Jindal administration to seek expedited hearing

The Jindal administration will seek an expedited hearing by the Louisiana Supreme Court on whether a 401(k)-type pension plan for new state employee hires was legally passed, administration lawyer Liz Murrill said Tuesday.

“We will try to fast track that, but that’s on the Supreme Court schedule,” Murrill told the Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana’s board.

The constitutionality of the law is just one of the issues surrounding the so-called “cash balance” plan that is supposed to go into effect July 1.

A state district judge ruled that the law’s passage constitutionally required a two-thirds vote, which it did not achieve through the legislative process.

Maureen Westgard, executive director of Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana, said the legal determination as well as issues of involving the IRS and Social Security status of the plan must be resolved soon if the July 1 date is to be met.

Adverse determinations could expose plan participants to tax liabilities and require some employees to be enrolled in Social Security with additional contributions required.

Murrill said the state’s request for a determination of the tax status and Social Security equivalency of the cash-balance plan has been transferred to the office of chief counsel that deals with Social Security issues.

“They are processing it. It’s moving. We are hoping they expedite it,” said Murrill.

In addition, Westgard said there are 13 policy areas that have been identified where there’s a need for clarification of what is meant by the cash balance statute.

Legislation has been filed for consideration in the legislative session that opens April 8 to fix the problem areas, she said.

“This will help from an administrative standpoint,” Westgard said.

Because there are so many issues up in the air, two legislators have filed resolutions aimed at suspending the law for a year.

Legislators can approve the delay on a majority vote. The resolution could not be vetoed by the governor.

Cash balance would be the pension plan for new hires of the Louisiana State Employees Retirement System and Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana members who are in higher education.

Gov. Bobby Jindal pushed the pension change as part of a package of legislation aimed at reducing escalating state expenses associated with statewide retirement systems. He said the current retirement plans are unsustainable as structured.

Discussion of the status of the cash balance plan came as the Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana’s legislative committee met to review proposed legislative changes that would impact its operations.

The board postponed until April taking positions on the bills because “we lack the financial information we need on most of them,” legislative committee Chairman Bill Baker said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (7)


1) Comment by Ben Yay - 07/03/2013

Looks like 2013 is shaping up to be year of reality checks (read: defeats) for the Wonder Boy.

2) Comment by SSA2 - 06/03/2013

How many times do we have to go over this? The majority of the shortfall in the state employees retirement system is due to the fact that the state kept deferring paying their portion for decades. The employees had no choice but to pay, as is should be, but the state's laissez-faire attitude to paying its portion has caused this "shortfall", and Piyush wants to penalize the workers for bureaucratic tomfoolery. And beleive me, this misconception that we have fantastic retirement benefits is totally unfounded. The average state employee who retires with 30 or 40 years of service gets under $1800.00 a month. Can you live on that "gravy train"? Stop buying into this nonsense. We earn every dollar we make and every dollar we will retire on, and this is not Piyush's money to play with. Period.

3) Comment by jwarren - 06/03/2013

The merits of the law aside, it is a fact that a common thread connecting most of Jindal's most important legislative initiatives in the past sessions is that they have been rule unconstitutional. Legislation was rushed and bullied through the legislature that -- regardless of the merits -- did not meet constitutional muster, often for procedural or technical reasons that could have been fixed during the session. If the legislature had acted as an independent branch of state government instead of as a part of the executive branch, none of these legal challenges would be occurring and, to this point, succeeding. This is the fault of the Jindal administration and cowardly legislators. It is executive and legislative negligence. Again, this is regardless of the merits of the laws.

4) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 06/03/2013

Fix the legislation, Mr. Sadow. Try thinking yourself. Tell your Boy Wonder to make a legal piece of legislation. It's too late to tell ghosts of legislatures past to properly fund what they have long used to entice people to come to work for this outfit. For pay so low that fake job titles now have to be created to pay people to leave the private sector and work for this zoo of an organization. And now with little or no benefits to boot. Fine. Make it legal, and at least people will know what they're getting. But what will we taxpaying citizens be getting?

5) Comment by jeffsadow - 06/03/2013

You in the minority will be wanting it a lot more when you find out each and every resident in the state currently owes $4,400 to pay off the unfunded accrued liability that without this change is only going to grow even more and right now costs the state a billion extra bucks a year because of the generosity of the current system. You now may resume your unthinking bashing.

6) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 06/03/2013

Yeah, well, at least we taxpayers get to keep paying legal fees to defend this legislation we don't want.

7) Comment by DMJ - 06/03/2013

Will this be yet another legal defeat for Jindal? Methinkso

8) Comment by merrilenyeart - 06/03/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****