be out after curfew or do things your parents do not want you to do ?

38) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 11/03/2013

1) I never said I was one of the parents. Read my previous post " I will repost a FB post that one of the fathers of the victims put out after the shooting. Of course, you won't believe a word of it because you have already decided that the kids wee at fault..." 2) You continue to blame the kids 3) What "other sites"? Bulletin boards like tiger droppings? 4) "roaming the streets?". They were bringing him home...THREE houses down. You will remain a contemptible person in my book. Nothing these kids did should have lead to them being shot. 5)You really need better reading skills. "Name-calling"? I have never called you a name (which would a noun). I have used various adjectives to describe you, so you may want grow up and quit whining about being called a "name" because you are a contemptible person IN MY OPINION. 6) You keep defending a murderer. You believe every RUMOR about the kids and believe every word in Seth's report. (Even to the point of making up "facts" out of whole cloth. His truck wasn't broken into that night. No police report was filed) 7) And while you thought I was one of the parents, you then turned the blame (and your scorn) on me. Seth pulled the trigger-three times. No one else.

39) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 11/03/2013

I thought maybe you were related. It takes courage to be truthful and hopefully the teens will be. From other sites, it appears Seth has support of the public and friends. And what about the teens breaking the law and Austin being encouraged to leave without parental consent. Or maybe against their wills since he had to leave without their knowing. And name calling gives a negative image. So you as a parent allowed these kids to be roaming the streets illegally or did they act against your will. I am sad for you and hope the best. Bitterness eats away at one's physical and mental health.

40) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 11/03/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

41) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 11/03/2013

1) You can relate to someone firing 3 rounds in into a moving vehicle? 2) "The word around"? Really? That is what you based your flawed illogical opinion upon? That is the root of my contempt for you. 3) So question, why would these teens be breaking into a truck 3 doors down from where they were driving to (Austin's home)? You aren't seeking truth. If you were, you would be looking at the published facts of the case and not what you heard around town. 4) what do "working people" have to do with anything? Having been burglarized on 2 occasions does not give Seth the right to shoot and vehicles driving past his house slowly (because the driver was beign given directions to Austin's house). Again, you can empathize with the murderer but not his victims. Again, contemptible... I will repost a FB post that one of the fathers of the victims put out after the shooting. Of course, you won't believe a word of it because you have already decided that the kids wee at fault...

42) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 11/03/2013

Tea killer, let me slide? Not wish me nice day? Hmmmm. I wish you a great day. You need it. Especially because of karma. I don't wish bad on you. So, the word around is that these teens have been up to know good. I guess that if that is true one would have to wonder if that was the case that night. And if they have a history of trouble then they are pretty good at cover ups and lying. So I guess the question is, are those stories true. Are the parents guilty of allowing their children to be out after curfew and driving illegally? Also hard working people would relate to other people who have to work. No one wants their stuff that they worked for such as 4.0gpa and vehicles and goods vandalized. As people try to make sense of it all and what they hear and see, they look for truth. The confusion is in that most of us can relate to both sides and both sides have made a bad decision including the parents. But so many of us have, too, done things we regret. Despite your crudeness I do wish you a good day. I don't own a gun do you?

43) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 10/03/2013

" The report says they were in his yard and he was awaken due to his truck being broken into and they happen ex to be there." What report? I have read everything that has been written on this incident, and NOWHERE does it say these teens were on his property. When you quit with the character assassination of the VICTIMS, then i will let you slide. I will attack your argument all day, every day. You are contemptible, and I will keep saying it because it is true and it's about opinions, right? Well, that is my opinion. I'd say have a nice day, but I could care less about your life.

44) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 10/03/2013

The teens have a history of criminal activity. The report says they were in his yard and he was awaken due to his truck being broken into and they happen ex to be there. The teens should be charged with murder since they e. ousted their friend to do wrong and be out against the will of his parents. And why don't you tell them to go cuddle with their guns. The fact that you must make your points with personal attacks speaks volumes of your argument and your character.

45) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 10/03/2013

for someone who claims to want intelligent discussion, you fail at it miserably. "Appears he had had enough." is not justification for murder. Your opinion has no basis in fact. 1) You claim Seth's "report" stated that his truck was being vandalized- FALSE. There was no police report from that night. There were reports from 2 previous burglaries. 2) The boys stole alcohol - Who cares? What does that have to do with being shot in the back of the head while riding in a truck? No teenager would live past 16 if they were all shot for taking alcohol from their parents. 3)You heard there were drugs..again, so what? I heard the moon is made of cheese. 4) Seth is a victim? That one would make me laugh if it were't so ridiculous.

46) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 09/03/2013

Slayer, our opinions don't really matter much and hopefully the truth on both sides is revealed and decisions will be made from that. I don't want to argue with you I don't think anyone appreciates their stuff messed with especially when they have to work hard for it. Appears he had had enough.

47) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 09/03/2013

Disputable and do you you know how to read are personal attacks. It doesn't happen in intelligent speech and debate nor court. And personal attacks because someone doesn't have same opinion as you is wrong. Intelligent conversation does not include such behavior. I believe the teens were wrong in being out after curfew and upto no good. I am of the opinion that that was not the first time. And I have heard that drugs Nd alcohol were involved. Those things will come out in trial if true. They should be held accountable for there role in this accident. They are not victims. In my opinion the only victims Are Austin and Seth.

48) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 09/03/2013

You need to learn how to read. At no point did Seth say that he saw these teens breaking into his truck. He filed no report for the incident where he fired at the truck. Had his truck actually been broken into, he would have filed a report just like the other two times. instead, he went back to bed and went to work the following day. The teens only "criminal activity" was driving and being out after curfew. The teens were nowhere near his truck when they were shot. Yet on your opinion and with no facts, you have blamed the victims with each of your posts. I think i will report you for personal attacks on these children. Just curious, what name have I called you (since you have reported me for doing so)?

49) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 09/03/2013

My opinion may be disposable to you but you may not call names. STOP! These teens have caused trouble by their criminal activities. They were not suppose to be out. Seth's report said his vehicle was being vandalized. The truth is the teens were wrong. Time and truth will tell. You are violating the terms of the comments. Stop name calling. You are being reported. I am commenting just as you are and without name calling. Is that your only defense. The truth will be revealed and then judgement. I do not know the whole truth. I base my opinions on what I have read. I have a right to do so. I don't call names. Stop being crude.

50) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 09/03/2013

NothingButTheTruth, I speak against a gun nut (and anyone with the temerity to defend his actions) who shot a teen in the back of the head as he was being driven home (after curfew) by his friend who didn’t want him to have to walk all the way home. Fontenot’s own statements betray him. He never stated these teens were on his property. He didn’t chase them off of his property. He shot at them while they were driving past his house. You are despicable for trying to disparage the victims of this crime. The truth is already out there. What does "stealing alcohol" have to do with this story? What does the fact that the parents of these teen may own weapons? What does your claim that "the two had been in trouble before" have to do with anything? Nothing. The fact is: Fontenot shot these teens while they were driving down the street. Fontenot's life and/or property were not in danger. He murdered that teen.

51) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 09/03/2013

The advocate, please check the comments of teaslayer for personal attacks and crudeness.

52) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 09/03/2013

Slayer, you speak against guns which makes you sound anti violent, however you responses are violent and crude. Please review terms for making comments. Thanks.

53) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 09/03/2013

I think each one of the teens own guns. Correct me if I am wrong.with proper language and intelligent writing.

54) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 09/03/2013

Slayer. Look st the terms for comments. Straighten it up or I will report you.

55) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 09/03/2013

Tea slayer you are the one with death in your name. Don't hide the fact that the teens were up to no good. What were they doing roaming the streets driving without a license. And what about reports that they had all ready been caught stealing alcohol? And don't they own guns? Is it true that the two had been in trouble before? I wish sweet Austin had better friends, Slayer. I am hoping that all the truth comes forth. No cover ups.

56) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 08/03/2013

NothingButTheTruth: you have no idea what the truth is. Should these teen have been shot for driving their friend home so he didn't have to walk? Had they actually walked him home, they may have all died. "NothingButTheTruth", indeed. Go back to your little hole and fondle your gun.

57) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 08/03/2013

Wouldn't it had been a different story if those teens had not been breaking the law by driving without a license past curfew and being foolish? They need to be charged for their crimes and for contributing to the death of their friend. With friends like that, who needs enemies?!

58) Comment by NothingButTheTruth - 08/03/2013

Appears that the facts were reported. There is no indication that the reporter is for or against. Why encourage censorship?

59) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 08/03/2013

This will be dropped to 2nd degree murder before the trial. Bank on it. He'll make a plea deal that makes the DA look good, receive 25 years per incident, to be served concurrently and be let out on good behavior after 8. Textbook case that happens time and time again.

60) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 08/03/2013

So???? Bighug, your gun-lover soapbox is teetering. Better step off before you fall. This young man murdered a child. Who cares if the house was burgled a 1000 times. This truck with three kids in it was driving past the house, had nothing to to with any burglary, and was fired upon by this murderer. Louisiana's "kill the burglar" law won't keep Seth out of jail.

61) Comment by Bouncer - 08/03/2013

The Fontenot youth is at an age when that portion of the brain governing decision-making is not fully developed. This is what happens when frustration, hot-headedness, and lack of impulse control work in tandem with a gun. He has ruined his life and the lives of others. And for what? To allegedly "scare" someone? To make some vague "point" about something? To "defend" property? Aside from all else, if he is that poor of a shot, he had no business having a gun in the first place.

62) Comment by Bighug - 08/03/2013

Do you have a gun, DMJ?

63) Comment by DMJ - 08/03/2013

It doesn't matter if those kids broke into his truck 100 times. It's stll murder. They were driving away when Fontenot fired. He was trying to scare them, was he? A likely story. What did he think would happen when firing a gun directly at someone? Good luck to his lawyers. They'll need it. If they're good, they'll plead him down to 2nd degree murder and 2 counts of attempted 2nd degree. If they're not, they'll plead not guilty and any plea deal goes away. Either way, this won't end well for this kid. This is what happens when you have a gun. Eventually, you'll find a use for it. Had he not had the gun, the dead would be alive and he wouldn't be facing the prospect of several decades in prison.