Speaker: Removing constraints will improve public education

Advocate staff photo by APRIL BUFFINGTON -- Frederick Hess, a  scholar with the conservative American Enterprise Institute think tank, speaks about how they can transform classrooms, schools and systems through what he calls Show caption
Advocate staff photo by APRIL BUFFINGTON -- Frederick Hess, a scholar with the conservative American Enterprise Institute think tank, speaks about how they can transform classrooms, schools and systems through what he calls "cage-busting" leadership during a talk sponsored by Stand for Children and held at the Louisiana Resource Center for Educators on Friday.

A former Baton Rouge high school teacher turned education scholar said Friday that reforms of public education have mostly failed and will continue to fail until school leaders learn to “cage-bust” the constraints placed upon them and that they place on themselves.

Author of several books, Rick Hess is promoting a new one, “Cage-Busting Leadership,” that was just published this month by the Harvard Education Press. The parent activist group Stand For Children organized the talk. Hess said he had already planned to be in Baton Rouge on Friday to talk to Louisiana Superintendent of Schools John White.

Hess, a scholar at the Washington, D.C-based conservative think tank, the American Enterprise Institute, said he is a supporter of charter schools, private school vouchers and alternative certification programs for teachers. He also said he is a fan of many of the controversial new education laws pushed the Louisiana Legislature last year by Gov. Bobby Jindal.

“A lot of things we think we can’t do are things we can do if we’re smart and strategic about the things we’re doing,” said Hess, speaking to an audience of about 50 people gathered Friday morning at the Louisiana Resource Center for Educators in Baton Rouge.

Hess said past reforms — school-based management, small high schools, he gave as examples — did not work that well because they ran aground when they were implemented, an area often ignored by activist groups. He said he worries that the same fate awaits Jindal’s changes.

“I get hugely concerned that some of the policy changes will not change anything,” Hess said.

Hess identified the main problem as the combination of restrictive rules enacted to deal with problems of yesteryear and perceived rules that people believe prevent action. He described these collectively as a “cage” that requires creative and daring leaders willing to break out of it.

Hess apparently has a history of fighting against constraints. He recalled two years he spent in the early 1990s as a brand new social studies teacher at Scotlandville High School in Baton Rouge.

His principal from those days, Freddie Williams, was in the audience Friday and Hess thanked him.

“He was kind enough at the time not to fire me, even though I was a major pain in the butt,” Hess recalled.

Since leaving teaching and become a scholar, Hess said, he watched with frustration as schools have tried in vain to improve their operations.

“It’s less stories about good and evil and more that people in these systems work hard to do things that will get very little results,” Hess said.

Hess told a story about how it used to take eight days for parents in Washington, D.C., public schools to find out whether their children had been at school because of an antiquated way of taking attendance.

New Washington, D.C., Superintendent Michelle Rhee suggested giving teachers laptops and having them type in attendance numbers, which would make them immediately available. Rhee, however, ended up in 12 weeks of discussions. The problem was an old rule, one that may have made sense when instituted, in the teacher bargaining contract that prohibited teachers from doing data entry, Hess said.

Hess said that schools could do more to maximize their instructional time. He pointed to a University of Michigan study suggested that just 65 percent of the school day is spent on classroom instruction.

One way to add time is to find ways to get teachers to take fewer days off. Hess said teachers on average take eight days off each year. If a school could cut that in half, they could not only add nearly a week of instruction each year and save in the cost of paying substitute teachers. To get teachers to go along, the school could pay them a share of the cost savings, Hess said.

Hess said taking time to make schools efficient and to get around needlessly restrictively rules helps children.

“You don’t do it instead of instructional leadership,” he said. “You do it so you can do instructional leadership better.”

Even charter schools — public schools run privately — often fail to take advantage of the added autonomy that such schools have compared with traditional public schools.

“There are 6,000 charters in America,” Hess said. “I would argue that 80 percent of them use their autonomy not at all.”

Hess said the unwillingness to use that freedom, to “cage-bust,” is linked to how almost all educational leaders, including most charter school leaders, have spent their whole careers in education. He noted that in private business, managers spend more time learning about other fields and gain more experience outside their core areas.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (15)


1) Comment by yankyny - 25/02/2013

Although I’m in no way an expert on grammar, I would argue that there is a big difference between speaking and writing. While speaking, you don’t have the luxury of rewriting your sentence so it’s not a “model of syntactic awkwardness.” But some are missing the point. Regardless of which side of the school reform agenda you fall, if there are such camps, the traditional mindset of “status quo” or “this is how we’ve always done” exits in our education system. If you are an outsider you are labeled as not knowing what it’s like to teach, if you do have experience and decide to reach a larger audience, but remain in education, you are labeled as quitter or couldn’t hack it. The point being, as education leaders, we must think outside the box, question regulations and in particular, people quoting regulations because many won’t know what they’re talking about. So be skeptic! I am, but of him and of course the education system. As you know….80% of people citing data on the spot are correct 50% of the time.

2) Comment by SuzanneMS - 24/02/2013

But you have to love the spin! The headline makes it sound as though he is going to attack all of the true restraints on public school teachers -- the NCLB, the LEAP, the unfunded mandates, the prohibitions on discipline, the lack of funding for classroom supplies, textbooks and computers, the lack of high-speed Internet in most schools -- when really what he's talking about is setting up more for-profit charter schools that will do away with such "restraints" as certified teachers, accepting special needs children, academic freedom for teachers, apparently even sick leave is going out the window. And the fact that jeffsadow's wife, who doesn't see anything wrong with that sentence, is teaching grammar says a lot about the problems in Louisiana public schools. I'll give him the "It's" as an unclear referent, as the statement is a quote taken out of context, but there is and can be no doubt that "fewer" should have been used, rather than "less." And "very few results." The use of "little" is utterly indefensible. I also dislike the word "get" -- "lead to very few results" would be far preferable. Or possible "result in very little positive change."

