La. GOP delegation blames Obama on sequester spending cuts

Republicans in the Louisiana congressional delegation continued to blame the president on Wednesday for $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts that begin going into effect Friday

The Democrats pointed fingers at the GOP for the lack of progress.

President Barack Obama is scheduled to meet with congressional leaders on Friday at the White House as the cuts, called the sequester, start to happen. The White House has indicated cuts would hurt Louisiana through teacher losses, substantial reductions in the pay of nearly 7,000 civilian defense employees, the potential closures of small airports in the state, losses to funding for meals to the elderly, vaccinations for children and more.

The Senate is scheduled to vote on competing, alternate budget-cutting plans on Thursday but nothing is expected to pass Congress before Friday.

“I certainly don’t think the efforts to fix or improve the situation ends on Friday,” Sen. David Vitter, R-La, said.

Vitter said his “Plan A” is to more strategically implement the cuts through congressional proposals that hurt defense spending less and are not made in an “across-the-board” fashion. “Plan B” is for Congress to give President Barack Obama and federal agencies “maximum flexibility” to implement the cuts in smarter ways, albeit with some congressional oversight.

However, Obama and Democrats such as Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and Rep. Cedric Richmond, D-New Orleans, are determined to increase federal revenues while also making significant budget cuts.

Obama is asking for a “balanced” plan that includes significant budget cuts but also increased revenues by eliminating some tax loopholes and exemptions that mostly benefit the wealthy, such as the oft-repeated corporate jet exemption. Republicans are refusing to consider additional revenue increases.

Landrieu and Richmond argued Congress has cut spending by nearly $1.7 trillion the past couple of years, although other spending increases also have occurred.

“But for some reason we have half this (Senate) chamber that only wants to work on one side of the equation,” Landrieu said Wednesday on the Senate floor. “It’s only about cuts, cuts and more cuts, even though they are senseless. They are dangerous, they do not make sense for our country and they most certainly don’t just impact the government, which is the enemy of the other side. They impact our economy.

“They impact our ability to grow this economy,” she continued, “and for every cut that comes down in a senseless way, and even cuts that are planned, they are harmful to the private sector.”

A Pew Center on the States analysis says Louisiana’s federal grants represent roughly 6.6 percent of its state revenues, which is the same as the national average for states.

The sequester came about in 2011 as a compromise that eventually came from the White House as a result of House Republicans threatening to make the federal government default on its bills over the debt ceiling debate. The across-the-board cuts to defense spending and non-defense discretionary spending were created as a poison pill to force compromises that have not come.

Rep. Bill Cassidy, R-Baton Rouge, said Obama is trying his hardest to ensure the “president’s sequester” goes into effect.

Cassidy, Rep. Steve Scalise, R-Jefferson, and other critics allege Obama is creating “fear-mongering” and that he wants the cuts to go into effect to get Republicans to cave on tax increases.

“The administration will do their best to make it as painful for the American people as possible,” Cassidy said, noting that the president has known the sequester was coming for more than a year. “He waited until three or four weeks ago to make it an issue.”

Scalise, who heads the conservative Republican Study Committee, said Obama needed to “park Air Force One” a while ago to meet with congressional leaders. Instead, Obama would rather “hurt American families” and try to blame Republicans.

“The president would rather live crisis to crisis every couple of weeks rather than sit with us in a room, work out solutions and begin to lead,” Scalise said.

However, Richmond said House Republicans are the ones who repeatedly refuse to compromise and thereby create the varying crises.