3) Comment by jwarren - 23/02/2013

Besides the sentence being nearly incomprehensible, "fewer" should be used instead of "less," since "stories" is a count-noun, that is, something that can be counted. Stories can be counted.

4) Comment by Bouncer - 23/02/2013

“It’s less stories about good and evil and more that people in these systems work hard to do things that will get very little results." Sorry to burst the doctoral bubbles of the Sadows, but that sentence is a model of syntactic awkwardness. Besides being clumsily constructed, it has no clear referent. Thus, as a reader, I have no way of knowing what the "it" points back to. I will say that if you (or your wife) think there's nothing wrong with the way the sentence is put together, then both of you need a refresher course in English composition. Then again, it's obvious that Hess is a disciple of Jindal and White. And since you, Mr. Sadow (and your wife, by association), have your nose firmly up Jindal's hoo-hah, then it follows that you would support his disciple.

5) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 23/02/2013

that jeff would marry someone as clueless as himself is telling... "...nondiscrete measurements of something..." A story is quite discrete which calls for "fewer" instead of "less"... it shouldn't take a PhD to know that... another swing and a miss by jeff (and his wife)

6) Comment by jeffsadow - 23/02/2013

>Meanwhile, when will I see the Advocate give as much space to someone opposed to the Jindal plan to destroy public education? Uh, maybe if there actually was such a plan it would, instead of this delusion being in feverish minds of those supporting the status quo that has supported attitudes that long ago destroyed public education in Louisiana.

7) Comment by jeffsadow - 23/02/2013

> “It’s less stories about good and evil and more that people in these systems work hard to do things that will get very little results." What's grammatically incorrect about that? "Less" and "more" are used when you have nondiscrete measurements of something. I don't see anything else wrong with the sentence, nor does my wife with a Ph.D. in English who teaches grammar.

8) Comment by Crawdaddy - 23/02/2013

Yes, if teachers taught 4 days (half of the 8 days on average they now take off) more per year that would solve our problems in education.

9) Comment by Bouncer - 23/02/2013

You beat me to the punch, spqr. This guy, although he has an impressive resume, spent the bulk of his teaching career at places like the University of Virginia, Georgetown University, the University of Pennsylvania, and Harvard University. Those are plum teaching assignments: motivated, engaged students; no discipline problems; none of the usual K-12 nonsense that teachers have to deal with. He wouldn't last two days in a K-12 classroom today, not unless in one of the upscale private schools. Even then, I have my doubts.

10) Comment by spqr - 23/02/2013

A FORMER BR teacher turned scholar. Former. How long did he last until he decided he could not hack it? He is no longer in the classroom and, when he was, he was at a top-rated high school with tough entrance requirements. No tough inner city school for him. This is another "expert" who has never had blood on his clothes from breaking up fights, been cursed by 15-year-old, worked in large classes six hours, walked a duty post, coached 20-plus hours per week, graded papers at home and attended more meetings after school for no pay than he could count. A joke. Read a real book. "Playing School" on sale at Barnes and Noble about life in a real world classroom. Painful read, but real.

11) Comment by crazycajun - 22/02/2013

Anybody wanna bet he's a card carrying member of ALEC? LOL

12) Comment by jwarren - 22/02/2013

beabea, this is a matter of follow the money.

13) Comment by jwarren - 22/02/2013

Then tell Jindal and White to remove all the constraints they have imposed on public schools. They have an ever-tightening set of rules backed up with unfunded mandates for regular schools, but no rules and no mandates for their favored private schools, and few rules for charters. Uncage public schools. Don't pick winners and losers. This chump should go tell this to White and Jindal. Meanwhile, when will I see the Advocate give as much space to someone opposed to the Jindal plan to destroy public education?

14) Comment by robrockk - 22/02/2013

Here are some things that could help save time for teachers: 1) Digital attendance and gradebooks 2) No over-the-air announcements during class 3) Consistent discipline by teachers (one teacher writes up students for dress code and ID infractions and the next teacher does not) 4) Simple student uniforms/dress codes 5) No candy/drinks sold at school except for lunch and only for lunch period consumption 6) A disciplinarian that does the disciplining (parent follow up instead of the teacher, paper work and referrals instead of the teacher, handle disruptive students immediately instead of a 12 step process by the teacher). YES, the teacher needs to be in touch with parents, but not all the follow up calls and the "your child is being disruptive" calls 7) Less teacher-duty: standing around watching kids talk is a big waste of time. It can be minimized. For the week, if you add these things up, between the teacher and the student, about 30 minutes a day (average) is wasted. There are 182 school days X 30 min = 13 days/year Man I'd love to have those 13 days back!!

15) Comment by beabea - 22/02/2013

An "education scholar" with a book to sell, the title of which is in slang, and who speaks in grammatically incorrect sentences like “It’s less stories about good and evil and more that people in these systems work hard to do things that will get very little results." The public education system is certainly in dire need of improvement, but should we be taking the advice of someone who sounds uneducated when he speaks?