“It’s a sad state of affairs when we can’t come together and find common ground on an act that everyone agrees will hurt the economy and the American people,” Richmond said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (13)


1) Comment by angelkiss - 28/02/2013

It is getting very long and tiresome of the blame game the Republicans keep throwing in our faces. But when Bush had all the rich getting richer at the expense of not only the hard working people of this state but the country you were okay with that. Not its time to pay the piper. Do your fair share, and stop crying. To those Republicans by default, meaning the broke ones, what are you benefiting from being Republican living in a shack on a dirt road. You are a working class just like everyone else. The state of LA needs to get out of the old ages...that thinking from the 1950's that only white are capable of doing higher level jobs. Did that work for American all these years and we are now struggling to get out of this mess. The good thing is Obama is not thinking about advancing the rich, he is trying to help your broke a%% and this country get back to where it should be. The only thing the Republicans know how to say is NO. Because it does not benefit their pockets. I'm tired of paying for the Republicans grand lifestyle

2) Comment by Diogenes - 28/02/2013

Biglsufan, the Sequester was designed by both Houses of Congress and approved by the President to be so onerous and so hurtful that everyone would be forced to reach an agreement. Admittedly a stupid idea, but in the context of the time (Where the Republicans were holding the US economy hostage by holding up the debt limit vote) it seemed like a good idea. Who would have thought that the Tea Party Republicans were so irrational as to purposely send the US economy back into recession.

3) Comment by biglsufan - 28/02/2013

Diogenes, Sequester was Obama's idea!

4) Comment by agagent - 28/02/2013

Historically taxes have been about 18% of GDP. Obama and the Democrats have increased taxes to 19.4% of GDP and spending is about 24% of GDP. Taxes are too high to be sustained and spending is out of control in relation to GDP. The economy cannot sustain the taxing and spending of Obama and the Democrats. It is just a matter of time before the next recession hits, or we have a total economic collapse if the federal government does not stop this spending benge.

5) Comment by DMJ - 28/02/2013

Now that we've decided it's the other guys' fault....what do we do now?

6) Comment by Diogenes - 28/02/2013

Typical Republican tactics, create a problem and then blame everyone else for creating it. Just look at our own Republican Golden Boy, Bobby Jindal, he guts State finances and State services and then yells “Look, government does not work!” I honestly think that many Republicans hate the idea of the US government so much that they actively seek to bring it down.

7) Comment by biglsufan - 28/02/2013

THROW ALL THE BUMS OUT! With the sequester, the federal government still plans to spend $14 billion dollars MORE than it did last year. While every single one of us have had to work with at least 10% less. The 'Chicken Little' routine is getting old. There should be no reason the department of Homeland Security can operate on the same budget it did last year. I'm sick of the grand standing and campaigning. It's about time EVERYONE start pulling the wagon! Those collecting welfare and food stamps need to do their FAIR SHARE!! Remember Workfare? IT'S TIME FOR TERM LIMITS!!

8) Comment by crazycajun - 28/02/2013

Enough acting like children on both sides. The rich abhor paying any taxes at all. On the other hand there are those that want a free ride in life. Meanwhile the middle class can't get ahead because we're paying the way for both. Stop arguing your point and realize you're not arguing for yourself.

9) Comment by nimby? - 28/02/2013

someone is lying , we'll find out who(m) soon enough ...

10) Comment by dday198 - 28/02/2013

both sides have dug in, just get something done this **it is getting old.

11) Comment by postscript56 - 28/02/2013

The entire affair can be summed up with one sentence from this article - "Republicans are refusing to consider additional revenue increases." The GOP delegation can open its collective mouth an pass gas until the moon turns blue. But they are to blame and the American people will rightly blame them. In fact it's already happening. The stupid party is still too stupid to figure it out.

12) Comment by minorvon - 27/02/2013

Nathaniel. although Teresa`s blurb is shocking... I just received a great new Acura from having made $5996 this-past/month and over ten grand this past-munth. this is really the nicest-work Ive ever had. I actually started 8-months ago and practically straight away startad bringin in over $81 per-hour. I follow the details here,-=-=-=- BIT40.COM -=-=-=-

13) Comment by agagent - 27/02/2013

Spending must be reduced but this is not the smart way to do it. The saddest thing about the sequester is that it does not solve Washington’s spending problem. In spite of the sequester, the federal government spending will increase this year. The Democrats do not think there is a spending problem and are calling for more taxes. We had negative growth last quarter, and more taxes will harm the economy. We do not know how much debt will sink the whole system, but we cannot continue down this path and find out.